If anyone was ever in doubt...

Cookie Monster said:
Thats not what an externalizer is, your example is wrong. Its overlaying psychology on inate biological behaviour in your example.

An externaliser would justify his behaviour by blaming people trying to stop it, a woman not interested would be rationalised as a lesbian. An externaliser changes their external world rather than their internal one.
Click to expand...

Ah okay. A lesbian or in the real way, shes a whore or ugly anyway?

Or the "everything i dont like is teh feminism"?
 
Cookie Monster said:
Thats not what an externalizer is, your example is wrong. Its overlaying psychology on inate biological behaviour in your example.

An externaliser would justify his behaviour by blaming people trying to stop it, a woman not interested would be rationalised as a lesbian. An externaliser changes their external world rather than their internal one.
Click to expand...
Crookie did not write that, where are the spelling mistakes? He cant fool me
 
Dove said:
Ah okay. A lesbian or in the real way, shes a whore or ugly anyway?

Or the "everything i dont like is teh feminism"?
Click to expand...
The example is a man making a biological essentialist statement, the other man objecting is making a moral one. Neither is a psychological position or dynamic. Your argument is at best spurious.. My counter argument was also dodgy.

What I mean by externliser is someone who demands change externaly to ease the conflict it causes with whats going on inside of them.. Cancelling the wrong opinions that trigger them for example.
 
aureca.jpg
 
Cookie Monster said:
The example is a man making a biological essentialist statement, the other man objecting is making a moral one. Neither is a psychological position or dynamic. Your argument is at best spurious.. My counter argument was also dodgy.

What I mean by externliser is someone who demands change externaly to ease the conflict it causes with whats going on inside of them.. Cancelling the wrong opinions that trigger them for example.
Click to expand...
Like the homophobes on the forum that think by calling me and others cock suckers, it absolves them from the guilt and shame they feel about themselves.
 
Cookie Monster said:
The example is a man making a biological essentialist statement, the other man objecting is making a moral one. Neither is a psychological position or dynamic. Your argument is at best spurious.. My counter argument was also dodgy.

What I mean by externliser is someone who demands change externaly to ease the conflict it causes with whats going on inside of them.. Cancelling the wrong opinions that trigger them for example.
Click to expand...

I didnt make an arguement, silly ass lol.

Im just trying to pick up what you're laying down, is all.
 
Fredricka said:
Crookie did not write that, where are the spelling mistakes? He cant fool me
Click to expand...

No shit he didn't write that.

Right of the bat I see 3 letter words being spelled correctly.

There's no way that's him. Plus, the idea wasn't stolen from another poster here, it's from another website and author.

He's a fucking goon for not including proper citations.
 
jack said:
Deflection and spam coming as a response in 3....2.....1

LOL she beat me to it.
Click to expand...
Don't tell me you think he wrote that, and spelt every word correctly? This is crookie we're talking about here
 
Fredricka said:
Don't tell me you think he wrote that, and spelt every word correctly? This is crookie we're talking about here
Click to expand...
Just seems specious to even mention it. You make spelling mistakes all the time.

We all do. Plus there's the "uk explanation" where you insist thats how its spelled.
 
jack said:
Just seems specious to even mention it. You make spelling mistakes all the time.

We all do. Plus there's the "uk explanation" where you insist thats how its spelled.
Click to expand...
Mine are typos. Are you talking about conceptualise? Look it up jack
 
Fredricka said:
Mine are typos. Are you talking about conceptualise? Look it up jack
Click to expand...
This is what I'm talking about. Spam and "uk trolling"

In america it's spelled with a z. We're bigger and richer than your little island.

What we say goes, especially in "spelling trolls"
 
To conceptualize means to form an idea, mental image, or abstract principle of something in your mind. It involves taking complex data, observations, or raw thoughts and organizing them into a structured, understandable concept. [
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
]

From the Cambridge Dictionary, which is what is used to settle ALL spelling claims.
 
jack said:
This is what I'm talking about. Spam and "uk trolling"

In america it's spelled with a z. We're bigger and richer than your little island.

What we say goes, especially in "spelling trolls"
Click to expand...
Crookie will go ape shit at this, you might get a rant on his across the pond Podcast for that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LotusBud
Was Bob Weir not noted by anyone?
Replies
2
Views
66
Reggie_Essent
Reggie_Essent
X
In case anyone was worried
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Lokmar
Lokmar
Lokmar
Does anyone still believe president poopie pants was ACTUALLY elected?
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Lokmar
Lokmar
Alticus
Anyone Here Use A Bong To Smoke?
2
Replies
38
Views
159
KiNG$LEY♛
KiNG$LEY♛
Iggy McLulz
  • Poll
Does anyone like The Prowler?
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Replies
265
Views
1K
Seamajor
Seamajor