This meme gave me ennui, I want it assboxed.
FACT!!!!
FACT!!!!
Obviously OP is ascribing attitudes of today onto the verbiage of the founders, what they fail to understand due to their criminal lack of historical context is that when 2A was written The USA was more of an Idea than a functioning United States as we think of it today, and it was thumbing it nose at the greatest military power on earth, and wihtout much in the way of a standing army of our own(I security concerns being managed by the Red Coats) we needed our citizen soldiers organized into regulated militias to having any hope of defense against the”Tyranny “ of King George III And The United Kingdom. Not Trump or Biden or McConnell, or even Boobert.
Pro Tip: When the Founders used the Word Tyranny there were clearly referring to King George III, not themselves, as many slower witted people seem to think.
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
If there aren't police already stationed in American schools I'm rather surprised that such a measure hasn't been introduced yet. That would act as a significant deterrent to school shooters. Plus cut down on school fights and bullying. If bullies are reported to on site police officers I believe they would be less inclined to misbehave.
Arming teachers in classrooms is not a solution but will only make matters worse.
Think about what you are saying and about whom you are saying it, our beloved founders were the 1% of their day, the leaders were very highly educated men of High Standing, you suggest they just decided "Hey lets write in a little clause giving the servant classes the right to assassinate us at will?" "Holy Fuck Madison, that is some sage af shit!" WOW, Awesome theory Bro!Pro Tip: When the Founders used the Word Tyranny there were clearly referring to King George III, not themselves, as many slower witted people seem to think.
So it wasnt like....all tyranny. JUST tyranny from the king and after that we can totally cave to tyranny from our own government....which the 2A was literally rooted in.
Not tyranny from control freak leftists. That's cool.
So you are claiming 2A was just meant one kind of tyranny and that tyranny is over?
That doesnt make sense, Admin. It was made into a constitutional right. If what you said was true.....why bother even putting it there? Do you think this stuff through or just stop at whatever activists you got this from because you think it sounds good?
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
If there aren't police already stationed in American schools I'm rather surprised that such a measure hasn't been introduced yet. That would act as a significant deterrent to school shooters. Plus cut down on school fights and bullying. If bullies are reported to on site police officers I believe they would be less inclined to misbehave.
Arming teachers in classrooms is not a solution but will only make matters worse.
Think about what you are saying and about whom you are saying it, our beloved founders were the 1% of their day, the leaders were very highly educated men of High Standing, you suggest they just decided "Hey lets write in a little clause giving the servant classes the right to assassinate us at will?" "Holy Fuck Madison, that is some sage af shit!" WOW, Awesome theory Bro!Pro Tip: When the Founders used the Word Tyranny there were clearly referring to King George III, not themselves, as many slower witted people seem to think.
So it wasnt like....all tyranny. JUST tyranny from the king and after that we can totally cave to tyranny from our own government....which the 2A was literally rooted in.
Not tyranny from control freak leftists. That's cool.
So you are claiming 2A was just meant one kind of tyranny and that tyranny is over?
That doesnt make sense, Admin. It was made into a constitutional right. If what you said was true.....why bother even putting it there? Do you think this stuff through or just stop at whatever activists you got this from because you think it sounds good?
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
Latest mass shooting incident in the US:
...even your Churches aren't safe anymore
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
Latest mass shooting incident in the US:
...even your Churches aren't safe anymore
I think you should look at the defensive fire arm use stats and explain why all those peoples lives are worthless garbage and they should be sacrificed for politcs.
Why should the rest of us be forced to endure violent attacks and murders that were normally prevented by defensive use of fire arms?
How do you justify responding to rising violence by making law abiding citizens MORE vulnerable? I see these events as reasons why we need our guns. If someone else has been armed this could have been dealt with.
I'm not sure how you think that making sure no one can defend themselves will help anything.
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
Latest mass shooting incident in the US:
...even your Churches aren't safe anymore
I think you should look at the defensive fire arm use stats and explain why all those peoples lives are worthless garbage and they should be sacrificed for politcs.
Why should the rest of us be forced to endure violent attacks and murders that were normally prevented by defensive use of fire arms?
How do you justify responding to rising violence by making law abiding citizens MORE vulnerable? I see these events as reasons why we need our guns. If someone else has been armed this could have been dealt with.
I'm not sure how you think that making sure no one can defend themselves will help anything.
like kids in school ??
Something for aidsman and his fellow retards.
They would rather see shootings continue and also remove all option for defense with fire arms.
If they manage to take away the 2A, they will simply ignore school shootings and higher crime rates.
I don't believe they truly care about any of these issues. They just kind of parrot stances without really considering the reality of them and instead of discussing it, they just become aggresive, patronizing and insulting.
I have yet to see ANY leftist anywhere defens their stance coherently in a respectful and considerate manner.
So I'm supposed to allow people who hold me in such a level of contempt to decide what rights I get to keep and what rights I lose. And insult me if I oppose it.
I support guns for home self defense but not conceal or open carry in public.
If the gun problem has gotten so bad in places like American public schools, then a police squad of 2 armed officers should be stationed in each one during school hours to protect students and teachers.
There are even some schools in Canada which have that arrangement.
It would help if the warning signs were acted on. The Oxford was openly threatening it and had a countdown on socail media. There were kids who skipped that day for that reason.
We could use security on schools.
But no school shooting involved anyone with an open or concealed carry liscence, Joe. So why I do I have to be less safe?
Latest mass shooting incident in the US:
...even your Churches aren't safe anymore
I think you should look at the defensive fire arm use stats and explain why all those peoples lives are worthless garbage and they should be sacrificed for politcs.
Why should the rest of us be forced to endure violent attacks and murders that were normally prevented by defensive use of fire arms?
How do you justify responding to rising violence by making law abiding citizens MORE vulnerable? I see these events as reasons why we need our guns. If someone else has been armed this could have been dealt with.
I'm not sure how you think that making sure no one can defend themselves will help anything.
like kids in school ??
No. Kids in school will NOT be any better off after regulating law abiding citizens.
Did gun regulation stop the Oxford shooter who gunned down classmates with a gun that was illegal for him to posses?
That's my point, X. The more the focus is on regulations and less on real solutions the more innocent people will be sacrificed for politcs. If you guys want to protect innocent people....youd drop the futile endeavors and present real solutions.
Regulations do not work. Reading my comments in the context I provided explains that and would have answered that question.
It also comes in handy for other things from time to time.