Moral of the story: There's no warhawk you won't hop in bed with as long as they'll give you a free Trump-hate high. There's a word for that.
Again, demonstrating your utter lack of simple logic skills.Moral of the story: There's no warhawk you won't hop in bed with as long as they'll give you a free Trump-hate high. There's a word for that.
Or, maybe, the people who oppose the American voters having our interests represented for a change -- instead of the MIC, lobbyists, and special interest groups -- are Fucking Evil consistently.Fucking tool. I'm not in bed with that monster. I am trying to show you low IQ crowd that even monsters recognize the monstrousness of your Orange Daddy. You people are thick.
LotusBud said:...demonstrating your utter lack of simple logic skills.
You're the one sucking the butter off Neocon nuts. Try again. Better yet, don't bother, you'll only fuck up again.Evil is on your side, so, I guess you're on the wrong side, Low IQ Man.
It's impossible to indict your philosophy when threads like this prove you don't actually have one.I imagine you think "Sucking the butter off Neocon nuts" is some sort of actual indictment of my philosophies.
I have one, and it's very clear, but you are witless, and you don't understand basic logic, so of course it eludes you.It's impossible to indict your philosophy when threads like this prove you don't actually have one.
Then explain your sudden adulation for a war profiteer based on the fact that he hates someone who opposes war profiteering.I have one, and it's very clear, but you are witless, and you don't understand basic logic, so of course it eludes you.
Explain where, when, and how I offered up adulation to Rove. How fucking thick are you?Then explain your sudden adulation for a war profiteer based on the fact that he hates someone who opposes war profiteering.
You gave him his own little spotlight right here. This thread is it.Explain where, when, and how I offered up adulation to Rove. How fucking thick are you?
You're stupid. Simple as that.You gave him his own little spotlight right here. This thread is it.
Or is this just your daily validation-seeking feed-the-hate-junkies thread?
= empty noise.You're stupid.
That was, indeed, plenty 'simple'.Simple as that.
I posted the same thread topic. I got similar responses.Explain where, when, and how I offered up adulation to Rove. How fucking thick are you?
Quit being a dunderheadThen explain your sudden adulation for a war profiteer based on the fact that he hates someone who opposes war profiteering.
It’s just like if a grade schooler reads a story that mentions someone having two dads both born into slavery the reader automatically become gay and black.What I learned in this thread is if a person says one thing that you agree with, you are committing yourself to their every word and action. It’s all or nothing. Isn’t that right Qtard?
It’s just like if a grade schooler reads a story that mentions someone having two dads both born into slavery the reader automatically become gay and black.
YupIt’s just like if a grade schooler reads a story that mentions someone having two dads both born into slavery the reader automatically become gay and black.
What you should've learned is that if an evil cock-licker says something you agree with, and you find yourself in agreement with an evil cock-licker, maybe you should reevaluate whether it's really moral to hold a position which is appealing to evil cock-lickers, and -- just maybe -- what holding that position indicates about you.What I learned in this thread is if a person says one thing that you agree with, you are committing yourself to their every word and action. It’s all or nothing. Isn’t that right Qtard?
What you should've learned is that if an evil cock-licker says something you agree with, and you find yourself in agreement with an evil cock-licker, maybe you should reevaluate whether it's really moral to hold a position which is appealing to evil cock-lickers, and -- just maybe -- what holding that position indicates about you.
Good point. A cynical bid to sucker a new segment of the public. And the suckers among them just hop right on it....and don't forget to take into account the possibility that the aforementioned clock-licker is merely trying to spit-shine his image which I think we can all agree needs a helluva lot of polish before people stop spitting at the very mention of his name.
Could you please put me on your ignore list, Tia....and don't forget to take into account the possibility that the aforementioned clock-licker is merely trying to spit-shine his image which I think we can all agree needs a helluva lot of polish before people stop spitting at the very mention of his name.
They think people won't remember that Rove is a piece of shit just because he's right about Trump?.Could you please put me on your ignore list, Tia.
Rove is a loathsome piece of shit.They think people won't remember that Rove is a piece of shit just because he's right about Trump?.
Strange
You’re a very tribal person. Good luck with that.Rove is a loathsome piece of shit.
Rove did not stop being a loathsome piece of shit during the brief window in which he penned his op-ed for the Wall Street Journal.
He was still a loathsome piece of shit when he formulated that opinion.
Meaning it's a loathsome piece of shit opinion.
He is basically arguing '"it's the source and not the content"...which is what he pretends to bemoan. But his sources can never be questioned. He couldn't do any better than shooting himself in the foot.You’re a very tribal person. Good luck with that.