A Couple Of My Bathroom Products

Reaction score
621
Location
The Best Location
Were not talking about anything else except for the 4th Amendment. Please stay on track.
We are done with it because you have been squashed in your assertion that it does not apply to illegal aliens.

Let's now talk about the Act which you cited as superseding the Bill of Rights re: illegal immigrants.
What does it say regarding the fate of children born on US soil to illegal immigrants.
That Act is the final werz is it not?
 

Flynn

Lion Heart Diva
Avatar Hack'd
Reaction score
4,698
Location
Far from yup!
We are done with it because you have been squashed in your assertion that it does not apply to illegal aliens.

Let's now talk about the Act which you cited as superseding the Bill of Rights re: illegal immigrants.
What does it say regarding the fate of children born on US soil to illegal immigrants.
That Act is the final werz is it not?

We were done days ago when you tripped up on the 4th Amendment.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,747
Location
Chicagoland
@The Cuntess and @Reggie_Essent apparently believe that the founders were illegal immigrants. I can only assume because they think she's winning that argument.
No. Our glorious Founders were touched by Enlightenment and God and created our most perfect Union that has secured the Blessings of Liberty for all American Citizens.

Illegal alien criminals are not citizens, so for them, not so much. Sorry.

Scream at the sky.
 
Reaction score
621
Location
The Best Location
Which is why you're trying to change your argument to the 14th Amendment? :LOL3:

Tell me moar!
Here's what the 1952 Act so beloved to you says re: Jus Soli citizenship:

Do you agree, Flynn-Flam? (because you have stated it is all knowing re: illegal immigration and it is the final word) Why do you agree with the following, Flynn-Flam?

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act, addressed birthright citizenship by restating the language of the 14th Amendment, providing that "a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, shall be a national and citizen of the United States at birth".
In simpler terms:
  • Affirmed existing principle: The 1952 Act incorporated the principle of birthright citizenship as already established in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
  • No exclusion for children of undocumented immigrants: The act did not exclude children born in the U.S. to parents living in the U.S. without legal authorization or temporary visas from receiving birthright citizenship.
 

Flynn

Lion Heart Diva
Avatar Hack'd
Reaction score
4,698
Location
Far from yup!
Here's what the 1952 Act so beloved to you says re: Jus Soli citizenship:

Do you agree, Flynn-Flam? (because you have stated it is all knowing re: illegal immigration and it is the final word) Why do you agree with the following, Flynn-Flam?

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act, addressed birthright citizenship by restating the language of the 14th Amendment, providing that "a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, shall be a national and citizen of the United States at birth".
In simpler terms:
  • Affirmed existing principle: The 1952 Act incorporated the principle of birthright citizenship as already established in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
  • No exclusion for children of undocumented immigrants: The act did not exclude children born in the U.S. to parents living in the U.S. without legal authorization or temporary visas from receiving birthright citizenship.

That has NOTHING to do with the 4th Amendment.