A Couple Of My Bathroom Products

[The Best Holliday]

Relaxing is important.

Relax to this, sparky:

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Hygiene counts, Raggs, and looking sharp. Recliner attached to your terrycloth ass don't rate.

Right. That's why the Jew gal left you all those years ago.

 

[The Prowler]

Right. That's why the Jew gal left you all those years ago.

@Admin. @Lily @The Best Holliday

All of them got dumped.

Big surprise.

 

[The Best Holliday]

That has NOTHING to do with the 4th Amendment.

What does the 1952 Immigration and Naturalization act say regarding the 4th amendment rights of illegal immigrants?
.This should be right up your alley.

Again, be cautioned. I know the answer to that question.

PS: I accept your surrender on Jus Soli and the 1952 Act.

 

[The Best Holliday]

Right. That's why the Jew gal left you all those years ago.

I left, Raggs. LoLz

 

[Flynn]

What does the 1952 Immigration and Naturalization act say regarding the 4th amendment rights of illegal immigrants?
.This should be right up your alley.

Again, be cautioned. I know the answer to that question.

PS: I accept your surrender on Jus Soli and the 1952 Act.

That's like comparing you to a real man. It's like apples and oranges.

No, no. I want you point out in the 1700's where the illegal immigrant clause was inserted into the 4th Amendment. Then we'll move on.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I left, Raggs. LoLz

You were cucked then? Poor guy.

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

You were cucked then? Poor guy.

Oh, personal experience.

 

[Flynn]

I left, Raggs. LoLz

Let me guess. She left as soon as you started talking about the 4th Amendment?

 

[The Prowler]

I left, Raggs. LoLz

After she told you to get the fuck out?

 

[The Best Holliday]

You were cucked then? Poor guy.

Actually Raggs, I didn't feel her fellating skills were up to snuff.
. It's all in the court docs.
Pass me your home address and I'll send you a copy.

 

[The Best Holliday]

That's like comparing you to a real man. It's like apples and oranges.

No, no. I want you point out in the 1700's where the illegal immigrant clause was inserted into the 4th Amendment. Then we'll move on.

One white flag is enough, Flynn-Flam. I don't need a collection from you.

Here is what it says and for obvious reason.
. The 4th applies to all persons no need for further reiteration: (oh, and remember - YOU said that the 1952 Act said all there is to say. So here it is.

The 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), also known as the McCarran-Walter Act, established the framework for immigration law in the United States, but did not specifically address the Fourth Amendment rights of undocumented individuals.
Instead, judicial interpretation and subsequent legal precedent have shaped the application of the Fourth Amendment to immigration enforcement, including cases involving individuals suspected of being undocumented.
Here's how this interplay has been interpreted:

• The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is generally understood to apply to all persons within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.
• For warrantless immigration arrests under the 1952 INA, the standard is equivalent to the Fourth Amendment's probable cause requirement. This means officers need sufficient facts to reasonably believe an individual has violated federal immigration laws and is likely to evade arrest before a warrant is obtained.
• There is a border search exception to the Fourth Amendment, allowing for routine searches without individualized suspicion at the border or its functional equivalent.
• Immigration officers can question individuals believed to be aliens about their right to be in the U.S., but this is subject to Fourth Amendment limitations. Brief questioning in public without restraint is permissible, but some lower courts have found that detaining individuals for questioning without reasonable suspicion is unlawful

Now, Flynn-Flam, that 3rd bullet applied to the hypothetical I provided earlier.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Oh, personal experience.

No. I have no idea what that must feel like.

I feel for my crusty old pal if that's the case.

But he does sound kind of femmy when he talks about his toiletry scents.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Actually Raggs, I didn't feel her fellating skills were up to snuff.
. It's all in the court docs.
Pass me your home address and I'll send you a copy.

Crude, dude. No need to play act for the two or three readers here.

I retract my own crude jibe. It was certainly beneath me when all I had to do was mock you going on about your soaps.

 

[The Best Holliday]

No. I have no idea what that must feel like.

I feel for my crusty old pal if that's the case.

But he does sound kind of femmy when he talks about his toiletry scents.

Enjoy yer own stink, sir.

 

[The Best Holliday]

Crude, dude. No need to play act for the two or three readers here.

I retract my own crude jibe. It was certainly beneath me when all I had to do was mock you going on about your soaps.

I love good smells, Raggs. That includes the great outdoors through the seasons.
. You should get the ejector feature for your recliner and take a smell around.

PS: wait, whut the...
YOU are shy about ME being crude?

Otay...


PPS: I see Flynn-Flam has slunk off in defeat (again). LoLz - the law firm of Queerier and Flynn-Flam still looking for a first win.

 

[Flynn]

One white flag is enough, Flynn-Flam. I don't need a collection from you.

Here is what it says and for obvious reason.
. The 4th applies to all persons no need for further reiteration: (oh, and remember - YOU said that the 1952 Act said all there is to say. So here it is.

The 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), also known as the McCarran-Walter Act, established the framework for immigration law in the United States, but did not specifically address the Fourth Amendment rights of undocumented individuals.
Instead, judicial interpretation and subsequent legal precedent have shaped the application of the Fourth Amendment to immigration enforcement, including cases involving individuals suspected of being undocumented.
Here's how this interplay has been interpreted:

• The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is generally understood to apply to all persons within the United States, regardless of their immigration status.
• For warrantless immigration arrests under the 1952 INA, the standard is equivalent to the Fourth Amendment's probable cause requirement. This means officers need sufficient facts to reasonably believe an individual has violated federal immigration laws and is likely to evade arrest before a warrant is obtained.
• There is a border search exception to the Fourth Amendment, allowing for routine searches without individualized suspicion at the border or its functional equivalent.
• Immigration officers can question individuals believed to be aliens about their right to be in the U.S., but this is subject to Fourth Amendment limitations. Brief questioning in public without restraint is permissible, but some lower courts have found that detaining individuals for questioning without reasonable suspicion is unlawful

Now, Flynn-Flam, that 3rd bullet applied to the hypothetical I provided earlier.

We are talking about the 4th Amendment. Please keep that in mind.

 

[Lily]

No. Our glorious Founders were touched by Enlightenment and God and created our most perfect Union that has secured the Blessings of Liberty for all American Citizens.

Illegal alien criminals are not citizens, so for them, not so much. Sorry.

Scream at the sky.

Then you shouldn't have agreed with The Duncetress and Flynn-Flam when you gave our laughing emoji to the ridiculous assertion that I was wrong for also arguing that the founders were not illegal immigrants.

You know what you did, douchey.

 

[Lily]

I left, Raggs. LoLz

Me too, 9/1/2007. I distinctly recall the date that I gained my freedom.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Then you shouldn't have agreed with The Duncetress and Flynn-Flam when you gave our laughing emoji to the ridiculous assertion that I was wrong for also arguing that the founders were not illegal immigrants.

You know what you did, douchey.

Er, clicking a laughing emoji does not indicate agreement with the substance of any poast. It only means the poast made me laugh. Duh!

 

[Lily]

Er, clicking a laughing emoji does not indicate agreement with the substance of any poast. It only means the poast made me laugh. Duh!

I see. Stupid shit makes you laugh. Are you high by any chance?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I see. Stupid shit makes you laugh. Are you high by any chance?

Quite often. I just went to the dispensary the other day. This latest batch is quite potent.

 

[Lily]

Quite often. I just went to the dispensary the other day. This latest batch is quite potent.

I've gotten high a few times in my life. I too laughed at stupid shit.

Like my college roommates boyfriend's red ears. They were very bright red when he came in from the cold. I found that extremely hilarious in the moment. I believed I pointed and laughed, deepening the red color, which only served to make me laugh more.

See? Stupid shit.

 

[Seamajor]

No idea. I don't understand Seaboobnese.

Look into it DD. Frank would appreciate it

 

[Frood]

Look into it DD. Frank would appreciate it

No Seaboobnese.

 

[Flynn]

Then you shouldn't have agreed with The Duncetress and Flynn-Flam when you gave our laughing emoji to the ridiculous assertion that I was wrong for also arguing that the founders were not illegal immigrants.

You know what you did, douchey.

Imagine this!

Lily pointing out how other's give out laughing emojis. This is the funny part. If you look throughout this thread, you'll see it is Lily repping every single post that talks bad about those she doesn't like.

You see, this is the behavior we're talking about. Another hypocritical statement from the Taco Queen. Lily us finding that her inner circle is slowly fading.

Shamu.

 

[wizer]

Lily us finding that her inner circle is slowly fading.

I tried to be nice to Lily and be supportive when she made a decent post. I even frowned when I saw people taking cheap shots at her weight.

Despite my past efforts to be nice to @Lily, more often than not my posts have been met with unwarranted insults and sarcasm either with words or an eye rolling emoticon or similar.

So I gave up.