Biden or Trump?

[skinofevil]

First, in a live broadcast, he was verbally beaten by Elisabeth Warren, without striking back. He then failed to confront Joe Biden with Biden's three obvious disabilities, namely the allegations of corruption, the women's stories, and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms.

So you've gone from willful ignorance to straight up lying now.

 

[Q]

First, in a live broadcast, he was verbally beaten by Elisabeth Warren, without striking back. He then failed to confront Joe Biden with Biden's three obvious disabilities, namely the allegations of corruption, the women's stories, and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms.

So you've gone from willful ignorance to straight up lying now.

Pleasere-read it. And then point out where they claim he is demented....

 

[skinofevil]

First, in a live broadcast, he was verbally beaten by Elisabeth Warren, without striking back. He then failed to confront Joe Biden with Biden's three obvious disabilities, namely the allegations of corruption, the women's stories, and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms.

So you've gone from willful ignorance to straight up lying now.

Pleasere-read it. And then point out where they claim he is demented....

Me doing that is exactly what you're replying to. Jesus, you may be even more senile than Tapioca Joe himself. I mean, just... holy shit. Are you by any chance on life support after having failed to get the hang of breathing? How is it possible for you to type, when you haven't even mastered the high art of being awake? If somebody bet me there are pine cones less oblivious than you are, I wouldn't throw away money betting against 'em.

 

[Q]

First, in a live broadcast, he was verbally beaten by Elisabeth Warren, without striking back. He then failed to confront Joe Biden with Biden's three obvious disabilities, namely the allegations of corruption, the women's stories, and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms.

So you've gone from willful ignorance to straight up lying now.

Pleasere-read it. And then point out where they claim he is demented....

Me doing that is exactly what you're replying to. Jesus, you may be even more senile than Tapioca Joe himself. I mean, just... holy shit. Are you by any chance on life support after having failed to get the hang of breathing? How is it possible for you to type, when you haven't even mastered the high art of being awake? If somebody bet me there are pine cones less oblivious than you are, I wouldn't throw away money betting against 'em.

Show me the fragment in that artice that says he IS (confirmed) demented....

 

[skinofevil]

First, in a live broadcast, he was verbally beaten by Elisabeth Warren, without striking back. He then failed to confront Joe Biden with Biden's three obvious disabilities, namely the allegations of corruption, the women's stories, and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms.

So you've gone from willful ignorance to straight up lying now.

Pleasere-read it. And then point out where they claim he is demented....

Me doing that is exactly what you're replying to. Jesus, you may be even more senile than Tapioca Joe himself. I mean, just... holy shit. Are you by any chance on life support after having failed to get the hang of breathing? How is it possible for you to type, when you haven't even mastered the high art of being awake? If somebody bet me there are pine cones less oblivious than you are, I wouldn't throw away money betting against 'em.

Show me the fragment in that artice that says he IS (confirmed) demented....

I've already done that, moron. It's in the post you quoted (and obviously didn't read.)

 

[Q]

First, in a live broadcast, he was verbally beaten by Elisabeth Warren, without striking back. He then failed to confront Joe Biden with Biden's three obvious disabilities, namely the allegations of corruption, the women's stories, and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms.

So you've gone from willful ignorance to straight up lying now.

Pleasere-read it. And then point out where they claim he is demented....

Me doing that is exactly what you're replying to. Jesus, you may be even more senile than Tapioca Joe himself. I mean, just... holy shit. Are you by any chance on life support after having failed to get the hang of breathing? How is it possible for you to type, when you haven't even mastered the high art of being awake? If somebody bet me there are pine cones less oblivious than you are, I wouldn't throw away money betting against 'em.

Show me the fragment in that artice that says he IS (confirmed) demented....

I've already done that, moron. It's in the post you quoted (and obviously didn't read.)

Who's the moron here? Did you tell it? Nope!
I translated it to DUTCH.

Now, back to your message and translation:
"and what may be suspected to be severe dementia symptoms."

"suspected" means they do not know, but thet..... there go the drums.... suspect it.
According to some soure: "have an idea or impression of the existence, presence, or truth of (something) without certain proof.".

So, I stand with my position: "THERE IS NO PROOF". You still claim it is there, but it is not.

 

[skinofevil]

Uh huh. You wanted the word of a specialist, you got it, then you moved the goalposts to "definitive proof."

Nope. You're finished. Your WoI bullshit is tiresome. I called it days back; you'll refuse to acknowledge the obvious. Even if the top neurologist in the world gave an hour long report documenting the proof in the minute-est of detail, you'd deny that, too.

Fuck off, ignoramus, you've beclowned yourself on this point.

 

[Q]

Uh huh. You wanted the word of a specialist, you got it, then you moved the goalposts to "definitive proof."

Nope. You're finished. Your WoI bullshit is tiresome. I called it days back; you'll refuse to acknowledge the obvious. Even if the top neurologist in the world gave an hour long report documenting the proof in the minute-est of detail, you'd deny that, too.

Fuck off, ignoramus, you've beclowned yourself on this point.

I asked for proof. Proof is -of course- as you call it "definitive proof". All you come with are wild accusations....

So come up with "definitive proof" (which is a stupid word combination, since all proof is definitive) or fuck off youself.

 

[skinofevil]

No point, clown. You won't accept proof.

You wanted the word of a specialist. I found you the word of a specialist. Not good enough for you.

Now you want proof. If somebody shows you that, you've already shown that won't be good enough.

Biden is senile. Everybody knows it. You know it just like the rest of us. You just won't admit it, because you want anybody other than Trump to win, and Biden is all the Democrats put up against him.

But Biden is a senile old kook who has no chance of winning. He's a figurehead, anyway -- they're not really running Biden, they're running Harris with Biden as a figurehead. And that, too, is obvious.

 

[Q]

No point, clown. You won't accept proof.

You wanted the word of a specialist. I found you the word of a specialist. Not good enough for you.

Now you want proof. If somebody shows you that, you've already shown that won't be good enough.

Biden is senile. Everybody knows it. You know it just like the rest of us. You just won't admit it, because you want anybody other than Trump to win, and Biden is all the Democrats put up against him.

But Biden is a senile old kook who has no chance of winning. He's a figurehead, anyway -- they're not really running Biden, they're running Harris with Biden as a figurehead. And that, too, is obvious.

Nope, no proof. You can say what you want, but no proof still is "NO PROOF".

No go look for some actal proof and someone that "suspects" something.

Btw, I suspect you are too dumb for that. Ah, there is some proof for you. You are too dumb.

 

[skinofevil]

No point, clown. You won't accept proof.

You wanted the word of a specialist. I found you the word of a specialist. Not good enough for you.

Now you want proof. If somebody shows you that, you've already shown that won't be good enough.

Biden is senile. Everybody knows it. You know it just like the rest of us. You just won't admit it, because you want anybody other than Trump to win, and Biden is all the Democrats put up against him.

But Biden is a senile old kook who has no chance of winning. He's a figurehead, anyway -- they're not really running Biden, they're running Harris with Biden as a figurehead. And that, too, is obvious.

Nope, no proof. You can say what you want, but no proof still is "NO PROOF".

That's what I'm saying, clownshoes. You won't accept proof if it's shown to you, so there's no point showing it to you.

 

[Q]

Nope, no proof. You can say what you want, but no proof still is "NO PROOF".

That's what I'm saying, clownshoes. You won't accept proof if it's shown to you, so there's no point showing it to you.

We can keep going round in circles, but there is no proof.

I will no longer respnd to this. You will probably call that "he will not accept the proof" and "weakness", but you know I am tight. I am just fed up with this nonsense.

Let's end it with Alizee. Let's see if you can find the hidden message:

 

[skinofevil]

The "message" isn't exactly hidden; you bend your will and reason to empty-headed little THOTs. At this point, that's not even a disclosure, let alone a surprise.

 

[skinofevil]

Here's Tim Pool. He's not even a "right wing" personality, he's actually moderate left, and even he is saying that the left in our country has gone insane.
But to you, they're 'normal'. Because you have been brainwashed to ignore reality.

 

[Q]

@skinofevil I will no longer respond to you substantively on this subject. Nor will I read your "proof".

Please go have a look at the Alizee clip.

 

[skinofevil]

@skinofevil I will no longer respond to you substantively on this subject.

This falsely implies that, at any point, you have responded substantively on this subject.

You ain't gotta lie to kick it.

 

[Scott]

@skinofevil I will no longer respond to you substantively on this subject.

This falsely implies that, at any point, you have responded substantively on this subject.

You ain't gotta lie to kick it.

He surrendered, you won.

Now, let us use his carcass as mortar for the wall..

 

[Q]

@skinofevil I will no longer respond to you substantively on this subject.

This falsely implies that, at any point, you have responded substantively on this subject.

You ain't gotta lie to kick it.

If you do not like the answer, it does not mean it does not exist. Let me proof it: YOU exist...

 

[Courier Six]

Joe Biden is a sekrit Chinaman

 

[skinofevil]

Joe Biden is a sekrit Chinaman

Don't be an idiot. It's not a secret.

 

[Q]

Joe Biden is a sekrit Chinaman

Don't be an idiot. It's not a secret.

Yes, two typical Trump voters here in discussion with each other :LMAO2:

 

[Kitty Zhang]

Kamala should win. I need healthcare plan.

 

[Q]

Kamala should win. I need healthcare plan.

Yes, all americans do. The way it is now organized is unhuman

 

[skinofevil]

Kamala should win. I need healthcare plan.

Sounds like you need job.

 

[skinofevil]

Kamala should win. I need healthcare plan.

Yes, all americans do. The way it is now organized is unhuman

Not at "unhuman" as forced labor, which is what universal healthcare is to doctors.

 

[Q]

Kamala should win. I need healthcare plan.

Yes, all americans do. The way it is now organized is unhuman

Not at "unhuman" as forced labor, which is what universal healthcare is to doctors.

WTF?! How would it be forced labor... Humor me...

 

[skinofevil]

Kamala should win. I need healthcare plan.

Yes, all americans do. The way it is now organized is unhuman

Not at "unhuman" as forced labor, which is what universal healthcare is to doctors.

WTF?! How would it be forced labor... Humor me...

Can a doctor refuse treatment?

 

[Q]

Not at "unhuman" as forced labor, which is what universal healthcare is to doctors.

WTF?! How would it be forced labor... Humor me...

Can a doctor refuse treatment?

Yes

 

[skinofevil]

Not at "unhuman" as forced labor, which is what universal healthcare is to doctors.

WTF?! How would it be forced labor... Humor me...

Can a doctor refuse treatment?

Yes

Then universal healthcare falls apart. You can't have medical professionals providing all the unpaid care the poors want, without getting paid what they think their work is worth, unless their labor is compelled.

 

[Q]

Not at "unhuman" as forced labor, which is what universal healthcare is to doctors.

WTF?! How would it be forced labor... Humor me...

Can a doctor refuse treatment?

Yes

Then universal healthcare falls apart. You can't have medical professionals providing all the unpaid care the poors want, without getting paid what they think their work is worth, unless their labor is compelled.

I think you don't understand the concept of a "healthcare plan". Doctors still get paid there...