Lotusbud, remains a cretin. She thinks every state should spend money they don't have and that there are no negative consequences for that. You can tell she has no financial sense, at all, and probably has lived paycheck to paycheck her entire life
How can such a financially illiterate person be allowed to teach children?
I live mostly check to check and that's exactly why I know spending has negative consequences.
It'd be nice if we could have permanent socialism, a guaranteed income and generous social benefits for all.
But in the long run, it isn't sustainable.
I this election, The Liberal Party in Canada is promising an expansion of the welfare state here after the country ran up the largest deficit in history. $10 daycare for families, more housing, etc.
Nice idea. But eventually we'll probably go broke trying to pursue those lofty ideals.
I'm not really fond of the Conservative Party or its leader & his message. But I think the guy is just telling the truth.
They should probably cut spending soon after the election then having to do it later because it's inevitable at some point.
Massive spending cuts are probably coming to the USA and other Western nations one day as well.
And it will be painful no matter which party has to do it.
So the generous social supports and recent un up in debt, better enjoy it now cuz it may not be there in the future.