Decide For Yourself - The Evidence in Clear

[Lily]

I'll nave to search her posts and find that.

It's been a minute.

 

[X]

He has no kids. Men don't much like being around kids that aren't theirs.

We all know that's true. Shit some dads even avoid their own.

He is suspect especially after his bj comment about an 8 year old boy

Youre rationalizing and it’s horrible, this will bite you in the ass lily not that you care

 

[X]

pedo. AT least you admit it.

Hi Jackdusky BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAJAJAJAJAJAJA

 

[Jack]

Youre rationalizing and it’s horrible, this will bite you in the ass lily not that you care

is this the passive X or the aggressive X??

Maybe the "wet fart" X?

 

[Lily]

Youre rationalizing and it’s horrible, this will bite you in the ass lily not that you care

No, you see weird behaviors and known facts about the man and don't question it...

You sell out kids for some cat food? Fuck off.

 

[Jack]

Hi Prowlerdusky BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAJAJAJAJAJAJA

Stick to sucking his ass. The rest of it is your pathetic dribble.

Moron.

 

[Jack]

No, you see weird behaviors and known facts about the man and don't question it...

You sell out kids for some cat food? Fuck off.

I was pretty shocked when he revealed that as well...

Maybe Prowler offers him candy too if he'll get in the car?

 

[Lily]

I was pretty shocked when he revealed that as well.

Maybe Prowler offers him candy too if he'll get in the car?

I'm serious though. Kids are hurt because adults look away.

X disgusts me almost as much as Yowler

 

[Alticus]

You know what goof if you weren’t so hurt by prowlers fucking car you could be a little concerned there’s a pedo in our midst, the pedo got lucky BF can’t pull it up

You insist on trolling me with this so I'm going to address this one last time as far you and I are concerned.


>Your basing your arguments on an edited post and words from a member who lies like a rug.
>You have no video or images to support your accusations.


The evidence mentioned above is critical if not mandatory, in order to prosecute someone for a cybercrime of this magnitude depending on who has jurisdiction. It's hard to prosecute cybercrime so in many cases the evidence must be overwhelming in order to have a decent shot at being successful. This and even more in some cases may be required and that takes a lot of time and money. While this whole process is going on the accused person is looked upon as a subhuman piece of garbage by many before it even goes to court. Guilty or not his reputation as a decent man is gone. The stink never goes away. If The Question ever joins another forum he could conceivably be looked upon as a child predator by those who read Prowler's and your words here.

Ever since all of this bullshit started, incessant ped0 accusations coming out of you and others has done nothing to make this place look appealing to people thinking about joining. Who the fuck wants to join and post when there's a possibility that they will be accused of being a ped0 by someone with no evidence at all? I don't give a flying fuck if you two are trolling or whatever other bullshit your trying to accomplish, it's a bad look.

Guests and some members read all of this and it makes us all look fucking bad. If you and Prowler are so committed to keeping this forum's reputation clean and free from cybercriminals who prey on children then scrap the conjecture and gather real evidence such as images or videos. If not, shut the fuck up and stop making this forum look like a den of criminals and scum. Personally, I'd appreciate that.

 

[Lily]

You insist on trolling me with this so I'm going to address this one last time as far you and I are concerned.


>Your basing your arguments on an edited post and words from a member who lies like a rug.
>You have no video or images to support your accusations.


The evidence mentioned above is critical if not mandatory, in order to prosecute someone for a cybercrime of this magnitude depending on who has jurisdiction. It's hard to prosecute cybercrime so in many cases the evidence must be overwhelming in order to have a decent shot at being successful. This and even more in some cases may be required and that takes a lot of time and money. While this whole process is going on the accused person is looked upon as a subhuman piece of garbage by many before it even goes to court. Guilty or not his reputation as a decent man is gone. The stink never goes away. If The Question ever joins another forum he could conceivably be looked upon as a child predator by those who read Prowler's and your words here.

Ever since all of this bullshit started, incessant ped0 accusations coming out of you and others has done nothing to make this place look appealing to people thinking about joining. Who the fuck wants to join and post when there's a possibility that they will be accused of being a ped0 by someone with no evidence at all? I don't give a flying fuck if you two are trolling or whatever other bullshit your trying to accomplish, it's a bad look.

Guests and some members read all of this and it makes us all look fucking bad. If you and Prowler are so committed to keeping this forum's reputation clean and free from cybercriminals who prey on children then scrap the conjecture and gather real evidence such as images or videos. If not shut the fuck up and stop making this forum look like a den of criminals and scum. Personally, I'd appreciate that.

Excellent reasoning.

Maybe something @Bastard Factory should think about and reconsider.

It is getting out of hand.

 

[X]

You insist on trolling me with this so I'm going to address this one last time as far you and I are concerned.


>Your basing your arguments on an edited post and words from a member who lies like a rug.
>You have no video or images to support your accusations.


The evidence mentioned above is critical if not mandatory, in order to prosecute someone for a cybercrime of this magnitude depending on who has jurisdiction. It's hard to prosecute cybercrime so in many cases the evidence must be overwhelming in order to have a decent shot at being successful. This and even more in some cases may be required and that takes a lot of time and money. While this whole process is going on the accused person is looked upon as a subhuman piece of garbage by many before it even goes to court. Guilty or not his reputation as a decent man is gone. The stink never goes away. If The Question ever joins another forum he could conceivably be looked upon as a child predator by those who read Prowler's and your words here.

Ever since all of this bullshit started, incessant ped0 accusations coming out of you and others has done nothing to make this place look appealing to people thinking about joining. Who the fuck wants to join and post when there's a possibility that they will be accused of being a ped0 by someone with no evidence at all? I don't give a flying fuck if you two are trolling or whatever other bullshit your trying to accomplish, it's a bad look.

Guests and some members read all of this and it makes us all look fucking bad. If you and Prowler are so committed to keeping this forum's reputation clean and free from cybercriminals who prey on children then scrap the conjecture and gather real evidence such as images or videos. If not, shut the fuck up and stop making this forum look like a den of criminals and scum. Personally, I'd appreciate that.

You sticking up for a pedo? You sick fuck, it’s good people read this so they know you harbor a potential pedo

 

[X]

Stick to sucking his ass. The rest of it is your pathetic dribble.

Jackduuuuusky

 

[X]

No, you see weird behaviors and known facts about the man and don't question it...

You sell out kids for some cat food? Fuck off.

Your poor kids, do they know you back pedos online? What a mother you must be

 

[Lily]

Jackduuuuusky

How do you manage to ride your bike with your head up Yowler's ass anyway?

 

[Lily]

Your poor kids, do they know you back pedos online? What a mother you must be

You stick up for a man that actually posted that an 8 year old boy would blow a forum member for a cookie.

Only pedophiles even think like that.

 

[Alticus]

Excellent reasoning.

Maybe something @Bastard Factory shouls think about and reconsider.

It is getting out of hand.

We want free speech, it's a good thing to have, especially these days with all of the censorship out there but this particular accusation is just too sensitive and destructive. I'll appeal to BF but I'm not so sure how it will go. Even some of the most horrendous of forum genres have a no ped0 accusation rule. It's not an easy thing to deal with on a free speech forum.

As far as the Shoutbox is concerned I was trying my best to give the members and myself as well, a little more latitude in what is posted in there and now it's gotten out of hand with those accusations again and that's my fault. The general public can't read content in the Meltdown, but can in the Shoutbox. I'll ban members in the chat who post these accusations from now on. If I lose my staff position as a result I'll be comfortable in the knowledge that I did the right thing in my mind at least.


NO MORE PEDO ACCUSATIONS IN THE SHOUT BOX


NO MORE PEDO ACCUSATIONS IN THE SHOUT BOX


NO MORE PEDO ACCUSATIONS IN THE SHOUT BOX


NO MORE PEDO ACCUSATIONS IN THE SHOUT BOX

 

[Jack]

Cmon lily, Yoire hanging out with a potential pedo, it’s not been proven he didn’t poast what prowlers says, I get ypu hate prowler but fuck don’t let it blind you, you have kids ffs

 

[Alticus]

I don't want to be in the business of destroying another member's rep with mere questionable words from a troublemaker. It's not fair. Prowler and X have already ruined The Question's rep and for nothing.

 

[Lily]

I don't want to be in the business of destroying another member's rep with mere questionable words from a troublemaker. It's not fair. Prowler and X have already ruined The Question's rep and for nothing.

I think everyone knows they're playing dirty.

I don't find the accusation to be credible. These tools have accused too many.

 

[Admin.]

I don't want to be in the business of destroying another member's rep with mere questionable words from a troublemaker. It's not fair. Prowler and X have already ruined The Question's rep and for nothing.

I don't think anyone with the ability to fog a mirror takes the the testicle twins seriously.

 

[Jack]

I don't want to be in the business of destroying another member's rep with mere questionable words from a troublemaker. It's not fair. Prowler and X have already ruined The Question's rep and for nothing.

That was his intent and intention. All because he was butthurt over his imaginary car.

I'm done response trolling and will respect your rules.

 

[Admin.]

That was his intent and intention. All because he was butthurt over his imaginary car.

I'm done response trolling and will respect your rules.

Even a dumpster fire needs oxygen to burn.

 

[Adam Hitler]

Fuck your dead rotting mom’s corpse, Punk

Amazing.... your parents are almost certainly dead, either that or 105 years old...

WTF are you doing?

 

[Adam Hitler]

@Aylana are you ok with Jack posting your PI?

 

[Admin.]

Amazing.... your parents are almost certainly dead, either that or 105 years old...

WTF are you doing?

You two make a ridiculous couple...

 

[Lily]

You two make a ridiculous couple...

Filth and Madam?

 

[Kirk]

I thought this thread might have gotten interesting after I left it yesterday, but it didn't.

Analana's projecting is kind of interesting, but not really.

Even Burke and Hare would not dig up your dead dick.

​

 

[Adam Hitler]

Filth and Madam?

Blimp and Gimp? Pig and Twig?

I've got loads for you and Fagmin, don't worry.

 

[Jack]

Filth and Madam?

Dream team?

 

[Admin.]

Blimp and Gimp? Pig and Twig?

I've got loads for you and Fagmin, don't worry.

I wouldn’t come within a hundred miles of your syphlitic load. You loser