Should Dead Kid Gore Pics be Removed?

Should Dead Kid Gore pics be removed?


  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

Breakfall

Such is life...
Site Supporter
Messages
47,898
Location
Great Southern Land
The rule says N
Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.

When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.

At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.


It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.

You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.

Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!

You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!
 

GG Allin

Everybody's an enemy.
Messages
241
Location
New Hampshire
GG Allin looks like he's been caged or caved for a while. His opinion clearly doesn't matter. Animals have no say in this issue on BF.

YOU'RE FUCKIN RIGHT, I'M AN ANIMAL, I'M A FUCKIN BEAST AND CAN OUT SURVIVE SOME STUPID FUCKIN CUNT SLIME LIKE YOU.

AT THE END OF THE DAY, PEOPLE LIKE YOU, NEED PEOPLE LIKE ME.

SUCK MY ASSHOLE, SWEET TITS.


Awwwww, you really hurt my feelings. I have SO many give a fucks about your opinion that I'm going to give you a free analysis of what I think of you. Torture. I see animal abuse and torture in your past. Late childhood, perhaps? Neglect. Your parents kept you caged in a basement somewhere. Fed you bread and water just to keep you alive. Abuse. Your father/mother beat you while you were caged. You have no empathy or sympathy. A wild animal is raging inside you....dying to be unleashed to victimize anyone that questions you or your intent. You seek refuge and mercy from those who do not understand you or pity you. You find nothing. Your animalistic behavior tends to control whatever decency you have left as a human being. Am I getting close?

I MUST HAVE HURT YOUR FEELINGS WITH SUCH A LONG ASS STUPID REPLY, YOU BUCKET OF SHIT!

I recorded this song SUXK MY BUTTHOLE just for people like YOU!!!




Nigga.....please. You didn't touch a nerve. Your cry baby tactics don't work on me. Roflmmfao.


YOU FUCKIN GOT A TINGE OF PAIN IN YOUR HEART, YOU GOT ALL UP IN YOUR FEELINS, WHORE SACK... YOU CAN PRETEND, BUT WE KNOW THE TRUTH, BEEFSTEAK TWAT.
 

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
GG Allin looks like he's been caged or caved for a while. His opinion clearly doesn't matter. Animals have no say in this issue on BF.

YOU'RE FUCKIN RIGHT, I'M AN ANIMAL, I'M A FUCKIN BEAST AND CAN OUT SURVIVE SOME STUPID FUCKIN CUNT SLIME LIKE YOU.

AT THE END OF THE DAY, PEOPLE LIKE YOU, NEED PEOPLE LIKE ME.

SUCK MY ASSHOLE, SWEET TITS.


Awwwww, you really hurt my feelings. I have SO many give a fucks about your opinion that I'm going to give you a free analysis of what I think of you. Torture. I see animal abuse and torture in your past. Late childhood, perhaps? Neglect. Your parents kept you caged in a basement somewhere. Fed you bread and water just to keep you alive. Abuse. Your father/mother beat you while you were caged. You have no empathy or sympathy. A wild animal is raging inside you....dying to be unleashed to victimize anyone that questions you or your intent. You seek refuge and mercy from those who do not understand you or pity you. You find nothing. Your animalistic behavior tends to control whatever decency you have left as a human being. Am I getting close?

I MUST HAVE HURT YOUR FEELINGS WITH SUCH A LONG ASS STUPID REPLY, YOU BUCKET OF SHIT!

I recorded this song SUXK MY BUTTHOLE just for people like YOU!!!




Nigga.....please. You didn't touch a nerve. Your cry baby tactics don't work on me. Roflmmfao.


YOU FUCKIN GOT A TINGE OF PAIN IN YOUR HEART, YOU GOT ALL UP IN YOUR FEELINS, WHORE SACK... YOU CAN PRETEND, BUT WE KNOW THE TRUTH, BEEFSTEAK TWAT.



I can imagine that you imagine my beefsteak twat in your mouth on an hourly basis but it will be our secret. I won't tell a soul.
 

LotusBud

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
19,145
Location
Portugal
The rule says N
Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.

When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.

At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.


It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.

You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.

Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!

You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!

I am going to say this once more, and if you make that claim again, you're on ignore. I do not support pedophiles, liar. I am a mother, you total piece of shit. I would gladly murder any pedophile. ANY pedophile. But you never offered any proof that Maxis is any such thing. I asked you repeatedly to show me proof, and you kept posting links to google. I googled him, you asshole. I saw no evidence of PLEASE ASS BOX ME!. I would have blasted him here gladly if I had seen anything. But I didn't, and I'm not taking your hysterical word for it. You are a jerkoff.
 

GG Allin

Everybody's an enemy.
Messages
241
Location
New Hampshire
GG Allin looks like he's been caged or caved for a while. His opinion clearly doesn't matter. Animals have no say in this issue on BF.

YOU'RE FUCKIN RIGHT, I'M AN ANIMAL, I'M A FUCKIN BEAST AND CAN OUT SURVIVE SOME STUPID FUCKIN CUNT SLIME LIKE YOU.

AT THE END OF THE DAY, PEOPLE LIKE YOU, NEED PEOPLE LIKE ME.

SUCK MY ASSHOLE, SWEET TITS.


Awwwww, you really hurt my feelings. I have SO many give a fucks about your opinion that I'm going to give you a free analysis of what I think of you. Torture. I see animal abuse and torture in your past. Late childhood, perhaps? Neglect. Your parents kept you caged in a basement somewhere. Fed you bread and water just to keep you alive. Abuse. Your father/mother beat you while you were caged. You have no empathy or sympathy. A wild animal is raging inside you....dying to be unleashed to victimize anyone that questions you or your intent. You seek refuge and mercy from those who do not understand you or pity you. You find nothing. Your animalistic behavior tends to control whatever decency you have left as a human being. Am I getting close?

I MUST HAVE HURT YOUR FEELINGS WITH SUCH A LONG ASS STUPID REPLY, YOU BUCKET OF SHIT!

I recorded this song SUXK MY BUTTHOLE just for people like YOU!!!




Nigga.....please. You didn't touch a nerve. Your cry baby tactics don't work on me. Roflmmfao.


YOU FUCKIN GOT A TINGE OF PAIN IN YOUR HEART, YOU GOT ALL UP IN YOUR FEELINS, WHORE SACK... YOU CAN PRETEND, BUT WE KNOW THE TRUTH, BEEFSTEAK TWAT.



I can imagine that you imagine my beefsteak twat in your mouth on an hourly basis but it will be our secret. I won't tell a soul.


I DON'T GIVE A FUCK, I'LL SUCK YOUR CUNT... IVE HAD WORSE IN MY MOUTH, LIKE YOUR COCK, BUT I DIG TRANS BITCHES... YOU ARE PASSABLE IN MY BOOK, THAT CAN BE OUR SECRET. DICK GIRL!
 

Breakfall

Such is life...
Site Supporter
Messages
47,898
Location
Great Southern Land
The rule says N
Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.

When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.

At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.


It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.

You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.

Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!

You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!

I am going to say this once more, and if you make that claim again, you're on ignore. I do not support pedophiles, liar. I am a mother, you total piece of shit. I would gladly murder any pedophile. ANY pedophile. But you never offered any proof that Maxis is any such thing. I asked you repeatedly to show me proof, and you kept posting links to google. I googled him, you asshole. I saw no evidence of PLEASE ASS BOX ME!. I would have blasted him here gladly if I had seen anything. But I didn't, and I'm not taking your hysterical word for it. You are a jerkoff.
I’m not reading your repetitive shit fuckwit. You don’t fucking listen and you don’t do adequate research. You’re an irritating leftard and I’ll never allow you to do pee-pee in my mouth if I was single.
Put me on ignore and be done with it. Clown!
 

LotusBud

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
19,145
Location
Portugal
The rule says N
Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.

When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.

At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.


It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.

You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.

Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!

You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!

I am going to say this once more, and if you make that claim again, you're on ignore. I do not support pedophiles, liar. I am a mother, you total piece of shit. I would gladly murder any pedophile. ANY pedophile. But you never offered any proof that Maxis is any such thing. I asked you repeatedly to show me proof, and you kept posting links to google. I googled him, you asshole. I saw no evidence of PLEASE ASS BOX ME!. I would have blasted him here gladly if I had seen anything. But I didn't, and I'm not taking your hysterical word for it. You are a jerkoff.
I’m not reading your repetitive shit fuckwit. You don’t fucking listen and you don’t do adequate research. You’re an irritating leftard and I’ll never allow you to do pee-pee in my mouth if I was single.
Put me on ignore and be done with it. Clown!

Done, PLEASE ASS BOX ME!!

I finally realized you were jealous of Q because you wanted to be the Alpha PLEASE ASS BOX ME! here.
 

Breakfall

Such is life...
Site Supporter
Messages
47,898
Location
Great Southern Land
The rule says N
Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.

When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.

At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.


It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.

You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.

Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!

You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!

I am going to say this once more, and if you make that claim again, you're on ignore. I do not support pedophiles, liar. I am a mother, you total piece of shit. I would gladly murder any pedophile. ANY pedophile. But you never offered any proof that Maxis is any such thing. I asked you repeatedly to show me proof, and you kept posting links to google. I googled him, you asshole. I saw no evidence of PLEASE ASS BOX ME!. I would have blasted him here gladly if I had seen anything. But I didn't, and I'm not taking your hysterical word for it. You are a jerkoff.
I’m not reading your repetitive shit fuckwit. You don’t fucking listen and you don’t do adequate research. You’re an irritating leftard and I’ll never allow you to do pee-pee in my mouth if I was single.
Put me on ignore and be done with it. Clown!

Done, PLEASE ASS BOX ME!!

I finally realized you were jealous of Q because you wanted to be the Alpha PLEASE ASS BOX ME! here.
@LotusBud ...you were mocked for supporting your paedophile mate maxis735. You will never redeem yourself here, your time is done
 

LotusBud

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
19,145
Location
Portugal
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.
 

Blazor

Put your glasses on!
Site Supporter
Messages
27,508
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.

Um, it took more than Break's vote for MaxiPedo to be removed, in fact he got a lot of votes, and even after his "saves" by you fucks that give him a reach around, he still had 10 votes against him. FACT!
 

Omnipotent

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter
Messages
8,067
Location
Australia
Oh man, I HATE censorship! HATE IT!!!! Its why I never joined FB.

I will say, censoring stuff like that, is simply turning a blind eye to what it actually happening in the world. Personally I think people should know what is going on, and not live in Fantasy Land, where its all Rainbows and Unicorns.

Hell, I even made a meme, that showed 2 images long ago. It was when NY was trying to ban Big Gulp drinks. Yet, Obama was bombing children, and that was ok! So yes, I had an image of kids that been blown up with the caption "why is this ok", and the an image of a kid drinking the giant drink with the caption "but this is not?".

Do I think plastering images of dead kids all over the place is ok? Prolly not, cause some dont like the sight of it evidently. Though, if I prefer not to look at something, I just scroll faster lol. Do I think it should be Banned outright.... no, BUT, if its the rules, as stated, then its the rules.

CtVaMNcWcAAF2h0.jpg


Everyone knows dead kids exist silly (: it's the way the pics are used in jest and merely for cheap thrills.
BF banning that shit wouldn't be a middle finger to your view of censorship but more a finger to weak pricks to fuck off with that shit, we're adults here. bad enough you got the fuckstains that cry PEAODO every time they get their ass ripped open from a burn ffs

Nah man, I know you feel me, I get what you saying. For real lol.

But just think of how I just put it to Succubus, even posting a pic/gif/video of that Trump kid being attacked by kneegrows, wont be allowed. I dont like this idea.

kids get attacked everyday .... you marveling at a pic is gonna help ?? LOL

Kids die in earthquakes and other natural disasters along with adults and die in car accidents to. And then there are the brave body recoverers who clean up our messes.

I have a cousin who took forensic pictures of crime scenes but had to move out of that section of policing because it was an horrendous job on his mentality.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Messages
45,498
The rule says N
Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.

When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.

At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.


It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.

You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.

Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!

You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!

I am going to say this once more, and if you make that claim again, you're on ignore. I do not support pedophiles, liar. I am a mother, you total piece of shit. I would gladly murder any pedophile. ANY pedophile. But you never offered any proof that Maxis is any such thing. I asked you repeatedly to show me proof, and you kept posting links to google. I googled him, you asshole. I saw no evidence of PLEASE ASS BOX ME!. I would have blasted him here gladly if I had seen anything. But I didn't, and I'm not taking your hysterical word for it. You are a jerkoff.
I’m not reading your repetitive shit fuckwit. You don’t fucking listen and you don’t do adequate research. You’re an irritating leftard and I’ll never allow you to do pee-pee in my mouth if I was single.
Put me on ignore and be done with it. Clown!

Done, PLEASE ASS BOX ME!!

I finally realized you were jealous of Q because you wanted to be the Alpha PLEASE ASS BOX ME! here.
Impossible. Sewagemajor sites on that throne
 

LotusBud

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
19,145
Location
Portugal
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.

Um, it took more than Break's vote for MaxiPedo to be removed, in fact he got a lot of votes, and even after his "saves" by you fucks that give him a reach around, he still had 10 votes against him. FACT!

That's not the point. BF posted the poll after Brainfail spent MONTHS whinging about Q. And now he's telling me, after a few days, to shut up about child murder pics. My point is, he's a damn hypcrite. What is it that's so difficult to understand about that?

It's also very clear from this poll that the majority are not interested in seeing child mutilation and murder pics. Look at the damn numbers.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Messages
46,077
Location
United states
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.

Um, it took more than Break's vote for MaxiPedo to be removed, in fact he got a lot of votes, and even after his "saves" by you fucks that give him a reach around, he still had 10 votes against him. FACT!

That's not the point. BF posted the poll after Brainfail spent MONTHS whinging about Q. And now he's telling me, after a few days, to shut up about child murder pics. My point is, he's a damn hypcrite. What is it that's so difficult to understand about that?

It's also very clear from this poll that the majority are not interested in seeing child mutilation and murder pics. Look at the damn numbers.

I cannot stomach seeing dead children. It just disturbs me. I'm confident most people here feel the same.

The argument is more about censorship than whether or not anyone wants to see it.

The tos says no one under 18 should be in any images and I think it's totally possible to make decisions on that using context. Like a Blazor said....if it's a news story like Cannon, that's okay.

If its horrific violence for the sake of showing violence or something preverse....not okay.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Messages
45,498
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.

Um, it took more than Break's vote for MaxiPedo to be removed, in fact he got a lot of votes, and even after his "saves" by you fucks that give him a reach around, he still had 10 votes against him. FACT!

That's not the point. BF posted the poll after Brainfail spent MONTHS whinging about Q. And now he's telling me, after a few days, to shut up about child murder pics. My point is, he's a damn hypcrite. What is it that's so difficult to understand about that?

It's also very clear from this poll that the majority are not interested in seeing child mutilation and murder pics. Look at the damn numbers.
Why do you have such an unwavering affection for pedophiles?
 

SirSuperSouthern

It's Always 5:55, bitch.
Site Supporter
Messages
5,625
Location
meltdown
What about people like you who innocently frequent sites that sick bastards are naturally drawn to? Telling everyone else what's best for them! Thanks for playing, seriously...



SSS
- Just fine like you. Just fine like you. Just fine like you.
 

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
What about people like you who innocently frequent sites that sick bastards are naturally drawn to? Telling everyone else what's best for them! Thanks for playing, seriously...



SSS
- Just fine like you. Just fine like you. Just fine like you.


Sweety, step away from the voices....for 5 min. Follow the sound of MY voice. Let me bring you to the darkness....away from the light. Succumb to my will....my passion....my desire.....let me take your soul....I can make you feel sooo good......euphoric, even.
 

Mr. 5050

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
714
Location
Uk
I voted contain... It's gives you options... You can check it out if you like or not...
 

Adam Hitler

110/14/88
Site Supporter
Messages
32,862
Location
Where the Aryans are
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.

Well you are a condescending, snooty old crow..... these traits make it very easy to take a dislike to you.
 

Breakfall

Such is life...
Site Supporter
Messages
47,898
Location
Great Southern Land
@LotusBud, don’t even bother. They more you show outrage, the more they’ll demand that it stay. Why do you think I just shut up about the subject now?

I guess it's different for some members. Brainfail whinged and blubbered relentlessly, all over the forum, until Q got banned. I guess I should understand that he has standing and I don't.

Well you are a condescending, snooty old crow..... these traits make it very easy to take a dislike to you.
Humourless old trout was funny as fuck! :LOL2:
 

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
This shouldn't even be a poll because you're pretty much posting for permission to eradicate your own rule. Why do you need our input on how you run this forum? You are the boss! Opinions are bullshit. Follow your own rules and make others follow the same. Otherwise, it's a waste of fucking time making rules. You love me. Admit it. :Lovin1:

@Bastard Factory
 

LotusBud

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter ☠️
Messages
19,145
Location
Portugal
IMO, acting like a tough troll who can tolerate anything is not worth the price of giving up your humanity.
 

X

xXx
Site Supporter
Messages
41,499
Location
here
IMO, acting like a tough troll who can tolerate anything is not worth the price of giving up your humanity.



I agree, when it's used as a troll tactic .. real trolls riSe above that shit, look down, like as in an outer worldly way upon the lowly wigger and shake our collective heads and think ' poor fellow, look at him ... flailing about, look @me look @me '


LOLOL ... hold him still whilst we piSSssss upon his brow .. the lowly fuck, surely a lunch for this fellow consists of a meAtball sandwich extra bAll !


say my name !
A7FE17F94C41F5B62D68BA542A9425680E243900