- Messages
- 54,746
- Location
- Great Southern Land
You support paedophiles you twisted freak!I’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!The rule says N
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.
When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.
At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.
It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.
Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
You didn't explain anything at all. I KNOW his name is Maxis735, you dickbrain.