- Messages
- 372
- Location
- the insubstantial
So many rules lawyers. More directly, more importantly, is it intolerable to you? My intuition is that if it were so, our administrator would not be the one raising the issue.
Take a look around the world and smell the blood and gore of the ages. You leftists with your leftard approach could potentially cause a slaughterhouse of terrorism because of your lack of judgment and military experience with regard to other nations. You’ll fuck it up and the right will mop it up, as per usual.IMO, acting like a tough troll who can tolerate anything is not worth the price of giving up your humanity.
You are DUMB. The Lotusbud guy is right. Problems are created by the righties.Take a look around the world and smell the blood and gore of the ages. You leftists with your leftard approach could potentially cause a slaughterhouse of terrorism because of your lack of judgment and military experience with regard to other nations. You’ll fuck it up and the right will mop it up, as per usual.IMO, acting like a tough troll who can tolerate anything is not worth the price of giving up your humanity.
Wait... the kid gore was posted in meltdown to begin with?This is really not a problem here at all and we're not making a new, posted ruLe.
+ Soft RuLe #4
WILL REMOVE: All dead kid gore images OUTSIDE the Meltdown forum to Hardcore Guts and Gore.
WILL NOT REMOVE: News. Moderators decision.
Probably best some of you enter Meltdown with one eye closed as only 3 ruLes apply.
\Topic
I voted contain... It's gives you options... You can check it out if you like or not...
Anyone who wants to check it out is a sick fuck and shouldn't be allowed to breathe, let alone post.
I voted contain... It's gives you options... You can check it out if you like or not...
Anyone who wants to check it out is a sick fuck and shouldn't be allowed to breathe, let alone post.
I watch gore (mainly on FB) but draw the line at kids and animals... Something about their innocence and not fully understanding what's happening... I can't put my finger on exactly why but it gives me the sads...
Fully grown adults usually put themselves in a position where they should have known better, been more aware of their environment etc... There's still the odd freak occurrence that's out of anyone's control but few and far between...
I wouldn't call ppl sick or bad for watching any of the above though... Sometimes it's purely out of curiosity but as we all know, it can kill the cat, so best to have a TW or separate place for the kids/animals stuff... It's another level of head fuck...
I voted contain... It's gives you options... You can check it out if you like or not...
Anyone who wants to check it out is a sick fuck and shouldn't be allowed to breathe, let alone post.
I watch gore (mainly on FB) but draw the line at kids and animals... Something about their innocence and not fully understanding what's happening... I can't put my finger on exactly why but it gives me the sads...
Fully grown adults usually put themselves in a position where they should have known better, been more aware of their environment etc... There's still the odd freak occurrence that's out of anyone's control but few and far between...
I wouldn't call ppl sick or bad for watching any of the above though... Sometimes it's purely out of curiosity but as we all know, it can kill the cat, so best to have a TW or separate place for the kids/animals stuff... It's another level of head fuck...
You can't put your finger on why it gives you the sads? Okay, sociopath.
Why would anyone need the option? This is the only forum I've ever been on that even has it at all. It boggles the mind.
Everyone looking at pictures of children in some weird way is really sick and needs to be shot!I voted contain... It's gives you options... You can check it out if you like or not...
Anyone who wants to check it out is a sick fuck and shouldn't be allowed to breathe, let alone post.
I watch gore (mainly on FB) but draw the line at kids and animals... Something about their innocence and not fully understanding what's happening... I can't put my finger on exactly why but it gives me the sads...
Fully grown adults usually put themselves in a position where they should have known better, been more aware of their environment etc... There's still the odd freak occurrence that's out of anyone's control but few and far between...
I wouldn't call ppl sick or bad for watching any of the above though... Sometimes it's purely out of curiosity but as we all know, it can kill the cat, so best to have a TW or separate place for the kids/animals stuff... It's another level of head fuck...
You can't put your finger on why it gives you the sads? Okay, sociopath.
Why would anyone need the option? This is the only forum I've ever been on that even has it at all. It boggles the mind.
You are sick. Go shoot yourself in the head!We need GORE!!! STOP leftism!!!! OGRISH !!!!!! Once saided “can you handle life ===??” Go to Disney if you dont like GORE!!!!!!!! We need sick GORE”!!!!!
Everyone looking at pictures of children in some weird way is really sick and needs to be shot!
When you like looking at these pictures you need to be shot! Pedos do not deserve to live!Everyone looking at pictures of children in some weird way is really sick and needs to be shot!
Kids are not immune from being run over in a car, falling from windows or being killed...
Imo watching suffering for the sake of it is bad but I enjoy reading the cases backgrounds etc... By your rational, reading an illustrated book on serial killers means the person reading it deserves to be shot?... Now that's sociopathic...
I'm not sure you're grasping the subject matter here...When you like looking at these pictures you need to be shot! Pedos do not deserve to live!Everyone looking at pictures of children in some weird way is really sick and needs to be shot!
Kids are not immune from being run over in a car, falling from windows or being killed...
Imo watching suffering for the sake of it is bad but I enjoy reading the cases backgrounds etc... By your rational, reading an illustrated book on serial killers means the person reading it deserves to be shot?... Now that's sociopathic...
You sick pedos get off on dead kid pictures!I'm not sure you're grasping the subject matter here...When you like looking at these pictures you need to be shot! Pedos do not deserve to live!Everyone looking at pictures of children in some weird way is really sick and needs to be shot!
Kids are not immune from being run over in a car, falling from windows or being killed...
Imo watching suffering for the sake of it is bad but I enjoy reading the cases backgrounds etc... By your rational, reading an illustrated book on serial killers means the person reading it deserves to be shot?... Now that's sociopathic...
We're talking about gore/death vids and pics, not sexual vids/pics...
Pedos deserve the woodchipper but that's a totally different subject altogether...
You sick pedos get off on dead kid pictures!I'm not sure you're grasping the subject matter here...When you like looking at these pictures you need to be shot! Pedos do not deserve to live!Everyone looking at pictures of children in some weird way is really sick and needs to be shot!
Kids are not immune from being run over in a car, falling from windows or being killed...
Imo watching suffering for the sake of it is bad but I enjoy reading the cases backgrounds etc... By your rational, reading an illustrated book on serial killers means the person reading it deserves to be shot?... Now that's sociopathic...
We're talking about gore/death vids and pics, not sexual vids/pics...
Pedos deserve the woodchipper but that's a totally different subject altogether...
wait --- by fat Oink's wetback logic you're the pedophile here for saying thisI’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!The rule says N
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.
When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.
At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.
It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.
Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
wait --- by fat Oink's wetback logic you're the pedophile here for saying thisI’ve already explained that paedophile’s antics to you you stupid cunt. It’s all over the fucking internet too idiot!!! Look it up and see the underage porn pattern. His name is not Q...it’s maxis735. I fucking can’t stand you being on my forum bitch!The rule says N
The rule says NOTHING about 'sexually explicit.' Anyone with a soul should have a problem with posting pics of dead children ANYWHERE, but especially in random threads. It shouldn't just be me whinging about it.I didn’t see the picture. The rule applies to sexually explicit material of under 18 years old. It’s a grey area where a gore/ accident victim happens to be naked for whatever reason and is under 18 years old. Anyway...really not worth envisioning @LotusBud ’s panties in a tangle either. That bitch is fucking tiresome at the best of times...don’t encourage the humourless old trout!Hi @Succubus. Dealing with gore shouldn’t be restricted to adults. It’s gore. As far as children are involved, it depends on what context. I don’t like seeing dead foetus for example. But if a child is involved in a horrific accident and it’s graphic, it shouldn’t be any different from seeing an adult in the same circumstance.
Next minute it’ll be no females should be seen in gore, or no animals, or no black people, etc.
Censorship really needs context. I want to see the damage been done to innocents in Islamic states for example, but I don’t necessarily relish seeing it.
When I was part of the community on a gore site, some pics would turn my stomach, but I always had the choice of looking away or not opening the segment from the outset.
At the end of the day I’ve had an absolute fucking gutful with the leftards that have recently joined Bastard Factory and their “political agenda”, that will all be changing very fucking soon.
It's not gore in general. It's children. The rules clearly state no images of anyone under the age of 18. Holliday was made to remove a pic or it was removed for him because a model appeared to be under age. The rules do not specify the "type" of picture that may not be posted. It just states "under the age of 18" and clearly any child (dead or not) being posted is against BF's rule. There is a thread for gore pictures but even children shouldn't be allowed to be posted in that thread per BF's rule. If that's the case, BF should remove his rule pertaining to no images of anyone under the age of 18 to be posted. I'm not against BF and this is his site but there is a reason rules are posted for this community to follow. No rule should be limited to just one person. We all have to abide by the rules here.
You went insane about Q being a pedophile, yet he posted NO sexually explicit pics of children here, and you posted no evidence, ever, that he was a pedophile. Still, you went fucking postal until he was banned, you fucking hypocrite.
Talk about humorless people with their panties in a twist. Pot/kettle. Whinger.
Oink Oink