Nowhere was this demonstrated more quickly than in the case of the meteoric rise and equally rapid fall of Andy Ngo, the provocateur and social media personality who garnered nationwide sympathy last June, when he tweeted that he was attacked by antifascist protesters at a 
 rally. Last week, the local newspaper the 
Portland Mercury  that a left-wing activist going undercover as a member of Patriot Prayer, a far-right group known for promoting and engaging in violent clashes with leftist activists, had given the publication an 18-minute video that included footage of Ngo with a group of Patriot Prayer members as the members discuss an upcoming brawl, including weaponry to be used in altercations with 
. Ngo, who describes himself as a journalist, did not record the conversation, and does not appear to have his camera or notebook out. For part of the footage, he is seen on his phone.
RELATED
The source told the 
Mercury that Ngo and Patriot Prayer have an “understanding” that the group offers him protection when he covers rallies in exchange for favorable coverage. While this has not been confirmed, and Ngo strongly denies these allegations, an audio 
 between members of the Proud Boys, released by 
Willamette Week seemed to confirm that such discussions between Ngo and the Proud Boys had occurred, as one man is recorded saying that Ngo was attacked on June 29th because he refused an offer of protection. “Andy Ngo was fucking told that if he wanted protection from the PBs [Proud Boys], he went in with us and he went out with us,” the man says.
When reached for comment, Ngo directed 
Rolling Stone to his attorney Harmeet Dhillon, who refuted the allegations made by the 
Portland Mercury.
 “There have been suggestions made by that story and others that he is part of that group or embedded in that group or took protection from that group, which is absolutely false,” she tells 
Rolling Stone. 
Nonetheless, the footage was highly embarrassing for Ngo, who has long claimed to be an independent and objective journalist, despite many left-wing activists in Portland accusing him of antagonizing them at rallies and selectively editing his footage to malign the left. Shortly after the footage was released, Quillette, a “free thought” publication with a libertarian bent,  
 though founder Claire Lehmann 
 to the Daily Beast that it had anything to do with the recently surfaced Patriot Prayer footage, as did Ngo in an op-ed published by the 
Spectator. (When asked about this, Dhillon says, “the suggestion that the video coming out is tied with [Ngo cutting ties with Quillette] is false and defamatory.”)
But the issue wasn’t so much that Ngo had finally been “exposed” as a right-wing provocateur as opposed to a journalist. It was that he’d managed to successfully convince so many ostensibly reasonable people otherwise, despite significant evidence to the contrary — and, in so doing, did some serious damage in the process.
Ngo has a long and rich history of trolling those on the left. While getting his master’s degree in political science at Portland State, he became convinced that a “social justice frenzy” was rapidly sweeping the nation, as he told a reporter who profiled him for 
 becoming particularly focused on what he viewed as the increasingly urgent threat of Islam. In 2017, Ngo attended an interfaith student panel and tweeted a paraphrase of a Muslim student’s comments about how non-Muslims would be treated in an Islamic state. After he posted the tweet, which used inflammatory language out of context, Ngo was fired from the campus newspaper, the 
Portland State Vanguard. At the time, the 
 said the firing was not motivated by partisanship, and that Ngo was removed from his post because the tweet was a “half-truth” that “incited a reaction and implicated the student panelist,” thus putting them in imminent jeopardy. But 
 and other national right-wing news outlets salivated over the story, painting Ngo as an innocent victim on the pyre of political correctness and liberal media bias.
It was the experience of getting fired that apparently gave Ngo his first taste of martyrdom. He started fashioning himself as a gonzo independent journalist of sorts, showing up at various far-right rallies in Portland, a city that has increasingly become a battleground of the culture wars. He developed a knack for obtaining footage of anti-fascist protesters that leaned into preconceived notions of radical leftists, making them look violent, red-faced, angry, or even just irrational, a gimmick that landed him a handful of spots as a commentator on Fox News. He also found the time to rack up a few bylines, penning an investigation into 
 for the 
New York Post, which notably quoted a gay Proud Boys member as saying it was “the most welcoming organization that I have ever been a part of.”
But it wasn’t until Ngo was attacked at the June rally that he truly ascended to the ranks of right-wing media shit-stirrer. “Attacked by antifa. Bleeding. They stole my camera equipment. No police until after. waiting for ambulance . If you have evidence Of attack please help,” he tweeted, later adding that he had been diagnosed at the ER with a brain hemorrhage and that antifa had thrown quick-dry cement milkshakes at him. (This claim was later 
.) Footage also surfaced on Twitter of Ngo at the rally, being doused with a milkshake and silly string, and getting punched by an antifascist protester.
Almost immediately, Ngo garnered tremendous sympathy from both sides of the political aisle, even raising $195,000 from a GoFundMe set up following the altercation. GOP leader Kevin McCarthy swiftly condemned the anti-fascist protesters, saying, “The hate and violence perpetrated by Antifa must be condemned in the strongest possible way by all Americans. I pray for full and speedy recovery for journalist Andy Ngo,” while Sen. Ted Cruz rallied for antifa to be labeled a domestic terrorist threat. CNN anchor Jake Tapper retweeted an interview with Ngo condemning antifa, and Democratic candidates Andrew Yang, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and Sen. Joe Biden also weighed in to defend Ngo, with a campaign spokesperson for the former vice president
New York Post, “violence directed at anyone because of their political opinions is never acceptable, regardless of what those beliefs might be,” and that “Andy Ngo’s attackers should be identified and investigated.”
Immediately, he metamorphosed from being just another right-wing troll scrambling for attention to a blank slate, a canvas onto which political figures and journalists of all stripes could project their goals and desires. For those on the right, condemning the boogeyman of antifa was a no-brainer, an easy and convenient way to score points with the base; for those on the left, it was an opportunity to telegraph being fair, rational, and level-headed, while simultaneously taking a few steps away from their black-clad brethren further left. And for members of the media, the industry to which Ngo ostensibly belonged, it was an opportunity to demonstrate, in the face of constant and unrelenting allegations of liberal bias, just how unbiased they could be.
What the buttoned-up campaign spokespeople and hair-shellacked CNN anchors could not have predicted, however, was that the legitimizing of Ngo would come at a cost. Not only did Ngo become a far more prominent media presence, warranting an expansive (if critical) profile in Buzzfeed and a byline in 
The Spectator, the world’s 
, he would also become the driving force behind — as Tess Owen of Vice
 — the increasingly hostile “national attitudes toward the decentralized [antifa] activist movement.” The coverage of the Portland attack helped to spur Sen. Ted Cruz’s bill to designate antifa as a terrorist organization, which was 
 in Congress in July. In the hours following the mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, which took more than 20 people’s lives, Ngo was 
 in promoting the conspiracy theory that antifa had played a role; when that was thoroughly debunked, he helped perpetuate the theory that the man behind the Dayton, Ohio shooting was a 
, despite the fact that there is no evidence he was involved in local activism or organizing.
Even if Ngo himself were a fraudulent journalist, and the victim narrative he promoted was also under fraudulent pretenses, his ability to get bad ideas in front of a mainstream audience was all too real. Because above all else, the attack on Ngo — and his ability to successfully spin it into a lucrative and semi-legitimate media career — appeared to shift the narrative regarding extremist violence more toward the far right’s favor. For groups like Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys, “what allegedly happened to Andy Ngo was 
 for them in a lot of ways,” Keegan Hankes, a researcher and analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center, previously told 
Rolling Stone. “It got a lot of media attention and it reinforced something the Proud Boys have pushed for years, which is the real threat is the violent left.”
The issue with this narrative is that this is verifiably not the case; though members of antifa have committed violent acts, that number is dwarfed by those committed by far-right extremists, says Hankes. That’s also the truth according to FBI director Christopher Wray, who has 
 that white supremacists constitute “the vast majority” of domestic terrorism threats. And when considering the very real, very immediate threat of far-right radicalization, promoting the conspiracy theories of a huckster like Ngo serves as little more than a distraction.
While the 
Portland Mercury story could cost him whatever was left of his mainstream reputation, it certainly won’t cost him his career. In the ever-expanding right-wing media ecosystem, there is plenty of room for trolls with a knack for video-editing software and gaming Twitter to find an audience, particularly if they are telling that audience what they know they want to hear. It should, however, serve as a chastening teachable moment to those who took him seriously, if only for a short time. That way, when some other ambitious young man with slick and dangerous ideas starts quacking, we’ll all know exactly what to call him.
Lil Uzi Vert Is Apparently Buying a Planet — and It’s a Real Steal | RS News 7/23/21
Lil Uzi Vert is reportedly buying a planet and, according to Yale astronomy professor Gregory Laughlin, it’s a steal. Get the full story at: 
0 seconds of 1 minute, 47 secondsVolume 0%
In This Article: 
, 
, 
Want more Rolling Stone? 
SPONSORED STORIES
ADVERTISEMENT
Popular in the Community
Conversation387 Comments
Your voice matters. Conversations are moderated for civility. Read our guidelines 
here.
Commenting as Guest
Log In
Sort by 
Best
 green moustache
 30 July, 2020
 
 EJ Dickson you should be ashamed and retract this, especially in light of what antifa has been perpetrating in the last couple of months. Regardless of what Andy Ngo believes or how he communicates it, no person deserves to be targeted, hit with projectiles, beaten or robbed. Violence is only ok def...See more
 Reply
 
 304
 
 47- 
 JJMAC
 26 September, 2020
 Replying to green moustache
 
 As a woman I am genuinely disturbed at how many woman are in defence of these organizations. Too stupid unfortunately to connect the dots, know their history, and know where this leads. They were a massive part of Hitlers rise as well.
 Reply
 
 67
 
 18
 
 2 replies
 
 Show 1 more reply
 nunya
 8 September, 2020
 
 I don't think Andy needs to manipulate anything to make Antifa look bad. They do enough of that on their own. People are finally waking up to the fact that Antifa is a disguise for a marxist revolution
 Reply
 
 199
 
 32
 
 1 reply
 Dancehall
 11 August, 2020
 
 I’m proud of all these comments calling out this article.
 Reply
 
 232
 
 29- 
 martine
 21 July, 2021
 Replying to Dancehall
 
 I feel the same. You can't overlook violence.
 Reply
 
 3
 
 
 GoldPumpkin
 30 September, 2020
 Replying to Dancehall
 
 THANK YOU VERY MUCH MY FRIEND. And I'm proud of you as well.
 Reply
 
 18
 
 19
 
 Erwin Schrödinger
 23 August, 2020
 
 Andy Ngo appears to be a spot-on, honest reporter of what is going on today on our city streets. It would be worderful if established newspapers such as the New York Times had as high a record for honest and accuracy.
 Reply
 
 162
 
 34- 
 JJMAC
 26 September, 2020
 Replying to Erwin Schrödinger
 
 Given how much money the New York Times takes from the CCP now to publish content disguised as news, are you really surprised? Media and journalism lost their way. The only thing that may salvage it is full and radical transparency around ownership and special interests and the same for the journali...See more
 Reply
 
 36
 
 19
 
 1 reply
 
 Sergey Lutsenko
 29 August, 2020
 
 That writing is actually shame. But keep going, that just makes November surprise even more likely.
 Reply
 
 96
 
 22
 
 1 reply
 OliveCar
 29 April, 2020
 
 Wow, this article is dishonest! 3rd paragraph implies Andy Ngo has an agreement with the PBs (then later admits that he is reported as rejecting the offer of protection from the PBs.) Here are some facts: Andy Ngo is a tiny guy, totally non-threatening physically. He's a credentialled journalist. H...See more
 Reply
 
 236
 
 34- 
 pablosodahead
 3 July, 2021
 Replying to Guest
 
 Rolling Stone has done little to show for changing its spots.  It has not and has not for years.  Just review its history in 'journalism' .   End of story.
 Reply
 
 3
 
 
 Show 2 more replies
 Tim
 3 September, 2020
 
 Well... this aged well.
 Reply
 
 36
 
 4- 
 GreenAnchor
 30 November, 2020
 Replying to Tim
 
 Turns out there are outlets with even lower standards than Quillette, like Newsweek
 Reply
 
 8
 
 5
 
 Show 1 more reply
 GoldMagnet
 12 February, 2020
 
 Did you know that he had a medically diagnosed brain hemorrhage after this?
 Reply
 
 85
 
 19- 
 Ngo’s a hack
 2 March, 2021
 Replying to Guest
 
 Which he never was able to prove, and immediately jumped on a plane.   Fun fact: people with traumatic brain injuries are explicitly told by doctors to not fly.
 Reply
 
 16
 
 23
 
 1 reply
 
 Show 1 more reply
 Alex Reynard
 18 July, 2020
 
 It is absolutely disgusting that you are painting the villain as the victim and the victim as the villain. You are no better than the fashionable American intellectuals in the 1930s who defended Hitler at cocktail parties. What an embarrassment to your beginnings you've become, Rolling Stone.
 Reply
 
 188
 
 22
 CyanSushi
 9 June, 2020
 
 Decades ago I was a house player at at Plant Studio in Sausalito and there was always a copy of Rolling Stone...always.  Back then the mag was cutting edge but today they are just a pipe organ for politics.  Saying the ANTIFA image has been manipulated is like saying the KKK image has been manipulat...See more
 Reply
 
 99
 
 15
 
 1 reply
Show More Comments
Feedback