You make statements with no evidence, all the time.
There are things that can be deduced.
Since the indian tribes in North America did not write things down, other than crude paintings, we are left to speculate to some degree.
We know some tribes conquered other tribes to increase their territory. It only makes sense that they would have spread it further across the ocean if they were able. Especially if they knew there were people across the ocean planning to do the same.
You objected to something I said earlier. You asked for evidence. I wanted to provide evidence through deduction, but you ignored my question.
When you give a whole bunch of people an excuse to fail, many will take you up on it.
This is what the CRT does to many black people. It gives them a free pass to fail, so they fail, without having to take any personal responsibility.
Please provide evidence for this allegation. The second part of your post.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement:
"When you give a whole bunch of people an excuse to fail, many will take you up on it."
?
Yes, you wanted "evidence".
And yes, a Google search was not going to find direct evidence in the form of some study or some statement by someone you trust.
So I was going to have to formulate an argument.
And yes, when I formulate an argument, sometimes I need to take it step-by-step and get agreement, or disagreement, along the way so I know the exact point that is contentious.
I mean, if you just want to discuss things that can be discovered by a simple Google search, that is fine.
But some conversation requires knowledge of human behaviour, some "common sense" level of speculation, and even sometimes critical thinking.
