Y'all ready for Civil War 2.0?

[LotusBud]

What a bunch of clueless fuckwits.

Whites were slaves too. Yes they got bad treatment too.

Slaves were in the North and South.

Slaves that went to the North, found ill treatment, and kept going to Canada, or went back South.

Im here all day.

I don't think that official slavery existed for Whites in the antebellum South, Blazor.
Nor was their official slave trade for them.
Plus I believe even the poorest Whites culd vote in Presidential elections back then.
Just men tho as women didn't have the right to vote.

If you make reference to White Slavery in the South, perhaps it was prevelant in the prison system there.

I think there were huge prison colonies i places like Georgia for example

And these housed many poor Whites.

These predated the existence of hte United States as a country, and were introduced by the British, much like they had done in Australia.

Before the first person, a black man, claimed his slaves (white and black) were his property, it was indentured servitude, for whites and blacks. Then becoming free after so many years. Only those who had committed crimes had to do life long slavery. So thank a black man next time you hear of slavery.

Whites who did not own land could not vote back then, if Im not mistaken. That law was changed though.

...so the antebellum South was more like an Athenian democracy in Ancient Greece?

Where they had a patrician land owning class that could vote, but plebian or working class could not?

Early on yes. Here is a good article on the matter......

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yes, some of our founders didn't want the white male riff-raff voting, never mind blacks or women.

After reading that article, I can see why. Land owners were the tax payers. Back then, if you were not a tax payer, you really didnt bother with politics. Only informed people (tax payers) were able to vote.

It's undemocratic. If you pay rent, you contribute to your community. If you work in the community, you contribute to it. Why deny the voice of all citizens?

This is an argument I've heard advanced.

That the purpose of the Electoral College was to favor land owners, particularly large ones.
So this arrangment helped to reinforce the institution of slavery.
Because of course, who owned them? The slave owneers.
To what the USA has today is that a typical voter in Los Angeles, has much smaller clout per vote than one in a rural state with few people.

That was very much its original purpose. And it explains why the alt-rght are so in love with the electoral college. They are clinging to one of the last vestiges of slavery.

Clearly you dont understand what the electoral college IS. We are a Republic, where every individuals vote matters.

YOU want it gone because you've been sold an ideology that tells you the majority is the people. Its NOT. It's a tyranny.

A full blown majority rule democracy SQUASHES the voices of the marginalized. You know....the little guy?

Here is the best comparison.

Democracy is the will of the majority. You know what else is the will of the majority? GANG RAPE.

When you speak about the majority, are you speaking about the US public that voted fatso out?

The people that played themselves? Who voted in Biden and aren't even watching what happens?

No. I'm talking about what would happen if we had no electoral college at all.

Then your hero would have been voted out the first time around.

Well, right. Because the whole country would be ran by CA and NY.

No one else would have a voice in anything federal. In a Constitutional Republic, the electrical college allows everyone to have a say in their own interests. Although in states.. I know MI gets ran by cities that are heavily populated and keep voting for the democrat.

No elected official is anyone "hero" but they are our representatives.

Still Dovey, what seems to be wrong with the Electoral College is that it's a winner take all system which doesn't reflect the popular vote within the States that determine themselves. i.e. - Michigan - if a Democrat wins by .005% of the vote, he gets all the EV's. That doesn't seem very fair. Even if the Republicans get 49.9995%, but not 50, they git nothin'!

That's the shits. They should split them up according to vote.

Also Georgia, the Democrats won by 12,000 votes - they get the whole state.

Like Michigan another close state which should be split by popular vote.

Anyways, I think it was an early US President who was uncomfortable with that winner take all system and thought it would lead to problems down the road.

Joe its NOT supposed to reflect the popular vote. That's the point. We want EVERYONES voice heard.

The popular vote is just the tyranny of the majority. We are a country whose values are rooted in individual liberties and rights. We are not a collective.

But the people living in states such as yours could demand that the Electoral votes be split up according to % of votes received.

It's absurd that Republicans who received 49% of the vote in Michigan last time didn't get any EV's and were shut out of the tally.

Actually I saw this video on YouTube from what appears to be a pro-Democrat & even he indicated that if the EV's were split in each state according to that formula, the last election would have been a lot closer & Trump would have received 30 more electoral votes.

The electoral college as it stands now is anti-democratic. It's fascistic, IMO. Both parties can rig elections at this point. The RNC does every bit as much rearranging of the deck chairs as the DNC does.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

What a bunch of clueless fuckwits.

Whites were slaves too. Yes they got bad treatment too.

Slaves were in the North and South.

Slaves that went to the North, found ill treatment, and kept going to Canada, or went back South.

Im here all day.

I don't think that official slavery existed for Whites in the antebellum South, Blazor.
Nor was their official slave trade for them.
Plus I believe even the poorest Whites culd vote in Presidential elections back then.
Just men tho as women didn't have the right to vote.

If you make reference to White Slavery in the South, perhaps it was prevelant in the prison system there.

I think there were huge prison colonies i places like Georgia for example

And these housed many poor Whites.

These predated the existence of hte United States as a country, and were introduced by the British, much like they had done in Australia.

Before the first person, a black man, claimed his slaves (white and black) were his property, it was indentured servitude, for whites and blacks. Then becoming free after so many years. Only those who had committed crimes had to do life long slavery. So thank a black man next time you hear of slavery.

Whites who did not own land could not vote back then, if Im not mistaken. That law was changed though.

...so the antebellum South was more like an Athenian democracy in Ancient Greece?

Where they had a patrician land owning class that could vote, but plebian or working class could not?

Early on yes. Here is a good article on the matter......

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yes, some of our founders didn't want the white male riff-raff voting, never mind blacks or women.

After reading that article, I can see why. Land owners were the tax payers. Back then, if you were not a tax payer, you really didnt bother with politics. Only informed people (tax payers) were able to vote.

It's undemocratic. If you pay rent, you contribute to your community. If you work in the community, you contribute to it. Why deny the voice of all citizens?

This is an argument I've heard advanced.

That the purpose of the Electoral College was to favor land owners, particularly large ones.
So this arrangment helped to reinforce the institution of slavery.
Because of course, who owned them? The slave owneers.
To what the USA has today is that a typical voter in Los Angeles, has much smaller clout per vote than one in a rural state with few people.

That was very much its original purpose. And it explains why the alt-rght are so in love with the electoral college. They are clinging to one of the last vestiges of slavery.

Clearly you dont understand what the electoral college IS. We are a Republic, where every individuals vote matters.

YOU want it gone because you've been sold an ideology that tells you the majority is the people. Its NOT. It's a tyranny.

A full blown majority rule democracy SQUASHES the voices of the marginalized. You know....the little guy?

Here is the best comparison.

Democracy is the will of the majority. You know what else is the will of the majority? GANG RAPE.

When you speak about the majority, are you speaking about the US public that voted fatso out?

The people that played themselves? Who voted in Biden and aren't even watching what happens?

No. I'm talking about what would happen if we had no electoral college at all.

Then your hero would have been voted out the first time around.

Well, right. Because the whole country would be ran by CA and NY.

No one else would have a voice in anything federal. In a Constitutional Republic, the electrical college allows everyone to have a say in their own interests. Although in states.. I know MI gets ran by cities that are heavily populated and keep voting for the democrat.

No elected official is anyone "hero" but they are our representatives.

Still Dovey, what seems to be wrong with the Electoral College is that it's a winner take all system which doesn't reflect the popular vote within the States that determine themselves. i.e. - Michigan - if a Democrat wins by .005% of the vote, he gets all the EV's. That doesn't seem very fair. Even if the Republicans get 49.9995%, but not 50, they git nothin'!

That's the shits. They should split them up according to vote.

Also Georgia, the Democrats won by 12,000 votes - they get the whole state.

Like Michigan another close state which should be split by popular vote.

Anyways, I think it was an early US President who was uncomfortable with that winner take all system and thought it would lead to problems down the road.

Joe its NOT supposed to reflect the popular vote. That's the point. We want EVERYONES voice heard.

The popular vote is just the tyranny of the majority. We are a country whose values are rooted in individual liberties and rights. We are not a collective.

But the people living in states such as yours could demand that the Electoral votes be split up according to % of votes received.

It's absurd that Republicans who received 49% of the vote in Michigan last time didn't get any EV's and were shut out of the tally.

Actually I saw this video on YouTube from what appears to be a pro-Democrat & even he indicated that if the EV's were split in each state according to that formula, the last election would have been a lot closer & Trump would have received 30 more electoral votes.

The electoral college as it stands now is anti-democratic. It's fascistic, IMO. Both parties can rig elections at this point. The RNC does every bit as much rearranging of the deck chairs as the DNC does.

And so how do you propose to preseve the interests of lets say a Connecticut or a Wyoming in this Federation of States which we have?

just allow California and New York to dictate the outcome of every Federal election for the next thousand years?

 

[Joe]

What a bunch of clueless fuckwits.

Whites were slaves too. Yes they got bad treatment too.

Slaves were in the North and South.

Slaves that went to the North, found ill treatment, and kept going to Canada, or went back South.

Im here all day.

I don't think that official slavery existed for Whites in the antebellum South, Blazor.
Nor was their official slave trade for them.
Plus I believe even the poorest Whites culd vote in Presidential elections back then.
Just men tho as women didn't have the right to vote.

If you make reference to White Slavery in the South, perhaps it was prevelant in the prison system there.

I think there were huge prison colonies i places like Georgia for example

And these housed many poor Whites.

These predated the existence of hte United States as a country, and were introduced by the British, much like they had done in Australia.

Before the first person, a black man, claimed his slaves (white and black) were his property, it was indentured servitude, for whites and blacks. Then becoming free after so many years. Only those who had committed crimes had to do life long slavery. So thank a black man next time you hear of slavery.

Whites who did not own land could not vote back then, if Im not mistaken. That law was changed though.

...so the antebellum South was more like an Athenian democracy in Ancient Greece?

Where they had a patrician land owning class that could vote, but plebian or working class could not?

Early on yes. Here is a good article on the matter......

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yes, some of our founders didn't want the white male riff-raff voting, never mind blacks or women.

After reading that article, I can see why. Land owners were the tax payers. Back then, if you were not a tax payer, you really didnt bother with politics. Only informed people (tax payers) were able to vote.

It's undemocratic. If you pay rent, you contribute to your community. If you work in the community, you contribute to it. Why deny the voice of all citizens?

This is an argument I've heard advanced.

That the purpose of the Electoral College was to favor land owners, particularly large ones.
So this arrangment helped to reinforce the institution of slavery.
Because of course, who owned them? The slave owneers.
To what the USA has today is that a typical voter in Los Angeles, has much smaller clout per vote than one in a rural state with few people.

That was very much its original purpose. And it explains why the alt-rght are so in love with the electoral college. They are clinging to one of the last vestiges of slavery.

Clearly you dont understand what the electoral college IS. We are a Republic, where every individuals vote matters.

YOU want it gone because you've been sold an ideology that tells you the majority is the people. Its NOT. It's a tyranny.

A full blown majority rule democracy SQUASHES the voices of the marginalized. You know....the little guy?

Here is the best comparison.

Democracy is the will of the majority. You know what else is the will of the majority? GANG RAPE.

When you speak about the majority, are you speaking about the US public that voted fatso out?

The people that played themselves? Who voted in Biden and aren't even watching what happens?

No. I'm talking about what would happen if we had no electoral college at all.

Then your hero would have been voted out the first time around.

Well, right. Because the whole country would be ran by CA and NY.

No one else would have a voice in anything federal. In a Constitutional Republic, the electrical college allows everyone to have a say in their own interests. Although in states.. I know MI gets ran by cities that are heavily populated and keep voting for the democrat.

No elected official is anyone "hero" but they are our representatives.

Still Dovey, what seems to be wrong with the Electoral College is that it's a winner take all system which doesn't reflect the popular vote within the States that determine themselves. i.e. - Michigan - if a Democrat wins by .005% of the vote, he gets all the EV's. That doesn't seem very fair. Even if the Republicans get 49.9995%, but not 50, they git nothin'!

That's the shits. They should split them up according to vote.

Also Georgia, the Democrats won by 12,000 votes - they get the whole state.

Like Michigan another close state which should be split by popular vote.

Anyways, I think it was an early US President who was uncomfortable with that winner take all system and thought it would lead to problems down the road.

Joe its NOT supposed to reflect the popular vote. That's the point. We want EVERYONES voice heard.

The popular vote is just the tyranny of the majority. We are a country whose values are rooted in individual liberties and rights. We are not a collective.

But the people living in states such as yours could demand that the Electoral votes be split up according to % of votes received.

It's absurd that Republicans who received 49% of the vote in Michigan last time didn't get any EV's and were shut out of the tally.

Actually I saw this video on YouTube from what appears to be a pro-Democrat & even he indicated that if the EV's were split in each state according to that formula, the last election would have been a lot closer & Trump would have received 30 more electoral votes.

The electoral college as it stands now is anti-democratic. It's fascistic, IMO. Both parties can rig elections at this point. The RNC does every bit as much rearranging of the deck chairs as the DNC does.

Given their vote share, The Republicans should also be getting a share of the electoral votes in California.
Likewise, Democrats would get their share in Texas.

right now, the current system in the US favors one where the 2 main parties only show up in the Battleground States during the election time. Perhaps winner take all affects which states get federal funds & projects too?

so it seems that getting rid of the winner take all might get rid of this Battleground state mentality & allow other states to get more.

 

[Dove]

What a bunch of clueless fuckwits.

Whites were slaves too. Yes they got bad treatment too.

Slaves were in the North and South.

Slaves that went to the North, found ill treatment, and kept going to Canada, or went back South.

Im here all day.

I don't think that official slavery existed for Whites in the antebellum South, Blazor.
Nor was their official slave trade for them.
Plus I believe even the poorest Whites culd vote in Presidential elections back then.
Just men tho as women didn't have the right to vote.

If you make reference to White Slavery in the South, perhaps it was prevelant in the prison system there.

I think there were huge prison colonies i places like Georgia for example

And these housed many poor Whites.

These predated the existence of hte United States as a country, and were introduced by the British, much like they had done in Australia.

Before the first person, a black man, claimed his slaves (white and black) were his property, it was indentured servitude, for whites and blacks. Then becoming free after so many years. Only those who had committed crimes had to do life long slavery. So thank a black man next time you hear of slavery.

Whites who did not own land could not vote back then, if Im not mistaken. That law was changed though.

...so the antebellum South was more like an Athenian democracy in Ancient Greece?

Where they had a patrician land owning class that could vote, but plebian or working class could not?

Early on yes. Here is a good article on the matter......

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yes, some of our founders didn't want the white male riff-raff voting, never mind blacks or women.

After reading that article, I can see why. Land owners were the tax payers. Back then, if you were not a tax payer, you really didnt bother with politics. Only informed people (tax payers) were able to vote.

It's undemocratic. If you pay rent, you contribute to your community. If you work in the community, you contribute to it. Why deny the voice of all citizens?

This is an argument I've heard advanced.

That the purpose of the Electoral College was to favor land owners, particularly large ones.
So this arrangment helped to reinforce the institution of slavery.
Because of course, who owned them? The slave owneers.
To what the USA has today is that a typical voter in Los Angeles, has much smaller clout per vote than one in a rural state with few people.

That was very much its original purpose. And it explains why the alt-rght are so in love with the electoral college. They are clinging to one of the last vestiges of slavery.

Clearly you dont understand what the electoral college IS. We are a Republic, where every individuals vote matters.

YOU want it gone because you've been sold an ideology that tells you the majority is the people. Its NOT. It's a tyranny.

A full blown majority rule democracy SQUASHES the voices of the marginalized. You know....the little guy?

Here is the best comparison.

Democracy is the will of the majority. You know what else is the will of the majority? GANG RAPE.

When you speak about the majority, are you speaking about the US public that voted fatso out?

The people that played themselves? Who voted in Biden and aren't even watching what happens?

No. I'm talking about what would happen if we had no electoral college at all.

Then your hero would have been voted out the first time around.

Well, right. Because the whole country would be ran by CA and NY.

No one else would have a voice in anything federal. In a Constitutional Republic, the electrical college allows everyone to have a say in their own interests. Although in states.. I know MI gets ran by cities that are heavily populated and keep voting for the democrat.

No elected official is anyone "hero" but they are our representatives.

Still Dovey, what seems to be wrong with the Electoral College is that it's a winner take all system which doesn't reflect the popular vote within the States that determine themselves. i.e. - Michigan - if a Democrat wins by .005% of the vote, he gets all the EV's. That doesn't seem very fair. Even if the Republicans get 49.9995%, but not 50, they git nothin'!

That's the shits. They should split them up according to vote.

Also Georgia, the Democrats won by 12,000 votes - they get the whole state.

Like Michigan another close state which should be split by popular vote.

Anyways, I think it was an early US President who was uncomfortable with that winner take all system and thought it would lead to problems down the road.

Joe its NOT supposed to reflect the popular vote. That's the point. We want EVERYONES voice heard.

The popular vote is just the tyranny of the majority. We are a country whose values are rooted in individual liberties and rights. We are not a collective.

But the people living in states such as yours could demand that the Electoral votes be split up according to % of votes received.

It's absurd that Republicans who received 49% of the vote in Michigan last time didn't get any EV's and were shut out of the tally.

Actually I saw this video on YouTube from what appears to be a pro-Democrat & even he indicated that if the EV's were split in each state according to that formula, the last election would have been a lot closer & Trump would have received 30 more electoral votes.

The electoral college as it stands now is anti-democratic. It's fascistic, IMO. Both parties can rig elections at this point. The RNC does every bit as much rearranging of the deck chairs as the DNC does.

Probably anti democratic because we are a Republic. We are states that are United. We are NOT all just under a federal government like you guys keep trying to push.

Btw right now its Republicans trying to secure our elections. Democrats are seeking to put the federal government in charge with another Orwellian double speak bill you guys wont read.

 

[Dove]

What a bunch of clueless fuckwits.

Whites were slaves too. Yes they got bad treatment too.

Slaves were in the North and South.

Slaves that went to the North, found ill treatment, and kept going to Canada, or went back South.

Im here all day.

I don't think that official slavery existed for Whites in the antebellum South, Blazor.
Nor was their official slave trade for them.
Plus I believe even the poorest Whites culd vote in Presidential elections back then.
Just men tho as women didn't have the right to vote.

If you make reference to White Slavery in the South, perhaps it was prevelant in the prison system there.

I think there were huge prison colonies i places like Georgia for example

And these housed many poor Whites.

These predated the existence of hte United States as a country, and were introduced by the British, much like they had done in Australia.

Before the first person, a black man, claimed his slaves (white and black) were his property, it was indentured servitude, for whites and blacks. Then becoming free after so many years. Only those who had committed crimes had to do life long slavery. So thank a black man next time you hear of slavery.

Whites who did not own land could not vote back then, if Im not mistaken. That law was changed though.

...so the antebellum South was more like an Athenian democracy in Ancient Greece?

Where they had a patrician land owning class that could vote, but plebian or working class could not?

Early on yes. Here is a good article on the matter......

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yes, some of our founders didn't want the white male riff-raff voting, never mind blacks or women.

After reading that article, I can see why. Land owners were the tax payers. Back then, if you were not a tax payer, you really didnt bother with politics. Only informed people (tax payers) were able to vote.

It's undemocratic. If you pay rent, you contribute to your community. If you work in the community, you contribute to it. Why deny the voice of all citizens?

This is an argument I've heard advanced.

That the purpose of the Electoral College was to favor land owners, particularly large ones.
So this arrangment helped to reinforce the institution of slavery.
Because of course, who owned them? The slave owneers.
To what the USA has today is that a typical voter in Los Angeles, has much smaller clout per vote than one in a rural state with few people.

That was very much its original purpose. And it explains why the alt-rght are so in love with the electoral college. They are clinging to one of the last vestiges of slavery.

Clearly you dont understand what the electoral college IS. We are a Republic, where every individuals vote matters.

YOU want it gone because you've been sold an ideology that tells you the majority is the people. Its NOT. It's a tyranny.

A full blown majority rule democracy SQUASHES the voices of the marginalized. You know....the little guy?

Here is the best comparison.

Democracy is the will of the majority. You know what else is the will of the majority? GANG RAPE.

When you speak about the majority, are you speaking about the US public that voted fatso out?

The people that played themselves? Who voted in Biden and aren't even watching what happens?

No. I'm talking about what would happen if we had no electoral college at all.

Then your hero would have been voted out the first time around.

Well, right. Because the whole country would be ran by CA and NY.

No one else would have a voice in anything federal. In a Constitutional Republic, the electrical college allows everyone to have a say in their own interests. Although in states.. I know MI gets ran by cities that are heavily populated and keep voting for the democrat.

No elected official is anyone "hero" but they are our representatives.

Still Dovey, what seems to be wrong with the Electoral College is that it's a winner take all system which doesn't reflect the popular vote within the States that determine themselves. i.e. - Michigan - if a Democrat wins by .005% of the vote, he gets all the EV's. That doesn't seem very fair. Even if the Republicans get 49.9995%, but not 50, they git nothin'!

That's the shits. They should split them up according to vote.

Also Georgia, the Democrats won by 12,000 votes - they get the whole state.

Like Michigan another close state which should be split by popular vote.

Anyways, I think it was an early US President who was uncomfortable with that winner take all system and thought it would lead to problems down the road.

Joe its NOT supposed to reflect the popular vote. That's the point. We want EVERYONES voice heard.

The popular vote is just the tyranny of the majority. We are a country whose values are rooted in individual liberties and rights. We are not a collective.

But the people living in states such as yours could demand that the Electoral votes be split up according to % of votes received.

It's absurd that Republicans who received 49% of the vote in Michigan last time didn't get any EV's and were shut out of the tally.

Actually I saw this video on YouTube from what appears to be a pro-Democrat & even he indicated that if the EV's were split in each state according to that formula, the last election would have been a lot closer & Trump would have received 30 more electoral votes.

The electoral college as it stands now is anti-democratic. It's fascistic, IMO. Both parties can rig elections at this point. The RNC does every bit as much rearranging of the deck chairs as the DNC does.

And so how do you propose to preseve the interests of lets say a Connecticut or a Wyoming in this Federation of States which we have?

just allow California and New York to dictate the outcome of every Federal election for the next thousand years?

Pretty much. They want to strip the individual of their voice and put us under some federal version of mob tyranny.

I dont think they understand what America even is.

This climaxes with a one party world government. I'm sure that's the end goal. Actual world domination of the elites.

 

[Joe]

 

[Blazor]

We're not gonna take it!!!!!

Warning: this might hurt some Lefty feelings....

 

[Admin.]

3 months later and you're still jacking your jaws about civil war 2.0. Get off your ass and make it happen, or stfu.

 

[Lokmar]

3 months later and you're still jacking your jaws about civil war 2.0. Get off your ass and make it happen, or stfu.

Trump won. We dont like cheaters, cheater.

 

[Dove]

This guys version of the confederacy is so inaccurate lol.

Yep even Democrats are over the attack on civil liberties and rights.

And no states are not trying to pass "restrictive" voting laws and the fact she said that shows why people are fed up enough to split. Its voting bills to protect citizens votes by stopping them from being diluted by illegal votes. And people have been thinking about it.

 

[Seamajor]

We're not gonna take it!!!!!

Warning: this might hurt some Lefty feelings....

Thats about all an Okie hill Billy southern army can do. You fat fuckers are riddled with covid and any other afflictions a vaccine would eliminate. Not to mention most of you are dumb as donkeys. Why bother? Really.

 

[Admin.]

 

[Lokmar]

ISIS wasnt all bad!

 

[Joe]

ISIS wasnt all bad!

You musta been there cheerin them on, Lokmeer.

 

[Lokmar]

ISIS wasnt all bad!

You musta been there cheerin them on, Lokmeer.

I shit on the corpse and now get a $2000/yr stipend from the palestinian authority.

 

[Blazor]

We're not gonna take it!!!!!

Warning: this might hurt some Lefty feelings....

Thats about all an Okie hill Billy southern army can do. You fat fuckers are riddled with covid and any other afflictions a vaccine would eliminate. Not to mention most of you are dumb as donkeys. Why bother? Really.

What a dumb cunt you are. Just like Lotus. And SOooooooooooooo Salty!!!!

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

 

[Lokmar]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

Trump was re-elected in 2020, idiot.

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

Trump was re-elected in 2020, idiot.

Really? Did he wake up in the White House this morning? Give him a call and let us know.

 

[Lokmar]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

Trump was re-elected in 2020, idiot.

Really? Did he wake up in the White House this morning? Give him a call and let us know.

You people should really give the stolen election back.

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

Trump was re-elected in 2020, idiot.

Really? Did he wake up in the White House this morning? Give him a call and let us know.

You people should really give the stolen election back.

Homeboy you are one ignorant fool. Most know and understand this.

 

[Lokmar]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

Trump was re-elected in 2020, idiot.

Really? Did he wake up in the White House this morning? Give him a call and let us know.

You people should really give the stolen election back.

Homeboy you are one ignorant fool. Most know and understand this.

Most know the elction was stolen. Even the fake approval polls cant keep him at 50% anymore. Do your duty and buy some hunter art! Oh, you cant? Thats because his "art" prices are actually the price of admission into the biden crime syndicate.

 

[Seamajor]

Most know? You and a few other fools?

 

[Blazor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

You win Sea, you win "The Shittiest Post of the Day" award!!!

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Blazer, I don’t get why you don’t see the clear and concise writing on the wall.

Wake up Blazer. The south failed years ago. There is no plan for a comeback. Deep down inside, you know this is true. Take your medicine.

 

[Lokmar]

Most know? You and a few other fools?

You know Trump won too, ya lyin faggit.

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know Lokbrain is a fool.

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Exactly