Card Carrying 2A open carry bad ass get's his gun jacked by a young boy.

Admin.

Nobody throws in the towel better than him!
Reaction score
14,216
Location
Cash me outside, how bow dah
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

gun-thief2.jpg


Ima Militia!
 
So you want me to stripped of my means of self defense because someone failed to shoot a 10 year old?

Is this some national problem with 10 year olds disarming people?

Looks like illegal possession of guns is still a thing to me.
 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

gun-thief2.jpg


Ima Militia!

That's why they should devise 'smart guns', similar in concept to Smart Phones, so that the only one who can activate or fire these things, are the owners.

Making smart guns mandatory, and eliminating guns with unlimited use might eliminate a lot of fatalities in the US.

Smart guns already exist, tho th technology hasn't been perfected yet.

 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

gun-thief2.jpg


Ima Militia!

That's why they should devise 'smart guns', similar in concept to Smart Phones, so that the only one who can activate or fire these things, are the owners.

Making smart guns mandatory, and eliminating guns with unlimited use might eliminate a lot of fatalities in the US.

Smart guns already exist, tho th technology hasn't been perfected yet.



Sounds great

Let's eliminate heroin that contains fent while we do this!
 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

gun-thief2.jpg


Ima Militia!

That's why they should devise 'smart guns', similar in concept to Smart Phones, so that the only one who can activate or fire these things, are the owners.

Making smart guns mandatory, and eliminating guns with unlimited use might eliminate a lot of fatalities in the US.

Smart guns already exist, tho th technology hasn't been perfected yet.



Sounds great

Let's eliminate heroin that contains fent while we do this!


Illegal or auathorized ownership of guns should carry the same kind of penalties for peddling heroin.

Hard time. in the slammer equivalent to sentences for trafficking hard drugs.

Since heroin is considered dangerous, unregulatd firemarms should be too.
 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

gun-thief2.jpg


Ima Militia!

That's why they should devise 'smart guns', similar in concept to Smart Phones, so that the only one who can activate or fire these things, are the owners.

Making smart guns mandatory, and eliminating guns with unlimited use might eliminate a lot of fatalities in the US.

Smart guns already exist, tho th technology hasn't been perfected yet.



Sounds great

Let's eliminate heroin that contains fent while we do this!


Illegal or auathorized ownership of guns should carry the same kind of penalties for peddling heroin.

Hard time. in the slammer equivalent to sentences for trafficking hard drugs.

Since heroin is considered dangerous, unregulatd firemarms should be too.


It varies from state to state, but it mostly does.

I know if you get caught with heroin here in Michigan, you will typically get the option of being "sentenced" to rehab, and if you get caught again....that 1st offense will become a felony on top of the felony of being caught again.

Michigan is harder on guns.
 
So you want me to stripped of my means of self defense because someone failed to shoot a 10 year old?

Is this some national problem with 10 year olds disarming people?

Looks like illegal possession of guns is still a thing to me.
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:

Every 30 minutes somewhere in American someone is disarmed by a child

Epidemic
 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

gun-thief2.jpg


Ima Militia!

So we have a law abiding 53 year old black male who felt a need to protect himself the only legal way he could given the sky high violent crime in Detroit and the poor response time of DPD. Then we have the 20 something black criminal who stole the older man's gun and who has a very long list of prior violent felonies. Oh, and who's side does Admin ignorantly take? Why the gun thieves of course.
 
If you wear a weapon, be prepared to have it used against you.
Firearm owner was a dumb ass for not having it properly secured.

The kid who stole it was a dumb ass for a) being filmed and b) getting caught.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
 
They have always claimed that the odds of getting killed by a gun are greater if you own a gun than if you don't.
 
If you wear a weapon, be prepared to have it used against you.
Firearm owner was a dumb ass for not having it properly secured.

The kid who stole it was a dumb ass for a) being filmed and b) getting caught.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
Most gun fondlers conveniently forget that Chris Kyle Navy Seal, a highly trained and very successful shooter, was gunned gunned down wearing a side arm at a table holding various weapons to shoot that day. Cue gun fondlers, "But they didn't give him a chance" "it was a surprise attack!"
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...
You think the two are similar? Interesting.

Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.

Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...
You think the two are similar? Interesting.

Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.

Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.

Modern holsters can't be light fingered and carjackers often need little expression of physical violence...
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...
You think the two are similar? Interesting.

Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.

Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.

Modern holsters can't be light fingered and carjackers often need little expression of physical violence...
Did you even read the OP? a small child grabbed the gun right out of Rambo's holster.
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...
You think the two are similar? Interesting.

Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.

Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.

Modern holsters can't be light fingered and carjackers often need little expression of physical violence...
Did you even read the OP? a small child grabbed the gun right out of Rambo's holster.

He should have been wearing a modern holster.
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...

You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?

No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.

There's not one iota of logic there, buster.

Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...

Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...

You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?

No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.

There's not one iota of logic there, buster.

Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...

Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.

That rules you out...
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...

You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?

No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.

There's not one iota of logic there, buster.

Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...

Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.

That rules you out...

Funny, that, since I am claiming it's illogical, and that it is only logical to someone with a low IQ, and you're claiming that I must think it's logical, since my IQ is lower than 100. Ponder that conundrum for a couple beats there.
 
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...

Fair is fair...

You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?

No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.

There's not one iota of logic there, buster.

Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...

Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.

That rules you out...

Funny, that, since I am claiming it's illogical, and that it is only logical to someone with a low IQ, and you're claiming that I must think it's logical, since my IQ is lower than 100. Ponder that conundrum for a couple beats there.

Thank you for accepting that your IQ is low.

:rightON: