- Messages
- 4,072
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
...It certainly is a competitive games between the Brits, Americans and Australians today. Who is winning(?), no one can say for the moment, but the rowdies in the Aussie section are making plenty of noise rootin their entries on (even though every one is dead).
PS: many women of the western states had voting rights before 1900. Just saying. 2 points for our team. YAY!
Maybe I was being too vague when I said western states:AMERICANS never give credit where it is due, ever!!!
And no to your comment about women voting rights. Only New Zealand and South Australia beat Western Australia by a year.
I always thought the Identical (girl) Triplets that grew up down the street from me were interesting.
Maybe I was being too vague when I said western states:
The first state to grant women the right to vote had been Wyoming, in 1869, followed by Utah in 1870, Colorado in 1893, Idaho in 1896.
Thems there is western states.
These were frontier women. They weren't the sort of proper eastern big city Victorian ladies sitting around the parlor eating bon-bons and making sure the curtains matched the furniture fabric. They build houses, chopped wood, shot injins, they were homesteaders and business owners helping build and civilize the west. They completely pulled their weight in the endeavor. They weren't sittin in front of a computer complainin to folks on the innernets all day. En thet-a-ther, little lady, is why they were awarded the vote earlier then mose.and how far did they travel to vote? Did just get up from their wood stoves and hitch their wagon to their mules and off they went.
Is fat shaming still a thing down there?They were fat lesbians....period!!!
Is fat shaming still a thing down there?
.. I still find myself closer to Theosophy than anything else and more to the original works of HPB than those that went their own way later - though I do like Krishmnamurti who was a Leadbeater "find" so to speak. Besant other than her work in clairvoyant projects that resulted in studies like Occult Chemistry, leaned toward Christianity as did Leadbeater with whom she had collaborated on the afore mentioned. I liked both her and CWL's approach to the subject, in clearing away the dogma.I’ve read works by both David-Neel and Besant. Interesting women indeed.
In the way back when, I dabbled in Theosophy. It was the closest “doctrine” to my youthful pantheistic leanings.
When she and her protégé, the very wise Jiddu Krishnamurti, parted ways over doctrinal issues, I stuck with Krishnamurti (“Think On These Things”).
I still enjoy reading Besant’s early works for their focus on atheism and materialism.
She was a thinking man’s woman, she was.
HPB would not have thought well of Crowley. She was an advocate of universal brotherhood rather than selfishness. She was, using defs I have previously given, a Liberal in the spiritual sense, never a practitioner of the conservatism of a Crowley. *Blavatsky was always rather too focused on the occult for my tastes. Too Aleister Crowley-ish.
Did she birth you because she was a fat lesbian or because she was a doctor?
Inquiring minds want to know.
I think my own path to atheism became clearer to me once I realized that any kind of spiritual or religious dogma had lost its appeal (to me, anyway--and not that it had had that much appeal to begin with).
Despite this, I continued to be a "faithful" subscriber to The Quest magazine (even though rather more Jungian publications such as Parabola appealed to me more).
I consider myself as having been on a lifelong quest of my own to understand my own place in the universe and the role(s) I'm meant to play in it. I abandoned any religious outlook when I fell in love with astronomer Carl Sagan's view of human beings as "starstuff in search of itself."
I still have a tremendous amount of respect for, and I derive no small enjoyment from, the great scriptures of humanity, even though I tend to prefer their esoteric commonalities to their dogmatic idiosyncracies.
Blavatsky was always rather too focused on the occult for my tastes. Too Aleister Crowley-ish. I'm not a superstitious sort. Nor am I a fan of so-called "magick" (except maybe when it remains confined to literature or video games).
These interests are the reason why I chose to study religion and philosophy at uni.
This Omnipootence is some of the worst trolling I've seen in a long long time. There ought to be a law.
Mother Teresa comes to mind -----Dr Fiona Wood from Perth WA ( born in Ireland) is like 10,000 times more interesting than the 3 women in the OP.
JUST saying...