- Messages
- 46,986
- Location
- Down by the seashore.
Sounds great Let's eliminate heroin that contains fent while we do this! | |||||
That's why they should devise 'smart guns', similar in concept to Smart Phones, so that the only one who can activate or fire these things, are the owners.
Making smart guns mandatory, and eliminating guns with unlimited use might eliminate a lot of fatalities in the US.
Smart guns already exist, tho th technology hasn't been perfected yet.
Sounds great
Let's eliminate heroin that contains fent while we do this!
That's why they should devise 'smart guns', similar in concept to Smart Phones, so that the only one who can activate or fire these things, are the owners.
Making smart guns mandatory, and eliminating guns with unlimited use might eliminate a lot of fatalities in the US.
Smart guns already exist, tho th technology hasn't been perfected yet.
Sounds great
Let's eliminate heroin that contains fent while we do this!
Illegal or auathorized ownership of guns should carry the same kind of penalties for peddling heroin.
Hard time. in the slammer equivalent to sentences for trafficking hard drugs.
Since heroin is considered dangerous, unregulatd firemarms should be too.
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:So you want me to stripped of my means of self defense because someone failed to shoot a 10 year old?
Is this some national problem with 10 year olds disarming people?
Looks like illegal possession of guns is still a thing to me.
Most gun fondlers conveniently forget that Chris Kyle Navy Seal, a highly trained and very successful shooter, was gunned gunned down wearing a side arm at a table holding various weapons to shoot that day. Cue gun fondlers, "But they didn't give him a chance" "it was a surprise attack!"If you wear a weapon, be prepared to have it used against you.
Firearm owner was a dumb ass for not having it properly secured.
The kid who stole it was a dumb ass for a) being filmed and b) getting caught.
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
You think the two are similar? Interesting.Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You think the two are similar? Interesting.Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.You think the two are similar? Interesting.Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.
Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.You think the two are similar? Interesting.Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.
Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
I carry muh gun for self defense, and a 10 year old boy done stole it right off of me!
moar guns plez!
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
I carry muh gun for self defense, and a 10 year old boy done stole it right off of me!
moar guns plez!
If he had 3 guns even if the thiefs buddy yoinked his backup he would have a third on his ankle and blow them fools away. The answer is ALWAYS more guns!
Did you even read the OP? a small child grabbed the gun right out of Rambo's holster.Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.You think the two are similar? Interesting.Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.
Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Modern holsters can't be light fingered and carjackers often need little expression of physical violence...
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.
Did you even read the OP? a small child grabbed the gun right out of Rambo's holster.Ok. One requires the threat of physical violence to be successfully stolen and one requires to simply be light fingered.You think the two are similar? Interesting.Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
Both are inanimate objects carried or operated. Both can save a life or take one.
Both have a degree of personal responsibility attached to them.
Modern holsters can't be light fingered and carjackers often need little expression of physical violence...
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.
There's not one iota of logic there, buster.
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.
There's not one iota of logic there, buster.
Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.
There's not one iota of logic there, buster.
Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...
Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.
There's not one iota of logic there, buster.
Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...
Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.
That rules you out...
Then the same applies to drivers who get jacked and don't drive away in time...
Fair is fair...
You realize that's a nonsensical analogy, right?
No, it's not. It is however wholly logical.
There's not one iota of logic there, buster.
Maybe not to a communism pushing fuck Muppet like you...
Or to anyone with an IQ above 100.
That rules you out...
Funny, that, since I am claiming it's illogical, and that it is only logical to someone with a low IQ, and you're claiming that I must think it's logical, since my IQ is lower than 100. Ponder that conundrum for a couple beats there.