Dear Stupid Cunts

[Lily]

Oerdin was attacked in a thread he made by silly Lily telling him not to post something...

she was then promoted to a global...

She is a total retard who was rewarded for wrongful moderation...

I will post back here when this place gets better mods.

I also support Flynn moderation, 100%.

He spams. My decision was supported by the owner. You don't have to like it, but you don't make decisions here beyond whether you post or not.

Don't let the door hit you in your decrepit flat ass.

 

[Admin.]

Oerdin was attacked in a thread he made by silly Lily telling him not to post something...

she was then promoted to a global...

She is a total retard who was rewarded for wrongful moderation...

I will post back here when this place gets better mods.

I also support Flynn moderation, 100%.

Thanks for the warning!

 

[Flynn]

Oerdin was attacked in a thread he made by silly Lily telling him not to post something...

she was then promoted to a global...

She is a total retard who was rewarded for wrongful moderation...

I will post back here when this place gets better mods.

I also support Flynn moderation, 100%.

Oerdin was spamming up the place like he usually does. He was warned over 30 times and even given verbal warnings but refused to stop. He even got away with trying to accuse Martini of being a child groomer and was given chances to clean up his act. His main purpose here was to attack Lily, accuse other's of being child abusers and flood the forum with useless videos. Lily was doing her job as she was the Politics mod at the time. She brought up Oerdin in the mod lounge and everyone agreed with Lily including BF himself. Lily wasn't the problem, Oerdin was.

Lily was chosen by BF and when you bash on Lily you also bash on him.

This place has gotten better. The scat pictures are no more and the child abuse claims are zero.

Caskur, we go waaay back and I know you know what is right and wrong. I just cannot fathom why you would ever okay poster's or a forum that "okays" child abuse claims.

 

[Flynn]

The way they obsess about child abuse is suspicious. The lady doth protest too much...

That's their go to, because like I said before, they're not smart enough to come up with anything witty that doesn't have to do with child abuse or politics.

 

[Lily]

That's their go to, because like I said before, they're not smart enough to come up with anything witty that doesn't have to do with child abuse or politics.

In their walnut sized brains, politics and child abuse are linked.

 

[LotusBud]

Oerdin was spamming up the place like he usually does. He was warned over 30 times and even given verbal warnings but refused to stop. He even got away with trying to accuse Martini of being a child groomer and was given chances to clean up his act. His main purpose here was to attack Lily, accuse other's of being child abusers and flood the forum with useless videos. Lily was doing her job as she was the Politics mod at the time. She brought up Oerdin in the mod lounge and everyone agreed with Lily including BF himself. Lily wasn't the problem, Oerdin was.

Lily was chosen by BF and when you bash on Lily you also bash on him.

This place has gotten better. The scat pictures are no more and the child abuse claims are zero.

Caskur, we go waaay back and I know you know what is right and wrong. I just cannot fathom why you would ever okay poster's or a forum that "okays" child abuse claims.

Hehe. I blocked him a long time ago. He was taking up valuable real estate and his posts were never worth reading. I didn't, therefore, notice that he's gone. LMAO

 

[cw_]

Hehe. I blocked him a long time ago. He was taking up valuable real estate and his posts were never worth reading. I didn't, therefore, notice that he's gone. LMAO

there you go +

 

[Seamajor]

Show ignored content by Pedro the ice cream Creeper


No thanks lol

Why does this stupid cunt find pleasure posting her pathetic life story, every chance she gets? Then fights back with lame ass guesses, assumptions and untruths?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

In their walnut sized brains, politics and child abuse are linked.

Yet strangely enough, Lily, not one Registered Democrat here has explained why they support the Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as 5 years old. It is irrefutably and inarguably Democrat Party Policy to inject homosexual and transgender ideology and content into public school curricula for children as young as five years old -- in kindergarten, for gods sake.

When Florida passed a law to ban such content for K-3rd grade, you people completely lost your shit and started calling it the "Don't say gay" bill, which was a complete lie, as you know.

Why is it so important to you filthy Democrats to expose children to sexual content so young?

Why do you support destroying the innocence of other people's children through your continued support of the vile and evil policies of the disgusting and verminous Democrat Party?

 

[Admin.]

Yet strangely enough, Lily, not one Registered Democrat here has explained why they support the Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as 5 years old. It is irrefutably and inarguably Democrat Party Policy to inject homosexual and transgender ideology and content into public school curricula for children as young as five years old -- in kindergarten, for gods sake.

When Florida passed a law to ban such content for K-3rd grade, you people completely lost your shit and started calling it the "Don't say gay" bill, which was a complete lie, as you know.

Why is it so important to you filthy Democrats to expose children to sexual content so young?

Why do you support destroying the innocence of other people's children through your continued support of the vile and evil policies of the disgusting and verminous Democrat Party?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Don't you have a public toilet to go hang out in?

 

[Admin.]

Don't you have a public toilet to go hang out in?

Sorry I don't swing that way Pedro, but you do you! (Not that there's anything wrong with it)

 

[Seamajor]

Don't you have a public toilet to go hang out in?

I bet you hang at the Ladies side. Easy pickings amigo.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

So, of course, no answer forthcoming. I guess you people have no valid excuse for the Democrat Party Policy of grooming children into deviant lifestyles.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Nice little script there, BF. It's a good way for Democrats to avoid having to explain why they support the vile and evil Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as five years old.

 

[Admin.]

So, of course, no answer forthcoming. I guess you people have no valid excuse for the Democrat Party Policy of PLEASE ASS BOX ME! children into deviant lifestyles.

are the "PLEASE ASSBOX ME!" Children in the room now?

 

[Lily]

Nice little script there, BF. It's a good way for Democrats to avoid having to explain why they support the vile and evil Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as five years old.

The rule has nothing to do with your desperate political and trolling strategies. We don't want our members accused of things that aren't accurate.

If any one suspects a member is actually hurting children, and not reporting them and only name-calling on forums, that person is screwed up.

In the US, there is a presumption of innocence. What country are you modeling?

 

[Admin.]

The rule has nothing to do with your desperate political and trolling strategies. We don't want our members accused of things that aren't accurate.

If any one suspects a member is actually hurting children and not reporting them and only name-calling on forums, that person is screwed up.

In the US, there is a presumption of innocence. What country are you modeling?

Old Ragey Asshole is a died in the wool Putinist.

 

[cw_]

Nice little script there, BF. It's a good way for Democrats to avoid having to explain why they support the vile and evil Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as five years old.

You. are. a. stupid. cunt.

 

[cw_]

 

[Seamajor]

Nice little script there, BF. It's a good way for Democrats to avoid having to explain why they support the vile and evil Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as five years old.

And you live in Chicago? Alabama may be a better fit.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

The rule has nothing to do with your desperate political and trolling strategies. We don't want our members accused of things that aren't accurate.

If any one suspects a member is actually hurting children, and not reporting them and only name-calling on forums, that person is screwed up.

In the US, there is a presumption of innocence. What country are you modeling?

I've accused no member here of any such thing. I simply asked why you Registered Democrats support your Party Policy of sexualizing five year olds.

Why can't you answer such a simple question, Lily? You do support the Democrat Policy of injecting homosexual and transgender ideology and content into public school curricula for children as young as five years old, don't you?

Why?

Old Ragey Asshole is a died in the wool Putinist.

Is that supposed to be an insult? At least Putin doesn't want five year old Russian children sodomized by adult homosexuals like you Registered Democrat do.

You. are. a. stupid. cunt.

Quiet, you saggy old whore.

 

[Lily]

I've accused no member here of any such thing. I simply asked why you Registered Democrats support your Party Policy of sexualizing five year olds.

Why can't you answer such a simple question, Lily? You do support the Democrat Policy of injecting homosexual and transgender ideology and content into public school curricula for children as young as five years old, don't you?

Why?


Is that supposed to be an insult? At least Putin doesn't want five year old Russian children sodomized by adult homosexuals like you Registered Democrat do.




Quiet, you saggy old whore.

Show me the DNC platform where it says the Democrats' goal is to sexualize children. Then we talk about your nonsense.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Show me the DNC platform where it says the Democrats' goal is to sexualize children. Then we talk about your nonsense.

So you are denying what is plainly evident. I see. Well, if it is not Democrat Party Policy to inject homosexual and transgender ideology and content into public school curricula, then why did all you Democrats go batshit crazy when Florida passed a law to ban such content from public schools for K through 3 school aged children?

Oh wait! That didn't happen either, huh?

 

[X]

The last part of my comment was meant for all women who post on these type of forums. As for women posting their tits and such, whatever floats the boat I guess. I don't understand or agree that it's a good thing for women at all.

good bad mneh

Nice little script there, BF. It's a good way for Democrats to avoid having to explain why they support the vile and evil Democrat Party Policy of sexualizing children as young as five years old.

the ojnly one I see seXualizeing kids, is YOU you fucking PEDO , FUCK OFF

 

[Lily]

So you are denying what is plainly evident. I see. Well, if it is not Democrat Party Policy to inject homosexual and transgender ideology and content into public school curricula, then why did all you Democrats go batshit crazy when Florida passed a law to ban such content from public schools for K through 3 school aged children?

Oh wait! That didn't happen either, huh?

We should always push back against unjust laws. If a little kid asks the teacher, why does Sally have two moms/dads, that law says the teacher cannot answer that question.

The teacher should be able to say "some families have two mommies or daddies" without being sanctioned. In your diseased and perverted minds you imagine that a teacher takes out dildos and dolls, KY jelly and Porn hub in the classroom, you sick fuckers.

 

[X]

FUCKING GHUY KEEPS COMING IN HERE PUSHING HIS AGENDA ...fucking pervy creepazoid, still here ?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

good bad mneh

the ojnly one I see seXualizeing kids, is YOU you fucking PLEASE ASS BOX ME! , FUCK OFF

Quiet, little X. I like you, but your tag along here is misplaced. I'm not sexualizing children. Registered Democrats are sexualizing children and none of the Democrats here will defend THEIR position.

We should always push back against unjust laws. If a little kid asks the teacher, why does Sally have two moms/dads, that law says the teacher cannot answer that question.

The teacher should be able to say "some families have two mommies or daddies" without being sanctioned. In your diseased and perverted minds you imagine that a teacher takes out dildos and dolls, KY jelly and Porn hub in the classroom, you sick fuckers.

Your dopey little story never happened and never will. No kindergarten kid would ever ask such a question of their teacher and you know it. You people want to inject your ideological filth upon other people's children, and you refuse to explain why YOU support these Democrat policies that are specifically designed to destroy the innocence of little children.

Why is perversion and moral filth so important to you Democrats?

 

[Lily]

Quiet, little X. I like you, but your tag along here is misplaced. I'm not sexualizing children. Registered Democrats are sexualizing children and none of the Democrats here will defend THEIR position.



Your dopey little story never happened and never will. No kindergarten kid would ever ask such a question of their teacher and you know it. You people want to inject your ideological filth upon other people's children, and you refuse to explain why YOU support these Democrat policies that are specifically designed to destroy the innocence of little children.

Why is perversion and moral filth so important to you Democrats?

No, I do know it because my own grandson asked me about how my gay friend had a "boy" for a husband. He's 7. He was in second grade.

This could happen in school easily.

 

[Seamajor]

Quiet, little X. I like you, but your tag along here is misplaced. I'm not sexualizing children. Registered Democrats are sexualizing children and none of the Democrats here will defend THEIR position.



Your dopey little story never happened and never will. No kindergarten kid would ever ask such a question of their teacher and you know it. You people want to inject your ideological filth upon other people's children, and you refuse to explain why YOU support these Democrat policies that are specifically designed to destroy the innocence of little children.

Why is perversion and moral filth so important to you Democrats?

How does rape fit into this scenario? Something your familiar with.