So how do the Founders define Women in the Constitution?

[Admin.]

U.S. Constitution stays silent on definition of 'woman'
Amid the Republican grievance signaling by those questioning Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Tennessee

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Others contented themselves with criticizing a private school's choice of books, venturing that states should decide if marriage between persons of different races is permitted, or demanding that the judge rate her religiousness on a scale of one to ten.

Senator Blackburn homed right in on her originalist's concern, asking Judge Jackson to define "woman."


Judge Jackson declined to answer, possibly aware that a case about the definition of "woman" under the law might soon reach the Supreme Court.

More:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Republican position would be ready. The

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

nowhere mentions women, and even the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments did not include women in giving certain men the vote.

We must turn to the common law for the originalist position.

Hear more Tennessee Voices:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the 18th century and throughout much of the 19th, "woman" was defined by the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, by which a married woman had no legal existence – those who married were "one person."

If a future case is decided by the Court on the basis of originalism, there will be no such thing as "woman" to define.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Lily]

Some women prefer to remain chattel. I find that unfathomable.

 

[Dove]

U.S. Constitution stays silent on definition of 'woman'
Amid the Republican grievance signaling by those questioning Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Tennessee

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Others contented themselves with criticizing a private school's choice of books, venturing that states should decide if marriage between persons of different races is permitted, or demanding that the judge rate her religiousness on a scale of one to ten.

Senator Blackburn homed right in on her originalist's concern, asking Judge Jackson to define "woman."


Judge Jackson declined to answer, possibly aware that a case about the definition of "woman" under the law might soon reach the Supreme Court.

More:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Republican position would be ready. The

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

nowhere mentions women, and even the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments did not include women in giving certain men the vote.

We must turn to the common law for the originalist position.

Hear more Tennessee Voices:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the 18th century and throughout much of the 19th, "woman" was defined by the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, by which a married woman had no legal existence – those who married were "one person."

If a future case is decided by the Court on the basis of originalism, there will be no such thing as "woman" to define.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The problem with this damage control is that she refused to answer on the basis she isnt a BIOLOGIST.

She did not refuse to answer on the basis that the Constitution doesnt "define" woman or any sort of legal basis.

She specifically stated she refused to answer because she is not a BIOLOGIST.

Also it should be ALARMING if there is no clear legal definition of "woman". If "woman" has no clear legal definition than womens rights do not exist.

Hence why it was so easy for them to be taken with the "equality act".

You guys claim to be so smart.....but you guys really do not think much and it shows. Cheer on the end of womens rights due to this partisan fuckery. At least you know you have a justice who will wipe her ass with womens rights to "fight teh right!". Everyone with a brain understands this monsters refusal to define "woman" is a precursor to destroying womens rights entirely.

Smdh.

 

[Admin.]

U.S. Constitution stays silent on definition of 'woman'
Amid the Republican grievance signaling by those questioning Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Tennessee

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Others contented themselves with criticizing a private school's choice of books, venturing that states should decide if marriage between persons of different races is permitted, or demanding that the judge rate her religiousness on a scale of one to ten.

Senator Blackburn homed right in on her originalist's concern, asking Judge Jackson to define "woman."


Judge Jackson declined to answer, possibly aware that a case about the definition of "woman" under the law might soon reach the Supreme Court.

More:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Republican position would be ready. The

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

nowhere mentions women, and even the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments did not include women in giving certain men the vote.

We must turn to the common law for the originalist position.

Hear more Tennessee Voices:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the 18th century and throughout much of the 19th, "woman" was defined by the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, by which a married woman had no legal existence – those who married were "one person."

If a future case is decided by the Court on the basis of originalism, there will be no such thing as "woman" to define.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The problem with this damage control is that she refused to answer on the basis she isnt a BIOLOGIST.

She did not refuse to answer on the basis that the Constitution doesnt "define" woman or any sort of legal basis.

She specifically stated she refused to answer because she is not a BIOLOGIST.

Also it should be ALARMING if there is no clear legal definition of "woman". If "woman" has no clear legal definition than womens rights do not exist.

Hence why it was so easy for them to be taken with the "equality act".

You guys claim to be so smart.....but you guys really do not think much and it shows. Cheer on the end of womens rights due to this partisan fuckery. At least you know you have a justice who will wipe her ass with womens rights to "fight teh right!". Everyone with a brain understands this monsters refusal to define "woman" is a precursor to destroying womens rights entirely.

Smdh.

It was bullshit attempt at a gotcha question, nothing more, and it is was asked by someone unfamiliar with our constitution.

 

[Lily]

U.S. Constitution stays silent on definition of 'woman'
Amid the Republican grievance signaling by those questioning Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Tennessee

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Others contented themselves with criticizing a private school's choice of books, venturing that states should decide if marriage between persons of different races is permitted, or demanding that the judge rate her religiousness on a scale of one to ten.

Senator Blackburn homed right in on her originalist's concern, asking Judge Jackson to define "woman."


Judge Jackson declined to answer, possibly aware that a case about the definition of "woman" under the law might soon reach the Supreme Court.

More:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Republican position would be ready. The

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

nowhere mentions women, and even the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments did not include women in giving certain men the vote.

We must turn to the common law for the originalist position.

Hear more Tennessee Voices:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the 18th century and throughout much of the 19th, "woman" was defined by the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, by which a married woman had no legal existence – those who married were "one person."

If a future case is decided by the Court on the basis of originalism, there will be no such thing as "woman" to define.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The problem with this damage control is that she refused to answer on the basis she isnt a BIOLOGIST.

She did not refuse to answer on the basis that the Constitution doesnt "define" woman or any sort of legal basis.

She specifically stated she refused to answer because she is not a BIOLOGIST.

Also it should be ALARMING if there is no clear legal definition of "woman". If "woman" has no clear legal definition than womens rights do not exist.

Hence why it was so easy for them to be taken with the "equality act".

You guys claim to be so smart.....but you guys really do not think much and it shows. Cheer on the end of womens rights due to this partisan fuckery. At least you know you have a justice who will wipe her ass with womens rights to "fight teh right!". Everyone with a brain understands this monsters refusal to define "woman" is a precursor to destroying womens rights entirely.

Smdh.

It was bullshit attempt at a gotcha question, nothing more, and it is was asked by someone unfamiliar with our constitution.

It's interesting that the party that fought tooth and nail to kill the Equal Rights Amendment is now besides themselves about the definition of woman.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

The reason the vile woman did not answer the question about the definition of woman is because she is a disgusting Leftist ideologue and is deathly afraid of offending the LGBTQRXYZ?#Pervert crowd.

Plus, since everyone is aware that litigation regarding this exact question is wending its way through the courts even now, she simply telegraphed how she would rule in such a case.

As if we didn't already know that a Leftist will rule to destroy America whenever possible.

 

[Lily]

The reason the vile woman did not answer the question about the definition of woman is because she is a disgusting Leftist ideologue and is deathly afraid of offending the LGBTQRXYZ?#Pervert crowd.

Plus, since everyone is aware that litigation regarding this exact question is wending its way through the courts even now, she simply telegraphed how she would rule in such a case.

As if we didn't already know that a Leftist will rule to destroy America whenever possible.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament?

Yes, low lives are very fond of that

turning pedophiles loose on society too

are you just now realizing this?

 

[Frood]

Women in the original paperwork were called bitches and ho's... then Ben Franklin got all uppity with his deist respectful shit and fucked everything up when nobody was looking....

 

[Lily]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

I need a bigger mug.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

oh man.....lol

anyway

 

[Frood]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

I need a bigger mug.

Your mug is plenty big enough....

 

[Dove]

U.S. Constitution stays silent on definition of 'woman'
Amid the Republican grievance signaling by those questioning Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Tennessee

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Others contented themselves with criticizing a private school's choice of books, venturing that states should decide if marriage between persons of different races is permitted, or demanding that the judge rate her religiousness on a scale of one to ten.

Senator Blackburn homed right in on her originalist's concern, asking Judge Jackson to define "woman."


Judge Jackson declined to answer, possibly aware that a case about the definition of "woman" under the law might soon reach the Supreme Court.

More:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Republican position would be ready. The

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

nowhere mentions women, and even the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments did not include women in giving certain men the vote.

We must turn to the common law for the originalist position.

Hear more Tennessee Voices:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the 18th century and throughout much of the 19th, "woman" was defined by the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, by which a married woman had no legal existence – those who married were "one person."

If a future case is decided by the Court on the basis of originalism, there will be no such thing as "woman" to define.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The problem with this damage control is that she refused to answer on the basis she isnt a BIOLOGIST.

She did not refuse to answer on the basis that the Constitution doesnt "define" woman or any sort of legal basis.

She specifically stated she refused to answer because she is not a BIOLOGIST.

Also it should be ALARMING if there is no clear legal definition of "woman". If "woman" has no clear legal definition than womens rights do not exist.

Hence why it was so easy for them to be taken with the "equality act".

You guys claim to be so smart.....but you guys really do not think much and it shows. Cheer on the end of womens rights due to this partisan fuckery. At least you know you have a justice who will wipe her ass with womens rights to "fight teh right!". Everyone with a brain understands this monsters refusal to define "woman" is a precursor to destroying womens rights entirely.

Smdh.

It was bullshit attempt at a gotcha question, nothing more, and it is was asked by someone unfamiliar with our constitution.

There is no "gotcha" question. This was a simple and direct question with an easy fucking answer.

The only reason YOU see it as a "gotcha" is because you want to root for team misogyny and cheervthe attack on womens rights while thinking you can pass it off as "equality". Your stupid "side" muddied the waters and created this bullshit with "gender" politics.

Her ideology was exposed. That was the point. You arent spinning it by pretending this stupid child rape enabling piece of shit judge was sticking to some legal standard when she clearly wasnt.

Womens rights are being attacked and YOU people are supporting it. You'll have your reckoning.

 

[Frood]

oh man.....lol

anyway

Mine! Grabbed it first!

 

[Dove]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

And raping women in prison. And going into domestic violence shelters.

Women shouldnt have anything now because its "transphobic".

 

[Dove]

The reason the vile woman did not answer the question about the definition of woman is because she is a disgusting Leftist ideologue and is deathly afraid of offending the LGBTQRXYZ?#Pervert crowd.

Plus, since everyone is aware that litigation regarding this exact question is wending its way through the courts even now, she simply telegraphed how she would rule in such a case.

As if we didn't already know that a Leftist will rule to destroy America whenever possible.

Exactly.

 

[Admin.]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

 

[Lily]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

Who does that?!

 

[Admin.]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

Who does that?!

Somone with the patience of Job, I would think.

 

[Lily]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

Who does that?!

Somone with the patience of Job, I would think.

Brains of a jellyfish actually

 

[The Prowler]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

Most leftists are miserable assholes and they support anything that will cause other people misery.

They are not athletes, so if some mentally ill and/or deviant males can ruin female sports, they will support it. Just to cause harm to female athletes.

They are passive-aggressive, miserable pricks and misery loves company.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

 

[Lily]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

Most leftists are miserable assholes and they support anything that will cause other people misery.

They are not athletes, so if some mentally ill and/or deviant males can ruin female sports, they will support it. Just to cause harm to female athletes.

They are passive-aggressive, miserable pricks and misery loves company.

I don't think the average monitor at home is quite large enough for your projections.

 

[Lily]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

How much did you care about Title IX before the transgender issue came up? Care to share?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

How much did you care about Title IX before the transgender issue came up? Care to share?

I know if I was the father or brother of the girl who came in 17th in the qualifiers I'd be pissed that some pervert freak dude stole her chance for athletic glory because of Leftist scum wokism.

 

[Admin.]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

Sorry to rain on your bullshit parade, lets' look at the facts, not the lunatic ravings of some right wing "influencer"

To all those pushing this false narrative that Trans People have an advantage in sports, and are using Lia Thomas as "proof", let me lay down some stats here ...
1650
Lia pre-transition: 14:54.765
Lia post-transition: 15:59.71 (lost 65 seconds)
Male record: 14:12.08 (Kieran Smith)
Female record: 15:03:31 (Katie Ledecky)
She was 40 seconds behind the male record, now she is 56 behind the female
500
Lia's best pre-transition, 4:18:72
Lia's current, 4:34:06
Female record (Katie Ledecky), 4:24:06
Male record (Kieran Smith), 4:06:32
200
Prior to transition 1:39.31
Male record, 1:29.15
After transition 1:41.93
Female record of 1:39.10
See a pattern here?
Not advantage, consistency
There's a reason that with all the Trans Women competing in sports for years, she is one of the only top ranking ones, because she's always been one of the top ranking.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

Did you see the shoulder span on that fucking sailor?

Of course he blew them bitches away with ease

i'd say women but of course, I'm no biologist, so there's that

 

[Lily]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

How much did you care about Title IX before the transgender issue came up? Care to share?

I know if I was the father or brother of the girl who came in 17th in the qualifiers I'd be pissed that some pervert freak dude stole her chance for athletic glory because of Leftist scum wokism.

Got it, never cared before. Though there are a lot of "social" and "legal" issues that are encompassed by Title 9 cases involving "women".

 

[Biggie Smiles]

So you're cool with a dude with a dick and a set of balls just saying he's now a woman and then thrashing all the real girls in an NCAA swimming tournament? That will probably be a case this verminous cunt might be ruling on -- and we now know how she would rule. On the side of the perverts, of course.

Why are you so fond of pervertry?

WTAF are you screeching about? I think you've been reading way too many Dove posts.

So you don't know about the dude swimmer who was ranked 427th who then decided to be a woman and according to the woke rules of the NCAA was allowed to swim the bitches and easily thrashed them all because, you know, he's a dude, and won the NCAA women's championship just a week or two ago?

You really are unaware of this?

How much did you care about Title IX before the transgender issue came up? Care to share?

I know if I was the father or brother of the girl who came in 17th in the qualifiers I'd be pissed that some pervert freak dude stole her chance for athletic glory because of Leftist scum wokism.

Here's your problem on this issue old friend

YOu seem to expect people with zero empathy to understand empathy

if something doesn't happen to affect them they simply don't give a flying fuck


But UKRAINE tho!!!!!!!!!!!