- Messages
- 10,605
- Location
- Scotland
If omnipotence existed, wouldn't the Roman Empire have recorded it?
I asked for Nurse Dovey's evidence that Jesus existed and that she had spent a lifetime compiling.
Faggots, pedophiles and other degenerate liberals will always deny the existence of GodI asked for Nurse Dovey's evidence that Jesus existed and that she had spent a lifetime compiling.
Bland if the Lord came down and told you, you would STILL argue and judge.
The fact you even argue that Jesus existed tells us all that you unreasonable and seeking for ways to be deeper in denial. There is no question Jesus walked the earth. You just want to justify your disbelief.....which in itself is bizzare if you truly do not believe.
You'll probably never have any peace at all because you are just too self important to accept that every other human on the planet can freely disagree with you and have beliefs that oppose your own. And your whole motive to subjugate and control because you think you are superior.
God offends you because again... you want to replace Gods standards with yours.
If omnipotence existed, wouldn't the Roman Empire have recorded it?
Fuck me they renamed Heracles and called him Hercules, he was a super hero too.
12 labours and all dat. Jesus is a pussy next to Heracles.
I wonder if Jesus could shoot out a web from his wrists, wiff an extremely potent tensile strength.
Could Jesus do dat Nurse Dovey?
Does the bible say Jesus had retractable Adamantium claws?
So @Seamajor is a rabbi?Why do Rabbis suck baby dick?
No Jew has ever responded adequately to that question.
I asked for Nurse Dovey's evidence that Jesus existed and that she had spent a lifetime compiling.
Bland if the Lord came down and told you, you would STILL argue and judge.
We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
I asked for Nurse Dovey's evidence that Jesus existed and that she had spent a lifetime compiling.
Bland if the Lord came down and told you, you would STILL argue and judge.
Wid I, wid I though.
Your attempt to paint me as a doubting Thomas isn't really going to work tonight, because I don't doubt you fink you are a decent human being, but all you keep doing isd proving my point.
You are human scum. On yer very best day.
Any "path" that doesn't acknowledge a creator is wrong.We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
I don't blame ye fur dat Nurse Dovey, I blame Flea.
:facepalm:Any "path" that doesn't acknowledge a creator is wrong.We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
Any "path" that doesn't acknowledge a creator is wrong.We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
just like anyone who believes there are more than two genders should be commited
now fuck off, yer boring
Just keep in mind you're arguing science and theology with a turd who thinks he can be a woman on Friday and Saturday nights because his mental illness tells him soAny "path" that doesn't acknowledge a creator is wrong.We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
just like anyone who believes there are more than two genders should be commited
now fuck off, yer boring
I could have called it fables and myths or even doctrines of demons.
Would that have been the humble way? Lol.
I'm not being anywhere NEAR as ruthless and sharp tongue as I COULD be. As sensitive as some are maybe they should consider a tad more humility themselves?
We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
Yeah I mean.....you just did the same thing.
Its fascinating how people who do what you just did feel its OTHER people who lack humility.
You literally are telling me to humble myself and say what you want me to say while degrading theistic beliefs as fables and myths.
It's amazing Blurt. It really is.
Why wouldnt you apply that standard to yourself first before applying it to me and ask yourself if what you were about to say was humble enough? All I said was we have no evidence that species change into other species. None. So Richard Dawkins patronizing and condescending attitude is unwarranted.
I didnt call it fables and myths. It's always left leaners who do this. Literally flat out get combative and start accusing people of what only they are doing.
I'm not being arrogant. I'm not having conceit. I'm not lacking humility. You guys are just uncomfortable with certain ideas and want your standards to be the go to ones and you arent very open to others. It's always some bizzare defensive.
We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
Yeah I mean.....you just did the same thing.
Its fascinating how people who do what you just did feel its OTHER people who lack humility.
You literally are telling me to humble myself and say what you want me to say while degrading theistic beliefs as fables and myths.
It's amazing Blurt. It really is.
Why wouldnt you apply that standard to yourself first before applying it to me and ask yourself if what you were about to say was humble enough? All I said was we have no evidence that species change into other species. None. So Richard Dawkins patronizing and condescending attitude is unwarranted.
I didnt call it fables and myths. It's always left leaners who do this. Literally flat out get combative and start accusing people of what only they are doing.
I'm not being arrogant. I'm not having conceit. I'm not lacking humility. You guys are just uncomfortable with certain ideas and want your standards to be the go to ones and you arent very open to others. It's always some bizzare defensive.
Soooo... unable or unwilling to answer the question, Dovey?
We have absolutely no evidence that shows a species can become another species.
People who believe this are relying on faith.
Of course they are, along with every other person whose ass is parked in a church pew, because church is the only place where you'll ever find people who think this is how natural selection works.
Scientific illiteracy goes hand in hand with the abdication of reason and submission to a God of the Gaps.
For God's sake, Dovey, have the humility to be able to say, "I don't know!" or "I'm not sure!" instead of adhering to ancient myths and fables purporting to definitively define the structure--both moral and physical--of the universe once and for all time!
And you want to accuse others of being God? Really?
Here's an easy question for you: can you, at the very least, admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path among a slew of others? (For the record, I can admit that belief in supernatural entities is but one path--one "live option," if you will--among a slew of others.)
Yeah I mean.....you just did the same thing.
Its fascinating how people who do what you just did feel its OTHER people who lack humility.
You literally are telling me to humble myself and say what you want me to say while degrading theistic beliefs as fables and myths.
It's amazing Blurt. It really is.
Why wouldnt you apply that standard to yourself first before applying it to me and ask yourself if what you were about to say was humble enough? All I said was we have no evidence that species change into other species. None. So Richard Dawkins patronizing and condescending attitude is unwarranted.
I didnt call it fables and myths. It's always left leaners who do this. Literally flat out get combative and start accusing people of what only they are doing.
I'm not being arrogant. I'm not having conceit. I'm not lacking humility. You guys are just uncomfortable with certain ideas and want your standards to be the go to ones and you arent very open to others. It's always some bizzare defensive.
Soooo... unable or unwilling to answer the question, Dovey?
I've actually made it very clear for years now that I dont like to argue these topics on the internet. Specifically made it clear to Bland for about 5 years now.
He wants to be God pretty badly though so everytime he sees me post he has to start with his anti theist tantrums. Arrogance, conceit and lack of humility can cause some pretty sad behavour.
If you are wrestling with belief or lack of belief there are probably much better avenues to work through all that.
If you are seeking to evangelize atheism or secular humanism? Understand that's an invite to be evangelized back to. Its pretty interesting when nonbelievers push and try to make secular disciples and mock and degrade belief and than cry about humility if that person sticks to their belief.