Agreed.
But I'll take even a candle in the darkness, wherever I'm at.
At some point you might come to realize that arguing about things that are based on "belief" is futile.
Dayum!
You know, you might be right.
Agreed.
But I'll take even a candle in the darkness, wherever I'm at.
At some point you might come to realize that arguing about things that are based on "belief" is futile.
Agreed.
But I'll take even a candle in the darkness, wherever I'm at.
At some point you might come to realize that arguing about things that are based on "belief" is futile.
Dayum!
You know, you might be right.
I think the worse ones are the men that clearly are beta males in real life, sycophantic at work and with their women. They come here to pretend they're strong and capable. They don't fool anyone.
Sez the biggest Dillard hereHahahahahaha!!!!
The Leaker is venting.
^^^ This what you were talking about, Lil?
Yes, it is tiresome dealing with dullards.
You're confusing passive aggressiveness with active aggressiveness.
Sez the biggest Dillard hereHahahahahaha!!!!
The Leaker is venting.
^^^ This what you were talking about, Lil?
Yes, it is tiresome dealing with dullards.
I think the worse ones are the men that clearly are beta males in real life, sycophantic at work and with their women. They come here to pretend they're strong and capable. They don't fool anyone.
I think the worse ones are the men that clearly are beta males in real life, sycophantic at work and with their women. They come here to pretend they're strong and capable. They don't fool anyone.
Yep. But those are the ones that both bother me the least and are the most fun to toy with... precisely because a) they're fooling no one, and b) they think they are.
Dayum!
You know, you are right.
Huh?
Dayum!
You know, you are right.
Fixed.
And you could reply to any of my posts that same way.
Huh?
That was unnecessary.
It's fascinating watching a "man" figuratively auto-fellate.
Dayum!
You know, you are right.
I've been fixed.
And you could reply to any of my posts that same way.
It's fascinating watching a "man" figuratively auto-fellate.
The Leaker is fantasizing about me again.
Creeeee-py.
Because I actually enjoy discussing matters of science and faith, but this sort of discussion is fraught with peril. People clam up when their religious views are aggressively called into question... just as those who hold secular views clam up under the same circumstances.
For any dialogue to be possible, all parties must first acknowledge that their respective positions on such matters are far from being the only possible ones. No dialogue is possible without such an acknowledgment.
All true. However, is that what this forum is here for? I don't find it a place for nuanced discussion. It's about bullshit, ego, and certainly seems to be a place where individuals vent their existential angst.
Like most of you, I come here to be entertained
^^E M A S C U L A T E D
O
The Leaker is fantasizing about me again.
Creeeee-py.
^^E M A S C U L A T E D
Because I actually enjoy discussing matters of science and faith, but this sort of discussion is fraught with peril. People clam up when their religious views are aggressively called into question... just as those who hold secular views clam up under the same circumstances.
For any dialogue to be possible, all parties must first acknowledge that their respective positions on such matters are far from being the only possible ones. No dialogue is possible without such an acknowledgment.
All true. However, is that what this forum is here for? I don't find it a place for nuanced discussion. It's about bullshit, ego, and certainly seems to be a place where individuals vent their existential angst.
Like most of you, I come here to be entertained
Because I actually enjoy discussing matters of science and faith, but this sort of discussion is fraught with peril. People clam up when their religious views are aggressively called into question... just as those who hold secular views clam up under the same circumstances.
For any dialogue to be possible, all parties must first acknowledge that their respective positions on such matters are far from being the only possible ones. No dialogue is possible without such an acknowledgment.
All true. However, is that what this forum is here for? I don't find it a place for nuanced discussion. It's about bullshit, ego, and certainly seems to be a place where individuals vent their existential angst.
Like most of you, I come here to be entertained
I'm willing to make an exception in your case, Foxy.
You've proven to be absolutely unentertainable.
Because I actually enjoy discussing matters of science and faith, but this sort of discussion is fraught with peril. People clam up when their religious views are aggressively called into question... just as those who hold secular views clam up under the same circumstances.
For any dialogue to be possible, all parties must first acknowledge that their respective positions on such matters are far from being the only possible ones. No dialogue is possible without such an acknowledgment.
All true. However, is that what this forum is here for? I don't find it a place for nuanced discussion. It's about bullshit, ego, and certainly seems to be a place where individuals vent their existential angst.
Like most of you, I come here to be entertained
I'm willing to make an exception in your case, Foxy.
You've proven to be absolutely unentertainable.
So miserable. Where does it run to gossip these days I wonder?
Because I actually enjoy discussing matters of science and faith, but this sort of discussion is fraught with peril. People clam up when their religious views are aggressively called into question... just as those who hold secular views clam up under the same circumstances.
For any dialogue to be possible, all parties must first acknowledge that their respective positions on such matters are far from being the only possible ones. No dialogue is possible without such an acknowledgment.
All true. However, is that what this forum is here for? I don't find it a place for nuanced discussion. It's about bullshit, ego, and certainly seems to be a place where individuals vent their existential angst.
Like most of you, I come here to be entertained
I'm willing to make an exception in your case, Foxy.
You've proven to be absolutely unentertainable.
So miserable. Where does it run to gossip these days I wonder?
This is a fucking troll forum you stupid bat faced idiot, it's a virtual rage room.
If this is the only place you look for entertainment, that sad
also, many of these people are completely different once they drop the "troll"character. But some are sort of stuck in "troll" mode 24/7.
I am sure many of the people who post here are also posting amazing, entertaining, non troll material on non troll websites.
am i right?
and Lily, you remind me of those old medieval crones who would go around cursing farm animals just by looking at them.
yanno, those crusty old hags who would cover themselves with cat piss and dance naked under the moon then return to their swamp shack and let pet toads suckle their sour milk teats.
and Lily, you remind me of those old medieval crones who would go around cursing farm animals just by looking at them.
yanno, those crusty old hags who would cover themselves with cat piss and dance naked under the moon then return to their swamp shack and let pet toads suckle their sour milk teats.
I couldn't decide if I should let you triple post your angst or not. I decided to save you from embarrassing yourself further. You can thank me now.
and Lily, you remind me of those old medieval crones who would go around cursing farm animals just by looking at them.
yanno, those crusty old hags who would cover themselves with cat piss and dance naked under the moon then return to their swamp shack and let pet toads suckle their sour milk teats.
I WILL say......there are no "different paths".
QED
And the reason no further dialogue is possible with you.
You're confusing passive aggressiveness with active aggressiveness.
Yeah, the way you addressed The Leaker while being aggressive "towards" me was "active aggressiveness".
Hahahaha!!!!
Because I actually enjoy discussing matters of science and faith, but this sort of discussion is fraught with peril. People clam up when their religious views are aggressively called into question... just as those who hold secular views clam up under the same circumstances.
For any dialogue to be possible, all parties must first acknowledge that their respective positions on such matters are far from being the only possible ones. No dialogue is possible without such an acknowledgment.
All true. However, is that what this forum is here for? I don't find it a place for nuanced discussion. It's about bullshit, ego, and certainly seems to be a place where individuals vent their existential angst.
Like most of you, I come here to be entertained