- Messages
- 13,820
- Location
- La La Land
mmm… I can smell the malpractice suit *sighs*
Easiest money evah. Get rich quick, if you’re not a frivolous claimant *gigglesnortz*
...seems to be all the rage these days.
There was a recent case in Canada where a woman got $373,000 or about $300,000 US dollars in damages:
The woman, who is not identified in the court ruling, booked and paid for a massage online with We Massage on Oct. 28, 2015.
'Basic Instinct' director disputes Sharon Stone's version of infamous scene
Following a criminal trial, Martin Contreras-Ramirez, the woman’s masseur, was convicted of sexually assaulting her. In July 2017, he was sentenced to 12 months in jail.
The victim then filed her civil lawsuit in B.C. Supreme Court.
The criminal trial heard that she wanted a massage to address a shoulder injury and made inquiries as to the legitimacy of the massage service when she realized that the massage would take place in Contreras-Ramirez’s residence.
She removed all of her clothing save her underwear during the massage and got on the table on her back, covering herself with a sheet. After she had fallen asleep during the massage, she woke up to find the masseur rubbing her right breast and digitally penetrating her vagina.
The victim yelled profanities at him, got dressed quickly and left the house and got into her car, locking herself in and calling police.
When police arrived, they found her visibly upset, with one of the officers describing her as being hysterical.
“The plaintiff was a confident and outgoing woman before the assault, often out to dinners with friends, movies, parties, weekend road trips, and hosted gatherings at her house,” B.C. Supreme Court Justice Robert Punnett said in his ruling on the civil suit. “After the assault, she changed. Initially, she suffered from considerable shame and guilt, stayed home, avoided contact with others, slept and suffered a loss of appetite.”
At the time of the attack, she was employed as a military public affairs officer. But she has lost her career, having been told she will be medically released from the Canadian Armed Forces this summer.
“The plaintiff deposes that from the time she was 15 she wanted to join the Canadian Armed Forces and directed her efforts to that goal,” said the judge. “As that career has been brought to an end, she struggles with her identity and her prospects.”
...I wonder how much of it is real damage or just hysteria from plaintiffs trying to get the most out of these settlements.
If a woman is sexually assaulted, the trauma is real, period. The only real question is whether she lied about the assault. Judging from personal experience, there is a shit ton of sexual predators out there, so the odds are that the woman is telling the truth, even though here and there you'll find a sadistic or money-hungry liar. My personal experience is the reason I would never, ever go to a male gyno. Not saying that most are predators, but there is always one lurking somewhere nearby. ALWAYS.
I practiced tort law for 18 years before I switched practice areas. Most of the women who made accusations against a medical provider suffered from numerous mental health issues and none of the claims were ever brought to economic fruition. Doctors are required to have staff present for exams of this nature and for good reason. I’m not saying that there aren’t bad doctors who do this… but they are gambling with their license to practice. I’m saying it’s minimal in comparison to the psychotic delusions of the opportunistic.
Well, in the cases I know about, the men have been accused by literally dozens of women. I don't believe that many women are making this shit up about one man. I really don't. Doctors are supposed to have staff present, but in my experience, they very often don't.
It’s your responsibility as the patient to ask for staff to be present if they don’t provide that. It’s your legal right. It’s mind boggling that people don’t know this.