Trans"women" are SEX OFFENDERS!!!

Jack

An ocean of most souls is a dry bed of sand
Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,058
Location
Upper US
^^Lmao, get a load of this soytard.

Until recently, sex and gender meant the same thing, but the definition has since been "revised" to fit the woke narrative. Vaccine is another term which received the same treatment... lf you had a VERY BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE JEWISH QUESTION you would already know this and be aware of kike shenanigans.
Do yourself a favor and fuck off right out of here, moron.

You still have a foreskin stuck to your bottom lip moherboy.
 

Admin.

Can I just have one a' more Moondance with you
Site Supporter
Reaction score
19,618
Location
Way down below the ocean where I wanna be she may
^^Lmao, get a load of this soytard.

Until recently, sex and gender meant the same thing, but the definition has since been "revised" to fit the woke narrative. Vaccine is another term which received the same treatment... lf you had a VERY BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE JEWISH QUESTION you would already know this and be aware of kike shenanigans.
Oh look Mr Hammer calls for Nails! GFY ya pansy ass fgt.
 

Adam Hitler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
14,770
Location
With the Whites
Men dressed as women are not trans, you fucking idiot. That would be a crossdresser you're describing. Crossdressers don't identify as women. Transwomen do. Whether you like it or agree with it or not is irrelevant.

Grow the fuck up.
Rope yourself, you fucking degenerate.

trooope.png
 

Jack

An ocean of most souls is a dry bed of sand
Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,058
Location
Upper US
What is it with these guys and endless dick lames? Y'all sound a little deprived not to mention adolescent. Did someone pull out before they shot?

What???
 
OP
OP
The Prowler

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,723
Location
Canada
Until recently, sex and gender meant the same thing

You are right, and you are wrong.

To scientists, sex and gender meant the same thing. I asked two of my sisters a few years ago and they both said sex and gender is interchangeable; they mean the same thing. Both of those sisters have degrees in Biology.

I was at a lecture on this subject about 5 years ago and there were several current biology students in the audience, including a Master's student who I spoke with. They assured the audience that sex and gender meant the same thing in all their course work.

But, non-scientific people started to use the word "gender" to mean something different. They call it a social construct. They say it not a black and white thing (you can be a mix of both genders). They talk about "gender roles". I think it started way back in the 1950's by feminists of the time. Most feminine traits would be associated with the "woman" gender and most masculin traits would be associated with the "man" gender. I think it started when women wanted to be respected for being able to perform some roles that were male dominated.

But, and this is important, it is not important. It is like a theory that can never be proven or dis-proven. It is a concept and it will always only be a concept. Arguing about it is pointless. It is a trap to argue about something that can never be proven or dis-proven.

It is a leftist tactic: Define a word, then argue about the meaning of the word.

Why?

Because it fools weak-minded people into believing that the definition of the word is way more meaningful than it is. Look at the people in this thread. They think "Oh, I know what gender means. They do not understand what gender is. They think dudes with dicks should not be able to invade women's spaces. Therefore, dudes with dicks should be able to invade women's spaces."

Seriously. Read that again. That is exactly their rationale for fighting so hard for something they know, deep down they know, is wrong.
 

Alticus

Mr. Excitement
Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,797
Location
Los Santos
You are right, and you are wrong.

To scientists, sex and gender meant the same thing. I asked two of my sisters a few years ago and they both said sex and gender is interchangeable; they mean the same thing. Both of those sisters have degrees in Biology.

I was at a lecture on this subject about 5 years ago and there were several current biology students in the audience, including a Master's student who I spoke with. They assured the audience that sex and gender meant the same thing in all their course work.

But, non-scientific people started to use the word "gender" to mean something different. They call it a social construct. They say it not a black and white thing (you can be a mix of both genders). They talk about "gender roles". I think it started way back in the 1950's by feminists of the time. Most feminine traits would be associated with the "woman" gender and most masculin traits would be associated with the "man" gender. I think it started when women wanted to be respected for being able to perform some roles that were male dominated.

But, and this is important, it is not important. It is like a theory that can never be proven or dis-proven. It is a concept and it will always only be a concept. Arguing about it is pointless. It is a trap to argue about something that can never be proven or dis-proven.

It is a leftist tactic: Define a word, then argue about the meaning of the word.

Why?

Because it fools weak-minded people into believing that the definition of the word is way more meaningful than it is. Look at the people in this thread. They think "Oh, I know what gender means. They do not understand what gender is. They think dudes with dicks should not be able to invade women's spaces. Therefore, dudes with dicks should be able to invade women's spaces."

Seriously. Read that again. That is exactly their rationale for fighting so hard for something they know, deep down they know, is wrong.
I was trolling you before, but that was then, this is now. In all seriousness, why not shell out a few clams, Prowlinator?

 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,465
Location
Chicagoland
OK I'll bite....what in the actual fuck are you talking about?
You've never heard of MAPs. I'm surprised. It was all over the news not that long ago when a prominent Leftist academic published a paper that attempts to recast pedophiles as "Minor Attracted Persons." You can look it up.

These are the same Cultural Marxist Academic Filth that successfully recast homosexuals as "Gays" as a way of softening and normalizing what heretofore had always been considered a deviant sexual perversion. I'm old enough to remember watching the Flintstones where Fred and Barney went down to old Bedrock to "have a gay old time," and no one back in those days thought they were going to a prehistoric bath house to engage in homo sex.
 
Last edited:

Jack

An ocean of most souls is a dry bed of sand
Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,058
Location
Upper US
You've never heard of MAPs. I'm surprised. It was all over the news not that long ago when a prominent Leftist academic published a paper that attempts to recast pedophiles as "Minor Attracted Persons." You can look it up.

These are the same Cultural Marxist Academic Filth that successfully recast homosexuals as "Gays" as a way of softening and normalizing what heretofore had always been considered a deviant sexual perversion. I'm old enough to remember watching the Flintstones where Fred and Barney went down to old Bedrock to "have a gay old time," and no one back in those days thought they were going to a prehistoric bath house to engage in homo sex.
When it comes to anything involving children I usually just say scroll. Have no interest in normalizing anything involving sexual violence towards kids being an adult survivor myself.

So no, I never heard the term before you brought it up.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,465
Location
Chicagoland
When it comes to anything involving children I usually just say scroll. Have no interest in normalizing anything involving sexual violence towards kids being an adult survivor myself.

So no, I never heard the term before you brought it up.
I can respect that. Sorry for your trauma. But you should be cognizant of what the leading intellectual luminaries of the Leftist ideology you support and defend here are saying. Today you're defending the Trannies because that's what the ideology you subscribe to compels you to do. So be aware that you may be asked to defend MAPs in the future.
 

Jack

An ocean of most souls is a dry bed of sand
Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,058
Location
Upper US
I can respect that. Sorry for your trauma. But you should be cognizant of what the leading intellectual luminaries of the Leftist ideology you support and defend here are saying. Today you're defending the Trannies because that's what the ideology you subscribe to compels you to do. So be aware that you may be asked to defend MAPs in the future.
I don't support "leftist ideology" whatever that means. I'm a fiscal conservative that leans liberal. I'm not a democrat, progressive, or radical anything. I believe in equal rights for everyone including the people your side loves to marginalize. I'm not defending "trannies" this pig fucking ignorant

FWIW I voted for Bernie this election.
 
Last edited:

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,465
Location
Chicagoland
I don't support "leftist ideology" whatever that means. I'm a fiscal conservative that leans liberal. I'm not a democrat, progressive, or radical anything. I believe in equal rights for everyone including the people your side loves to marginalize. I'm not defending "trannies" this pig fucking ignorant

FWIW I voted for Bernie this election.
I see. You're not a Leftist, you just play one on the internets. Interesting.

Here's a question: Who are these people that "(my) side loves to marginalize?" How are these people "marginalized?" And exactly which "rights" are these "marginalized" people denied?
 

Jack

An ocean of most souls is a dry bed of sand
Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,058
Location
Upper US
I see. You're not a Leftist, you just play one on the internets. Interesting.

Here's a question: Who are these people that "(my) side loves to marginalize?" How are these people "marginalized?" And exactly which "rights" are these "marginalized" people denied?
Transwomen for one. Gay men for 2. Your side seems to like lesbians. Must be hot to watch two women fuck I guess.

Y'all don't even listen to the hate and bullshit you spew like breathing. It's all normalized. Transwomen are not "trannies". Transvestite is a perjorative term for crossdresser. Different animal entirely. Then there's "fags" etc etc etc.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,465
Location
Chicagoland
Transwomen for one. Gay men for 2. Your side seems to like lesbians. Must be hot to watch two women fuck I guess.

Y'all don't even listen to the hate and bullshit you spew like breathing. It's all normalized. Transwomen are not "trannies". Transvestite is a perjorative term for crossdresser. Different animal entirely. Then there's "fags" etc etc etc.

There's no such thing as a "trans woman." This has already been long established by science. One is either genetically male or genetically female. There are occasional mutations that may cause a human to be born a hermaphrodite, but such mutations are exceedingly rare.

There is also a rare physiological condition labeled as "gender dysphoria" wherein the subject suffers from hormonal imbalances through puberty which often result in an acquired psychological fixation regarding gender. The numbers of actual persons who actually have these clinical conditions are far less than 0.000001% of the general population, so all these trannies walking around claiming to be trannies are just following a fad. Same thing with the majority of men who call themselves "gay."

As for lesbians, most lesbians are just fat and ugly bitches that can't find a man to fuck them.

In any case, please tell me exactly which "rights" any person in any of the categories above have been denied to them?