- Reaction score
- 19,637
Agreed but X is still riding ‘pillion’ on that lame horse’To be honest, I think that's @Adam Hitler
Agreed but X is still riding ‘pillion’ on that lame horse’To be honest, I think that's @Adam Hitler
You have alts?Did somebody say I have to stop posting as my Alts?
Where'd you learn all them big words, toadette?Dilf and me were having a conversation and you stuck your snout in.
Go gaslight someone else, you disingenuous moron.
Only on the inside, one of them is a Navy Seal/NASCAR Driver!You have alts?
You have alts?
I don’t gaf how many alts you haveBF and I get along just fine. We have exactly the same vision for this board.
As far as alts, I'm the main. There are no "alts" connected to me here.
I always suggest to them the time-honored procedure known as TYDAFOS.Flamboyant Hitler, don’t jump, self immolation is more real Nazi
For maybe a year or so after I quit CO, I kept one alt that I’d pop into every month or two, sometimes I’d just see what was trending, and now and then drop a turd in someone’s punch, and go check back in a week or two for reacts, usually one or two “who the heck is this?”I tried ALTs long ago, but I simply cannot hide my light under a bushel, and everyone knew it was me after a few poasts. That's why I've only changed my ID 4 times in all of internets history.
usually one or two “who the heck is this?”
I ran a couple three hundred alts back in the day at TK. Maybe we're not talking about the same thing?Well, that is close.
It was really "Who the heck is dickbreath?"
Even back then.
I would, too, if it had a century-long track record of shitting on the shareholders.Watched a little Nati news, it gave me a revelation. If I ever buy a well running company with a long history, I’ll immediately fire the entire senior management team
You elided over “well running” try to pay attention.I would, too, if it had a century-long track record of shitting on the shareholders.
No, I acknowledge that. It's just what it's doing well that isn't 100% good.You elided over “well running” try to pay attention.
Examples?No, I acknowledge that. It's just what it's doing well that isn't 100% good.
Foreign military adventurism, money-laundering through the military-industrial complex, forced prison labor, contracting with private prisons... cataloguing the various malfeasance and malefactors emergent from the Federal government alone could be a pretty serious undertaking.Examples?
I agree reckless abandon cutting ongoing programs wholesale firing of critical staff to assuage the outrage over his fealty to the mega donor class, I’ll give you 3 guesses why he’s wanting to raise the debt limit, and go!Foreign military adventurism, money-laundering through the military-industrial complex, forced prison labor, contracting with private prisons... cataloguing the various malfeasance and malefactors emergent from the Federal government alone could be a pretty serious undertaking.
Because every time we hit it, they just raise it anyway -- except that it turns into a tempest in a teacup, with the negotiations for the limit increase coming with assloads of profligate spending bundled in. So my guess is that he means to take that regular opportunity for earmarking away from them.I agree reckless abandon cutting ongoing programs wholesale firing of critical staff to assuage the outrage over his fealty to the mega donor class, I’ll give you 3 guesses why he’s wanting to raise the debt limit, and go!
It was an artifice to begin with, the way it’s written, G goes about its business changing law and creating bills that need funding, only to hit the made up road block that asks when it’s time to pay the money already spent “well are you going to pay your bills Punk?”Because every time we hit it, they just raise it anyway -- except that it turns into a tempest in a teacup, with the negotiations for the limit increase coming with assloads of profligate spending bundled in. So my guess is that he means to take that regular opportunity for earmarking away from them.
Frankly, I'd have preferred to see another solution; for example, a total prohibition on spending having any part of debt ceiling limit negotiations.It was an artifice to begin with, the way it’s written, G goes about its business changing law and creating bills that need funding, only to hit the made up road block that asks when it’s time to pay the money already spent “well are you going to pay your bills Punk?”
Which I guess is what you said +\-
Seems reflective of the idea that there are things POTUS knows that the rest of us don't. To put it another way, he was sure he could halt the war in 24 hours based on what he knew as former POTUS -- what he came to know once he was POTUS again altered his perspective on the odds of accomplishing that.Apropos of nada the end the Putin war in 24 hours guy has now flip flopped again and has sent Patriot missiles to Ukraine. Which I approve
I agree Trump’s facility In shooting from the hip before reconnaissance is very troubling. Don’t forget he knows more than flag officers and is also steadily decimating the actual people in Washington putting in the work.Seems reflective of the idea that there are things POTUS knows that the rest of us don't. To put it another way, he was sure he could halt the war in 24 hours based on what he knew as former POTUS -- what he came to know once he was POTUS again altered his perspective on the odds of accomplishing that.
Depends on what one finds troubling. Optimism may lead somebody to over-promise, but at least it shows an intention to deliver.I agree Trump’s facility In shooting from the hip before reconnaissance is very troubling.
Not all the work they're putting in benefits anybody but themselves. That contingent has to go, and they're not about to spontaneously develop consciences and go on their own.Don’t forget he knows more than flag officers and is also steadily decimating the actual people in Washington putting in the work.
I agree if Roosevelt had only installed his donors and his sycophantic fraternity brothers and fam. WW2 would have been averted!Depends on what one finds troubling. Optimism may lead somebody to over-promise, but at least it shows an intention to deliver.
Not all the work they're putting in benefits anybody but themselves. That contingent has to go, and they're not about to spontaneously develop consciences and go on their own.