I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
He was assboxed several times.I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
Blandy's on to something here.
Biggies should be brought back, but the word filter here should replace the word "cock" with "peppermint Life Savers."
I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
You shouldn't have been surprised. It was coming, it just took a while.
Perhaps, but I didn't see Holliday being banned. I wonder if he's coming back?
Do you miss Holliday?
I guess I do.
I see.
Blandy's on to something here.
Biggies should be brought back, but the word filter here should replace the word "cock" with "peppermint Life Savers."
He was assboxed several times.I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
He was assboxed several times.I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
Oh ffs, he simply pissed off Admin one too many times, and at least that shows a modicum of courage, and by the way Oak, the Joo I used to know would destroy you in one post, count yourself lucky he castrated himself.
Oh, she’s trying her best to get a panel here.The only way to stop this is for his posting privileges set to limit the number of posts per hour/and or minimum words required per posts increased. He will not self moderate. @Bastard Factory, fyi.Blandy,can you not just write ONE LONG FUCKING post instead of this boring as fuck one line spamathons that you like to go in too.Post count really doesn't mean fuck all,you battered mars bar eating jock.
You're not running shit here. You couldn't even run a dead forum. No one is "stop"ing Blandscape from how he normally posts. If you don't like it, you can always go revive that shithole you named FT. Or you can go and suck more ass at TBC and try to ingratiate your way into a global mod spot.
I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
You shouldn't have been surprised. It was coming, it just took a while.
Perhaps, but I didn't see Holliday being banned. I wonder if he's coming back?
Do you miss Holliday?
I guess I do.
I see.
Do you though? There is a context. In a forum full of morons, NAZIs (same thing), the fetishists...there are few posters that can post anything worth reading.
And whit are you doing boy, what do you always do, beg fur a panel and hope fur the best.Oh, she’s trying her best to get a panel here.The only way to stop this is for his posting privileges set to limit the number of posts per hour/and or minimum words required per posts increased. He will not self moderate. @Bastard Factory, fyi.Blandy,can you not just write ONE LONG FUCKING post instead of this boring as fuck one line spamathons that you like to go in too.Post count really doesn't mean fuck all,you battered mars bar eating jock.
You're not running shit here. You couldn't even run a dead forum. No one is "stop"ing Blandscape from how he normally posts. If you don't like it, you can always go revive that shithole you named FT. Or you can go and suck more ass at TBC and try to ingratiate your way into a global mod spot.
I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
I always wondered outa a blind curiosity, why your multiple accounts were never banned, and then I realised you were always just magnolia, on every site you ever inhabited (all of them).
I don’t want a panel here and have refused it.And whit are you doing boy, what do you always do, beg fur a panel and hope fur the best.Oh, she’s trying her best to get a panel here.The only way to stop this is for his posting privileges set to limit the number of posts per hour/and or minimum words required per posts increased. He will not self moderate. @Bastard Factory, fyi.Blandy,can you not just write ONE LONG FUCKING post instead of this boring as fuck one line spamathons that you like to go in too.Post count really doesn't mean fuck all,you battered mars bar eating jock.
You're not running shit here. You couldn't even run a dead forum. No one is "stop"ing Blandscape from how he normally posts. If you don't like it, you can always go revive that shithole you named FT. Or you can go and suck more ass at TBC and try to ingratiate your way into a global mod spot.
I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
You shouldn't have been surprised. It was coming, it just took a while.
Perhaps, but I didn't see Holliday being banned. I wonder if he's coming back?
Do you miss Holliday?
I guess I do.
I see.
Do you though? There is a context. In a forum full of morons, NAZIs (same thing), the fetishists...there are few posters that can post anything worth reading.
Eh. I never really got to know him, though I almost had it out with him via pm's when I kindly asked him to stop doing something.
I mean I don't miss him but then again I really never paid any attention to him out here. In my mind he was like 360 and Admin...harmless.
I don’t want a panel here and have refused it.And whit are you doing boy, what do you always do, beg fur a panel and hope fur the best.Oh, she’s trying her best to get a panel here.The only way to stop this is for his posting privileges set to limit the number of posts per hour/and or minimum words required per posts increased. He will not self moderate. @Bastard Factory, fyi.Blandy,can you not just write ONE LONG FUCKING post instead of this boring as fuck one line spamathons that you like to go in too.Post count really doesn't mean fuck all,you battered mars bar eating jock.
You're not running shit here. You couldn't even run a dead forum. No one is "stop"ing Blandscape from how he normally posts. If you don't like it, you can always go revive that shithole you named FT. Or you can go and suck more ass at TBC and try to ingratiate your way into a global mod spot.
Sorry, slappy.
He was assboxed several times.I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
Oh ffs, he simply pissed off Admin one too many times, and at least that shows a modicum of courage, and by the way Oak, the Joo I used to know would destroy you in one post, count yourself lucky he castrated himself.
You're right, he would call me fat.
Ye see, old Blandy is reminding you what a meltdown forum is.
Yeah roll your eyes, it's a fact.
He was assboxed several times.I'll translate for Blandscape. He's basically saying it's not a good idea to ban any poster because less posters means less people to debate with and without posters, new ideas are aborted before they have a chance to grow into a thread.
At least I think that's what he's saying.
Oh, I get it. However, are we responsible for the banning?
I don't know about you but I am.
I didn't like his tedious posts. I don't find him to be a good poster. However, I came back from a short hiatus to find Bigly Stupid, Holliday and Admin banned.
I was surprised to be frank.
I assume the owner warned biggie numerous times before banning him.
Oh ffs, he simply pissed off Admin one too many times, and at least that shows a modicum of courage, and by the way Oak, the Joo I used to know would destroy you in one post, count yourself lucky he castrated himself.
You're right, he would call me fat.
well these flame legends always think they are literally beating up people on these forums by calling them gay and other assorted, unimaginative insults.
very rarely did anyone post a well thought out and funny flame that read like a short story at TRF or SG. There were a few great ones posted at FT but none since.
My work in this thread is done.
That’s not gonna happen.My work in this thread is done.
Disappointing performance. We should ask for Bigly Stupid to be reinstated, because this is where we are now.
No, we should not ask for that buffoon to be reinstated. It has been quite nice without him and you know who running around flinging their turd pies up and down the forum.My work in this thread is done.
Disappointing performance. We should ask for Bigly Stupid to be reinstated, because this is where we are now.
You do realize that community also means a group of people with similar interests right?We are a very small community, you fucking morons need to bear dat in mind before you start proffering advice on your own failed sites.
Did you say "community"?
can you define what this "community" is.
do people live there?
do you live there?
No, we should not ask for that buffoon to be reinstated. It has been quite nice without him and you know who running around flinging their turd pies up and down the forum.My work in this thread is done.
Disappointing performance. We should ask for Bigly Stupid to be reinstated, because this is where we are now.
No, we should not ask for that buffoon to be reinstated. It has been quite nice without him and you know who running around flinging their turd pies up and down the forum.My work in this thread is done.
Disappointing performance. We should ask for Bigly Stupid to be reinstated, because this is where we are now.
That was a bit of sarcasm on my part.
eta: "Where we are now." So desperate that "we" want a guy that only posts 3 catch phrases.
If that's "where we are", shut it all down, call it several good years and move on.