Conservatard males are the biggest pussies

[Lily]

Watching @Lily and @Flynn dance around trying to pretend that @Flynn did not criticize a group of people that @Lily is clearly a part of....

Is kinda par for the course.

Sure, I'm a part of some homosexual and transgender movement...now all you need is proof.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Ohhhhh....the dreaded faglame!

Is that worse than the Skank lame?

C'mon! Call me a tard! Makes me want to slowly unbuckle your shoes.

 

[Flynn]

Is that worse than the Skank lame?

C'mon! Call me a tard! Makes me want to slowly unbuckle your shoes.

I thought you were going to cite your source for skank?

P.S.-You're a tard.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I thought you were going to cite your source for skank?

No one needs a source for skank, Skank. It's a self evident descriptor that we've all been using since middle school.

See, Skank?

 

[Flynn]

No one needs a source for skank, Skank. It's a self evident descriptor that we've all been using since middle school.

See, Skank?

I just want to see where it says that a skank is an Indian Male that shits in the street.

Source?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

... you forgot about the blow jobs in the back alleys for pocket change.

Didn't Poofer's brother fill you in when you took over the Flynnmobile?

 

[The Prowler]

Source?

Right here....

a skank is an Indian Male that shits in the street.

Glad I could help.

 

[Flynn]

... you forgot about the blow jobs in the back alleys for pocket change.

Didn't Poofer's brother fill you in when you took over the Flynnmobile?

Deflection noted. Do you enjoy making up fake facts?

 

[Flynn]

Right here....



Glad I could help.

Nope. Nice try. Try posting the whole post.

 

[The Prowler]

Didn't Poofer's brother fill you in when you took over the Flynnmobile?

I think Pickles knew what he was doing when he passed the account over to a drooling idiot.

A gift for the community to pummel.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I think Pickles knew what he was doing when he passed the account over to a drooling idiot.

A gift for the community to pummel.

I do like when Sabu is driving. He may be a male Indian Skank, but he's funny.

 

[The Prowler]

I do like when Sabu is driving. He may be a male Indian Skank, but he's funny.

Bling bling.

 

[Lily]

I do like when Sabu is driving. He may be a male Indian Skank, but he's funny.

 

[Admin.]

Why NYC have TDS?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Flynn]

I do like when Sabu is driving. He may be a male Indian Skank, but he's funny.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

One side is for a smaller government and the other wants to expand it. I just think that both sides are to blame.

Despite Admin throwing a "No" reaction to your above post, because he's a fucking dunce... the fact is you are right.

Extremists on both sides make both sides look as dumb as Admin. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The extremists are squeaky wheels. They are loud. They are obnoxious. They are noticed. They are drama filled which the media loves because, click bait. And because they are such sqeaky wheels, this also means they are fucking broken. Not working correctly. Too far gone.

The majority of us go along to get along. Because we have lives outside of horseshit argumentative neverending drama club fuckwittery.

The country is split but there are more liberals by popular vote. Did you ever wonder why this is?

Even a liberal will say we don't want the government in our bedrooms and in our bodies but in order for the government to make shit fair... it HAS TO BE THERE.

Ask anyone on the street if they think the government should be big and huge and do everything for everyone and most (on both sides) will say no. And rightly so.

But then after they say no, you simply ask if the government should assist with housing because we don't have enough and they will say yes. And should the government assist with food because of starvation and they will say yes. And should the government assist with health insurance because it costs too much and they will say yes.

See what I mean? It's literally a Catch 22 moment.

No one WANTS a big intrusive bloated money hungry corrupt government but the more you say we need help from the government then by logic the government has to be that much bigger to give you the help you say you need.

Anyone have kids here? If you give a mouse a cookie... If you give the government a reason to be bigger. It fucking will be. And once it is... good goddamned luck trying to tame that beast.

 

[Lily]

Despite Admin throwing a "No" reaction to your above post, because he's a fucking dunce... the fact is you are right.

Extremists on both sides make both sides look as dumb as Admin. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The extremists are squeaky wheels. They are loud. They are obnoxious. They are noticed. They are drama filled which the media loves because, click bait. And because they are such sqeaky wheels, this also means they are fucking broken. Not working correctly. Too far gone.

The majority of us go along to get along. Because we have lives outside of horseshit argumentative neverending drama club fuckwittery.

The country is split but there are more liberals by popular vote. Did you ever wonder why this is?

Even a liberal will say we don't want the government in our bedrooms and in our bodies but in order for the government to make shit fair... it HAS TO BE THERE.

Ask anyone on the street if they think the government should be big and huge and do everything for everyone and most (on both sides) will say no. And rightly so.

But then after they say no, you simply ask if the government should assist with housing because we don't have enough and they will say yes. And should the government assist with food because of starvation and they will say yes. And should the government assist with health insurance because it costs too much and they will say yes.

See what I mean? It's literally a Catch 22 moment.

No one WANTS a big intrusive bloated money hungry corrupt government but the more you say we need help from the government then by logic the government has to be that much bigger to give you the help you say you need.

Anyone have kids here? If you give a mouse a cookie... If you give the government a reason to be bigger. It fucking will be. And once it is... good goddamned luck trying to tame that beast.

Except most other industrialized nations in the world. And on average, their people are happier.

The American right has fallen for the boogeyman big gooberment freak out and yet we pay more and taxes and get less for it. Oh, the government is as involved as it wants, as long as those in power get what they pay for when they buy the politicians.

 

[Admin.]

Despite Admin throwing a "No" reaction to your above post, because he's a fucking dunce... the fact is you are right.

Extremists on both sides make both sides look as dumb as Admin. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The extremists are squeaky wheels. They are loud. They are obnoxious. They are noticed. They are drama filled which the media loves because, click bait. And because they are such sqeaky wheels, this also means they are fucking broken. Not working correctly. Too far gone.

The majority of us go along to get along. Because we have lives outside of horseshit argumentative neverending drama club fuckwittery.

The country is split but there are more liberals by popular vote. Did you ever wonder why this is?

Even a liberal will say we don't want the government in our bedrooms and in our bodies but in order for the government to make shit fair... it HAS TO BE THERE.

Ask anyone on the street if they think the government should be big and huge and do everything for everyone and most (on both sides) will say no. And rightly so.

But then after they say no, you simply ask if the government should assist with housing because we don't have enough and they will say yes. And should the government assist with food because of starvation and they will say yes. And should the government assist with health insurance because it costs too much and they will say yes.

See what I mean? It's literally a Catch 22 moment.

No one WANTS a big intrusive bloated money hungry corrupt government but the more you say we need help from the government then by logic the government has to be that much bigger to give you the help you say you need.

Anyone have kids here? If you give a mouse a cookie... If you give the government a reason to be bigger. It fucking will be. And once it is... good goddamned luck trying to tame that beast.

"OMG The Negroes got guns!" Conservative White Males.

The Mulford Act was a California bill passed in 1967 in response to the Black Panther Party's open carry of loaded guns. The bill prohibited the public carrying of loaded firearms without a permit. The National Rifle Association (NRA) supported the bill, and then-Governor Ronald Reagan signed it into law.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[MrNiceGuy]

Except most other industrialized nations in the world. And on average, their people are happier.

The American right has fallen for the boogeyman big gooberment freak out and yet we pay more and taxes and get less for it. Oh, the government is as involved as it wants, as long as those in power get what they pay for when they buy the politicians.

Which countries are happier? The ones with only one culture and skin tone, i.e. ALL OF THEM but us? Is any other country a melting pot? Yeah, maybe in other countries they all have one skin tone so one side can't gross claim racism against any debate from the other side; they probably are happier not dealing with such foolish dogshit antics.

When socialists like Bernie Sanders says it works in Norway, they forget we are multicultural with pretty much open borders and individual states each trying their own thing, held in place by a federal gov't. We are a true experiment in freedom. "Happier" people in other countries are just clones. They ain't us. We are the golden delicious apple to whatever orange fruit roll up wannabe they roll up as.

 

[Lily]

Which countries are happier? The ones with only one culture and skin tone, i.e. ALL OF THEM but us? Is any other country a melting pot? Yeah, maybe in other countries they all have one skin tone so one side can't gross claim racism against any debate from the other side; they probably are happier not dealing with such foolish dogshit antics.

When socialists like Bernie Sanders says it works in Norway, they forget we are multicultural with pretty much open borders and individual states each trying their own thing, held in place by a federal gov't. We are a true experiment in freedom. "Happier" people in other countries are just clones. They ain't us. We are the golden delicious apple to whatever orange fruit roll up wannabe they roll up as.

Why can't we be happy with different skin tones? Who believes that?

 

[MrNiceGuy]

Why can't we be happy with different skin tones? Who believes that?

Canada can be happy with different skin tones. Did you know Canada had slaves?

If you listen to Admin, the USA is probably the only place slavery existed anywhere in the known universe!

To a prog like him, when you have one thing to argue like that, you just never let that shit go. Especially when you have no actual solutions to any problem that ever existed so the best you can hope for is to say, hey I don't know how to fix shit but I sure know that other side is full of racists!

I don't equate a happy poll with how well the USA is going. This country didn't start by people being so happy. No offense to the lotus-eater Admin. Happy & practical are not always similar paths.

 

[Lily]

Canada can be happy with different skin tones. Did you know Canada had slaves?

If you listen to Admin, the USA is probably the only place slavery existed anywhere in the known universe!

To a prog like him, when you have one thing to argue like that, you just never let that shit go. Especially when you have no actual solutions to any problem that ever existed so the best you can hope for is to say, hey I don't know how to fix shit but I sure know that other side is full of racists!

I don't equate a happy poll with how well the USA is going. This country didn't start by people being so happy. No offense to the lotus-eater Admin. Happy & practical are not always similar paths.

Yes, I know Canada had slaves. But being a British colony at one time, they ended slavery before we did.

Now, as for Admin, and the topic of slavery, I think you're not seeing what's pretty obvious. It's a deflection to focus on slavery in other countries when that's not our history. Why point fingers at other countries and not focus on our own history?

 

[MrNiceGuy]

"OMG The Negroes got guns!" Conservative White Males.

The Mulford Act was a California bill passed in 1967 in response to the Black Panther Party's open carry of loaded guns. The bill prohibited the public carrying of loaded firearms without a permit. The National Rifle Association (NRA) supported the bill, and then-Governor Ronald Reagan signed it into law.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

New Mexico's governor has a gun ban going now. Do you think she is against old white men having guns?

See, my fiend? Extremists. Extremists are the assholes who make both of us look bad.

I just admit that fact, while you choose to do your best ostrich head in sand impersonation.

You want permits and background checks and fingerprint registrations and gun insurance and yet when the nra and Reagan did it, you scream racism again.

You lost. And you are lost.

Sho shad.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

Yes, I know Canada had slaves. But being a British colony at one time, they ended slavery before we did.

Now, as for Admin, and the topic of slavery, I think you're not seeing what's pretty obvious. It's a deflection to focus on slavery in other countries when that's not our history. Why point fingers at other countries and not focus on our own history?

So because Canada ended slavery in 1834 and the USA ended slavery in 1865 that means we are chopped liver compared to the heightened enlightened Canadians, even though none of us living now had any thing to do with any of that then?

Connect me some dots please. Should we all die in a fire because we ended it 31 years later? I mean, not us. We weren't even born.

You bring up the happiness of other industrialized nations and ask me why we can't be happier and I bring up Canada had slavery too so why is it such a big deal here and you wonder why it is ME who started comparing another country history to ours?

Sorry, but I call it like a courtoom. You opened the door. I just walked my argument in through the same door you already opened.

 

[Lily]

So because Canada ended slavery in 1834 and the USA ended slavery in 1865 that means we are chopped liver compared to the heightened enlightened Canadians, even though none of us living now had any thing to do with any of that then?

Connect me some dots please. Should we all die in a fire because we ended it 31 years later? I mean, not us. We weren't even born.

You bring up the happiness of other industrialized nations and ask me why we can't be happier and I bring up Canada had slavery too so why is it such a big deal here and you wonder why it is ME who started comparing another country history to ours?

Sorry, but I call it like a courtoom. You opened the door. I just walked my argument in through the same dolr you already opened.

Who said we're chopped liver? I'm saying that it's irrelevant to us as Americans. Good for them, but what does that have to do with us now?

I am comparing industrialized nations now. It's not about the past and what we did then. It's about what impacts us now. Right now there are countries with happier citizens.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

"OMG The Negroes got guns!" Conservative White Males.

The Mulford Act was a California bill passed in 1967 in response to the Black Panther Party's open carry of loaded guns. The bill prohibited the public carrying of loaded firearms without a permit. The National Rifle Association (NRA) supported the bill, and then-Governor Ronald Reagan signed it into law.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Actually I do want Admin's take on this, or anyone who can chime in.

So the idea of a national gun registration brings up heated debate because the system could be rife for abuse.

Nevermind that. I want to go beyond that.

So, when we are born, what if all fingerprints and dna from all babies born is logged into a national database so when a crime is committed and dna is found, they don't even have to wait on familial dna websites if the suspect isn't already in the system?

I'm interested to hear all viewpoints on this.

 

[Lily]

Actually I do want Admin's take on this, or anyone who can chime in.

So the idea of a national gun registration brings up heated debate because the system could be rife for abuse.

Nevermind that. I want to go beyond that.

So, when we are born, what if all fingerprints and dna from all babies born is logged into a national database so when a crime is committed and dna is found, they don't even have to wait on familial dna websites if the suspect isn't already in the system?

I'm interested to hear all viewpoints on this.

In a country where we have a constitutional right to the presumption of innocence, I don't support our fingerprints being held by the government.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

In a country where we have a constitutional right to the presumption of innocence, I don't support our fingerprints being held by the government.

What if you buy a gun? Should your fingerprints/dna be held with the registration?

 

[Lily]

What if you buy a gun? Should your fingerprints/dna be held with the registration?

No.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

No.

In a country where we have a constitutional right to the presumption of innocence, I don't support our fingerprints being held by the government.

Careful now Lily, you may skew conservative and be banned from Admin's protest everything block traffic at all times, mailing list.

But, thank-you for your candid replies.