Faggot book for four-year-olds

[The Prowler]

This thread is an excellent representation of the minds of the pathological right. You don't even care about the vulnerable people in society.

They are throwaway people...you people are straight up evil.

They are mentally ill and need help.

Pretending that they are okay is not helping them.

How many of your transgender friends, who are totally accepted and loved by you and your close circle, can you say say you believe are truly happy?

 

[Lily]

Or the price of tea in China, for that matter.

Yeah, because unfair competition in athletics is so much more important than the destruction of childhood innocence and trauma.

 

[Lily]

They are mentally ill and need help.

Pretending that they are okay is not helping them.

How many of your transgender friends, who are totally accepted and loved by you and your close circle, can you say say you believe are truly happy?

There's nothing you're doing on a troll forum that's helping anything.

 

[The Prowler]

Yeah, because unfair competition in athletics is so much more important than the destruction of childhood innocence and trauma.

Uggg.

Can only think one thing at time.

Uuuuggggg.

 

[Lily]

Uggg.

Can only think one thing at time.

Uuuuggggg.

No, but I prioritize what I think is important. That's how real problems should be addressed. No one person, nor one organization can "do it all". So, to prevent the most egregious of outcomes, we should address those in order of priority, imo.

 

[Courier Six]

There's nothing you're doing on a troll forum that's helping anything.

And yet, people speaking up against Commie troons indoctrinating children seems to make you bust out every manipulation technique in the narcissist toolbox. Why is that?

 

[Lily]

And yet, people speaking up against Commie troons indoctrinating children seems to make you bust out every manipulation technique in the narcissist toolbox. Why is that?

Who's manipulating anything, retard?

I am pushing back on bullshit. Yours and anyone who comes here to make a mockery of vulnerable children.

 

[Courier Six]

I am pushing back on bullshit.

Really? Sounds to me like you're bitching and whining that people are only pushing back on Commie troon indoctrination of kids by speaking up against it. You frame that as if you think it's meaningless -- at the same time, you just called it, "bullshit", as if you think it does indeed have meaning and might affect something you don't want affected.

Why don't you take a little time to decide what your story is before you try to convince me of it.

 

[Lily]

I've been skimming the following resource guide on the abuse of children. Interestingly, nowhere does it talk about whining on forums as a solid prevention strategy. Funny that.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[The Prowler]

No, but I prioritize what I think is important. That's how real problems should be addressed. No one person, nor one organization can "do it all". So, to prevent the most egregious of outcomes, we should address those in order of priority, imo.

Well then why are we not talking about climate change?

Or do you think there are more important things than the extinction of the human species?

 

[Lily]

Really? Sounds to me like you're bitching and whining that people are only pushing back on Commie troon indoctrination of kids by speaking up against it. You frame that as if you think it's meaningless -- at the same time, you just called it, "bullshit", as if you think it does indeed have meaning and might affect something you don't want affected.

Why don't you take a little time to decide what your story is before you try to convince me of it.

I'm not here to convince you or any other mentally twisted individual of anything.

 

[Courier Six]

I'm not here to convince you or any other mentally twisted individual of anything.

Yeah, you're really givin' off that "ferocious indifference" vibe with all these attacks on people who don't want kids indoctrinated by Commie troons.

Yyyep. That's very, very believable. Mmm hm.

 

[Lily]

Well then why are we not talking about climate change?

Or do you think there are more important things than the extinction of the human species?

Because this thread isn't about climate change it's about the abuse of children. There is a politics forum and you can go there right now and discuss climate change. I think it's a great idea.

 

[Courier Six]

Because this thread isn't about climate change it's about the abuse of children. There is a politics forum and you can go there right now and discuss climate change. I think it's a great idea.

What, you don't have a Religion forum to put that one in?

 

[Lily]

Yeah, you're really givin' off that "ferocious indifference" vibe with all these attacks on people who don't want kids indoctrinated by Commie troons.

Yyyep. That's very, very believable. Mmm hm.

Yeah, everything is my fault, including the abuse of children across the globe. Cool story, bro.

 

[Lily]

What, you don't have a Religion forum to put that one in?

First, "I" don't own this forum, so I don't have any sub that belongs to me. If you want a religion sub, ask the owner for one.

 

[Courier Six]

Yeah, everything is my fault, including the abuse of children across the globe. Cool story, bro.

I already called it, you don't have to go out of your way to prove it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Courier Six]

First, "I" don't own this forum, so I don't have any sub that belongs to me. If you want a religion sub, ask the owner for one.

That'd be the natural place for discussions of that religion, is all I'm saying.

 

[Lily]

I already called it, you don't have to go out of your way to prove it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More bullshit. Funny, sounds like Dove under a new nic

 

[Lily]

That'd be the natural place for discussions of that religion, is all I'm saying.

You are certainly entitled to that opinion.

 

[The Prowler]

it's about the abuse of children

It is about removing overly sexual, inappropriate reading matter from children's spaces.

You are okay with changing the subject.

Just not when you are put into a tough spot.

Then it becomes "Must talk about what has been beaten to death already!"

 

[Lily]

It is about removing overly sexual, inappropriate reading matter from children's spaces.

You are okay with changing the subject.

Just not when you are put into a tough spot.

Then it becomes "Must talk about what has been beaten to death already!"

That "book" that was posted by Madam Shitler was not overtly sexual whatsoever. The books that are available for minors over the age of 12 are age appropriate. They have to be checked out of libraries. They are not part of curriculum that anyone has been able to demonstrate to the readers here. They aren't in any way, shape, or form, mandatory.

If it were mandatory, we would be having a different discussion.

What other people allow their minor children to read is not your call. Do you understand that?

 

[Courier Six]

What other people allow their minor children to read is not your call.

Nobody's talking about what other peoples' minor children are reading at home. That, indeed, is nobody's call. This thread kicked off with some shit put in the hands of a 4 year old at a pre-school. Yeah. That's a matter for discussion.

And it's something you're evidently defending. Porn in the hands of little kids. Squirm all you want, you're on the wrong side of this. Best course of action? Stop denying it, since it's undeniable, and be proud to be a villain. You're all about pride, right? Well, be proud to be a degenerate shitheel who champions the perversion of little kids, then.

 

[Lily]

Nobody's talking about what other peoples' minor children are reading at home. That, indeed, is nobody's call. This thread kicked off with some shit put in the hands of a 4 year old at a pre-school. Yeah. That's a matter for discussion.

And it's something you're evidently defending. Porn in the hands of little kids. Squirm all you want, you're on the wrong side of this. Best course of action? Stop denying it, since it's undeniable, and be proud to be a villain. You're all about pride, right? Well, be proud to be a degenerate shitheel who champions the perversion of little kids, then.

How is a few pages with rainbows, porn?

 

[Courier Six]

How is a few pages with rainbows, porn?

If the truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie. The opening post shows what was in the book. It wasn't "a few pages with rainbows."

If you're going to lie, have the decency to at least be a little bit skilled at it.

 

[Lily]

If the truth was on your side, you wouldn't have to lie. The opening post shows what was in the book. It wasn't "a few pages with rainbows."

If you're going to lie, have the decency to at least be a little bit skilled at it.

Where was the porn, that I did miss?

 

[Courier Six]

Where was the porn, that I did miss?

You didn't miss it. And since you're clearly literate, you're obviously not mentally deficient enough to not know that it's porn. So there's the lie, wherein you claim to not know that it's porn.

And, as stated, you wouldn't have to lie if you had either a functional moral compass which would place you on the right side of this, or at least sufficient courage to be honest about being a villain.

 

[Lily]

You didn't miss it. And since you're clearly literate, you're obviously not mentally deficient enough to not know that it's porn. So there's the lie, wherein you claim to not know that it's porn.

And, as stated, you wouldn't have to lie if you had either a functional moral compass which would place you on the right side of this, or at least sufficient courage to be honest about being a villain.

How are two people kissing, porn?

Where are the scars those hysterical parents whined about? I don't see them. And you don't see them, because there are no "top surgery", sometimes called "mastectomy" scars.

 

[Courier Six]

How are two people kissing, porn?

What are the "two people" wearing? And what are the sexes of the "two people"? See, I get that you think you're being slick. You're not. You're just using weasel words. You're being a coward.

If you really thought you were on the right side of this topic, you'd have said something like, "Okay, so two men in bondage regalia are kissing in a book aimed at little kids. So what?"

But you haven't got the guts for that, have you. Because you know just as well that putting that in front of little kids is sick. You're just too much of a chickenshit to defend that sickness with courage and honesty.

 

[X]

I already called it, you don't have to go out of your way to prove it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Oi DUHHHvvvy, go wash yer hair you yappy tard