It doesnt matter who wins in November

[Succubus]

As far as I can tell, you're both spun harder than fucking dreidls.

I think I wanna marry you.......

 

[Q]

And then there was that time he traded 5 terrorists for 1 deserter. And that other time he shipped millions of our dollars to a terrorist state. Our how about when his regulatory red tape unnecessarily prolonged a recession. Or when his Attorney General hatched a plot to run guns to Mexican drug cartels to make it look like America's 2nd Amendment guarantee to safeguard our natural birthright to own effective tools for personal, family, and community defense was being exploited by narco-terrorists -- and when questioned about it, he claimed Executive Privilege to get away with it.

Oh, wait. That wasn't Trump, was it.

Who was that?

Let's see if you can guess.

I suppose my friend Barack :-)
But... usually when terrorists are being traded, there is more happening than we (the normal people) know. So I have the idea that we cannot judge that situation.
You might have some idea what I think of the 2nd amendement ;-) I cannot think bad of him if he wants to improve things there :-)
And the other one... I don't know which situation you mean, but political stuff is usually the stuff that takes a long time, has big impact and needs to be done in a proper way. I cannot judge based on the info I have.

You've been conditioned not to use common sense. When terrorists are being released? Put it another way -- when people who want to murder innocent people in order to impose totalitarian religious rule are being released to continue to inflict violence upon innocent lives in order to subjugate people?

That's bad. And you know perfectly well that that's bad. If it was Christians instead of muslims, you'd even be willing to admit that it's bad, and to say so, openly and vocally.

But you've been trained not to. You've been trained to surrender to the aggression of a primitive, backward foreign theocracy.

Of course you can judge that situation. It's not only your right but your obligation, as a civilized man, to judge it.

And I know just exactly what you think of armed civilian self defense. I just pointed that out. You've been trained to be helpless against foreign aggression.

Well, first of all I do not care what kind of terrorsts it were, because all terrorists are despicable people. And too much christians are/were also terrorists. It does not make any difference.
I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also. Especially in amserica lots of stuff is kept secret.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona.... In my mind that is much harder to defend.

 

[skinofevil]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

 

[Q]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I believe the proper english term for it is: "crusades"

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

Trump has it in his prower to prevent it. Again you underestimate the power of propaganda. He and him alone is responsible.

 

[skinofevil]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I believe the proper english term for it is: "crusades"

Nope. That was a proper war, and it was in response to centuries of Islamic conquest of Europe.

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

Trump has it in his prower to prevent it.

Nope, he doesn't. Look up the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution.

Again you underestimate the power of propaganda.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about. There are two remedies for that -- know whereof you post, or cease to post -- and I'll be pleased with whichever of those two remedies you choose.

 

[Adam Hitler]

When I read the humorless debate points of Slaphappy Diabullstinko's
very "serious" winner take all arguments, I am reminded of what was said about winning arguments on the old yahoo boards.
It was
Arguing on yahoo is like the Special Olympics
Even if you win
you're still a retard.

The same could be said for theBadTardsFactory.

PS: Slaphappy never wins, even though it's all that matters to him.
That makes him the most special type of retard.

You're only saying that because you're a leftist and by default almost always lose the argument due to the ridiculous and illogical nature of liberal left wing politics.

 

[Q]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I believe the proper english term for it is: "crusades"

Nope. That was a proper war, and it was in response to centuries of Islamic conquest of Europe.

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

Trump has it in his prower to prevent it.

Nope, he doesn't. Look up the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution.

Again you underestimate the power of propaganda.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about. There are two remedies for that -- know whereof you post, or cease to post -- and I'll be pleased with whichever of those two remedies you choose.

The crusades were no war, it was pure terrorism. Christians went there, distroyed as much as they could, just because...

There is more to being a president than just letting stupid stuff happen... He has a responsibility to the people and he should have prevented this. He SHOULD, he is the president. If he is not able to convince people, he is a lousy president.
Oh wait... he is one :-)

 

[skinofevil]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I believe the proper english term for it is: "crusades"

Nope. That was a proper war, and it was in response to centuries of Islamic conquest of Europe.

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

Trump has it in his prower to prevent it.

Nope, he doesn't. Look up the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution.

Again you underestimate the power of propaganda.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about. There are two remedies for that -- know whereof you post, or cease to post -- and I'll be pleased with whichever of those two remedies you choose.

The crusades were no war, it was pure terrorism. Christians went there, distroyed as much as they could, just because...

Look up the meaning of "reconquista" and dispel your ignorance. Back to the original point, if the most recent thing you can point to as Christian "terrorism" harkens back to the middle ages, your concession of the point is accepted.

There is more to being a president than just letting stupid stuff happen... He has a responsibility to the people and he should have prevented this.

Funny how the American left whines that he's a "dictator" -- and here you are bitching that he isn't acting like one.

But read up:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Trump has no responsibility to micromanage State Governors, nor does he have the power to do so. So when said Governors pardon people they shouldn't, that's entirely on them.

What the Federal government can do, on the other hand, is deputize local law enforcement as (IIRC) U.S. Marshalls, imbuing their arrests of rioters with the power of Federal prosecution, thereby bypassing District Attorneys who refuse to prosecute. And that's exactly what's being done now.

Summing up: The more you opine, the more you expose the lack of information backing your opinions. You should be embarrassed.

 

[Q]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I believe the proper english term for it is: "crusades"

Nope. That was a proper war, and it was in response to centuries of Islamic conquest of Europe.

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

Trump has it in his prower to prevent it.

Nope, he doesn't. Look up the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution.

Again you underestimate the power of propaganda.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about. There are two remedies for that -- know whereof you post, or cease to post -- and I'll be pleased with whichever of those two remedies you choose.

The crusades were no war, it was pure terrorism. Christians went there, distroyed as much as they could, just because...

Look up the meaning of "reconquista" and dispel your ignorance. Back to the original point, if the most recent thing you can point to as Christian "terrorism" harkens back to the middle ages, your concession of the point is accepted.

There is more to being a president than just letting stupid stuff happen... He has a responsibility to the people and he should have prevented this.

Funny how the American left whines that he's a "dictator" -- and here you are bitching that he isn't acting like one.

But read up:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Trump has no responsibility to micromanage State Governors, nor does he have the power to do so. So when said Governors pardon people they shouldn't, that's entirely on them.

What the Federal government can do, on the other hand, is deputize local law enforcement as (IIRC) U.S. Marshalls, imbuing their arrests of rioters with the power of Federal prosecution, thereby bypassing District Attorneys who refuse to prosecute. And that's exactly what's being done now.

Summing up: The more you opine, the more you expose the lack of information backing your opinions. You should be embarrassed.

You want christian terrorism? The crusades were a large one, that's why I mentioned it.

The most famous one: KKK "Ku Klux Klan"? In america btw...
And of course the "Army of God" in america.
In India there are christian terrorists "the NLFT " in Tipura . They attack non christians.
Israel has the "The Concerned Christians"
In Uganda there are christian terrorists active. "The Lord's Resistance Army".

So, also in the current time we have christian terrorists.


Now, I do not care if Trump -by law- is able to force people to do something. A good president does not need the letter of the law, he is able to CONVINCE people to do the right thing. Especially if those others are also -like him- serving the people of the country.

 

[Mr. Whipple]

I like your shoes ...shove one up your ass :IggyMcLulz:

 

[skinofevil]

And too much christians are/were also terrorists.

Name one terror attack carried out by Christians.

I believe the proper english term for it is: "crusades"

Nope. That was a proper war, and it was in response to centuries of Islamic conquest of Europe.

I do also know that sometime the price seems high, but when you know all the facts, it is acceptable because the gain might be bigger. I assume that that is the situation here also.

It wasn't. Bergdahl was found guilty at a Court Martial and dishonorably discharged. Getting him back wasn't worth the release of 5 Taliban.

By the way, your all-mighty-holy-Donald-Trump is releasing murderers, child rapists and other criminals due to Corona....

No, he isn't. That's Democrats doing that, which is why I'll never vote Democrat. They advance the interests of criminals at the expense of innocent people.

Trump has it in his prower to prevent it.

Nope, he doesn't. Look up the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution.

Again you underestimate the power of propaganda.

And again, you don't know what you're talking about. There are two remedies for that -- know whereof you post, or cease to post -- and I'll be pleased with whichever of those two remedies you choose.

The crusades were no war, it was pure terrorism. Christians went there, distroyed as much as they could, just because...

Look up the meaning of "reconquista" and dispel your ignorance. Back to the original point, if the most recent thing you can point to as Christian "terrorism" harkens back to the middle ages, your concession of the point is accepted.

There is more to being a president than just letting stupid stuff happen... He has a responsibility to the people and he should have prevented this.

Funny how the American left whines that he's a "dictator" -- and here you are bitching that he isn't acting like one.

But read up:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Trump has no responsibility to micromanage State Governors, nor does he have the power to do so. So when said Governors pardon people they shouldn't, that's entirely on them.

What the Federal government can do, on the other hand, is deputize local law enforcement as (IIRC) U.S. Marshalls, imbuing their arrests of rioters with the power of Federal prosecution, thereby bypassing District Attorneys who refuse to prosecute. And that's exactly what's being done now.

Summing up: The more you opine, the more you expose the lack of information backing your opinions. You should be embarrassed.

You want christian terrorism? The crusades were a large one, that's why I mentioned it.

The Crusades were conventional wars, not terrorism.

The most famous one: KKK "Ku Klux Klan"? In america btw...

Racially motivated, not religiously motivated. I'd say "nice try" but it was actually pretty shabby.

And of course the "Army of God" in america.

Well, there, you found one. One whose focus is on wiping out abortion, not on spreading Christianity. Hardly comparable to Islam, whose entire "evangelism" strategy is based on terror and conquest, explicitly, in its "scriptures."

Now, I do not care if Trump -by law- is able to force people to do something. A good president does not need the letter of the law, he is able to CONVINCE people to do the right thing. Especially if those others are also -like him- serving the people of the country.

As noted, the Democrats -- who are the ones ordering violent criminals released from detainment, or refusing to prosecute them in the first place, do not serve the people of this country. They serve criminals -- not just first but, it seems, exclusively.

 

[Q]

You want christian terrorism? The crusades were a large one, that's why I mentioned it.

The Crusades were conventional wars, not terrorism.

That is exactly what the muslims are also saying to you about their terrorism. In their believe it is true, and I sincerely believe you also think it is true. And that is fine by me, because it does not matter if you call it terrorism or not, as long as we both agree that it was motivated by something wrong and the actions were wrong.

The most famous one: KKK "Ku Klux Klan"? In america btw...

Racially motivated, not religiously motivated. I'd say "nice try" but it was actually pretty shabby.

Unfortunately these people also act out of their religion. The justification for that is just as twisted as the one the muslims use, but still they do. This might not be the case for all of them of course, because some just believe that racims is a good thing.

And of course the "Army of God" in america.

Well, there, you found one. One whose focus is on wiping out abortion, not on spreading Christianity. Hardly comparable to Islam, whose entire "evangelism" strategy is based on terror and conquest, explicitly, in its "scriptures."

You are adjusting the definition to something very narrow now :-)
We were talking about christians that are terrorists. But actually they are forcing their relion upon us, by wanting the abortion to be illegal. Something purely from their religious-interpretation.

Now, I do not care if Trump -by law- is able to force people to do something. A good president does not need the letter of the law, he is able to CONVINCE people to do the right thing. Especially if those others are also -like him- serving the people of the country.

As noted, the Democrats -- who are the ones ordering violent criminals released from detainment, or refusing to prosecute them in the first place, do not serve the people of this country. They serve criminals -- not just first but, it seems, exclusively.

Do you know that you are now calling half of america criminals and/or accomplices?

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever. A government has also the obligation to keep the laws updated. And -I know- this is not something I can blame only on Donald, but also everyone before him.

 

[skinofevil]

That is exactly what the muslims are also saying to you about their terrorism.

No, in fact, it isn't. The Crusaders struck Islamic soldiers in order to take back European land the Muslims had conquered. Muslims deliberately target civilians in order to strike fear into civilian non-Muslim populations in order to intimidate them into converting to Islam.

Those are two radically different mechanisms with two radically different objectives.

The Crusades were waged to liberate people from oppression. Islam uses terrorism to establish oppression. And you have been taught, your whole life, to ignore the difference.

 

[skinofevil]

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever.

Human rights do not change. Laws which protect them should change -- but only when the nature of human rights changes.

And that will never happen. The right to defense of one's own life, family, property, and community is the same now as it's been since pre-history, and it will go on being the same for as long as we are humans. The same is true for every other human right.

 

[skinofevil]

We were talking about christians that are terrorists. But actually they are forcing their relion upon us, by wanting the abortion to be illegal.

They can want anything under the sun. All the things you imply Christians merely "want" that makes them terrorists, muslims are out there chopping peoples' fucking heads off over it. You wanna be a big tough fella and stand up to religion? Bravo. Stand up to the religion that is actually murdering people. Not the fuzzy-wuzzy sweater wearing one that you insist merely "would if it could."

Be a real Big Man and stand up to Islam, not the fluffy soft Ned Flanders set.

 

[Q]

The Crusades were waged to liberate people from oppression. Islam uses terrorism to establish oppression. And you have been taught, your whole life, to ignore the difference.

The crusades were started as a revenge. To "get back what belonged to us". And to get some more power over the world by opressing the "evil muslims". Interesting thing is that the muslims now are told that if they perform a terroristic attack, they will go straight to heaven. During the crusades the christans were forgiven all their sins because they attended the crusades.
And of course one more reason: to stop the people with the "wrong religion".

 

[Q]

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever.

Human rights do not change. Laws which protect them should change -- but only when the nature of human rights changes.

And that will never happen. The right to defense of one's own life, family, property, and community is the same now as it's been since pre-history, and it will go on being the same for as long as we are humans. The same is true for every other human right.

The 2nd amendment is abused by the gun manufacturers to let you believe that everyone should buy their products.
Dive a bit into history, befeore 1976 (I am not really sure about the year, but it was around that time) hadly anyone had a gun. The 2nd amendment desribes that the states are allowed to create a small army to protect themself. Read the text and you will see that that is what it means. Check how it was interpreted until 1976 (or which year it was). This interpretation is based upon the reason it was written. The states wanted more power, which was logic in that time.

Nowadays the world is much smaller, so it does not make sense to have a country where every state is able to have their own laws. And since these amandments are written in a time that is so different from the current time, you should update the law by making laws of these amendments that are based on how we live now. On how the world is now.

 

[Q]

We were talking about christians that are terrorists. But actually they are forcing their relion upon us, by wanting the abortion to be illegal.

They can want anything under the sun. All the things you imply Christians merely "want" that makes them terrorists, muslims are out there chopping peoples' fucking heads off over it. You wanna be a big tough fella and stand up to religion? Bravo. Stand up to the religion that is actually murdering people. Not the fuzzy-wuzzy sweater wearing one that you insist merely "would if it could."

Be a real Big Man and stand up to Islam, not the fluffy soft Ned Flanders set.

I want to stand up to the people who abuse religion for bad things. The large relgions (Christianity & Islam) are about how we can live together in a good manner. Love & peace, respect, forgiving each other. Those are the things that are in the religion.

The idiots that make it something to fight about should be stopped. No matter the religion, the extemists are dangerous.

 

[skinofevil]

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever.

Human rights do not change. Laws which protect them should change -- but only when the nature of human rights changes.

And that will never happen. The right to defense of one's own life, family, property, and community is the same now as it's been since pre-history, and it will go on being the same for as long as we are humans. The same is true for every other human right.

The 2nd amendment is abused by the gun manufacturers to let you believe that everyone should buy their products.

Which "gun manufacturers" were around in the late 18th century Colonies? You're full of ignorance on this subject.

Dive a bit into history, befeore 1976 (I am not really sure about the year, but it was around that time) hadly anyone had a gun.

Which halfwitted Disney movie did you even get that idea from?

The 2nd amendment desribes that the states are allowed to create a small army to protect themself.

U.S. Code ~10 describes two forms of militia. Organized militia, which is a body of men which can be called up by the state on an as-needs basis; and the unorganized militia, which is any able-bodied male at least 17 years of age. Unlike you, skinofevil has read the text and does understand it perfectly well.

Check how it was interpreted until 1976 (or which year it was).

It was interpreted properly until 1935 or so.

Nowadays...

Presentism is entitled horseshit second only to outright solipsism. The world is different today from what it was in 1776, or 1076, or 1076 B.C.E. only in the nature of our technology. Human nature has not changed, nor is it going to.

 

[skinofevil]

We were talking about christians that are terrorists. But actually they are forcing their relion upon us, by wanting the abortion to be illegal.

They can want anything under the sun. All the things you imply Christians merely "want" that makes them terrorists, muslims are out there chopping peoples' fucking heads off over it. You wanna be a big tough fella and stand up to religion? Bravo. Stand up to the religion that is actually murdering people. Not the fuzzy-wuzzy sweater wearing one that you insist merely "would if it could."

Be a real Big Man and stand up to Islam, not the fluffy soft Ned Flanders set.

I want to stand up to the people who abuse religion for bad things. The large relgions (Christianity & Islam) are about how we can live together in a good manner. Love & peace, respect, forgiving each other. Those are the things that are in the religion.

Those are aspects of New Testament Christianity, almost exclusively. Old Testament Christianity is rather shit when it comes to urging violence and bigotry, but New Testament Christianity sort of, almost, fixed that. It wouldn't be until the Reformation that it was dealt with more fundamentally, and even then there are still shitheels who reach back to the Old Testament to justify behaving like slime. Islam, on the other hand, only got more extremely villainous as time went by, not less. Read up:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[UncleDiLF]

November 3rd is approaching more and more!

This country will be in chaos. If Trump wins, scum and piodio Antfia scum will make chaos! If sleepy Joe wins, the country will fall down. With Ape Kamala Africa HArris, the she boon.

I feel sorry for my fellow americans

 

[skinofevil]

If the latter happens, non-Commie Americans will simply shrug, say to themselves and each other, "Well... okay.", and slaughter the Commies at will. It will be an open civil war, and we will purge with overwhelming violence and unbridled rage every anti-American individual we find.

They will learn, in a sea of their own tears and blood, that they should not have dared to try to take our country from us.

skin has spoken.

 

[Q]

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever.

Human rights do not change. Laws which protect them should change -- but only when the nature of human rights changes.

And that will never happen. The right to defense of one's own life, family, property, and community is the same now as it's been since pre-history, and it will go on being the same for as long as we are humans. The same is true for every other human right.

The 2nd amendment is abused by the gun manufacturers to let you believe that everyone should buy their products.

Which "gun manufacturers" were around in the late 18th century Colonies? You're full of ignorance on this subject.

I meant in 1977. That was the year they boosted the gun sales.

Dive a bit into history, befeore 1976 (I am not really sure about the year, but it was around that time) hadly anyone had a gun.

Which halfwitted Disney movie did you even get that idea from?

Just reading about the american history. Look it up, you will find out that it is actually true.

The 2nd amendment desribes that the states are allowed to create a small army to protect themself.

U.S. Code ~10 describes two forms of militia. Organized militia, which is a body of men which can be called up by the state on an as-needs basis; and the unorganized militia, which is any able-bodied male at least 17 years of age. Unlike you, skinofevil has read the text and does understand it perfectly well.

Apprently you do not. Which is not that strange, it was written in a different time and in different english as used nowadays.
And on top of that you have been brainwashed your whole life about the meaning.

Nowadays...

Presentism is entitled horseshit second only to outright solipsism. The world is different today from what it was in 1776, or 1076, or 1076 B.C.E. only in the nature of our technology. Human nature has not changed, nor is it going to.

The world HAS changed. When was the last time you needed a well organised militia to protect you agains rebellious slaves?

 

[skinofevil]

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever.

Human rights do not change. Laws which protect them should change -- but only when the nature of human rights changes.

And that will never happen. The right to defense of one's own life, family, property, and community is the same now as it's been since pre-history, and it will go on being the same for as long as we are humans. The same is true for every other human right.

The 2nd amendment is abused by the gun manufacturers to let you believe that everyone should buy their products.

Which "gun manufacturers" were around in the late 18th century Colonies? You're full of ignorance on this subject.

I meant in 1977. That was the year they boosted the gun sales.

Sources? Do you have any?

Dive a bit into history, befeore 1976 (I am not really sure about the year, but it was around that time) hadly anyone had a gun.

Which halfwitted Disney movie did you even get that idea from?

Just reading about the american history. Look it up, you will find out that it is actually true.

The American Revolution, the winning of the Old West, and... basically everything in U.S. history prior to 1976 says you're just talking out of your ass.

The 2nd amendment desribes that the states are allowed to create a small army to protect themself.

U.S. Code ~10 describes two forms of militia. Organized militia, which is a body of men which can be called up by the state on an as-needs basis; and the unorganized militia, which is any able-bodied male at least 17 years of age. Unlike you, skinofevil has read the text and does understand it perfectly well.

Apprently you do not. Which is not that strange, it was written in a different time and in different english as used nowadays.
And on top of that you have been brainwashed your whole life about the meaning.

English is still English, you pop tart.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes

• Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
• Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

prev |

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(a)
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b)The classes of the militia are—
(1)
the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2)
the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, § 311;

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, Sept. 2, 1958,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

;

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, Nov. 30, 1993,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

; renumbered § 246,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, Dec. 23, 2016,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.)

Dimwit, there it is, right there in front of you. Now stop talking nonsense.

Nowadays...

Presentism is entitled horseshit second only to outright solipsism. The world is different today from what it was in 1776, or 1076, or 1076 B.C.E. only in the nature of our technology. Human nature has not changed, nor is it going to.

The world HAS changed. When was the last time you needed a well organised militia to protect you agains rebellious slaves?

The militia never had anything to do with "protecting anyone against slaves", you fruit salad. It existed -- and still exists -- as a barrier of protection against tyrannical government. You know, tyranny? The thing that, on the one hand, you bitch that Trump is and which, on the other hand, you whine that Trump isn't but should be?

By the way, you know what that inconsistency, that cognitive dissonance, indicates on your part? The total absence of a logical or moral compass. You can't even figure out whether you want Trump to be a tyrant or not. Which means you don't know what you want, which means you don't want anything. You just spew whatever opinions more dominant personalities issue to you.

 

[Q]

By the way, your 10th amendment should be revised. All the amendments originate from a time that has passed long time ago and are applicable on the times that are also gone forever.

Human rights do not change. Laws which protect them should change -- but only when the nature of human rights changes.

And that will never happen. The right to defense of one's own life, family, property, and community is the same now as it's been since pre-history, and it will go on being the same for as long as we are humans. The same is true for every other human right.

The 2nd amendment is abused by the gun manufacturers to let you believe that everyone should buy their products.

Which "gun manufacturers" were around in the late 18th century Colonies? You're full of ignorance on this subject.

I meant in 1977. That was the year they boosted the gun sales.

Sources? Do you have any?

Dive a bit into history, befeore 1976 (I am not really sure about the year, but it was around that time) hadly anyone had a gun.

Which halfwitted Disney movie did you even get that idea from?

Just reading about the american history. Look it up, you will find out that it is actually true.

The American Revolution, the winning of the Old West, and... basically everything in U.S. history prior to 1976 says you're just talking out of your ass.

The 2nd amendment desribes that the states are allowed to create a small army to protect themself.

U.S. Code ~10 describes two forms of militia. Organized militia, which is a body of men which can be called up by the state on an as-needs basis; and the unorganized militia, which is any able-bodied male at least 17 years of age. Unlike you, skinofevil has read the text and does understand it perfectly well.

Apprently you do not. Which is not that strange, it was written in a different time and in different english as used nowadays.
And on top of that you have been brainwashed your whole life about the meaning.

English is still English, you pop tart.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes

• Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
• Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

prev |

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(a)
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b)The classes of the militia are—
(1)
the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2)
the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, § 311;

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, Sept. 2, 1958,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

;

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, Nov. 30, 1993,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

; renumbered § 246,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, Dec. 23, 2016,

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.)

Dimwit, there it is, right there in front of you. Now stop talking nonsense.

Nowadays...

Presentism is entitled horseshit second only to outright solipsism. The world is different today from what it was in 1776, or 1076, or 1076 B.C.E. only in the nature of our technology. Human nature has not changed, nor is it going to.

The world HAS changed. When was the last time you needed a well organised militia to protect you agains rebellious slaves?

The militia never had anything to do with "protecting anyone against slaves", you fruit salad. It existed -- and still exists -- as a barrier of protection against tyrannical government. You know, tyranny? The thing that, on the one hand, you bitch that Trump is and which, on the other hand, you whine that Trump isn't but should be?

By the way, you know what that inconsistency, that cognitive dissonance, indicates on your part? The total absence of a logical or moral compass. You can't even figure out whether you want Trump to be a tyrant or not. Which means you don't know what you want, which means you don't want anything. You just spew whatever opinions more dominant personalities issue to you.

I would suggest you start reading the constitution and the amendments. What you now are saying does not make sense at all.
Note: you have to read it with the period it was written in mind. The people were uniting a bunch of seperate "countries" into one country. During tht time a lot was done to make the states happy, so they would become part of the us. Most of those concessions are not relevant anymore and in the current world are even stupid to maintain.