- Reaction score
- 3,900
- Location
- Upper US
no, yuo.Just stop it, @jack.
no, yuo.Just stop it, @jack.
no, yuo.
Keep me out of this, you little bitch.It is disturbing to me, which is why I wanted to keep it quiet. I did tell X because I had to get it off my chest. But you just had to keep making references to the cover-up. Like it makes you giddy in a sick way.
You are so full of shit even your eyes are brown. You are disturbed? What about you and your posts about Lily's 9yo grandson blowing SSS or whatever the fuck his name is.It is disturbing to me, which is why I wanted to keep it quiet. I did tell X because I had to get it off my chest. But you just had to keep making references to the cover-up. Like it makes you giddy in a sick way.
Keep me out of this
Passive aggressive bullshit noted.You seem to celebrate it by playing stupid.
You creepy fuck.
Yeah what about that @The Prowler ?What about you and your posts about Lily's 9yo grandson blowing SSS or whatever the fuck his name is.
I guess it's ok when he does it?You are so full of shit even your eyes are brown. You are disturbed? What about you and your posts about Lily's 9yo grandson blowing SSS or whatever the fuck his name is.
Yep looks like it.I guess it's ok when he does it?
You’re lucky, you don’t have to play!You seem to celebrate it by playing stupid.
You creepy fuck.
Oh? What was it that The Question posted that disturbed you so much? What did he say?Nowhere close to what @The Question posted.
You are a sick fuck for trying to cover this up and you are questionable now too, @Alticus . Being stupid is one thing, but purposely covering up that deviant shit is a whole other level.
He doesn’t remember, but his mom had to give him a handy to calm him down.Oh? What was it that The Question posted that disturbed you so much? What did he say?
Oh yes, equivalent to searching out 10 year olds
Maybe it was one of those velvet clown paintings, some people are triggered by them.
Seems to me that if you were so disturbed by what he posted you'd answer me.
Does what retard, make a very off color joke did he search out kids ypu absolute bellend twatI guess it's ok when he does it?
Keep flailing dude. I had nothing to do with whatever your issue is.Nowhere close to what @The Question posted.
You are a sick fuck for trying to cover this up and you are questionable now too, @Alticus . Being stupid is one thing, but purposely covering up that deviant shit is a whole other level.
You love Baldy, you really really love him!Does what retard, make a very off color joke did he search out kids ypu absolute bellend twat
Does what retard, make a very off color joke did he search out kids ypu absolute bellend twat
You fix your own mess, shit stirrer.Put it in General Discussion, you corrupt retard, and I will answer.
Fix this mess.
Oh-woah-woah, Baldy’s cryin'Exactly.
These fuckin' idiots try to equate the two?
I am very willing to admit that I was a little pissed at @Lily when I said that about her grandkid. My recollection is that she said something about someone in my family and that pissed me off so I went too low and made the remark that I made. I should never have said that.
And that has nothing to do with what @The Question posted and then covered-up.
Answer me here. After you decided to sexualize Lily's 9yo grandson a while back you are now here claiming that you are disturbed by The Question's post about a 10yo. You're being a hypocrite. This thread is not being moved again. Sexualizing a 9yo boy is every bit as disturbing as The Question's post was. Who the hell do you think you are anyway? It's a free speech forum that applies to everyone. You only wanted it in the GD so your words wouldn't be challenged like they are being challenged right now. Since when is accusing someone of sexualizing a child a GD topic? You're entire goal was to call out The Question as being a ped0, no other reason. Almost every post you make is designed to antagonize.Put it in General Discussion, you corrupt retard, and I will answer.
Fix this mess.
Thank you. I know you guys get hassled a lot, but you do a really good job, especially with what you're working with at the moment.Answer me here. After you decided to sexualize Lily's 9yo grandson a while back you are now here claiming that you are disturbed by The Question's post about a 10yo. You're being a hypocrite. This thread is not being moved again. Sexualizing a 9yo boy is every bit as disturbing as The Question's post was. Who the hell do you think you are anyway? It's a free speech forum that applies to everyone. You only wanted it in the GD so your words wouldn't wouldn't be challenged like they are being challenged right now. Since when is accusing someone of sexualizing a child, a GD topic? You're entire goal was to call out The Question as being a ped0, no other reason. Almost every post you make is designed to antagonize.
The way you are rationalizing is stunning to watchAnswer me here. After you decided to sexualize Lily's 9yo grandson a while back you are now here claiming that you are disturbed by The Question's post about a 10yo. You're being a hypocrite. This thread is not being moved again. Sexualizing a 9yo boy is every bit as disturbing as The Question's post was. Who the hell do you think you are anyway? It's a free speech forum that applies to everyone. You only wanted it in the GD so your words wouldn't be challenged like they are being challenged right now. Since when is accusing someone of sexualizing a child a GD topic? You're entire goal was to call out The Question as being a ped0, no other reason. Almost every post you make is designed to antagonize.
Fuck off Prowler you're no better than anyone else here.Exactly.
These fuckin' idiots try to equate the two?
I am very willing to admit that I was a little pissed at @Lily when I said that about her grandkid. My recollection is that she said something about someone in my family and that pissed me off so I went too low and made the remark that I made. I should never have said that.
And that has nothing to do with what @The Question posted and then covered-up.