EVERYTHING. Every single grocery item.
But….it’s all Elon Musk’s fault, according to the gay Libs on FB.
Oh now it's Musk's fault? Not Putin these days
it's just amazing the excuses those clowns will come up with
Yup. I got called all sorts of bitches for saying I want Musk to win. I’m a Trumptard, you name it, they said it lol
I wish I could say I was surprised but all the progressives have been melting down over a guy who says he just wants free speech.
Right?
Elon Musk doesnt spew the left wing narratives like he is supposed to so.....that makes him "teh right".
So they are hysterical over that.
I absolutely love Elon for telling all of them to go fuck themselves. He ain’t with the bullshit
Exchange 1 tech dictator for another
@The Countess.
None is the better, eh?
Are we accusing Elon of being a tech dictator before we even see what happens now?
I think the Internet needs to be regulated with ordinary citizens being able to call out the excesses of Big Tech no matter who owns it.
I don't trust Elon Musk either.
He said shit like we need more people planet so he'll have more customers to buy his cars in the future.
Like any businessman he's just guided by his own selfish interests not the greater good.
That doesnt make him a dictator, Joe. You should wait and honestly judge what he does with Twitter before judging him prematurely of being just another big tech dictator.
I think we need an Internet Bill of Rights
@Dove y.
And that would include among other things, setting limits on the power of Big Tech no matter who owns it.
We arent talking about that though. That's another topic.
You said Elon was just another big tech dictator but he hasnt even started anything yet. I'm saying it's unfair to judge someones performance before they even give it, is all.
Let the guy have a chance to show what he is about.
When WE were saying that same thing you just said we were patronized with the "private business can do what they want" thing. So someone came along to work within that.
And yet I agree with you that the present arrangement doesn't work either.
I also agree with you that the MSM has used fear mongering about Elon Musk and others without addressing the excesses of Big Tech which they should have when Parler got shut down. MSM was content to go along with the status quo and say nothing as long as it benefited them.
It's at that point that the government should have stepped in and slammed the brakes on Big Tech & told them they overstepped their acceptable limits.
The reason it comes down to 1 billionaire having to buy out another to achieve a perceived 'balance' or parity has been a lack of regulation. Likewise CNN can't close down fox news or vice versa because there's a regulatory body, the FCC, which prevents them from doing it.
Big Tech needs to be similarly regulated too.
Joe.....the government uses big tech. It's all pro establishment propaganda.
Did you miss how the press secretary even admitted the WH "works with" socail media?
They need to step way out. They are a huge part of the problem.
....and do you think if Television were similarly unregulated like the Internet, that Fox News as an example, would be allowed to thrive alongside CNN and MSNBC?
That's why you have a government regulated body in television broadcasting.
so one TV network doesn't try to muzzle the other and shut them down like Big Tech did to Parler.
Ideally, you don't want one political bias shutting the other down like that.
There should be a balance of opposing political viewpoints.
Evidently that is what is missing from the Internet these days.
A couple of Big players shutting everyone else down that they don't like.
If government can regulate TV, they can do it to the Internet so that there is a fairer model than currently exists.
And, as I pointed out before, there should be an Internet Bill of Rights for citizens and consumers.
BTW, a government body in Germany prevented Google Earth from ramming its way into neighborhoods and photographing people's homes.
Perhaps not in the USA, but on other countries, the government does look out for the interests of their own citizens.
So it can be done in such a way that it benefits and protects the consumer and ordinary citizens.