At Least 10 People Killed On New Orleans’ Bourbon Street After Car Drives Into Crowd Officials Say

[Lily]

Lardo @Lily has a 26 inch neck.....


But her ginormous head makes it look proportional.


Think Shrek.

Do you also go around sniffing Shrek's ass like you do mine?

You know he's not real, right?

 

[LotusBud]

LoLz - tell us all about the Christians who forced pagans to convert in the 3rd century. Present your case.

PS: there were no 19th century 'Christians" operating in full view, never mind with power. They were all sent underground once and for all by Theodosius 1 as surely you know.

Theodosius sent Christians underground in the 19th century?

PS, I said "around" the 3rd century, didn't I? Because I didn't remember the exact dates the ban hammer came down on Pagans. But you know full well it did.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[LotusBud]

No, dear, you started spewing hate along with the rest of the herd when you all came down with TDS. It became clearly evident by the end of 2017 that Trump is just a cipher for the vitriol, invective and sheer hate you people have been spewing. It's very clear that who you people really hate is Trump supporters. "MAGAts," as you're fond of calling us.

It's Hate, Lily. Hate for half the country and I got quite sick of it a few years back, so I just hate you Leftist fucks back. Why do I have to be nice when no one on your side has been nice?

I am astonished that you, a MAGAt, can convince yourself with a straight face that liberals are the haters in your divided country. God god, man, what the fuck are you smoking? Not marijuana. Clearly something crack or bath salt-like.

 

[The New Holliday]

Theodosius sent Christians underground in the 19th century?

PS, I said "around" the 3rd century, didn't I? Because I didn't remember the exact dates the ban hammer came down on Pagans. But you know full well it did.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

LoLz @ LotusDud. Who said that? Theodosius 1 in the late 4th century. That's what I wrote. By the 19th century there were no Christians in power (if in power or seeking it they ever were) having been sent underground by the Roman bastardization of the movement - as I wrote..Nicea 325 CE - that final nail in the coffin by Theodosius' closing of the mystery schools at the end of the 4th century. I mistakenly assumed you knew that. That, as I have many a time said was the Church of Rome (Roman Catholicism) not Roman Christianity, and later Protestantism, again not Christianity.
Did you read the preceding thread as I had suggested? Once again, Lotus, you have proved yourself a world class poser in a class with Oak and jack.

You said "around the 3rd century". LoLz - you're going to enter into a conversation on a subject you clearly know zilch about with approximations. Otay

They were all sent underground once and for all by Theodosius 1 as surely you know.

Therefore there were none long before the 19th century when you are making accusations they (Christians) were doin all sorts-a-bad-thins. You, Lotus know nothing of this, but go ahead and make a fool of yourself as your libtarded allies have.

Your cognitive impairment is accelerating, and I am worried for you, Lotus. I truly am.

Is it ayyyyleeeeins?

 

[The New Holliday]

1) How many Muslims are there in the world, Holliday? 2)If they were all terrorists, 3)don't you think there would be millions dead by now? 4) Your prejudices make your reason fall by the wayside.

Did you read the thread as I had suggested, LotusDud?
.You have been given the answer to that in this very thread and another that was linked in which you were oft directly addressed on the subject:

https://bastardfactory.net/threads/does-murdering-tents-look-good-on-a-national-cv.15199/page-2#post-935627

from it:
Hamas is a tiny band of islamists which are 1)2 Billion in number....2)and no, not all muslims are terrorists or members of the warrior class, any more than all of any society are warriors. As in all societies there are farmers, merchants, administrators etc etc. I have explained this many times. The fact is, all muslims (if a person is a muslim) approve and support the warrior class' actions because they are doing the work of the infallible allah. It's all there in the Koran (which I suppose I will shortly hear is a work of fiction invented by Jews). No - it is Hamas' goal to keep Israel in a perpetual state of war and defense against attack. Remember they are sponsored by Iran with support of other Islamist nations. Together allah's army has been doing a very good job at their genocidal mission. Those are facts - historical facts which have been repeatedly presented and disputed by no one.

3) Do I think there would be millions dead by now? There are hundreds of millions dead by now at the hands of islamists - that is not what I think, it is what historians have concluded in their studies of islamic atrocities.

4) I do not have prejudices on anything. My reasoning is the result of study, and understanding of the religion and of its history, with the benefit of scholar's reports.

More killed, Lotus, by islam than by all of the other demented, violent, intolerant movements mentioned earlier combined. It isn't even close....
...and it continues today in NOLA, Germany, France, UK, the ME, in Africa, in Kashmir. Wherever you find muslims/islam you find conflict and killing. It's their way.

Oh and PS: I do strongly suggest that you 1) read through a thread before starting to swing wildly like a drunk in a barroom brawl, and 2) familiarize yourself with the subject at hand before swinging wildly like a drunk in a barroom brawl. If you do that at least you may recover some degree of credibility. Others I have less hope for.

Hey, remember:
Do be a do-bee.
Don't be a don't bee.

well,
Do be a Lotusbud
Don't be a Lotusdud

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I am astonished that you, a MAGAt, can convince yourself with a straight face that liberals are the haters in your divided country. God god, man, what the fuck are you smoking? Not marijuana. Clearly something crack or bath salt-like.

Yes, you Leftist liberals are driven by hate of those you deem your political enemies first and foremost. Also, just ask yourself who it is that "divides" the country up into this group, that constituency, this "underserved community" over here and that oppressed minority over there?

It's not we good and wholesome conservatives who trade in such divisiveness, Lotus, that would be you Leftist liberals.

Should we discuss the intersection of race, class and gender and all the latest and most faddish forms of sexual deviancy that all get their own letter in the GLBTQYXZ alphabet of pervertry? Those aren't really conservative ideas, but they sure are divisive and engender hatred between groups, right?

Yes, dear, I'm sorry, but all the hate comes from your side of the divide these days.

Now stop mucking up Holliday's muslim hate thread or he'll fire off a sternly worded PM to Alticus.

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

Then yoo hate the MUSLIM DEVILS!!

Not all of them. Just the ones that go off the deep end.

 

[Plitthaddio]

Nothing of value lost.

 

[Weeg]

Not all of them. Just the ones that go off the deep end.

so 90%

 

[Lily]

so 90%

There are over 1 billion Muslims...do you even math?

 

[Weeg]

There are over 1 billion Muslims...do you even math?

actually its 5 billion

 

[LotusBud]

LoLz @ LotusDud. Who said that? Theodosius 1 in the late 4th century. That's what I wrote. By the 19th century there were no Christians in power (if in power or seeking it they ever were) having been sent underground by the Roman bastardization of the movement - as I wrote..Nicea 325 CE - that final nail in the coffin by Theodosius' closing of the mystery schools at the end of the 4th century. I mistakenly assumed you knew that. That, as I have many a time said was the Church of Rome (Roman Catholicism) not Roman Christianity, and later Protestantism, again not Christianity.
Did you read the preceding thread as I had suggested? Once again, Lotus, you have proved yourself a world class poser in a class with Oak and jack.

You said "around the 3rd century". LoLz - you're going to enter into a conversation on a subject you clearly know zilch about with approximations. Otay

Therefore there were none long before the 19th century when you are making accusations they (Christians) were doin all sorts-a-bad-thins. You, Lotus know nothing of this, but go ahead and make a fool of yourself as your libtarded allies have.

Your cognitive impairment is accelerating, and I am worried for you, Lotus. I truly am.

Is it ayyyyleeeeins?

I know full well about Nicea. if you don't think they were slamming Pagans all around that time you are clueless. BTW, here's what you wrote:

PS: there were no 19th century 'Christians" operating in full view, never mind with power. They were all sent underground once and for all by Theodosius 1 as surely you know.

You are trying to be clever with your "no Christians in the 19th century" BS. I guess your stance is that Catholics are not Christians.

 

[The New Holliday]

I know full well about Nicea. if you don't think they were slamming Pagans all around that time you are clueless. BTW, here's what you wrote:

PS: there were no 19th century 'Christians" operating in full view, never mind with power. They were all sent underground once and for all by Theodosius 1 as surely you know.

You are trying to be clever with your "no Christians in the 19th century" BS. I guess your stance is that Catholics are not Christians.

That is correct - Catholics are not Christians. xtians they are though. Frankensteinians of Rome (catholic).
...and that is what I wrote. Theodosius, as I had writ sent them underground once and for all which I had also writ, so obviously there were none around in any position of power to do all the bad stuff you suggested 1500 years later. Furthermore there is nothing at all in Christian philosophy or teachings that would permit violence toward pagans (or anyone else). You know whose philosophy and teachings does though? That's right...islam.
...and have I not asked you if you weep for those beautiful pagans of Mecca who "the prophet" murdered and stole from? Do you?

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

The guy was an American citizen. That makes him a domestic terrorist.

Islam may exist in America, but hate crimes perpetrated under that guise are treated just like any other act of domestic terror.

It's the same thing as the guy in Charlottesville who drove through the crowd and killed that woman. He wasn't "Muslim" He was an American citizen.

Same shit, different day. hate isn't confined to a segment that makes us comfortable to identify and be angry about.

Apparently he was an American citizen but with a name like "Shamsud-Din Jabbar" come on you can't ignore that Islam wasnt a motive

 

[jack]

Apparently he was an American citizen but with a name like "Shamsud-Din Jabbar" come on you can't ignore that Islam wasnt a motive

Obviously he was a follower and a fanatic. All I wanted to know was what his American name was. Muhammad Ali was born Cassius Clay. He was a Muslim but I don't recall him being anything but the greatest.

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

The problem you are having in this thread @The New Holliday is that you are being bigoted towards the killer who happens to be black ( forget his religious affiliation )
You just can't do that as a liberal

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

Obviously he was a follower and a fanatic. All I wanted to know was what his American name was. Muhammad Ali was born Cassius Clay. He was a Muslim but I don't recall him being anything but the greatest.

I understand but Ali wasn't a terrorist like this guy all I'm saying is Islam can be dangerous and a problem

 

[jack]

I understand but Ali wasn't a terrorist like this guy all I'm saying is Islam can be dangerous and a problem

Scroll up and read the long ass arguments a couple posters put up. To them if you believe in Islam you believe in terrorism. Ali quoted Muhammad regularly and Louis farrakhan was in his corner when he fought.

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

Scroll up and read the long ass arguments a couple posters put up. To them if you believe in Islam you believe in terrorism. Ali quoted Muhammad regularly and Louis farrakhan was in his corner when he fought.

Man I ain't reading all that I tried lol its an argument that will never be settled as long as mankind exists but if the killer was of Christian faith people would be losing their minds. The left is so quick to point out that Christianity is bigoted towards gays and other minority groups but Muslims actively and openly promote violence towards those groups whereas Christians simply "pray" for them I just don't get it

 

[The New Holliday]

The problem you are having in this thread @The New Holliday is that you are being bigoted towards the killer who happens to be black ( forget his religious affiliation )
You just can't do that as a liberal

. One thing I will say for islamists is that aren't racist in the genetic sense as were Nazis. They accept all prospective members w/o regard for that. Of course as I had noted earlier on, in a more Victorian sense of race - cultural movements such as Roman race, Egyptian race, American race, then they are as racist and antiLiberal as were the Nazis, they in fact being two breaths of the same evil (conservative) beast slithering its way through time, each member being a cell in it with it's own function.
I'll tell you what I think does have racist undertones though - suggesting that Shamsud-Din Jabbar could not be an American name. Highly suspicious wouldn't you say?

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

. One thing I will say for islamists is that aren't racist in the genetic sense as were Nazis. They accept all prospective members w/o regard for that. Of course as I had noted earlier on, in a more Victorian sense of race - cultural movements such as Roman race, Egyptian race, American race, then they are as racist and antiLiberal as were the Nazis, they in fact being two breaths of the same evil (conservative) beast slithering its way through time, each member being a cell in it with it's own function.
I'll tell you what I think does have racist undertones though - suggesting that Shamsud-Din Jabbar could not be an American name. Highly suspicious wouldn't you say?

Yea Shimshur Abdul or whatever is in no way an American name call me racist idgaf

 

[LotusBud]

That is correct - Catholics are not Christians. xtians they are though. Frankensteinians of Rome (catholic).
...and that is what I wrote. Theodosius, as I had writ sent them underground once and for all which I had also writ, so obviously there were none around in any position of power to do all the bad stuff you suggested 1500 years later. Furthermore there is nothing at all in Christian philosophy or teachings that would permit violence toward pagans (or anyone else). You know whose philosophy and teachings does though? That's right...islam.
...and have I not asked you if you weep for those beautiful pagans of Mecca who "the prophet" murdered and stole from? Do you?

Except violence toward Pagans is a recorded fact in Roman history. Honey, I am tired of your prejudices. You paint with a very broad brush. The difference between you and me: I weep for all victims, no matter what group they are members of.

 

[LotusBud]

I understand but Ali wasn't a terrorist like this guy all I'm saying is Islam can be dangerous and a problem

As history plainly shows, so can Christianity.

 

[Lily]

As history plainly shows, so can Christianity.

And Judaism now...

 

[jack]

suggesting that Shamsud-Din Jabbar could not be an American name. Highly suspicious wouldn't you say?

Jabbar came from an

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

family that predominantly attended the local

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, though his father, a convert to Islam born in Houston, had changed his surname from Young to Jabbar.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

His grandfather moved from Louisiana to Texas as part of a migration of

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

to the Beaumont area for work.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I'll accept your apology any time, Holly.

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

As history plainly shows, so can Christianity.

Ancient history?? Of course but recent history nope Islam has the win there

 

[LotusBud]

Ancient history?? Of course but recent history nope Islam has the win there

Oh, come on. Look at all the "Christian" domestic terrorists.

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

Oh, come on. Look at all the "Christian" domestic terrorists.

What the whole handful of them? Really compare that to the Muslim terrorists

 

[Lily]

What the whole handful of them? Really compare that to the Muslim terrorists

Yeah, but in all fairness, the West has been bombing the shit out of them since 1991...in recent history.

Like all humans, they want revenge. Not condoning it, but try to step into their shoes once in a while...at least so we can try to find peace at some point in time.

 

[Oliver Shagnasty]

Yeah, but in all fairness, the West has been bombing the shit out of them since 1991...in recent history.

Like all humans, they want revenge. Not condoning it, but try to step into their shoes once in a while...at least so we can try to find peace at some point in time.

I can't step in their shoes I like pork too much