- Messages
- 4,884
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
so? LoLzMy college roommate's father was Egyptian and a practicing Muslim. She and her sister were raised Catholic by their British mother.
His descriptions of Muslims are a bit twisted.
so? LoLzMy college roommate's father was Egyptian and a practicing Muslim. She and her sister were raised Catholic by their British mother.
His descriptions of Muslims are a bit twisted.
Explain Amal Clooney and her Lebanese family. Why have the adherent Muslims come after them?So you don't know the consequence for apostacy in islam? You should look it up then tell me it doesn't really mean what it does.
So, why would a praticing adherent Muslim allow this?so? LoLz
In America? Nothing happens. Good grief man. We have freedom of religion enshrined in this country. You can do what you like, and no radical muslims are going to do anything about it.So you don't know the consequence for apostacy in islam? You should look it up then tell me it doesn't really mean what it does.
I will state again. If you do not practice the precepts of a religion you are not a practitioner of it, call yourself what you may.It's more atrocious to murder and subjugate people KNOWING that your professed religion condemns it.
He's loco in the coco, yo.In America? Nothing happens. Good grief man. We have freedom of religion enshrined in this country. You can do what you like, and no radical muslims are going to do anything about it.
Yes, they most certainly did.I will state again. If you do not practice the precepts of a religion you are not a practitioner of it, call yourself what you may.
No Christian has ever spread the religion by the sword. Period. That is not so in islam.
Explain Salman RushdieExplain Amal Clooney and her Lebanese family. Why have the adherent Muslims come after them?
he insulted the prophet and is still alive to tell the tale, last I heard.Explain Salman Rushdie
Nope. Cite me book and verse that says that is permissible, or in fact any acts of violence are permissible.Yes, they most certainly did.
Why? I acknowledge that radical Islam is dangerous and has hurt people.Explain Salman Rushdie
Nope. Cite me book and verse that says that is permissible, or in fact any acts of violence are permissible.
Explain Salman Rushdie
LoLz - I have many times over. Learn to read and comprehend, Oak.Why? I acknowledge that radical Islam is dangerous and has hurt people.
It's you that can't account for the overwhelming number of Muslims who don't.
Bullshit.LoLz - I have many times over. Learn to read and comprehend, Oak.
So, you can't. Neither can anyone else.Actions speak louder than words.
How many times have I stated that not all people in a society are warrior class? hmmmm? Who doesn't understand that?Bullshit.
LOL and the Crusades were just "pony rides"Oh, and no Christian ever killed anyone in the name of spreading Christianity.
LOL and the Crusades were just "pony rides"
You, having limited education and low intellectual ceiling, don't understand that the actions of the frankenstein Roman church had nothing to do with Christianity. Quite remarkable that you would believe that in the total absence of scriptural (Biblical) or Christian apocryphal writings support of them (the Crusades), but exonerate the actions of muslims when they murder hundreds of millions. Duplicity much, jack?LOL and the Crusades were just "pony rides"
I've spoken of warrior class many times over in the past, Oak. It has always been the observation I have made.Did you notice that "warrior class" didn't start being used until we, successfully, pointed out his condemnation of all Muslims?
I did.
Giddyup horsie. Yeeeeeehaaaaah!You, having limited education and low intellectual ceiling, don't understand that the actions of the frankenstein Roman church had nothing to do with Christianity. Quite remarkable that you would believe that in the total absence of scriptural (Biblical) or Christian apocryphal writings support of them (the Crusades), but exonerate the actions of muslims when they murder hundreds of millions. Duplicity much, jack?
WoW, jack - that was a very concise and well thought out reply. I bow to your intellect. LoLz @ jackGiddyup horsie. Yeeeeeehaaaaah!
If you mean, libtards (the other conservatives in their own right), I agree it is unlikely.Give int up, Holliday. Leftist Progs can never condemn Islam because their betters won't allow them to. They have to remain focused denigrating white european-descended people and shitting on America and Western Civilization.
Well, you've always been a bit off, Holliday. The Lib (insane) / Con (sane) divide is more stark today than it ever was back in BY days. Back then we could all rag on each other over issues with no hard feelings, but for the last 8 years or so, it's been nothing but hate, hate, hate spewing from the Lib side. So nowadays I just hurl the hate back since I've been hated for nothing moar than not being a lockstep Democrat piece of garbage filth.If you mean, libtards (the other conservatives in their own right), I agree it is unlikely.
. These retards can't even figure out how they are the people primarily responsible for giving us a second Trump presidency - even though it has been explained to them in fair detail.
Hey, I had been remembering the first internet intro of anti-libiConism on BY. The Chief (great poster that he was) was very upset by it - he admonished me..."We have the Lib/Con (libs vs Cons) paradigm here"...and likewise with these toolbags, no freethinking principled views are welcome. They got their playbook. So sad.
I'm sorry for your suffering, Raggs.Well, you've always been a bit off, Holliday. The Lib (insane) / Con (sane) divide is more stark today than it ever was back in BY days. Back then we could all rag on each other over issues with no hard feelings, but for the last 8 years or so, it's been nothing but hate, hate, hate spewing from the Lib side. So nowadays I just hurl the hate back since I've been hated for nothing moar than not being a lockstep Democrat piece of garbage filth.
Well, you've always been a bit off, Holliday. The Lib (insane) / Con (sane) divide is more stark today than it ever was back in BY days. Back then we could all rag on each other over issues with no hard feelings, but for the last 8 years or so, it's been nothing but hate, hate, hate spewing from the Lib side. So nowadays I just hurl the hate back since I've been hated for nothing moar than not being a lockstep Democrat piece of garbage filth.
@Lily - here but being one example: (#57)I've spoken of warrior class many times over in the past, Oak. It has always been the observation I have made.