If he got in with lower grades than another applicant who wanted to practice in the city, then I'd say yes.
Okay, so what Joe has been calling
"affirmative action" is not what people consider affirmative action.
If you don't wanna call it 'affirmative action' then it sure as hell is a form of preferential treatment.
What I want to call it has no bearing on this, Joe. It is not what is understood to be affirmative action.
You even know this because you posted this:
Traditionally in the United States, it has been used by what its advocates feel addresses racial or gender inequalities due
Racial, yet you are calling it affirmative action when we are talking about a
white guy.
Gender, yet you are calling it affirmative action when we are talking about a white
guy.
it sure as hell is a form of preferential treatment
But not affirmative action. The problem is you did not say
"preferential treatment". You said
"affirmative action".
Medical schools at least in my province do it if they can lure applicants regardless of race into practicing in remote regions after they graduate.
"regardless of race"
Therefore, not affirmative action.
I saw the problem a while ago in this thread.
You were saying
"affirmative action", so everybody thought you meant
"affirmative action".
I think affirmative action could work
At that point, way back on Page 9, I thought everyone should know that you were redefining terms.
You tend to get into these ridiculous discussions where nobody is even talking about the same thing. If you are going to use terms like
"affirmative action", you need to use it as understood by everyone else.
I do not know if I am getting through to you, Joe.
There is a reason some people do not make it past 1st year....