- Messages
- 55,627
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Who sponsored it?
Who cares? It was fairly even vote. It's not as if conservatives abhorred the idea.
Who sponsored it?
"Sponsored by of , the bill was passed by and signed into law by ."Who sponsored it?
Second, the 1994 law shaped Democratic Party politics for years to come. Under the leadership of Bill Clinton, Democrats wanted to wrest control of crime issues from Republicans,
For the record......@Lily used the suck it emoji......therefore recognizing I am right and she is wrong.......rather tgan engaging intelligently in the discussion
Its not even enjoyable confronting such a weak ninded individual
I feel sorry for it really
As fucked up as leftie whites turning on themselves in 2020"Sponsored by of , the bill was passed by and signed into law by ."
"A majority of The voted for the bill. A Gallup survey in 1994 found that '58% of African Americans supported the crime bill, compared to 49% of white Americans.'"
Is it racist if more blacks than white supported the crime bill?
Directly out of Killary's mouth........if only she could figure out a use for that mouth other tgan hate speech.......accusing young black men of violence.......at least ol' Slick Willy got them prisons built
This is the Leftist legacy.....supporting mass imprisonment of young blacks.
Oh well.....very sad really
As fucked up as leftie whites turning on themselves in 2020
But human libtard weakness has no bounds
As farcas the black leaders......perhaps they were hoping to help those in the black community thatcdid not deserve a violent community......look at all what obama did for the community
Is Charlie Kirk a Democratic leader representing all voters who placed their ballot with him......no.....he is not......he is a commentator without the means to send millions of blacks to prison.
Here's RW Darling Charlie Kirkus not trusting black professionals.
PatriotTakes
@patriottakes
Charlie Kirk: “I’m sorry. If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, ‘Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’”
And why not you absolute failure at anything requiring reason?Seriously, clown has to go back to 1994...
Is it racist if more blacks than white supported the crime bill?
To be fair, that's not a reliable metric unless you assume the congressional black caucus is immune to selling out and acting as one propaganda arm of the DNC. Any such notion should have been dissolved in 2016 and rendered absurd in 2020 when they endorsed and supported Hilary/Joe, both of whom had atrocious civil rights records, against Sanders who had a bonafide history of marching for and championing civil rights issues.
If you want to know what real people think of Clyburn and his ilk try this:
I was referring to polls where more black folks supported the idea at the time. After all, it is they that were dealing with the impact of the crime rate.
Of course not. It was bad policy, however I do remember the devastation of the crack epidemic in that era. It's not as if this country was then, as it still isn't now, ready to redress the wrongs of our past. Sometimes people just want things fixed. It's not as if Black and brown people actually believe racism will be fixed.If true I suspect it's because, as usual, they were lied to about what the bill actually did and the people lying to them were the media and their so-called "leaders" whose job was and still is to prevent seeking remedies anywhere except within the wholly corrupt duopoly that doesn't and never will represent people instead of their own greed and the interests of the donor class.
Now that we're not reliant on legacy media and captured pundits for our information there's no excuse for continuing to believe the establishment liars and stenographers for the professional managerial class.
Since when do we blame the victims?
Surely you're not implying black and brown people deserved to be subjected to mass incarceration because they were lied to by the people who were supposed to be protecting and representing them?
That's not unfortunate. It's unforgivably infuriating.
If true I suspect it's because, as usual, they were lied to about what the bill actually did and the people lying to them were the media and their so-called "leaders" whose job was and still is to prevent seeking remedies anywhere except within the wholly corrupt duopoly that doesn't and never will represent people instead of their own greed and the interests of the donor class.
Now that we're not reliant on legacy media and captured pundits for our information there's no excuse for continuing to believe the establishment liars and stenographers for the professional managerial class.
Since when do we blame the victims?
Surely you're not implying black and brown people deserved to be subjected to mass incarceration because they were lied to by the people who were supposed to be protecting and representing them?
That's not unfortunate. It's unforgivably infuriating.
It was bad policy, however I do remember the devastation of the crack epidemic in that era.
Yet no mention of *how* that crack made its way to the streets which conveniently led to the bad policies being implemented?
Interesting.
I guess it was all just a long string of unfortunate coincidences. /shrug
A perfectly normal mode of commerce.
Her bigotry is almost breathtaking.