Why did they make Sir Gawain an Indian?

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

 

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

Where? It's high time someone quashed this bullshit, WHERE?

 

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

i only say that cuz thats how i would use them >:D

 

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

i only say that cuz thats how i would use them >:D

These fools always leave out racism when they talk about about medieval times when in reality a negroe couldn't walk down a road in those days without being set upon even if they were there, people were superstitious as fuck back then and there's just no way a black could fit in, not in a thousand years ffs...

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquer their kingdoms.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

 

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

its std practice not 2 use your own ppl, the romans did it all the time

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

It's not real history though Joe, it's modern bullshit trying to rewrite the old days... You're trying to tell people that in medieval times black people got knighted in England yet hung in the what 19 hundreds? Think about it ffs mate

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

It's not real history though Joe, it's modern bullshit trying to rewrite the old days... You're trying to tell people that in medieval times black people got knighted in England yet hung in the what 19 hundreds? Think about it ffs mate

It's possible that Black people were not knighted in England.

But they certainly were in other parts of Europe.

At least you should acknowledge that much.

England was the only place with Knights.

Holy Roman Empire, Portugal, Italy had them too.

And historical records that at least in those countries, they were Black.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

It's not real history though Joe, it's modern bullshit trying to rewrite the old days... You're trying to tell people that in medieval times black people got knighted in England yet hung in the what 19 hundreds? Think about it ffs mate

It's possible that Black people were not knighted in England.

But they certainly were in other parts of Europe.

At least you should acknowledge that much.

England was the only place with Knights.

Holy Roman Empire, Portugal, Italy had them too.

And historical records that at least in those countries, they were Black.

No they were not, it's impossible! Absolutely impossible!

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

Just like White mummies 10,000 years old are showng up in China.

And the Chinese government for years deneid it until they couldn't anymore

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

It's not real history though Joe, it's modern bullshit trying to rewrite the old days... You're trying to tell people that in medieval times black people got knighted in England yet hung in the what 19 hundreds? Think about it ffs mate

It's possible that Black people were not knighted in England.

But they certainly were in other parts of Europe.

At least you should acknowledge that much.

England was the only place with Knights.

Holy Roman Empire, Portugal, Italy had them too.

And historical records that at least in those countries, they were Black.

No they were not, it's impossible! Absolutely impossible!

Then fucking WHY do statues of Knights with Black faces show up in armor dating from the Middle ages from Germany Italy, Spain an d Portugal show up then? Like is said, if you wanted to prove their authenticity, then just carbon date or x ray them. Even the paint on them.

You can't fake that shit, Shampain. If a lab analysis reveals their age, then must have some authenticity to them.

Just like the Chinese government denied the existence of White/Caucasian mummies in China until they couldn't deny it anymore after sceintists examined and carbon dated the corpses.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

Just like White mummies 10,000 years old are showng up in China.

And the Chinese government for years deneid it until they couldn't anymore

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

It's not real history though Joe, it's modern bullshit trying to rewrite the old days... You're trying to tell people that in medieval times black people got knighted in England yet hung in the what 19 hundreds? Think about it ffs mate

It's possible that Black people were not knighted in England.

But they certainly were in other parts of Europe.

At least you should acknowledge that much.

England was the only place with Knights.

Holy Roman Empire, Portugal, Italy had them too.

And historical records that at least in those countries, they were Black.

No they were not, it's impossible! Absolutely impossible!

Then fucking WHY do statues of Knights with Black faces show up in armor dating from the Middle ages from Germany Italy, Spain an d Portugal show up then? Like is said, if you wanted to prove their authenticity, then just carbon date or x ray them. Even the paint on them.

You can't fake that shit, Shampain. If a lab analysis reveals their age, then must have some authenticity to them.

Where are they then Joe I've already asked you this, there's none absolutely none! I've been all over Europe visiting places of worship, places of influence and never ever have I heard or seen anything pointing to a negro being someone of impotance in those times... I'm sorry but you're showing signs of being brainwashed by modern liberalism... The furthest North niggers got in those times were the moors and it was the absolute South of Europe...

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

Just like White mummies 10,000 years old are showng up in China.

And the Chinese government for years deneid it until they couldn't anymore

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

It's not real history though Joe, it's modern bullshit trying to rewrite the old days... You're trying to tell people that in medieval times black people got knighted in England yet hung in the what 19 hundreds? Think about it ffs mate

It's possible that Black people were not knighted in England.

But they certainly were in other parts of Europe.

At least you should acknowledge that much.

England was the only place with Knights.

Holy Roman Empire, Portugal, Italy had them too.

And historical records that at least in those countries, they were Black.

No they were not, it's impossible! Absolutely impossible!

Then fucking WHY do statues of Knights with Black faces show up in armor dating from the Middle ages from Germany Italy, Spain an d Portugal show up then? Like is said, if you wanted to prove their authenticity, then just carbon date or x ray them. Even the paint on them.

You can't fake that shit, Shampain. If a lab analysis reveals their age, then must have some authenticity to them.

Where are they then Joe I've already asked you this, there's none absolutely none! I've been all over Europe visiting places of worship, places of influence and never ever have I heard or seen anything pointing to a negro being someone of impotance in those times... I'm sorry but you're showing signs of being brainwashed by modern liberalism... The furthest North niggers got in those times were the moors and it was the absolute South of Europe...

But your grasp of European history doesn't seem to be all that strong, Shampain.

There was a time when Islam occupied Spain and Southern Italy.

Given that the White european population was vastly outnumbered, Islam threatened to overrun Northern Europe as well.

Those Muslim empires had Black soldiers wandering around Europe.

before that, Blacks were present in Europe during the Roman Empire.

I think there was a Black Roman Emperer or 2.

So Black soldiers in the Roman legions would not have been implausible.

North Africa was part of the Roman Empire at one time y'know.

 

[SHAMPAIN]

Well you see what muslims look like today? They're not fucking BLACK and have about the same skin tone as italians, Greeks, Portuguese ffs get real!
Looks NOTHING like them

 

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

i think u just wanna create an argument so u can toot some virtue, like that ^

black european history? getting their asses kicked out of southern europe and othello, thats about it

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

i think u just wanna create an argument so u can toot some virtue, like that ^

black european history? getting their asses kicked out of southern europe and othello, thats about it

I never claimed that Black Africans were ever the dominant tribe/race in Europe.

Only that they had a presence.

ie - tho this is from a later priod, this song mentions the presence of Blacks in European Culture:

La conflades de la estlaya by Juan de Aurujo (17th Century)

Spanish text

Los coflades de la estleya
vamo turus a Beleya
y velemo a ziola beya
con Siolo en la poltal.
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!
Oylemo un viyansico
que lo compondla Flasico ziendo
gayta su fosico y luego
lo cantala Blasico, Pellico, Zuanico y Tomá
y lo estliviyo dila:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Bamo a bel que traen de Angola a ziolo y a ziola
Baltasale con Melchola y mi plimo Gasipar
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Vamo siguiendo la estleya — ¡Eya!
lo negliyo coltezano — ¡Vamo!
pus lo Reye cun tesuro — turo
de calmino los tlesban — ¡aya!
Blasico, Pelico, Zuanico y Tomá,
¡aya! vamo tura aya!

English translation

Brothers and sisters of the League of the Star,
let’s all go now to Bethlehem,
where we’ll see our lovely Lady
with our little Lord in the stable.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!
We’ll hear a carol
that Francisco will compose,
with a gourd to keep the beat;
then Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás will sing it,
and the refrain will go:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

Let’s see what Baltasar, Melchor and my cousin Gaspar
are bringing from Angola to Our Lady and our little Lord.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

So all you blacks who work at court, — O yeah!
yes, let’s go, and follow the star, — Let’s go!
behind the kings with the treasure — All of us!
they carry across the desert — To the stable!
And you, Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás,
let’s all get going now,

Anyways, I know Shampain hates Black people.

but acknowledging that they had at least a peripheral presence in European history just as blond or red headed White settlers were similarly present in China thousands of years ago isn't so far fetched either.

However small in numbers, they were there.

Anyways because it is/was an anomaly, that's why it is interesting.

Sort of like 'the odd man out'.

In other words, something that didn't belong....but like White mummies in China...it was there

So it makes history more interesting, not less.

That Blacks were in the armies and were present in the Royal courts of Europe.

 

[LotusBud]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

Where? It's high time someone quashed this bullshit, WHERE?

OMG. Your narrow little world of hate will come crashing down if we learn that it's a fact, won't it?

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

i think u just wanna create an argument so u can toot some virtue, like that ^

black european history? getting their asses kicked out of southern europe and othello, thats about it

I never claimed that Black Africans were ever the dominant tribe/race in Europe.

Only that they had a presence.

ie - tho this is from a later priod, this song mentions the presence of Blacks:

La conflades de la estlaya by Juan de Aurujo (17th Century)

Spanish text

Los coflades de la estleya
vamo turus a Beleya
y velemo a ziola beya
con Siolo en la poltal.
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!
Oylemo un viyansico
que lo compondla Flasico ziendo
gayta su fosico y luego
lo cantala Blasico, Pellico, Zuanico y Tomá
y lo estliviyo dila:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Bamo a bel que traen de Angola a ziolo y a ziola
Baltasale con Melchola y mi plimo Gasipar
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Vamo siguiendo la estleya — ¡Eya!
lo negliyo coltezano — ¡Vamo!
pus lo Reye cun tesuro — turo
de calmino los tlesban — ¡aya!
Blasico, Pelico, Zuanico y Tomá,
¡aya! vamo tura aya!

English translation

Brothers and sisters of the League of the Star,
let’s all go now to Bethlehem,
where we’ll see our lovely Lady
with our little Lord in the stable.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!
We’ll hear a carol
that Francisco will compose,
with a gourd to keep the beat;
then Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás will sing it,
and the refrain will go:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

Let’s see what Baltasar, Melchor and my cousin Gaspar
are bringing from Angola to Our Lady and our little Lord.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

So all you blacks who work at court, — O yeah!
yes, let’s go, and follow the star, — Let’s go!
behind the kings with the treasure — All of us!
they carry across the desert — To the stable!
And you, Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás,
let’s all get going now,

Anyways, I know Shampain hates Black people.

but acknowledging that they had at least a peripheral presence in European history just as blond or red headed White settlers were similarly present in China thousands of years ago isn't so far fetched either.

However small in numbers, they were there.

They were in the armies and they were in the Royal courts of Europe.
[/QUOTE]
NO they were NOT!!! Joe my friend please just take this on board... The world is a far less racially aware place than it was 100 years ago and then 200 years and 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on there's nothing you can say or post that will change my mind or actually prove anything you're saying! Right, it's 2021 and there's still no black fuckers in my country that i see and you're trying to tell me the same royalty that seen Scottish red heads as sub human touched negroes with the sword of knighthood and hailed them as upper class? You've truly lost your mind fren.

 

[Jeannie]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

i think u just wanna create an argument so u can toot some virtue, like that ^

black european history? getting their asses kicked out of southern europe and othello, thats about it

I never claimed that Black Africans were ever the dominant tribe/race in Europe.

Only that they had a presence.

ie - tho this is from a later priod, this song mentions the presence of Blacks:

La conflades de la estlaya by Juan de Aurujo (17th Century)

Spanish text

Los coflades de la estleya
vamo turus a Beleya
y velemo a ziola beya
con Siolo en la poltal.
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!
Oylemo un viyansico
que lo compondla Flasico ziendo
gayta su fosico y luego
lo cantala Blasico, Pellico, Zuanico y Tomá
y lo estliviyo dila:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Bamo a bel que traen de Angola a ziolo y a ziola
Baltasale con Melchola y mi plimo Gasipar
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Vamo siguiendo la estleya — ¡Eya!
lo negliyo coltezano — ¡Vamo!
pus lo Reye cun tesuro — turo
de calmino los tlesban — ¡aya!
Blasico, Pelico, Zuanico y Tomá,
¡aya! vamo tura aya!

English translation

Brothers and sisters of the League of the Star,
let’s all go now to Bethlehem,
where we’ll see our lovely Lady
with our little Lord in the stable.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!
We’ll hear a carol
that Francisco will compose,
with a gourd to keep the beat;
then Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás will sing it,
and the refrain will go:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

Let’s see what Baltasar, Melchor and my cousin Gaspar
are bringing from Angola to Our Lady and our little Lord.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

So all you blacks who work at court, — O yeah!
yes, let’s go, and follow the star, — Let’s go!
behind the kings with the treasure — All of us!
they carry across the desert — To the stable!
And you, Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás,
let’s all get going now,

Anyways, I know Shampain hates Black people.

but acknowledging that they had at least a peripheral presence in European history just as blond or red headed White settlers were similarly present in China thousands of years ago isn't so far fetched either.

However small in numbers, they were there.

They were in the armies and they were in the Royal courts of Europe.
[/QUOTE]
but their numbers were so small and their impact not worth a conversation let alone a chapter in a history book

a black 'knight' in medieval days? he was shown off as a token of conquest during royal parties along with lions, tigers, chimps and talking parrots

 

[Joe]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

i think u just wanna create an argument so u can toot some virtue, like that ^

black european history? getting their asses kicked out of southern europe and othello, thats about it

I never claimed that Black Africans were ever the dominant tribe/race in Europe.

Only that they had a presence.

ie - tho this is from a later priod, this song mentions the presence of Blacks:

La conflades de la estlaya by Juan de Aurujo (17th Century)

Spanish text

Los coflades de la estleya
vamo turus a Beleya
y velemo a ziola beya
con Siolo en la poltal.
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!
Oylemo un viyansico
que lo compondla Flasico ziendo
gayta su fosico y luego
lo cantala Blasico, Pellico, Zuanico y Tomá
y lo estliviyo dila:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Bamo a bel que traen de Angola a ziolo y a ziola
Baltasale con Melchola y mi plimo Gasipar
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Vamo siguiendo la estleya — ¡Eya!
lo negliyo coltezano — ¡Vamo!
pus lo Reye cun tesuro — turo
de calmino los tlesban — ¡aya!
Blasico, Pelico, Zuanico y Tomá,
¡aya! vamo tura aya!

English translation

Brothers and sisters of the League of the Star,
let’s all go now to Bethlehem,
where we’ll see our lovely Lady
with our little Lord in the stable.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!
We’ll hear a carol
that Francisco will compose,
with a gourd to keep the beat;
then Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás will sing it,
and the refrain will go:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

Let’s see what Baltasar, Melchor and my cousin Gaspar
are bringing from Angola to Our Lady and our little Lord.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

So all you blacks who work at court, — O yeah!
yes, let’s go, and follow the star, — Let’s go!
behind the kings with the treasure — All of us!
they carry across the desert — To the stable!
And you, Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás,
let’s all get going now,

Anyways, I know Shampain hates Black people.

but acknowledging that they had at least a peripheral presence in European history just as blond or red headed White settlers were similarly present in China thousands of years ago isn't so far fetched either.

However small in numbers, they were there.

They were in the armies and they were in the Royal courts of Europe.

NO they were NOT!!! Joe my friend please just take this on board... The world is a far less racially aware place than it was 100 years ago and then 200 years and 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on there's nothing you can say or post that will change my mind or actually prove anything you're saying! Right, it's 2021 and there's still no black fuckers in my country that i see and you're trying to tell me the same royalty that seen Scottish red heads as sub human touched negroes with the sword of knighthood and hailed them as upper class? You've truly lost your mind fren.
[/QUOTE]

But you don't seem to take into account that the world was not the same as it was 500,1000, 10,000 or 20,000 years ago.

That borders constantly changed.

Heck, even geographically the world isn't the same as it once was.

Was a time where you live in England, where your whole country was uninhabitable due to the last Ice Age.

All of England was covered in Ice and once big glacier.

So your ancestors lived further south where it was habitable like Northern S[pain.

And then they migrated North once the glaciers retreated.

That's just one example

 

[SHAMPAIN]

sounds like a bbc production, they would make king arthur a black muslim homo if they could get away with it

But do you at least agree that men with Black or dark skin color were assigned to be Knights who wore armor during the Middle Ages in Europe?

it wouldnt surprise me but they were also probably used as cannon fodder in battles lol

Yes, they were certainly a lot less racist back then... Fuckin lmao

Who says they were more or less racist?

You should at least acknowledge that Knights with Black Skin color existed back then.

They probably fought and died protecting Europe against Muslim invaders who were trying to enslave your ancestors and force them to convert to Islam.

No they definetely did not Joe, there's absolutely no way in a month of Sundays that negroes were treated with respect in England back then, NO FUCKING WAY! Get real man!

Then why do numerous statues of Black Men with with suits of armor and shields throughout representing Kingodms such as the Holy Roman Empire exist today, Shampain?

You could carbon date and X-ray them and they'd likely be verified as authentic.

whats 'numerous', one in a million?

europe was fighting the moors forever so the last thing they wanted were blacks mixing with their women and changing the country

Nevertheless, White Christian Kings of Europe used Black soldiers or Knights when they were needed.

In a time of war, they likely didn't give a shit what the color of the Knight's skin was.

Just as long as he could hold the line and keep the invaders out so they wouldn't conquering your kingdom.

The Kings probably ran out of White soldiers/Knights as they got slaughtered on the battlefield as well.

So a Black body just the same as a White one. As long as it stands in harm's way to protect you.

Anyways, nobody said or claimed that these soldiers with Black skins every became Princes or Lords.

they were allowed to become soldiers for the Kingdom, that is all.

The royals kept their bloodlines and racial heritage intact by intermarrying.

Oh wow lolol :facepalm: You're not listening Joe!

But you'ure jus as bad as those BLM activists, who want to tear down history of White Confederate soldiers and deny that it ever existed.

I'm just a Heritage supporter. Doesn't matter if it's White, Brown, Asian, Black, Native American Indian.

Let's not tear down or erase ANYONE's history. All f it is valuable.

BTW, I also get really sick of these BLM activisits who are tearing down Confederate monuments.

It's history, and whether we like it or not, history is history.

Let's not bury it r deny that it happened.

L:earn from it, eh.

i think u just wanna create an argument so u can toot some virtue, like that ^

black european history? getting their asses kicked out of southern europe and othello, thats about it

I never claimed that Black Africans were ever the dominant tribe/race in Europe.

Only that they had a presence.

ie - tho this is from a later priod, this song mentions the presence of Blacks:

La conflades de la estlaya by Juan de Aurujo (17th Century)

Spanish text

Los coflades de la estleya
vamo turus a Beleya
y velemo a ziola beya
con Siolo en la poltal.
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!
Oylemo un viyansico
que lo compondla Flasico ziendo
gayta su fosico y luego
lo cantala Blasico, Pellico, Zuanico y Tomá
y lo estliviyo dila:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Bamo a bel que traen de Angola a ziolo y a ziola
Baltasale con Melchola y mi plimo Gasipar
¡Vamo, vamo curendo aya!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá
guache, guache molenio de Safala.

Vamo siguiendo la estleya — ¡Eya!
lo negliyo coltezano — ¡Vamo!
pus lo Reye cun tesuro — turo
de calmino los tlesban — ¡aya!
Blasico, Pelico, Zuanico y Tomá,
¡aya! vamo tura aya!

English translation

Brothers and sisters of the League of the Star,
let’s all go now to Bethlehem,
where we’ll see our lovely Lady
with our little Lord in the stable.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!
We’ll hear a carol
that Francisco will compose,
with a gourd to keep the beat;
then Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás will sing it,
and the refrain will go:

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

Let’s see what Baltasar, Melchor and my cousin Gaspar
are bringing from Angola to Our Lady and our little Lord.
Let’s go, let’s go running there!

Gulumbé, gulumbé, gulumbá.
Guaché, guaché! O blacks from Safala!

So all you blacks who work at court, — O yeah!
yes, let’s go, and follow the star, — Let’s go!
behind the kings with the treasure — All of us!
they carry across the desert — To the stable!
And you, Blas, Pedro, Juan and Tomás,
let’s all get going now,

Anyways, I know Shampain hates Black people.

but acknowledging that they had at least a peripheral presence in European history just as blond or red headed White settlers were similarly present in China thousands of years ago isn't so far fetched either.

However small in numbers, they were there.

They were in the armies and they were in the Royal courts of Europe.

NO they were NOT!!! Joe my friend please just take this on board... The world is a far less racially aware place than it was 100 years ago and then 200 years and 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on there's nothing you can say or post that will change my mind or actually prove anything you're saying! Right, it's 2021 and there's still no black fuckers in my country that i see and you're trying to tell me the same royalty that seen Scottish red heads as sub human touched negroes with the sword of knighthood and hailed them as upper class? You've truly lost your mind fren.

But you don't seem to take into account that the world was not the same as it was 500,1000, 10,000 or 20,000 years ago.

That borders constantly changed.

Heck, even geographically the world isn't the same as it once was.

Was a time where you live in England, where your whole country was uninhabitable due to the last Ice Age.

All of England was covered in Ice and once big glacier.

So your ancestors lived further south where it was habitable like Northern S[pain.

And then they migrated North once the glaciers retreated.

That's just one example
[/QUOTE]
We're talking about black knights though not the history of human beings...

 

[SHAMPAIN]

Quotes are fucked up lol