And what do we hear from the pee dough supporting MAGAts? Crickets

Reggie_Essent

10k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,286
Location
Chicagoland
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They will be retunred after they have been strategically scrubbed.
So please explain to me how Billy Clinton, Barry Obama, Bill Gates, Tom Hanks and any number of other of your Leftist Betters that have been implicated in the Epstein Files of deviant sex shit are presumed innocent - but Trump is presumed guilty even though the files do not seem to indicate that he was sodomizing children like so many of your Leftist Betters?

I know you're ignoring me, dear, but I really would like to hear your deranged and mangled explanation of why Leftists are presumed innocent but Trump is presumed guilty.

TIA
 

MrNiceGuy

peace through anarchy
Reaction score
334
Location
yes
Fact of the matter is @LotusBud & I could run with Lotus as a front tunner & me as a backup.

People are fed up.

Talarico is propagating a narrative.

Lotus disavowing Obama is me disavowing Trump.

Be yourself. In the end it's all we have left.
 

The Prowler

20k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,908
Location
Canada
Isn’t it because there was an ongoing investigation just asking I thought that was it

There is an ongoing investigation now....

When they say "The investigation is ongoing" it means they are still gathering information, not "We cannot tell you what we already know."
 

X

80k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
-4,435
Location
here
There is an ongoing investigation now....

When they say "The investigation is ongoing" it means they are still gathering information, not "We cannot tell you what we already know."
Yes but those files were classified as some sort of evidence at the time, I would think that Biden or his camp would have used all the info where TrumpF is mentioned numerous times against him in the election had they been able too imo of course
 

The Prowler

20k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,908
Location
Canada
Yes but those files were classified as some sort of evidence at the time

So they just had to declassify them....


I would think that Biden or his camp would have used all the info where TrumpF is mentioned numerous times against him in the election had they been able too imo of course

Which makes you wonder if there is anything in there that actually incriminates Trump.

Or at least....it should.
 

X

80k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
-4,435
Location
here
So they just had to declassify them....




Which makes you wonder if there is anything in there that actually incriminates Trump.

Or at least....it should.
Happens all the time here, where evidence isn’t disclosed until after a trial I’m no expert just talking common sense here
 

mastersplither

1k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
796
Location
Alaska
Everyday on the news all over the country a Police Chief is telling people "This is what we already know... " and "The investigation in ongoing."

You are so gullible when the Democrats feed you bullshit.

Yes, they update the public with common information not key evidence known to the investigation.

The common knowledge was that Epstein was a pedophile (that already received a sweetheart deal from a prosecutor Trump later gave a administration position to..).

While lawsuits and possible criminal investigations are still ongoing, and without someone being charged, they absolutely wouldn't release all relevant information.

That's the whole point of the public demanding the files and all relevant information are released NOW... to see why none of the investigations resulted in anyone else being charged.

You know this shit, dumbass. Stick to your talking points though lol
 

Reggie_Essent

10k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,286
Location
Chicagoland
How come no Leftist piece of shit garbage scum has answered my simple question as to why every Leftist named and implicated as engaging in deviant sex with minors in the Epstein Files is presumed innocent, but Trump is presumed guilty even though there is no evidence in the millions of pages of Epstein Files that Trump ever diddled the kinder?

Is the question too hard for any Leftist Filth to answer?
 

Larry Loungelizard

1k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
3,047
Location
Milwaukee
How come no Leftist piece of shit garbage scum has answered my simple question as to why every Leftist named and implicated as engaging in deviant sex with minors in the Epstein Files is presumed innocent, but Trump is presumed guilty even though there is no evidence in the millions of pages of Epstein Files that Trump ever diddled the kinder?

Is the question too hard for any Leftist Filth to answer?
TL, DR.
 

Dove

40k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
17,976
Location
United states
How come no Leftist piece of shit garbage scum has answered my simple question as to why every Leftist named and implicated as engaging in deviant sex with minors in the Epstein Files is presumed innocent, but Trump is presumed guilty even though there is no evidence in the millions of pages of Epstein Files that Trump ever diddled the kinder?

Is the question too hard for any Leftist Filth to answer?

Because its not about justice or survivors at all. Its just the next "Trump" bullshit.

Trust me these people dont care. They'd allow actual sex offenders to keep offended. They'd probably agree to giving thrm more victims so long as they could blame Trump and throw him in prison.

Its not about justice
 

mastersplither

1k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
796
Location
Alaska
It literally says in the Epstein files (now that the Trump DOJ was called out for removing it and added it back) that Trump forced a 14 year old to perform oral sex on him...

Where does it say anything like that about tHe DeMoNrAtS?...

And if it does say anything like that about an active democrat politician I absolutely support them being removed from office by any means necessary..

Can you say the same about Trump? Of course not lol you're Minor Attracted Guardian Association members
 

Reggie_Essent

10k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,286
Location
Chicagoland
It literally says in the Epstein files (now that the Trump DOJ was called out for removing it and added it back) that Trump forced a 14 year old to perform oral sex on him...
Did you miss the bit were the investigators deemed the person who made these allegations to be an unreliable witness who likely fabricated the story, which is why that report was not included in the prosecution?

Of course you did. Your Betters have told you Trump is guilty and by golly you believe it.
Where does it say anything like that about tHe DeMoNrAtS?...
So you also missed the bit where one of the "survivors" was talking about Barry Obama and Tom Hanks cavorting with the Cabana Boys too, huh?
 

Dove

40k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
17,976
Location
United states
Did you miss the bit were the investigators deemed the person who made these allegations to be an unreliable witness who likely fabricated the story, which is why that report was not included in the prosecution?

Of course you did. Your Betters have told you Trump is guilty and by golly you believe it.

So you also missed the bit where one of the "survivors" was talking about Barry Obama and Tom Hanks cavorting with the Cabana Boys too, huh?

When that document was passed around, the part where it was investigated and the conclusion was edited out.

So he probably didnt see it. I have the full document somewhere in my phone....ill have to dig

And no one the left side and algorithm they aren't hearing anything about ANY of the other people there is evidence on.