feminism

FagglesMcGee

Forever forgotten.
Factory Bastard
Messages
208
If anyone is interested in putting feminism where it actually belongs as of 2018, I'd suggest a 3rd world shit hole like the Middle East. There's just something about being raped by a rogue party and then murdered by your sexist government/society for being assaulted that just doesn't sit well with pretty much anyone these days.
 

skinofevil

Undeniably Plausible
Site Supporter
Messages
2,194
Location
The Third Rail
If anyone is interested in putting feminism where it actually belongs as of 2018, I'd suggest a 3rd world shit hole like the Middle East. There's just something about being raped by a rogue party and then murdered by your sexist government/society for being assaulted that just doesn't sit well with pretty much anyone these days.

Exactly where feminism needs to focus, IMO, and exactly where the third-wave iteration of feminism REFUSES to focus. Why? Because third-wave feminism isn't even about empowering women, it's about destroying civilization, which also happens to be what a certain bronze-age death cult is about.
 

FagglesMcGee

Forever forgotten.
Factory Bastard
Messages
208
If anyone is interested in putting feminism where it actually belongs as of 2018, I'd suggest a 3rd world shit hole like the Middle East. There's just something about being raped by a rogue party and then murdered by your sexist government/society for being assaulted that just doesn't sit well with pretty much anyone these days.

Exactly where feminism needs to focus, IMO, and exactly where the third-wave iteration of feminism REFUSES to focus. Why? Because third-wave feminism isn't even about empowering women, it's about destroying civilization, which also happens to be what a certain bronze-age death cult is about.
It's also too busy using Islam as a shield to deflect its awful behavior. Defending the most misogynistic ideology on the planet; the very definition of irony.
 

skinofevil

Undeniably Plausible
Site Supporter
Messages
2,194
Location
The Third Rail
If anyone is interested in putting feminism where it actually belongs as of 2018, I'd suggest a 3rd world shit hole like the Middle East. There's just something about being raped by a rogue party and then murdered by your sexist government/society for being assaulted that just doesn't sit well with pretty much anyone these days.

Exactly where feminism needs to focus, IMO, and exactly where the third-wave iteration of feminism REFUSES to focus. Why? Because third-wave feminism isn't even about empowering women, it's about destroying civilization, which also happens to be what a certain bronze-age death cult is about.
It's also too busy using Islam as a shield to deflect its awful behavior. Defending the most misogynistic ideology on the planet; the very definition of irony.
Right because -- again -- the third-wave version is intensely hostile to actual civilization. Just as Islam is. So they see in Islam an implicit ally in their campaign against civilization.
 

D-Day

_
Factory Bastard
Messages
8
Location
Not Modesto
Why can’t we hate men?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Suzanna Danuta Walters, a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, is the editor of the gender studies journal Signs.

It’s not that Eric Schneiderman (the now-former New York attorney general accused of abuse by multiple women) pushed me over the edge. My edge has been crossed for a long time, before President Trump, before Harvey Weinstein, before “mansplaining” and “incels.” Before live-streaming sexual assaults and red pill men’s groups and rape camps as a tool of war and the deadening banality of male prerogative.

Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men. I can’t lie, I’ve always had a soft spot for the radical feminist smackdown, for naming the problem in no uncertain terms. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half.

But, of course, the criticisms of this blanket condemnation of men — from transnational feminists who decry such glib universalism to U.S. women of color who demand an intersectional perspective — are mostly on the mark. These critics rightly insist on an analysis of male power as institutional, not narrowly personal or individual or biologically based in male bodies. Growing movements to challenge a masculinity built on domination and violence and to engage boys and men in feminism are both gratifying and necessary. Please continue.

But this recognition of the complexity of male domination (how different it can be in different parts of the world, how racism shapes it) should not — must not — mean we forget some universal facts.

Pretty much everywhere in the world, this is true: Women experience sexual violence, and the threat of that violence permeates our choices big and small. In addition, male violence is not restricted to intimate-partner attacks or sexual assault but plagues us in the form of terrorism and mass gun violence. Women are underrepresented in higher-wage jobs, local and federal government, business, educational leadership, etc.; wage inequality continues to permeate every economy and almost every industry; women continue to provide far higher rates of unpaid labor in the home (e.g., child care, elder care, care for disabled individuals, housework and food provision); women have less access to education, particularly at the higher levels; women have lower rates of property ownership.

The list goes on. It varies by country, but these global realities — of women’s economic, political, social and sexual vulnerabilities — are, well, real. Indeed, the nations in which these inequities have been radically minimized (e.g., Iceland) are those in which deliberate effort has been made to both own up to gender disparities and to address them directly and concretely.

So, in this moment, here in the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity, is it really so illogical to hate men? For all the power of #MeToo and #TimesUp and the women’s marches, only a relatively few men have been called to task, and I’ve yet to see a mass wave of prosecutions or even serious recognition of wrongdoing. On the contrary, cries of “witch hunt” and the plotted resurrection of celebrity offenders came quick on the heels of the outcry over endemic sexual harassment and violence. But we’re not supposed to hate them because . . . #NotAllMen. I love Michelle Obama as much as the next woman, but when they have gone low for all of human history, maybe it’s time for us to go all Thelma and Louise and Foxy Brown on their collective butts.

The world has little place for feminist anger. Women are supposed to support, not condemn, offer succor not dismissal. We’re supposed to feel more empathy for your fear of being called a harasser than we are for the women harassed. We are told he’s with us and #NotHim. But, truly, if he were with us, wouldn’t this all have ended a long time ago? If he really were with us, wouldn’t he reckon that one good way to change structural violence and inequity would be to refuse the power that comes with it?

So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.

Well she’s not wrong.

Would anyone care to compare death counts of patriarchal societies v matriarchal throughout history?

Or in the modern era compare social welfare/happiness/health/etc for modern countries that are more feminist v less?

Now I’m not saying that if all of a sudden the US political system moved to half female we’d transforms into a Nordic paradise, but I do think we’d at least be moving in that direction as opposed to the dark ages our current system is hell bent on taking us.
 
Last edited:

skinofevil

Undeniably Plausible
Site Supporter
Messages
2,194
Location
The Third Rail
Why can’t we hate men?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Suzanna Danuta Walters, a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, is the editor of the gender studies journal Signs.

It’s not that Eric Schneiderman (the now-former New York attorney general accused of abuse by multiple women) pushed me over the edge. My edge has been crossed for a long time, before President Trump, before Harvey Weinstein, before “mansplaining” and “incels.” Before live-streaming sexual assaults and red pill men’s groups and rape camps as a tool of war and the deadening banality of male prerogative.

Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men. I can’t lie, I’ve always had a soft spot for the radical feminist smackdown, for naming the problem in no uncertain terms. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half.

But, of course, the criticisms of this blanket condemnation of men — from transnational feminists who decry such glib universalism to U.S. women of color who demand an intersectional perspective — are mostly on the mark. These critics rightly insist on an analysis of male power as institutional, not narrowly personal or individual or biologically based in male bodies. Growing movements to challenge a masculinity built on domination and violence and to engage boys and men in feminism are both gratifying and necessary. Please continue.

But this recognition of the complexity of male domination (how different it can be in different parts of the world, how racism shapes it) should not — must not — mean we forget some universal facts.

Pretty much everywhere in the world, this is true: Women experience sexual violence, and the threat of that violence permeates our choices big and small. In addition, male violence is not restricted to intimate-partner attacks or sexual assault but plagues us in the form of terrorism and mass gun violence. Women are underrepresented in higher-wage jobs, local and federal government, business, educational leadership, etc.; wage inequality continues to permeate every economy and almost every industry; women continue to provide far higher rates of unpaid labor in the home (e.g., child care, elder care, care for disabled individuals, housework and food provision); women have less access to education, particularly at the higher levels; women have lower rates of property ownership.

The list goes on. It varies by country, but these global realities — of women’s economic, political, social and sexual vulnerabilities — are, well, real. Indeed, the nations in which these inequities have been radically minimized (e.g., Iceland) are those in which deliberate effort has been made to both own up to gender disparities and to address them directly and concretely.

So, in this moment, here in the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity, is it really so illogical to hate men? For all the power of #MeToo and #TimesUp and the women’s marches, only a relatively few men have been called to task, and I’ve yet to see a mass wave of prosecutions or even serious recognition of wrongdoing. On the contrary, cries of “witch hunt” and the plotted resurrection of celebrity offenders came quick on the heels of the outcry over endemic sexual harassment and violence. But we’re not supposed to hate them because . . . #NotAllMen. I love Michelle Obama as much as the next woman, but when they have gone low for all of human history, maybe it’s time for us to go all Thelma and Louise and Foxy Brown on their collective butts.

The world has little place for feminist anger. Women are supposed to support, not condemn, offer succor not dismissal. We’re supposed to feel more empathy for your fear of being called a harasser than we are for the women harassed. We are told he’s with us and #NotHim. But, truly, if he were with us, wouldn’t this all have ended a long time ago? If he really were with us, wouldn’t he reckon that one good way to change structural violence and inequity would be to refuse the power that comes with it?

So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.

Well she’s not wrong.

Except in the head. But that's not uncommon for the outer fringe of bigots, of which she is one.
 

skinofevil

Undeniably Plausible
Site Supporter
Messages
2,194
Location
The Third Rail
Now I’m not saying that if all of a sudden the US political system moved to half female we’d transforms into a Nordic paradise...

For that to happen, two other fundamental changes would have to take place. First, way more of us would have to be constantly dosed to the tits on anti-depressants, and second, our culture would have to adopt a proclivity for lying about being happy when we're actually miserable. Yes, that's a Scandinavian thing, a social aversion to complaining, even when they have things to complain about. It's from that that most Americans get the reflexive response of "I'm fine" when asked, "How are you?" -- even when we're pretty fucking far from fine. So that Nordic paradise trope -- it's a myth.
 

Fashionista

Factory Bastard
Site Supporter
Messages
157
Why can’t we hate men?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Suzanna Danuta Walters, a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, is the editor of the gender studies journal Signs.

It’s not that Eric Schneiderman (the now-former New York attorney general accused of abuse by multiple women) pushed me over the edge. My edge has been crossed for a long time, before President Trump, before Harvey Weinstein, before “mansplaining” and “incels.” Before live-streaming sexual assaults and red pill men’s groups and rape camps as a tool of war and the deadening banality of male prerogative.

Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men. I can’t lie, I’ve always had a soft spot for the radical feminist smackdown, for naming the problem in no uncertain terms. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half.

But, of course, the criticisms of this blanket condemnation of men — from transnational feminists who decry such glib universalism to U.S. women of color who demand an intersectional perspective — are mostly on the mark. These critics rightly insist on an analysis of male power as institutional, not narrowly personal or individual or biologically based in male bodies. Growing movements to challenge a masculinity built on domination and violence and to engage boys and men in feminism are both gratifying and necessary. Please continue.

But this recognition of the complexity of male domination (how different it can be in different parts of the world, how racism shapes it) should not — must not — mean we forget some universal facts.

Pretty much everywhere in the world, this is true: Women experience sexual violence, and the threat of that violence permeates our choices big and small. In addition, male violence is not restricted to intimate-partner attacks or sexual assault but plagues us in the form of terrorism and mass gun violence. Women are underrepresented in higher-wage jobs, local and federal government, business, educational leadership, etc.; wage inequality continues to permeate every economy and almost every industry; women continue to provide far higher rates of unpaid labor in the home (e.g., child care, elder care, care for disabled individuals, housework and food provision); women have less access to education, particularly at the higher levels; women have lower rates of property ownership.

The list goes on. It varies by country, but these global realities — of women’s economic, political, social and sexual vulnerabilities — are, well, real. Indeed, the nations in which these inequities have been radically minimized (e.g., Iceland) are those in which deliberate effort has been made to both own up to gender disparities and to address them directly and concretely.

So, in this moment, here in the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity, is it really so illogical to hate men? For all the power of #MeToo and #TimesUp and the women’s marches, only a relatively few men have been called to task, and I’ve yet to see a mass wave of prosecutions or even serious recognition of wrongdoing. On the contrary, cries of “witch hunt” and the plotted resurrection of celebrity offenders came quick on the heels of the outcry over endemic sexual harassment and violence. But we’re not supposed to hate them because . . . #NotAllMen. I love Michelle Obama as much as the next woman, but when they have gone low for all of human history, maybe it’s time for us to go all Thelma and Louise and Foxy Brown on their collective butts.

The world has little place for feminist anger. Women are supposed to support, not condemn, offer succor not dismissal. We’re supposed to feel more empathy for your fear of being called a harasser than we are for the women harassed. We are told he’s with us and #NotHim. But, truly, if he were with us, wouldn’t this all have ended a long time ago? If he really were with us, wouldn’t he reckon that one good way to change structural violence and inequity would be to refuse the power that comes with it?

So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.

Well she’s not wrong.

Would anyone care to compare death counts of patriarchal societies v matriarchal throughout history?

Or in the modern era compare social welfare/happiness/health/etc for modern countries that are more feminist v less?

Now I’m not saying that if all of a sudden the US political system moved to half female we’d transforms into a Nordic paradise, but I do think we’d at least be moving in that direction as opposed to the dark ages our current system is hell bent on taking us.
Nordic paradise?

Sweden has the fastest growing income inequality in the OECD.
The growth in inequality between 1985 and the early 2010s was the largest among all OECD countries, increasing by one third. In 2012, the average income of the top 10% of income earners was 6.3 times higher than that of the bottom 10%. This is up from a ratio of around 5.75 to 1 in the 2007 and a ratio of around 4 to 1 during much of the 1990s.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Their cities are as divided racially as American cities too..

Wages are considerably lower than Canada..

People that haven't been to Scandinavia often have misconceptions about the Nordic countries.
 

realgrimm

ፕልክፏቹክፕ ነየርጎልረጎነፕ
Global Moderator
photo_2016-08-15_17-22-13.jpg
 

Sharona

white wine divorcee
Factory Bastard
Messages
767
Location
Chicago
Your president endorses rape culture and hate. He is a snarky, shady business man and wants to be a greedy person.
 

Blazor

Put your glasses on!
Site Supporter
Messages
27,508
Your president endorses rape culture and hate.

Thanks for reminding me! I totally forgot that its the president, and not when a woman tries to meet strangers to let them smell you while you sell them used panties!

lol
 

Sharona

white wine divorcee
Factory Bastard
Messages
767
Location
Chicago
excuse me?? i was going to be evicted! men r creeps and anyone i met was in Applebees or post office lobby next door!
maybe when u get older and move out of ur parents house u will see how hard.
kthnks
 

Blazor

Put your glasses on!
Site Supporter
Messages
27,508
excuse me?? i was going to be evicted! men r creeps and anyone i met was in Applebees or post office lobby next door!
maybe when u get older and move out of ur parents house u will see how hard.
kthnks

I think getting another job, vs risking getting raped would of been a better option. Stop encouraging the rape culture Sharona! lol

For the record, I've been on my own for a long time. Maybe when you quit man hating, and eventually have a kid of your own, you will see how hard it is.

Tata!