No Ahmaud Arbery trial thread

Lily, pay Mel no mind.

"DDT" stands for "Definitely Delirium Tremens."
Just admit it. That jogger was there to jog away with other peoples shit...

What do you mean, "Just admit it"?

You think I was there?

In a previous life, I had a few gigs at high-profile construction sites as a security worker. Never saw no joggers in the dark.

I also worked as a ghost for Chapters-Indigo (the Canadian version of Barnes & Noble, for you Muricans); the only people I ever caught with goods they "forgot to pay for" once out the door were older, White, well off ladies who couldn't be arsed to pay for a book or a trinket or who took a secret pleasure in contributing to the store's half a million dollar yearly shrinkage.
 
And yet, nothing was found on him, least of all a weapon to defend himself. And he only went through/around 1 house on a construction site. God forbid a black man show any curiosity about a project in his community.
He didn't even live in that community, and he had no business jogging around on private property there, new construction or not. He was caught more than once prowling around on private property there, and shit was going missing.

Just admit that your jogger was jogging for shit to come back and steal in the middle of the night...

So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?
Only if he's a nigger.
 
EYBh5-Ia-Wo-AA4pg5.jpg
I have never seen a black jogger. There weren't very many blacks where I grew up though as we were prosperous.
 
Black joggers are about as rare as black swimmers.

And while I'm no keep fit fanatic, I'm pretty sure that wearing heavy Timberland boots isn't exactly ideal footwear for running.
 
And yet, nothing was found on him, least of all a weapon to defend himself. And he only went through/around 1 house on a construction site. God forbid a black man show any curiosity about a project in his community.
He didn't even live in that community, and he had no business jogging around on private property there, new construction or not. He was caught more than once prowling around on private property there, and shit was going missing.

Just admit that your jogger was jogging for shit to come back and steal in the middle of the night...

So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?

1) He wasn't jogging nor was he dressed for jogging.

2) He didn't walk around someone's property he illegally went into a house undergoing a partial remodel.

3) He physically hit and attacked the good citizens who tried to legally hold him for the police to arrest him. He was shot when he was struggling with and trying to take a gun from the elder man.

Why are you always too lazy and stupid to do basic research?
 
So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?

Just for that?

No.

Are you dumb as shit?

Oh, but it's legal to murder him if you decide he's casing the joint.

So you don't think the "jogger" attacking people and trying to take their gun is not the relevant part here? Moron.

If it's true at all, it is, of course. But usually the gun is used as a threat first, which is probably what happened here.
 
And yet, nothing was found on him, least of all a weapon to defend himself. And he only went through/around 1 house on a construction site. God forbid a black man show any curiosity about a project in his community.
He didn't even live in that community, and he had no business jogging around on private property there, new construction or not. He was caught more than once prowling around on private property there, and shit was going missing.

Just admit that your jogger was jogging for shit to come back and steal in the middle of the night...

So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?
correct

jogging with a hammer in construction boots.....lulz
 
And yet, nothing was found on him, least of all a weapon to defend himself. And he only went through/around 1 house on a construction site. God forbid a black man show any curiosity about a project in his community.
He didn't even live in that community, and he had no business jogging around on private property there, new construction or not. He was caught more than once prowling around on private property there, and shit was going missing.

Just admit that your jogger was jogging for shit to come back and steal in the middle of the night...

I won't admit to what I have no evidence of. He wasn't murdered at night.
 
And yet, nothing was found on him, least of all a weapon to defend himself. And he only went through/around 1 house on a construction site. God forbid a black man show any curiosity about a project in his community.
He didn't even live in that community, and he had no business jogging around on private property there, new construction or not. He was caught more than once prowling around on private property there, and shit was going missing.

Just admit that your jogger was jogging for shit to come back and steal in the middle of the night...

So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?

1) He wasn't jogging nor was he dressed for jogging.

2) He didn't walk around someone's property he illegally went into a house undergoing a partial remodel.

3) He physically hit and attacked the good citizens who tried to legally hold him for the police to arrest him. He was shot when he was struggling with and trying to take a gun from the elder man.

Why are you always too lazy and stupid to do basic research?

It isn't our right as Americans to detain anyone. If they suspected him of something and that a crime was in progress all they needed to do was call 9-1-1.

Asked the lawyer I live with, if you detain someone you can be charged with false imprisonment, assault, etc.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
 
So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?

Just for that?

No.

Are you dumb as shit?

Oh, but it's legal to murder him if you decide he's casing the joint.

So you don't think the "jogger" attacking people and trying to take their gun is not the relevant part here? Moron.

They followed him and chased him down. If anything he was trying to defend himself.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.


cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun
 
Gotta say I love the attitude that some Americans have about people they don't like or are suspicious of...I have the right to shoot them dead if they don't do what I say.

Fucked up much? Oh yeah.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
p

cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun

They got in their vehicles to follow him. FFS, that's not normal behavior. Call the police, end of.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
p

cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun

They got in their vehicles to follow him. FFS, that's not normal behavior. Call the police, end of.
those details the court can play with, im just talking about the moment in dispute the case is all about
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
p

cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun

They got in their vehicles to follow him. FFS, that's not normal behavior. Call the police, end of.
those details the court can play with, im just talking about the moment in dispute the case is all about


Well, it shows intent or motive. It's all relevant. You can't cherry pick the facts that make you comfortable with your judgment. I mean you can, but I won't take that seriously since the courts don't either.
 
I also worked as a ghost for Chapters-Indigo (the Canadian version of Barnes & Noble, for you Muricans); the only people I ever caught with goods they "forgot to pay for" once out the door were older, White, well off ladies who couldn't be arsed to pay for a book or a trinket or who took a secret pleasure in contributing to the store's half a million dollar yearly shrinkage.

Bad example.

Blacks do not read books.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
p

cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun

They got in their vehicles to follow him. FFS, that's not normal behavior. Call the police, end of.
those details the court can play with, im just talking about the moment in dispute the case is all about


Well, it shows intent or motive. It's all relevant. You can't cherry pick the facts that make you comfortable with your judgment. I mean you can, but I won't take that seriously since the courts don't either.
im only cherry picking the actual video of the act in question

entertaining this in the court is just more politically motivated bs
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
p

cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun

They got in their vehicles to follow him. FFS, that's not normal behavior. Call the police, end of.
those details the court can play with, im just talking about the moment in dispute the case is all about


Well, it shows intent or motive. It's all relevant. You can't cherry pick the facts that make you comfortable with your judgment. I mean you can, but I won't take that seriously since the courts don't either.
im only cherry picking the actual video of the act in question

entertaining this in the court is just more politically motivated bs

I disagree. There are legal consequences for detaining a citizen.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.
p

cmon, he turned and attacked a fat guy standing still with a shotgun

They got in their vehicles to follow him. FFS, that's not normal behavior. Call the police, end of.
those details the court can play with, im just talking about the moment in dispute the case is all about


Well, it shows intent or motive. It's all relevant. You can't cherry pick the facts that make you comfortable with your judgment. I mean you can, but I won't take that seriously since the courts don't either.
im only cherry picking the actual video of the act in question

entertaining this in the court is just more politically motivated bs

I disagree. There are legal consequences for detaining a citizen.


ofc we do, we always will on these things
 
So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?

Just for that?

No.

Are you dumb as shit?

Oh, but it's legal to murder him if you decide he's casing the joint.

So you don't think the "jogger" attacking people and trying to take their gun is not the relevant part here? Moron.

If it's true at all, it is, of course. But usually the gun is used as a threat first, which is probably what happened here.
Please grab the barrel of the next loaded gun you see and pull hard.
 
So now if a black man jogs where he doesn't live, and he jogs around some private property, it's legal and justified to kill him?

Just for that?

No.

Are you dumb as shit?

Oh, but it's legal to murder him if you decide he's casing the joint.

So you don't think the "jogger" attacking people and trying to take their gun is not the relevant part here? Moron.

They followed him and chased him down. If anything he was trying to defend himself.

At the time citizen's arrest was perfectly legal in the state of Georgia. They legally were 100% correct to hold a suspected criminal until the police arrived. That was explicit in the law. Are you really claiming it is wrong for people to use their legal rights under that law?

As soon as the criminal "jogger" attacked a 70 year old man, punching him in the face, and trying to take his firearm... That is legally the definition of a good shoot. You are barking at the moon.
 
I also worked as a ghost for Chapters-Indigo (the Canadian version of Barnes & Noble, for you Muricans); the only people I ever caught with goods they "forgot to pay for" once out the door were older, White, well off ladies who couldn't be arsed to pay for a book or a trinket or who took a secret pleasure in contributing to the store's half a million dollar yearly shrinkage.

Bad example.

Blacks do not read books.

No, they write them...

Their Eyes Were Watching God, Native Son, Invisible Man, Go Tell It On the Mountain, Babel-17, Roots, Kindred, The Color Purple, Beloved, The Known World, Sing Unburied Sing, to name but a few.

These books are intended for smart people so you can be excused for not being familiar with them.
 
thats true, he wasnt murdered at night

he was justifiably shot during the day when he charged someone with a shotgun and grabbed it barrel first

They were chasing him, he had a right to defend himself. They killed him. They have been charged with murder and I hope they go down for being the racist assholes that they are and hard.

It's posts like this which illustrate perfectly just how warped your mind is and the alarming extent which leftist politics have rendered you the equivalent of a drooling vegetable.