Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[X]

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa

 

[Dove]

WoW - Killer Kyle fired the kill shots when Rosey was on the ground - in the back.
. What a brave fellow he is. That's murder.

PS: Bear spray - LoLz, what kind of pussy carries bear spray?

So why didn't Killer Kyle just carry pepper spray? People aren't as tough as bears. LoLz @ theGrowler

The bullet in the child rapists back was not Kyle's.

You guys COULD try to be fully informed.

 

[The Prowler]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

 

[Dove]

WoW - Killer Kyle fired the kill shots when Rosey was on the ground - in the back.
. What a brave fellow he is. That's murder.

PS: Bear spray - LoLz, what kind of pussy carries bear spray?

So why didn't Killer Kyle just carry pepper spray? People aren't as tough as bears. LoLz @ theGrowler

The forensic specialist who testified in court said the exact opposite, you ignorant fool. He said Rosenbaum had his hand on the muzzle of Kyle's rifle (based upon powder burn patterns on part of the hand) and Kyle fired four shots in 0.7 seconds. Rosenbaum was bent over and lunging and was falling due to being shot.

They also said someone else fired three rounds AT Kyle and Rosenbaum at the same time. Watch the trial testimony and stop repeating debunked lies.

It's like when Murd was trying to tell me she read Jacob Blake's arrest record and his warrant but she very clearly did not because she was arguing bullshit said while I actually read the records.

Clearly he didnt bother with facts either and lies about it, probably assuming no one really looks.

These are the people who make propaganda so effective. They will seriously stick to the media versions, accept it with no question and jump on whatever bandwagon the establishment tells them.

These people would fight to destroy the Constitution just to "win" over all these "far right extremists" who are really just normal regular Americans who dont want to live in a one party authoritarian regime. That's lies. That violates rights. That has no regard for life or liberty.

 

[X]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

 

[Dove]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

I doubt I could fight off a few men who were bent on attacking me.

The country is more dangerous for women if we lose our 2A. Lord knows it's already vastly more dangerous because of the "equality act" and how a girl can be raped in school and these dumb fuckers ignore it or deny it.

 

[Holliday1881]

The forensic specialist who testified in court said the exact opposite,

Nope - shot him in the head and back when he was down.

Kelley, the pathologist, said Rosenbaum was shot four times by someone who was within 4 feet of him. He testified that Rosenbaum was first wounded in the groin and then in the hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the head and in the back.
Those final two shots were at a downward angle, the pathologist said. Prosecutors have said this indicates Rosenbaum was falling forward, while defense attorney Mark Richards said Rosenbaum was lunging.
Kelley said both scenarios were possible.
Kelley also said Rosenbaum's hand was "in close proximity or in contact with the end of that rifle.”
Richards pointed out small injuries from soot on Rosenbaum's hand and said: “So that hand was over the barrel of Mr. Rittenhouse’s gun when his hand was shot."
“That makes sense,” Kelley said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(many sources besides the trial video)

Dr. Doug Kelley, a forensic pathologist with the Milwaukee County medical examiner's office, said Rosenbaum was shot by someone who was within 4 feet of him.

Kelley testified Rosenbaum was shot four times: He was first wounded in the groin, hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the back — which prosecutor James Kraus called the "kill shot."

Kelley also said Rosenbaum's hand was "in close proximity or in contact with the end of that rifle."

 

[Dove]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

Is having a spare tire looking for a flat?

If you were going into a violent situation to aid a community, you would take a gun IN CASE.

You dont HAVE to look for trouble at a left wing riot. The riot itself is the trouble. Kenosha certainly didnt ask to get destroyed.

 

[Dove]

The forensic specialist who testified in court said the exact opposite,

Nope - shot him in the head and back when he was down.

Kelley, the pathologist, said Rosenbaum was shot four times by someone who was within 4 feet of him. He testified that Rosenbaum was first wounded in the groin and then in the hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the head and in the back.
Those final two shots were at a downward angle, the pathologist said. Prosecutors have said this indicates Rosenbaum was falling forward, while defense attorney Mark Richards said Rosenbaum was lunging.
Kelley said both scenarios were possible.
Kelley also said Rosenbaum's hand was "in close proximity or in contact with the end of that rifle.”
Richards pointed out small injuries from soot on Rosenbaum's hand and said: “So that hand was over the barrel of Mr. Rittenhouse’s gun when his hand was shot."
“That makes sense,” Kelley said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(many sources besides the trial video)

Dr. Doug Kelley, a forensic pathologist with the Milwaukee County medical examiner's office, said Rosenbaum was shot by someone who was within 4 feet of him.

Kelley testified Rosenbaum was shot four times: He was first wounded in the groin, hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the back — which prosecutor James Kraus called the "kill shot."

Kelley also said Rosenbaum's hand was "in close proximity or in contact with the end of that rifle."

And again, the bullet to the back was not Kyle's.

They suspect it was Ziminski.

And yeah....Kyle shot him when he lunged and touched the gun. And?

 

[Holliday1881]

@Oerdin
you gonna be okay man ??

you havin' a hairy coniption party ??

The young lady is a highly emotional type.

 

[Lily]

Uh oh retoerdin is flippin his lid again

Oh, I call him Overdone because I think he was in gestation for 11 months, but retoerdin is good too.

 

[The Prowler]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

I disagree.

I trained in fighting techniques so I could defend myself.

When I went out, even to an event where fighting was highly probable, I was not asking for trouble. I was prepared for it if it came to me.

 

[X]

@Oerdin
you gonna be okay man ??

you havin' a hairy coniption party ??

The young lady is a highly emotional type.

well I'm terribly sorry to have upset ye' m'am

 

[X]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

I disagree.

I trained in fighting techniques so I could defend myself.

When I went out, even to an event where fighting was highly probable, I was not asking for trouble. I was prepared for it if it came to me.

you were honorable, gun zealots have no honor only cowardice

 

[X]

Unless you're Ben or Joe or Hoss or Adam Cartwright, those fuckerz had honor

 

[Holliday1881]

You know - seriously though, if Kryin Killer Kyle didn't shoot him in the back you'd think the defense would have mentioned it and presented ballistics evidence in support.

...but they didn't.
What could it mean?

Rosenbaum was first wounded in the groin and then in the hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the head and in the back.
Those final two shots were at a downward angle, the pathologist said.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

You know - seriously though, if Kryin Killer Kyle didn't shoot him in the back you'd think the defense would have mentioned it and presented ballistics evidence in support.

...but they didn't.
What could it mean?

Congratulations. you're the dumbest person here today.

 

[The Prowler]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

I doubt I could fight off a few men who were bent on attacking me.

The country is more dangerous for women if we lose our 2A. Lord knows it's already vastly more dangerous because of the "equality act" and how a girl can be raped in school and these dumb fuckers ignore it or deny it.

Yeah, it is complicated.

Even with dudes, and even in a one-on-one fight, there are situations where you are severely outmatched.

I understand that carrying a weapon is desirable. Shit, I carry a knife with me a lot of the time when walking my dog late at night. This one usually:

 

[Oerdin]

 

[Joe]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

I doubt I could fight off a few men who were bent on attacking me.

The country is more dangerous for women if we lose our 2A. Lord knows it's already vastly more dangerous because of the "equality act" and how a girl can be raped in school and these dumb fuckers ignore it or deny it.

Yeah, it is complicated.

Even with dudes, and even in a one-on-one fight, there are situations where you are severely outmatched.

I understand that carrying a weapon is desirable. Shit, I carry a knife with me a lot of the time when walking my dog late at night. This one usually:

We had a problem in Vancouver this summer where a growing coyote population was attacking people in the city & even gobbling up their pets while they were taking them out for walks.

So perhaps one of those could act as a last line of defense against them (?).

 

[X]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

I doubt I could fight off a few men who were bent on attacking me.

The country is more dangerous for women if we lose our 2A. Lord knows it's already vastly more dangerous because of the "equality act" and how a girl can be raped in school and these dumb fuckers ignore it or deny it.

Yeah, it is complicated.

Even with dudes, and even in a one-on-one fight, there are situations where you are severely outmatched.

I understand that carrying a weapon is desirable. Shit, I carry a knife with me a lot of the time when walking my dog late at night. This one usually:

We had a problem in Vancouver this summer where a growing coyote population was attacking people in the city & even gobbling up their pets while they were taking them out for walks.

So perhaps one of those could act as a last line of defens against them (?).

could also charge a tax on the homebuyers that buy homes built where wildlife used to live and use that money to have a relocate policy and not a kill policy ...

 

[The Prowler]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

I disagree.

I trained in fighting techniques so I could defend myself.

When I went out, even to an event where fighting was highly probable, I was not asking for trouble. I was prepared for it if it came to me.

you were honorable, gun zealots have no honor only cowardice

I think honour is a good word to describe it.

But expecting everyone else to be honourable might be a little naive.

I remember when I was a teenager and I got into a few scraps. My dad sat me down and had a talk. He was known to be a bit of a scrapper when he was younger. He told me that when he was young, it was less dangerous. He said that very rarely did someone "put the boots" to someone. So if you lost, it was over. If you said "I've had enough." it was over. He told me that it was much more dangerous for me (this was int he 1980s) because people would continue and beat the shit out of someone even after they could no longer defend themselves.

40 years later, I think honour is even rarer.

 

[DDT]

We had a problem in Vancouver this summer where a growing coyote population was attacking people in the city & even gobbling up their pets while they were taking them out for walks.

So perhaps one of those could act as a last line of defense against them (?).

Carry a small canister of dog spray in yer pocket. Good for two legged and four legged beasts. Just don't ever tell the cops it's for self-defense against humans, but don't hesitate to use it against some thug if he threatens you.

 

[X]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

I disagree.

I trained in fighting techniques so I could defend myself.

When I went out, even to an event where fighting was highly probable, I was not asking for trouble. I was prepared for it if it came to me.

you were honorable, gun zealots have no honor only cowardice

I think honour is a good word to describe it.

But expecting everyone else to be honourable might be a little naive.

I remember when I was a teenager and I got into a few scraps. My dad sat me down and had a talk. He was known to be a bit of a scrapper when he was younger. He told me that when he was young, it was less dangerous. He said that very rarely did someone "put the boots" to someone. So if you lost, it was over. If you said "I've had enough." it was over. He told me that it was much more dangerous for me (this was int he 1980s) because people would continue and beat the shit out of someone even after they could no longer defend themselves.

40 years later, I think honour is even rarer.

you're right
but what your entering is a realm of owning a gun for the reason it is intended, a GUN not an automatic rifle in civilian hands, I mean if I lived in 'Merica I would have a gun, I would HAVE TO HAVE ONE ..I would be in the 2 percent that needs protection from the other 98 percent of gun zealots

 

[Oerdin]

The leftists are outraged that facts and the law are being used at this trial.

 

[Holliday1881]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

I doubt I could fight off a few men who were bent on attacking me.

The country is more dangerous for women if we lose our 2A. Lord knows it's already vastly more dangerous because of the "equality act" and how a girl can be raped in school and these dumb fuckers ignore it or deny it.

Yeah, it is complicated.

Even with dudes, and even in a one-on-one fight, there are situations where you are severely outmatched.

I understand that carrying a weapon is desirable. Shit, I carry a knife with me a lot of the time when walking my dog late at night. This one usually:

We had a problem in Vancouver this summer where a growing coyote population was attacking people in the city & even gobbling up their pets while they were taking them out for walks.

So perhaps one of those could act as a last line of defens against them (?).

I always carry a knife but I only carry a sheath knife when out in the woods and in areas where there are Mountain Lion. I don't feel I need it at the supermarket. I never carry a gun - guns are for pussies. The one exception is in wilderness areas where Brown bear, cougar, wolf and the wild conservatives may be. Then I could see carrying a gun. Not in a city - not at a demonstration where emotions are running high and the sight of a rifle would put people on edge.
The question is - if Kryin Killer Kyle hadn't been carrying the rifle, would people have seen him as a threat and defended themselves? Most certainly not - and no one would have been shot.

 

[Oerdin]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

I disagree.

I trained in fighting techniques so I could defend myself.

When I went out, even to an event where fighting was highly probable, I was not asking for trouble. I was prepared for it if it came to me.

you were honorable, gun zealots have no honor only cowardice

I think honour is a good word to describe it.

But expecting everyone else to be honourable might be a little naive.

I remember when I was a teenager and I got into a few scraps. My dad sat me down and had a talk. He was known to be a bit of a scrapper when he was younger. He told me that when he was young, it was less dangerous. He said that very rarely did someone "put the boots" to someone. So if you lost, it was over. If you said "I've had enough." it was over. He told me that it was much more dangerous for me (this was int he 1980s) because people would continue and beat the shit out of someone even after they could no longer defend themselves.

40 years later, I think honour is even rarer.

you're right
but what your entering is a realm of owning a gun for the reason it is intended, a GUN not an automatic rifle in civilian hands, I mean if I lived in 'Merica I would have a gun, I would HAVE TO HAVE ONE ..I would be in the 2 percent that needs protection from the other 98 percent of gun zealots

No one in this trial used an "automatic rifle". You are just not very good at present either facts or logical arguments.

 

[The Prowler]

When you leave home carrying a weapon as he was, you're looking for trouble, otherwise why have one?

To defend yourself if someone else brings trouble to you, even if you avoid it.

If I carry a can of bear spray when I go hiking in bear country, do you really think I am looking for a confrontation with a bear?

I hope this helps you understand.

pepper spray mentality Vs. the Gun zealot ... two very diff things .. he prays for circumstances in which he may caress his trusty gun, may even invent reasons ..

You are over-generalizing. But even if that were true in this case, the fact is that the circumstances presented the opportunity to smoke a couple of douchebags in legal self-defense.

That's exactly what it was, legally, Kylie is still a pussy that would get smoked if not for his trusty lifeline...as is the case with 98 percent of the gun zealot population

I think I mistook your "may even invent reasons .." as an implication that this was the case with Rittenhouse.

You might be right about the "gun zealots". I am not sure.

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

Where I grew up, there was very little gun crime. If you needed to defend yourself, you needed to fight unarmed. So learning and training in different fighting techniques gave you a real-life advantage in self-defense. But in the USA, there is not the same incentive to train in different fighting techniques. You just get a gun.

I doubt I could fight off a few men who were bent on attacking me.

The country is more dangerous for women if we lose our 2A. Lord knows it's already vastly more dangerous because of the "equality act" and how a girl can be raped in school and these dumb fuckers ignore it or deny it.

Yeah, it is complicated.

Even with dudes, and even in a one-on-one fight, there are situations where you are severely outmatched.

I understand that carrying a weapon is desirable. Shit, I carry a knife with me a lot of the time when walking my dog late at night. This one usually:

We had a problem in Vancouver this summer where a growing coyote population was attacking people in the city & even gobbling up their pets while they were taking them out for walks.

So perhaps one of those could act as a last line of defense against them (?).

We have a good sized forest that I walk in frequently. Lots of coyotes. My dog wants to walk through it sometimes in the wee hours when it is nearly pitch black. I take him every once in a while. When I am in there, I get a little scared. I try to keep my dog moving a bit more than usual, not letting him stop and smell stuff as much. It is kind of stupid to be there. I know that if we were attacked and I used my knife, there is a danger that I would cut my own dog.

See, even TheProwler does some stupid shit.

 

[Joe]

We had a problem in Vancouver this summer where a growing coyote population was attacking people in the city & even gobbling up their pets while they were taking them out for walks.

So perhaps one of those could act as a last line of defense against them (?).

Carry a small canister of dog spray in yer pocket. Good for two legged and four legged beasts. Just don't ever tell the cops it's for self-defense against humans, but don't hesitate to use it against some thug if he threatens you.

I actually found a rechargeable animal taser lying on the ground 1 day so I picked it up and took it home. I think it's intended for animals like coyotes.

Then 1 day I pressed the button & it emitted a large electrical lightning bolt. Kinda scary if someone is on the receiving end of it.

They could get burned with it.

 

[X]

There are so many armed people in America that it does seem prudent to arm yourself when going into a potentially volatile situation.

just asking for trouble

I disagree.

I trained in fighting techniques so I could defend myself.

When I went out, even to an event where fighting was highly probable, I was not asking for trouble. I was prepared for it if it came to me.

you were honorable, gun zealots have no honor only cowardice

I think honour is a good word to describe it.

But expecting everyone else to be honourable might be a little naive.

I remember when I was a teenager and I got into a few scraps. My dad sat me down and had a talk. He was known to be a bit of a scrapper when he was younger. He told me that when he was young, it was less dangerous. He said that very rarely did someone "put the boots" to someone. So if you lost, it was over. If you said "I've had enough." it was over. He told me that it was much more dangerous for me (this was int he 1980s) because people would continue and beat the shit out of someone even after they could no longer defend themselves.

40 years later, I think honour is even rarer.

you're right
but what your entering is a realm of owning a gun for the reason it is intended, a GUN not an automatic rifle in civilian hands, I mean if I lived in 'Merica I would have a gun, I would HAVE TO HAVE ONE ..I would be in the 2 percent that needs protection from the other 98 percent of gun zealots

No one in this trial used an "automatic rifle". You are just not very good at present either facts or logical arguments.

hey calm the fuck down man
I was generally speaking you hot headed retard