Misplaced ⓂⒺⓁⓉⒹⓄⓌⓃⓈ

[wizer]

Im glad to see wizer came to his senses and came back to a well functioning forum, I saw your mega list of complaints elsewhere

They're not complaints. They're issues that could be easily fixed in under an hour and it would make it a better forum and easier to navigate, potentially attracting more members.

Honestly I've never seen such sloppy coding in my entire forum life.

 

[ESAD TIA]

Scroll up. #2894

I'm a little perplexed, but obviously BF suspects that worksman is using someone elses images, not necessarily accusing Worksman of being an alt.

 

[wizer]

The intended recipient got the message.

If you're reading it you'll never know what it said before I edited it.

 

[Fredricka]

They're not complaints. They're issues that could be easily fixed in under an hour and it would make it a better forum and easier to navigate, potentially attracting more members.

Honestly I've never seen such sloppy coding in my entire forum life.

Did they ever fix the problems?

 

[wizer]

Did they ever fix the problems?

There was an entire Category called "Rules". If you clicked it, the Subcategory had only two threads in it. Each had only one post. The first was the "Rules" thread, and the second was an Amendment to one of the Rules in the first thread.

I pointed out that an entire Category for 2 threads was a waste of space, and to combine the two threads and make it a sticky in one of the other active Categories and remove the Rules Category.

That was one of about a dozen suggestions and the only one addressed.

 

[ESAD TIA]

I remember your pics from the Goregrish early years.

 

[wizer]

BF is into bestiality as well as fecal porn? Why am I not surprised at this revelation.

 

[The Question]

You're wrong on so many levels, and the ignorance is rather shocking, given that it's affected you to such a degree during your entire life.

1- LASIK doesn't fix congenital cataracts, it's a procedure done to reshape the cornea to correct refractive error. The congenital cataract is an opacification of the intraocular lens, the only treatment is to remove it.

2- If you had the 1950's version of cataract surgery, you wouldn't have had a replacement lens inserted into the eyeball, and you'd have been left extremely farsighted, and you'd have to wear really thick lenses that make your eyes look freaking huge. That is something LASIK could fix.

3- Odds are you vision doesn't correct to 20/20 since the reduced vision as the eyes continued to develop up until the age of 10 would cause amblyopia and nothing can fix that.

Re-read everything you wrote here.

 

[wizer]

Re-read everything you wrote here.

In fact I do that with every post I make, and often make edits to correct spelling or change the way I worded a particular phrase.

 

[The Question]

In fact I do that with every post I make, and often make edits to correct spelling or change the way I worded a particular phrase.

2- If you had the 1950's version of cataract surgery, you wouldn't have had a replacement lens inserted into the eyeball, and you'd have been left extremely farsighted, and you'd have to wear really thick lenses that make your eyes look freaking huge. That is something LASIK could fix.

And?

 

[wizer]

And?

LASIK wasn't around in the 1950s you moron.

 

[The Question]

LASIK wasn't around in the 1950s you moron.

I didn't say it was, you hilarious nincompoop. I had cataract surgery in 1989, and femtosecond laser cateract surgery was still experimental at the time, which is why it wasn't available to a 14 year old kid. LASIK wasn't available yet, either.

 

[wizer]

I didn't say it was, you hilarious nincompoop.

No, you're making up shit about your eyes as you go along expecting people to believe it, because you didn't realize you'd run into a retired optometrist.

 

[The Question]

No, you're making up shit about your eyes as you go along

Sure I am, d00d.

 

[Fredricka]

There was an entire Category called "Rules". If you clicked it, the Subcategory had only two threads in it. Each had only one post. The first was the "Rules" thread, and the second was an Amendment to one of the Rules in the first thread.

I pointed out that an entire Category for 2 threads was a waste of space, and to combine the two threads and make it a sticky in one of the other active Categories and remove the Rules Category.

That was one of about a dozen suggestions and the only one addressed.

No customer service, tut tut

 

[wizer]

Sure I am, d00d.

So did you ever actually get LASIK (or an alternative refractive surgery) after it was approved for high hyperopia a few years ago, or are you wearing really thick glasses that make you look like an owl? Or do you wear contacts.

Because those are the only 3 options.

Oh I forgot option 4, the most likely possibility. You're full of shit.

 

[wizer]

No customer service, tut tut

Yeah, there's a whole bunch of apathy over there.

 

[The Question]

So did you ever actually get LASIK (or an alternative refractive surgery) after it was approved for high hyperopia a few years ago, or are you wearing really thick glasses that make you look like an owl? Or do you wear contacts.

Because those are the only 3 options.

Contact lenses with reading glasses.

Oh I forgot option 4, the most likely possibility. You're full of shit.

Option 5: Go shit in your hat.

 

[wizer]

Contact lenses with reading glasses.

Option 5: Go shit in your hat.

Ok, so if that's true, and you had the 1950's version of cataract surgery which means no implanted intraocular lens (IOL), then you're really fucking old.

In fact, by the time I retired 2 years ago I hadn't seen an aphakic patient (no intraocular lens) in many years.

They were all dead.

Although you were younger than the average cataract patient but you're still old.

 

[The Question]

Ok, so if that's true, and you had the 1950's version of cataract surgery which means no implanted intraocular lens (IOL), then you're really fucking old.

In fact, by the time I retired 2 years ago I hadn't seen an aphakic patient (no intraocular lens) in many years.

They were all dead.

Although you were younger than the average cataract patient but you're still old.

I turned 50 in September. Old, yes. 'Really fucking' old, no. In Oregon, in 1989, they weren't doing femtosecond laser surgery on people under 18, as it was still experimental at the time (so far as I was told.)

 

[wizer]

I turned 50 in September. Old, yes. 'Really fucking' old, no. In Oregon, in 1989, they weren't doing femtosecond laser surgery on people under 18, as it was still experimental at the time (so far as I was told.)

Femto is laser assisted cataract surgery, which has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not an IOL is placed within the eyeball. That's been around for decades. Like I said I can't recall the last patient I examined that didn't have an IOL.

The only reason I can think of as to why your cataract lens wasn't replaced with an IOL was that it was a really long time ago and like I said that means you're really fucking old and you're making shit up about your age.

 

[ESAD TIA]

Femto is laser assisted cataract surgery, which has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not an IOL is placed within the eyeball. That's been around for decades. Like I said I can't recall the last patient I examined that didn't have an IOL.

The only reason I can think of as to why your cataract lens wasn't replaced with an IOL was that it was a really long time ago and like I said that means you're really fucking old and you're making shit up about your age.

I've known him around 20 years and had I been asked to guess I'd had said early 50s.

 

[The Question]

Femto is laser assisted cataract surgery, which has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not an IOL is placed within the eyeball. That's been around for decades.

Like I said, the surgery was in 1989.

The only reason I can think of as to why your cataract lens wasn't replaced with an IOL was that it was a really long time ago and like I said that means you're really fucking old and you're making shit up about your age.

Or I was a 14 year old kid who didn't get it because (I was told) it was experimental at the time. I was a kid who couldn't get that surgery, not the doctor who performed it, ya smarmy motherfucker. I'm not an expert about this shit, get it?

 

[Bastard Factory]

Funny guy. As if you are unaware that you can use the forum software to match an unknown alt with the regular member. It just takes one logon with the same IP to link it all together. If you're really that lost, maybe take a lesson from @Alticus, he's clearly more on top of things than you are.

And by the way how does it feel to have a perfectly good thread hijacked?

You outted yourself today f00L. I got a red flag email when you added the alt back in Feb.
Its not the worst alter I've seen pop up around here and I let you roll with it... but its gone nowhere and the idle chatter/backstory BS is getting stale and I tried moving it along. Fucking up a thread that's suppose to get real life replies with your little deformity.

 

[The Question]

I've known him around 20 years and had I been asked to guess I'd had said early 50s.

And you'd be right. Like I said, I turned 50 in September.

 

[wizer]

After checking my sources, an IOL may not have been an option following congenital cataract removal in a 14 year old, 3.5 decades prior.

 

[Bastard Factory]

Call them out.... let the comedy ensue.

https://bastardfactory.net/threads/alter-ego-account-check-in.2842/

 

[wizer]

Like I said, the surgery was in 1989.

Or I was a 14 year old kid who didn't get it because (I was told) it was experimental at the time.

Let's do the math, just to show how foolish your posts are.

You claim you're 50, and you had cataract surgery at age 14. So that's 36 years ago.

IOLs were common going back to 1949. That's over 75 YEARS ago.

Like I said, you're making shit up.

 

[ESAD TIA]

And you'd be right. Like I said, I turned 50 in September.

Yeah I saw your prior comment, I'm just saying had I not seen It and were I asked to throw a semi edumacated guess at it that is where abouts I woulda landed.