- Messages
- 45,498
I love this meme tho
I love this meme tho
"Self-defense is not only our right; it is our duty" - Ronald Reagan
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
"Self-defense is not only our right; it is our duty" - Ronald Reagan
When you commit a crime using an illegally obtained weapon, you are liable for everything that happens. That’s your Tort Law 101 lesson for today.
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
:facepalm:Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
:facepalm:Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
Wanna wager?:facepalm:Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
that’s what I’m doing while reading the hunting laws that they are using for his defense lolz
This kid is gonna fry. Mark my words.
Wanna wager?:facepalm:Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
that’s what I’m doing while reading the hunting laws that they are using for his defense lolz
This kid is gonna fry. Mark my words.
how about 1000 dollars?
They won’t let you suck his cock thoThe question, is will "they" let Oerdin and Stubby et al. have conjugal visits with Kyle after he is convicted?
Your onWanna wager?:facepalm:Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
that’s what I’m doing while reading the hunting laws that they are using for his defense lolz
This kid is gonna fry. Mark my words.
how about 1000 dollars?
Sure.
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
"Self-defense is not only our right; it is our duty" - Ronald Reagan
When you commit a crime using an illegally obtained weapon, you are liable for everything that happens. That’s your Tort Law 101 lesson for today.
Except the long rifle was fully legal. It was legally purchased, it was legally possessed, and it was legally used for self defense. It was purchased in Kenosha, was never taken out of Kenosha, and was legally stored by its lawful purchaser in Kenosha. It is legal to lend a firearm to a friend and in Wisconsin it is legal for a 17 year old to open carry a long rifle if they have the correct certification which Kyle did have.
So what exactly are you talking about wrt "an illegally obtained weapon"?
You couldn’t get me to render a guilty verdict in this case if you put a gun to my head
fuck all these shitstain vermin filth liberals
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
Funny because the judge in this case admitted that the law is unclear. One law say no one under 18 can own a firearm while another says that a person 17 years of age can legally possess a long rifle if they have a training certificate. Kyle did not own the rifle. His 19 year old friend owned the rifle and legally purchased it as well as legally stored it in his home.
The judge said in the next hearing he will decide whither to dismiss the prosecutions claim that possessing a firearm by a 17 year old was some how illegal.
Discuss.
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
Funny because the judge in this case admitted that the law is unclear. One law say no one under 18 can own a firearm while another says that a person 17 years of age can legally possess a long rifle if they have a training certificate. Kyle did not own the rifle. His 19 year old friend owned the rifle and legally purchased it as well as legally stored it in his home.
The judge said in the next hearing he will decide whither to dismiss the prosecutions claim that possessing a firearm by a 17 year old was some how illegal.
Clearly the judge is a right wing extremist and part of a cabal of white supremacists.
When Kyle walks that will be the narrative. Incurable hate and ignorance that allows violent riots and only gets mad about "murder" when someone defends themselves against leftwing terrorists are never gonna be reasonable.
Discuss.
Why would anyone on this site support someone like Kyle Rittenhouse? Shame on his parents for allowing him to go out during a global pandemic. Shame on the adult who was stupid and negligent enough to arm a child with a semi-automatic weapon. But a 17 yo with some wannabe hero complex thinks he did anyone a favor by ruining his life and killing 2 people? Seriously?!?!
I went to peaceful protests strapped because I’m a white woman and tensions are typically high during racially charged police inflicted brutality. But this you condone? This you are for???? He is a child!
You are all INSANE and I hope your neighborhoods are full of these psychos. It would serve you all right to have some lunatic with a semi automatic weapon living right next door.
You are all INSANE and I hope your neighborhoods are full of these psychos.
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
Funny because the judge in this case admitted that the law is unclear. One law say no one under 18 can own a firearm while another says that a person 17 years of age can legally possess a long rifle if they have a training certificate. Kyle did not own the rifle. His 19 year old friend owned the rifle and legally purchased it as well as legally stored it in his home.
The judge said in the next hearing he will decide whither to dismiss the prosecutions claim that possessing a firearm by a 17 year old was some how illegal.
Clearly the judge is a right wing extremist and part of a cabal of white supremacists.
When Kyle walks that will be the narrative. Incurable hate and ignorance that allows violent riots and only gets mad about "murder" when someone defends themselves against leftwing terrorists are never gonna be reasonable.
He won't walk completely free, Dovey.
However I suspect the Judge will seek some sort of compromise verdict in order to assuage tensions on both sides.
Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
Funny because the judge in this case admitted that the law is unclear. One law say no one under 18 can own a firearm while another says that a person 17 years of age can legally possess a long rifle if they have a training certificate. Kyle did not own the rifle. His 19 year old friend owned the rifle and legally purchased it as well as legally stored it in his home.
The judge said in the next hearing he will decide whither to dismiss the prosecutions claim that possessing a firearm by a 17 year old was some how illegal.
Clearly the judge is a right wing extremist and part of a cabal of white supremacists.
When Kyle walks that will be the narrative. Incurable hate and ignorance that allows violent riots and only gets mad about "murder" when someone defends themselves against leftwing terrorists are never gonna be reasonable.
He won't walk completely free, Dovey.
However I suspect the Judge will seek some sort of compromise verdict in order to assuage tensions on both sides.