- Messages
- 12,022
- Location
- La La Land
So ramming blazing dumpsters into gas stations in residential areas is standing up for justice now?Uh. This case is being tried in Wisconsin hello? Anyone home?The stupidity from the far right gun enthusiasts in this thread is alarming.
The Castle Doctrine in Illinois does not allow you to use deadly force against any intruder in your home. Illinois law allows a person to protect their home. But the use of deadly force is qualified by requiring much more than a simple trespass before deadly force is justified.
It’s going to be extremely difficult for this minor child to prove that his life was actually in danger when he has illegally obtained a semi automatic weapon that he used to carry out vigilante justice to unarmed and unsuspecting citizens that night.
Vigilante justice is against the law.
Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 to carry a weapon. He is FUCKED.
ps tort law is universal in this nation lol
Funny because the judge in this case admitted that the law is unclear. One law say no one under 18 can own a firearm while another says that a person 17 years of age can legally possess a long rifle if they have a training certificate. Kyle did not own the rifle. His 19 year old friend owned the rifle and legally purchased it as well as legally stored it in his home.
The judge said in the next hearing he will decide whither to dismiss the prosecutions claim that possessing a firearm by a 17 year old was some how illegal.
Clearly the judge is a right wing extremist and part of a cabal of white supremacists.
When Kyle walks that will be the narrative. Incurable hate and ignorance that allows violent riots and only gets mad about "murder" when someone defends themselves against leftwing terrorists are never gonna be reasonable.
He won't walk completely free, Dovey.
However I suspect the Judge will seek some sort of compromise verdict in order to assuage tensions on both sides.
Considering he didnt break any laws he better.
Kyle broke laws but it appears his attackers did to.
Cite the laws he broke.
He didn't break a single law.
Well 3 people are dead.
Plus he was a minor carrying a firearm being in a place he shouldn't have.
And yet his attackers were vicious assailants.
So it's a mixed bag.
I'd say not entirely guilty but not entirely innocent either.
And if Kyle is found guilty on some charges his parent (s) should be too.
Cite the laws he broke.
There's no use in arguing with you about it.
Your mind is made up.
You've decided the verdict without weighing all the facts.
Keep in mind, I'm not siding with those Antifa types who died that night tho.
Just think there should be a fair trial where all the facts and liabilities are considered.
exactly!!! and they will never understand that because they feel empowered by the fascist pig of a former president his totalitarian antics
they blatantly refuse to get it because everyone is automatically guilty who stands up for justice in this country *rolls eyes*
that's an odd version of reality you live in.
Now, about that wager.
And forcing this version of reality on innocent communities is an entitlement they feel.
They think they own everything.
In that case you ought not approve of or condone the Jan 6 Capitol Hill riots either.
I think there have to better laws as to what constitutes peaceful assembly and protests. Both left and right in the US have been out of control in this regard.
it got out of control because they wanted this to go away… they want to sweep injustice under the rug and pretend that systemic racism doesn’t exist because then everything in their white honky world can go back to “normal.”
Speaking of mythical made up "systemic racism" I am still waiting for you to find a single example of all those supposedly racist laws. You keep claiming they are every where yet can never find a specific example.
you should really stop driving your dual when you’re this starved out for a brawl, Big *smh*