Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
10,912
Location
Portugal
And, of course, these cockroaches are always violent felons. Always.


Look at the bright side

liberal cunts defend scum like this so they get what they got coming when these same animals beat the piss out of them in their own bedrooms.


And they will too. And the state whose dick they suck with vigor will protect the rioters.

These stupid useful idiots deserve it, fighting against our rights because they are retard level partisan.

These morons would eat out Caligulas asshole if he were an American democrat.

That's why I won't feel empathy for any of them when this shit turns around and bites them in the ass


I cheer every time I the chickens coming home to roost on these rodents


I'm not one to feel bad when hateful people who want to see other peoples lives destroyed finally get exactly what they wanted.

The mindless herd mentality they have is sickening. They are so dumb they are dangerous.


You people are so full of hatred.


Goes for ANTIFA side too.

There are strikes against both sides.


Yeah that's the thing. They view state sponsored antifa/blm destroying innocent peoples communities, beating and murdering innocent people, destroying livelihoods as "blow back".

If we oppose this ghoulish attacks on innocent people and the campaign against our constitutional rights WE are hateful.


For Sure. Governor should have called in the National Guard to prevent the situation from spiralling out of control like it did. They have to be more responsive than that.

But ideally a society shouldn't have to rely upon vigilantes to patrol the streets either.

Personally I think open and carry gun policies in the US are totally fucked up.

No one shold be able to carry guns openly in public within city limits. left or right. Antifa or Proud Boys.

Guns should be confined to homes for self defense only. Bans/ restrictions on certain kinds of guns too.


Joe the GOVERNOR played part in inciting the violence and then had police sit back while these violent fucks burnt down the community. They even attempted to burn occupied buildings.

Now they are charging KYLE because they attacked him and he defended himself.

We have constitutional rights to have arms and defend ourselves. This isnt Canada.

You cant be neutral on something like this. If you are not on the side of innocent people and communities than you may as well be against them.


I think the Governor failed because he didn't call in the National Guard after unrest had been brewing for 2-3 days.

The police wern'T sufficient in numbers to handle the situation.


People more concerned with order than justice are what caused the riots.


At the very least, the jury are not. It isn't the slam dunk conservatives said it was.


There are one or two tainted jurors because, yes, this was a slam dunk. There is also the problem of the tainted "evidence" and multiple counts of prosecutorial misconduct.


If the judge saw misconduct, why hasn't there been a mistrial declared?


There is a big debate on why he is waiting to rule on the motion to mistrial.


I bet you've spent hours and hours analyzing it and searching for info that supports your view.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,032
Location
United states
And, of course, these cockroaches are always violent felons. Always.


Look at the bright side

liberal cunts defend scum like this so they get what they got coming when these same animals beat the piss out of them in their own bedrooms.


And they will too. And the state whose dick they suck with vigor will protect the rioters.

These stupid useful idiots deserve it, fighting against our rights because they are retard level partisan.

These morons would eat out Caligulas asshole if he were an American democrat.

That's why I won't feel empathy for any of them when this shit turns around and bites them in the ass


I cheer every time I the chickens coming home to roost on these rodents


I'm not one to feel bad when hateful people who want to see other peoples lives destroyed finally get exactly what they wanted.

The mindless herd mentality they have is sickening. They are so dumb they are dangerous.


You people are so full of hatred.


Goes for ANTIFA side too.

There are strikes against both sides.


Yeah that's the thing. They view state sponsored antifa/blm destroying innocent peoples communities, beating and murdering innocent people, destroying livelihoods as "blow back".

If we oppose this ghoulish attacks on innocent people and the campaign against our constitutional rights WE are hateful.


For Sure. Governor should have called in the National Guard to prevent the situation from spiralling out of control like it did. They have to be more responsive than that.

But ideally a society shouldn't have to rely upon vigilantes to patrol the streets either.

Personally I think open and carry gun policies in the US are totally fucked up.

No one shold be able to carry guns openly in public within city limits. left or right. Antifa or Proud Boys.

Guns should be confined to homes for self defense only. Bans/ restrictions on certain kinds of guns too.


Joe the GOVERNOR played part in inciting the violence and then had police sit back while these violent fucks burnt down the community. They even attempted to burn occupied buildings.

Now they are charging KYLE because they attacked him and he defended himself.

We have constitutional rights to have arms and defend ourselves. This isnt Canada.

You cant be neutral on something like this. If you are not on the side of innocent people and communities than you may as well be against them.


I think the Governor failed because he didn't call in the National Guard after unrest had been brewing for 2-3 days.

The police wern'T sufficient in numbers to handle the situation.


People more concerned with order than justice are what caused the riots.


At the very least, the jury are not. It isn't the slam dunk conservatives said it was.


There are one or two tainted jurors because, yes, this was a slam dunk. There is also the problem of the tainted "evidence" and multiple counts of prosecutorial misconduct.


If the judge saw misconduct, why hasn't there been a mistrial declared?


There is a big debate on why he is waiting to rule on the motion to mistrial.


I bet you've spent hours and hours analyzing it and searching for info that supports your view.


You mean all the well documented and even video footage of facts that rioters destroying Kenosha targetted and went after Kyle and he tried to flee them before being forced to shoot?

Stop accusing others of the shit only you guys do. Its blatantly clear that you guys will lie, twist and freak out until you can put an innocent person in prison for protecting themselves from YOUR state sponsored terrorists.

Denial and dishonesty will not be good for your soul.
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
What I want to know is why the defense wasn’t all over this video like flies on shit. Where is the spoliation/subpoena? This kid’s life is literally hanging in the balance and they didn’t search the far corners of the earth to find it?

Something is fishy… like they didn’t want it entered because it incriminates their client further.

Absolutely! I believe that's what's happening with the video evidence. They wanted to avoid it.

how the fuck is video surveillance available to the prosecution NOT available to the defense? It’s public record ffs

Burdensome discovery response deserved an objection… and I bet they did lol
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,392
Location
California
My partner said that he had forgotten to tell me that he was bestowed with clairvoyance when he graduated law school. He then shared that he was bestowed with other secret superpowers when he passed the CA bar that he cannot yet reveal.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,032
Location
United states
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.

You know that "who gave the orders" absurdity came from something real.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,392
Location
California
What I want to know is why the defense wasn’t all over this video like flies on shit. Where is the spoliation/subpoena? This kid’s life is literally hanging in the balance and they didn’t search the far corners of the earth to find it?

Something is fishy… like they didn’t want it entered because it incriminates their client further.

Absolutely! I believe that's what's happening with the video evidence. They wanted to avoid it.

how the fuck is video surveillance available to the prosecution NOT available to the defense? It’s public record ffs

Burdensome discovery response deserved an objection… and I bet they did lol

Exactly, they don't want transparency for some reason.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,032
Location
United states
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup

If we were nearly as well versed in law as these leftards? We would know the laws about evidence do not apply when it's a leftwing political case.

If it's a leftwing anti American cause, they can break laws and shit on rights in anyway needed to help their kangaroo circus court against someone they already marked. Laws only apply to US.

Get that or you are just a hack.
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup

that doesn’t apply to public record evidence

that would apply to police withholding evidence that the defendant doesn’t have access to that exonerates a defendant
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup

that doesn’t apply to public record evidence

that would apply to police withholding evidence that the defendant doesn’t have access to that exonerates a defendant
And it's your position that the drone footage dropped off at the prosecutor's office at the 10th hour is public record

okay lol
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
It's public record folks

you could have seen it on just about any public billboard if you looked carefully enough

we just didn't

Good thing smart people are here to reveal that :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


woooooooooooo that west coast cron is a motherfaucker
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup

that doesn’t apply to public record evidence

that would apply to police withholding evidence that the defendant doesn’t have access to that exonerates a defendant
And it's your position that the drone footage dropped off at the prosecutor's office at the 10th hour is public record

okay lol

who owns the drone
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup

that doesn’t apply to public record evidence

that would apply to police withholding evidence that the defendant doesn’t have access to that exonerates a defendant
And it's your position that the drone footage dropped off at the prosecutor's office at the 10th hour is public record

okay lol

who owns the drone
um.... I'll take a stab

A member of the human race?


why does that matter?
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
It's public record folks

you could have seen it on just about any public billboard if you looked carefully enough

we just didn't

Good thing smart people are here to reveal that :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


woooooooooooo that west coast cron is a motherfaucker

Kyle didn’t hire an attorney who knows how to conduct their own investigation?

Amateur hour.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,392
Location
California
It's public record folks

you could have seen it on just about any public billboard if you looked carefully enough

we just didn't

Good thing smart people are here to reveal that :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


woooooooooooo that west coast cron is a motherfaucker

Kyle didn’t hire an attorney who knows how to conduct their own investigation?

Amateur hour.


But but but "we" are all paying for his attorneys when we donate to his legal defense fund, those are "our" lawyers too...
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
It's public record folks

you could have seen it on just about any public billboard if you looked carefully enough

we just didn't

Good thing smart people are here to reveal that :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


woooooooooooo that west coast cron is a motherfaucker

Kyle didn’t hire an attorney who knows how to conduct their own investigation?

Amateur hour.


But but but "we" are all paying for his attorneys when we donate to his legal defense fund, those are "our" lawyers too...

mistrial…

cause the prosecution did their job and found it lol
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,032
Location
United states
WRT the mistrial with prejudice.



Yep. The corporate media constantly incites violence and directly attacks the country with lies and division.

And the saddest part is the hateful people who eat it up enjoy it.

I cant imagine being one of them and having this mentality. You have to be miserable. Completely miserable and devoid of empathy.

I'm telling you. A whole party of narcissistic abusers. All the good people who care about the country have been bailing on them.

We see people who consider themselves "leftists" all the time showing up in discussion groups saying they can no longer stand with the dems/progs. They dont like Republicans and disagree with many "right wing" stances but they are bailing on the party of hatred, lies and destruction.

It will get worse when all the good police have quit... that's been happening.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
It's public record folks

you could have seen it on just about any public billboard if you looked carefully enough

we just didn't

Good thing smart people are here to reveal that :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


woooooooooooo that west coast cron is a motherfaucker

Kyle didn’t hire an attorney who knows how to conduct their own investigation?

Amateur hour.


But but but "we" are all paying for his attorneys when we donate to his legal defense fund, those are "our" lawyers too...

mistrial…

cause the prosecution did their job and found it lol
found a high resolution copy (through magic) and used a video editing software to reduce the quality by 10 times to send a flawed copy over to the defense at the 10th hour

good job they did there
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
Okay, enough arguing minutia with people who don't have the slightest fucking clue what they are talking about

tell me Binger doesn't remind you of this guy

 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
It's public record folks

you could have seen it on just about any public billboard if you looked carefully enough

we just didn't

Good thing smart people are here to reveal that :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


woooooooooooo that west coast cron is a motherfaucker

Kyle didn’t hire an attorney who knows how to conduct their own investigation?

Amateur hour.


But but but "we" are all paying for his attorneys when we donate to his legal defense fund, those are "our" lawyers too...

mistrial…

cause the prosecution did their job and found it lol
found a high resolution copy (through magic) and used a video editing software to reduce the quality by 10 times to send a flawed copy over to the defense at the 10th hour

good job they did there

Except the video information like origin/ ownership of the drone, date taken, etc. was produced in a discovery response before the video was ever produced.

Nice try.
 
Reaction score
7,486
What I want to know is why the defense wasn’t all over this video like flies on shit. Where is the spoliation/subpoena? This kid’s life is literally hanging in the balance and they didn’t search the far corners of the earth to find it?

Something is fishy… like they didn’t want it entered because it incriminates their client further.

Absolutely! I believe that's what's happening with the video evidence. They wanted to avoid it.

how the fuck is video surveillance available to the prosecution NOT available to the defense? It’s public record ffs

Burdensome discovery response deserved an objection… and I bet they did lol

1) It was not a government drone. A private company.
2) The full video was never provided just a tiny clip.
3) There was no raw footage provided just one edited clip and no sound even though that model records sound. There are foundational issues as the person who records it didn't provide all the data and was not named by prosecutors so defense could not cross examine.
4) The defense had high res video but only gave defense a low res version with 1/16th the data and even then only gave them a copy last Saturday evening after the defense had rested. That is a massive problem. Further more the prosecution admitted they had a better resolution copy so they knew they withheld the high res video from the defense illegally.
5) The prosecutor claimed he had no idea how the defense only got a low res copy and he didn't even know how to do it yet in court he played it off his laptop and his laptop had the programs I stalled to edit and compress videos on it. So it is obvious this was intentional withholding of evidence.
 
Reaction score
7,486
Settle down folks. Smart people are discussing the clairvoyance that is automatically bestowed upon a law school graduate

But only if you become a defense attorney and are defending a kid with right leanings

listen in as reasonable points are being made


lulz

I still want Admin to explain who and how gives clairvoyant orders for people to defend themselves.

Maybe he thinks because he gets direct messages and voices in his brain from Leftard HQ we all function the same way.
I wanna know how the defense was supposed to know about evidence which the prosecution didn't even know about until it magically appeared on their doorstep?

seriously, we might be onto to something groundbreaking here which could render the Brady rule completely obsolete

so hushup

that doesn’t apply to public record evidence

that would apply to police withholding evidence that the defendant doesn’t have access to that exonerates a defendant

You mean like when Binger called the police captain and told him not to collect evidence off of Grosskreutz phone even though a judge had already granted a search warrant? That kind of exculpatory evidence? Or how about how witnesses testified under oath that Binger tried to pressure him to change his sworn testimony?

Or how Binger lied to both the defense and the court that he didn't know the identity of jump kick man yet Binger knew full well and just didn't want to call him as a witness because he was a bad witness. He lied to both the defense and the court to prevent the defense from calling that witness. Corrupt enough for you yet?

Now tack on that twice Binger tried to claim that people taking the fifth was some how proof that they were dishonest liars? Something which is absolutely not allowed u der the constitution? And even after that Binger told the jury about an event which the judge had ruled inadmissible.

The guy is dirty and corrupt.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
What I want to know is why the defense wasn’t all over this video like flies on shit. Where is the spoliation/subpoena? This kid’s life is literally hanging in the balance and they didn’t search the far corners of the earth to find it?

Something is fishy… like they didn’t want it entered because it incriminates their client further.

Absolutely! I believe that's what's happening with the video evidence. They wanted to avoid it.

how the fuck is video surveillance available to the prosecution NOT available to the defense? It’s public record ffs

Burdensome discovery response deserved an objection… and I bet they did lol

1) It was not a government drone. A private company.
2) The full video was never provided just a tiny clip.
3) There was no raw footage provided just one edited clip and no sound even though that model records sound. There are foundational issues as the person who records it didn't provide all the data and was not named by prosecutors so defense could not cross examine.
4) The defense had high res video but only gave defense a low res version with 1/16th the data and even then only gave them a copy last Saturday evening after the defense had rested. That is a massive problem. Further more the prosecution admitted they had a better resolution copy so they knew they withheld the high res video from the defense illegally.
5) The prosecutor claimed he had no idea how the defense only got a low res copy and he didn't even know how to do it yet in court he played it off his laptop and his laptop had the programs I stalled to edit and compress videos on it. So it is obvious this was intentional withholding of evidence.
basically the leftists around here are admitting liberals are scum and a conservative defense attorney should never trust a liberal prosecutor to honor the brady rule and simply subpoena everything supplied for himself. Lest he be the one accused of lacking transparency when the liberal scum prosecutor deliberately alters his copy in violation of a time honored legal principle

HOw can you argue with such stupidity under that context?

I won't

I'll just laugh at them for being morons
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
What I want to know is why the defense wasn’t all over this video like flies on shit. Where is the spoliation/subpoena? This kid’s life is literally hanging in the balance and they didn’t search the far corners of the earth to find it?

Something is fishy… like they didn’t want it entered because it incriminates their client further.

Absolutely! I believe that's what's happening with the video evidence. They wanted to avoid it.

how the fuck is video surveillance available to the prosecution NOT available to the defense? It’s public record ffs

Burdensome discovery response deserved an objection… and I bet they did lol

1) It was not a government drone. A private company.
2) The full video was never provided just a tiny clip.
3) There was no raw footage provided just one edited clip and no sound even though that model records sound. There are foundational issues as the person who records it didn't provide all the data and was not named by prosecutors so defense could not cross examine.
4) The defense had high res video but only gave defense a low res version with 1/16th the data and even then only gave them a copy last Saturday evening after the defense had rested. That is a massive problem. Further more the prosecution admitted they had a better resolution copy so they knew they withheld the high res video from the defense illegally.
5) The prosecutor claimed he had no idea how the defense only got a low res copy and he didn't even know how to do it yet in court he played it off his laptop and his laptop had the programs I stalled to edit and compress videos on it. So it is obvious this was intentional withholding of evidence.

The defense could have subpoenaed it themselves when they were made aware of its existence.