- Messages
- 46,751
- Location
- United states
Arm the homeless.
Agreed!
This man should have had an AR too.
Too bad Scalise didnt have one.
The leftwing is violent as fuck! It's obvious we all should be armed.
Arm the homeless.
Listen to these low energy Antifa cucks.
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
And your murder/homicide rates are very high in the US. Much higher than any other Western democracy with stricter gun laws.
If I had a choice between a gun culture, I think I'd choose Switzerland's over the United States.
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
And your murder/homicide rates are very high in the US. Much higher than any other Western democracy with stricter gun laws.
If I had a choice between a gun culture, I think I'd choose Switzerland's over the United States.
And again most gun violence occurs in states that are not open carry.
Like fucking Chicago? Yeah. NY. CA. All strict gun laws. All high crime areas.
Dont you want laws that actually work to curb violence and keep residents safer?
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
And your murder/homicide rates are very high in the US. Much higher than any other Western democracy with stricter gun laws.
If I had a choice between a gun culture, I think I'd choose Switzerland's over the United States.
And again most gun violence occurs in states that are not open carry.
Like fucking Chicago? Yeah. NY. CA. All strict gun laws. All high crime areas.
Dont you want laws that actually work to curb violence and keep residents safer?
You know Dovey we have too many gun deaths in Canada too tho our rates are much lower than the US. Still a nation with a gun culture & a much higher rate of gun ownership than Canada - Switzerland - has a much lower rate of homicides than Canada.
And yet as well armed as they are, Swiss people don't gun each other down in the streets like Kenosha.
...why is that Dovey?
Even Canada could learn from the Swiss example.
I own 7Do any of you actually own a gun?
Do any of you actually own a gun?
I own 7Do any of you actually own a gun?
So you know of the responsibility then. I owned my first gun at 17 years of age. A Smith and Wesson .38 police-issue revolver. I preferred rifles though as I’m a crack shot. If war were to break out, I need a sniper’s nest to pick off heads. They explode like watermelons. LolDo any of you actually own a gun?
I own a few.
MENTALITY !!Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
And your murder/homicide rates are very high in the US. Much higher than any other Western democracy with stricter gun laws.
If I had a choice between a gun culture, I think I'd choose Switzerland's over the United States.
And again most gun violence occurs in states that are not open carry.
Like fucking Chicago? Yeah. NY. CA. All strict gun laws. All high crime areas.
Dont you want laws that actually work to curb violence and keep residents safer?
You know Dovey we have too many gun deaths in Canada too tho our rates are much lower than the US. Still a nation with a gun culture & a much higher rate of gun ownership than Canada - Switzerland - has a much lower rate of homicides than Canada.
And yet as well armed as they are, Swiss people don't gun each other down in the streets like Kenosha.
...why is that Dovey?
Even Canada could learn from the Swiss example.
Arm the homeless.
Agreed!
This man should have had an AR too.
Too bad Scalise didnt have one.
The leftwing is violent as fuck! It's obvious we all should be armed.
All homeless are drug addicts*, why do you want armed drug addicts swarming our urban cores?Arm the homeless.
Agreed!
This man should have had an AR too.
Too bad Scalise didnt have one.
The leftwing is violent as fuck! It's obvious we all should be armed.
And the wailing will continue for how many more pages now, another 124?
Excuse me, Miss? All those pages...... were from trying to tell y'all the truth, as y'all kept on saying otherwise, according to your media masters.
I own 7Do any of you actually own a gun?So you know of the responsibility then. I owned my first gun at 17 years of age. A Smith and Wesson .38 police-issue revolver. I preferred rifles though as I’m a crack shot. If war were to break out, I need a sniper’s nest to pick off heads. They explode like watermelons. LolDo any of you actually own a gun?
I own a few.
Canada actually has more guns per capita than Switzerland.You know Dovey we have too many gun deaths in Canada too tho our rates are much lower than the US. Still a nation with a gun culture & a much higher rate of gun ownership than Canada - Switzerland - has a much lower rate of homicides than Canada.
And yet as well armed as they are, Swiss people don't gun each other down in the streets like Kenosha.
...why is that Dovey?
Even Canada could learn from the Swiss example.
And the wailing will continue for how many more pages now, another 124?
Excuse me, Miss? All those pages...... were from trying to tell y'all the truth, as y'all kept on saying otherwise, according to your media masters.
The truth is that Kyle murdered two people, and he got off, like OJ
I've been telling you that through all these pages. So what?
Our joy makes them so so angry.guess what
Kyle is still free as fuck
And when this happens to some alt right supporter sometime in the future and some blm guy invokes the Rittenhouse rule of self defense will you be similarly cheering them on Dovey?
Make no mistake murderers on both sides will use the argument of self defense and play victim from now on
I will ALWAYS oppose domestic terrorism and support law abiding citizens RIGHTS to defend themselves.
I dont give a gotdamn rip shit about politics. You attack an innocent person and get shot? I'm supporting the person you attacked. Period.
Actually I think you are politically very biased and you don't realize it.
I found fault/blame on both sides.
Sure.
I'm not the one saying an innocent person who was forced to defend himself should be legally punished.
You keep claiming Kyle broke the law but he did not. Because you are seeing this as some left vs right and you think "both sides" should chastised when in reality.....no one even KNOWS what "politics" Kyle has. He isnt a symbol of a "side".
He is an innocent kid who wanted to help people and was targeted by criminal savages and attacked for no fucking reason.
And he was immediately labeled a "far right white supremacist" and had purely political charges flung on him when normally cases like this dont even see the court and charges are not brought. There were NO laws broken by Kyle.
This was a political attack on a community and a political attack on the rights of law abiding citizens.
WHY should Kyle be punished when he didnt break any laws? Because you see political sides and want to take a position that you think is neutral. You are seeing this as politics.
I thought there were grounds to possibly acquit Rittenhouse of the murder charges but not on the illegal possession of guns.
I know you don't like my middle of the road perspective but I feel thit is wrong to give a flawed individual like that a blank cheque of justice.
Even parents place restrictions on their kids. And a society should do the same on a minor who is out of control.
Rittenhouse's parents seem like failures.
Earth to idiot, come in idiot? It is 100% legal to open carry a long rifle in Wisconsin from the age of 16 up as long as you are not a felon.
21st time telling you that.
Even the prosecution was forced to admit that was true thus why that charge got dismissed. It never should have been charged to begin with and just shows how poorly Binger knows the laws in his state.
A minor Carrying a firearm in public without a license? Especially when the state law stipulated that it was illegal prior to this trial. He was supposed to wait until his 18th birthday
Oh well laws must be made to be bent, broken and stepped on in America.
Not my country or many others tho.
22nd time.
The state law said it was legal for non-felons age 16 and up to open carry a long rifle. The judge said this, the defense said this, the prosecution admitted that on the record. Why are you so think headed you cannot understand that?
The prosecution lied. They lied and claimed it was some "hunting law" which it wasn't. It was part "C" of the exact same law.
Also, no, no one needs a license to omeither own or open carry a firearm. None at all. You only need a license if you wish to conceal carry a pistol.
But nO license to own or carry a gun in public?
I find that hard to believe. If so than the lawmakers are pretty fucking stupid and are enabling more unecessary deaths to take place.
It's like allowing a 10 year old to drive an SUV or 1/2 ton truck w/o a license which has actually happened and led to some pretty horrific and tragic results.
Nope, no license needed as WI is an open carry state. Absolutely anyone who is 16 or older and who is not a felon (well, also can't be drunk or on drugs) may open carry a long rifle and no license of any kind is needed. Half the country are open carry states and have been for decades and decades.
And your murder/homicide rates are very high in the US. Much higher than any other Western democracy with stricter gun laws.
If I had a choice between a gun culture, I think I'd choose Switzerland's over the United States.
And again most gun violence occurs in states that are not open carry.
Like fucking Chicago? Yeah. NY. CA. All strict gun laws. All high crime areas.
Dont you want laws that actually work to curb violence and keep residents safer?
You know Dovey we have too many gun deaths in Canada too tho our rates are much lower than the US. Still a nation with a gun culture & a much higher rate of gun ownership than Canada - Switzerland - has a much lower rate of homicides than Canada.
And yet as well armed as they are, Swiss people don't gun each other down in the streets like Kenosha.
...why is that Dovey?
Even Canada could learn from the Swiss example.
Canada actually has more guns per capita than Switzerland.You know Dovey we have too many gun deaths in Canada too tho our rates are much lower than the US. Still a nation with a gun culture & a much higher rate of gun ownership than Canada - Switzerland - has a much lower rate of homicides than Canada.
And yet as well armed as they are, Swiss people don't gun each other down in the streets like Kenosha.
...why is that Dovey?
Even Canada could learn from the Swiss example.
We must carefully analyze the data when it comes to gun deaths... If we remove Negro gun deaths from the data, the US then has a gun homicide rate closer to Canada's.
If we remove Negro, Injun, and East Indian gang banger deaths from Canada's data, we have a gun homicide rate closer to Switzerland's.
The data shows that White people have a very low rate of shooting each other.