Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[Seamajor]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Weird? I think they look alike.

 

[Dove]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

This too.

Will these governors be accountable for thier dereliction of duty? Nope. Fuck the people. It's more politically important to validate domestic terror as a protest.

 

[Lokmar]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Weird? I think they look alike.

Hero Kyle dont have them slanty chink eyes!

 

[Joe]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Both of them? You mean the murderer and the people he murdered?

 

[Dove]

Innocent people who were murdered because of these mobs or brutally beaten do not even get a mention. No one talks about the actual murderers who murdered an 8 year old black girl. Or murdered Italia Kelly. Or anyone who was innocent.

But Kyle defends himself from real savage murderers with no regard for life? Kyle is the murderer.

These people are authoritarians. The only rights and liberties they support is for people THEY approve of. The rest of us are just garbage to stomp on.

It's no different from any other totalitarian street thugs who did things like this through history.

 

[Oerdin]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He has been very even handed and, no, he did not say what the media spin claims. I swear "journalists" have exceptionally low I.Q.s. The judge said the terms looters and arsonists can only be used in closing statements and only if the evidence of the trail has proven those things. He also said he thought a lawyer would be foolish to waste his closing statements doing that and that if the prosecution objected to it then they could object then but that he would not pre-emptovely rule those words out.

The left wing reporting on this has been completely dishonest and stupid. The only one who was honest and knowledgeable in a fair way was the NYT.

 

[Joe]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Both of them? You mean the murderer and the people he murdered?

But weren't there also others involved in this incident who were not murdered that were either wounded or were unharmed? They took part in it too and their actions have to be taken into account as well.

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Both of them? You mean the murderer and the people he murdered?

But weren't there also others involved in this incident who were not murdered that were either wounded or were unharmed? They took part in it too and their actions have to be taken into account as well.

He shot another guy who did not die. That guy has his own legal troubles. He wasn't left out.

But murder trumps anything anyone else did there that day.

 

[Oerdin]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

The whole point of the trial is to determine who is the victim. The most likely outcome is that Kyle was the victim of three people attacking him. Oh, and most states disallow using the term victim and the judge even said neutral terms which can be used "complaining party" or "deceadent". He has been exceptionally even handed all along yet the left wing media has to lie and try to make up a victim narrative.

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

The whole point of the trial is to determine who is the victim. The most likely outcome is that Kyle was the victim of three people attacking him. Oh, and most states disallow using the term victim and the judge even said neutral terms which can be used "complaining party" or "deceadent". He has been exceptionally even handed all along yet the left wing media has to lie and try to make up a victim narrative.

Bullshit. Kyle is a vigilante. But with a biased judge like the one he got, he'll probably walk, and your hate-filled heart will rejoice.

Kyle is charged with murder. This isn't a "let's see who was really the victim" trial. It's a murder trial.

 

[Lokmar]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Kyle was right, your people were wrong. I picked a side because it was the right thing to do. There's no book to throw at Kyle because he did nothing wrong.

 

[LotusBud]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Kyle was right, your people were wrong. I picked a side because it was the right thing to do. There's no book to throw at Kyle because he did nothing wrong.

He was charged with murder because he did nothing wrong. Gotcha.

 

[Oerdin]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Both of them? You mean the murderer and the people he murdered?

Lotusbud and Admin are the type of people Yuri Besmenov spoke about.

 

[Oerdin]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

The whole point of the trial is to determine who is the victim. The most likely outcome is that Kyle was the victim of three people attacking him. Oh, and most states disallow using the term victim and the judge even said neutral terms which can be used "complaining party" or "deceadent". He has been exceptionally even handed all along yet the left wing media has to lie and try to make up a victim narrative.

Bullshit. Kyle is a vigilante. But with a biased judge like the one he got, he'll probably walk, and your hate-filled heart will rejoice.

Kyle is charged with murder. This isn't a "let's see who was really the victim" trial. It's a murder trial.

Dear idiot, what do you think the trial is for, retard? We have a political hyper partisan extreme leftist A.D.A. Binger alleges but he is innocent until proven guilty. The point of the trial is to determine who the victim was. Was Kyle the victim of being attacked and having to defend himself or are his attackers the victims as you foolishly claim.

 

[Oerdin]

 

[Biggie Smiles]

The prosecutors opening statements are desperate and irrelevant.

 

[Dove]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Kyle was right, your people were wrong. I picked a side because it was the right thing to do. There's no book to throw at Kyle because he did nothing wrong.

He was charged with murder because he did nothing wrong. Gotcha.

He is charged with murder because of an activist prosecutor with a history of trying to charge people who had to defend themselves.

Charged and convicted are two different things and if Kyle was a leftists running from alt righters your view of this would totally change. Which is SAD.

 

[Dove]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

The whole point of the trial is to determine who is the victim. The most likely outcome is that Kyle was the victim of three people attacking him. Oh, and most states disallow using the term victim and the judge even said neutral terms which can be used "complaining party" or "deceadent". He has been exceptionally even handed all along yet the left wing media has to lie and try to make up a victim narrative.

Bullshit. Kyle is a vigilante. But with a biased judge like the one he got, he'll probably walk, and your hate-filled heart will rejoice.

Kyle is charged with murder. This isn't a "let's see who was really the victim" trial. It's a murder trial.

Dear idiot, what do you think the trial is for, retard? We have a political hyper partisan extreme leftist A.D.A. Binger alleges but he is innocent until proven guilty. The point of the trial is to determine who the victim was. Was Kyle the victim of being attacked and having to defend himself or are his attackers the victims as you foolishly claim.

They already decided he was guilty. Facts dont matter. They are so bias and decided Kyle is guilty of murder that they view the judges FAIRNESS as bias.

Even when you can literally SEE Kyle being attacked they argue this.

It's always going to be ideology over humanity with them.

No shit we picked a "side". We didnt pick based on partisan politics. They are sympathetic towards destructive riots and think since the mobs are leftwing we should have to give a fuck about thier "side".

It doesnt MATTER if the mobs are left or right. They are terrorizing and destroying communities and seriously harming innocent people. Which is the definition of domestic terrorists.

Exactly WHY should anyone legitimatize these scum bags by pretending they are "just protesting"?

Sorry no. They didnt belong in Kenosha and were not entitled to attack Kenosha. So everyone who lives in and is connected to that community has a RIGHT to be out there trying to defend it from violent intruders. Period.

And those men were chasing Kyle. That makes them aggressors by law.

The only reason why this is even in court is because we have fucktarded activists in places activists do not belong.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Oh lol

The prosecutor is trying to bad mouth kyle for not offering aid to Rausebuam

yeah, kyle put the gun down and tend to the guy you were just forced to shoot as the mob starts to close in. :facepalm:

 

[Dove]

Since they have labeled all of us as right wing, and they see Kyle as some right wing symbol.....ALL this is about to them is ideology and politics.

Absolutely nothing we say, or any facts we show(to the people who claim to be the gatekeepers of all facts) matters. It's just all "right wing nonsense". There isnt ever going to be a human to human discussion. None of us are people to them.

There is no such things as humanity anywhere in this or in these discussions.

It's a complete waste of time. They have thier insanely twisted rhetoric and they are gunning to "win one" on the righties even if it destroys the rights of the people.

The only people that matter to them are the ones they see as on thier "side".

It's all about pure hatred. They couldnt give less a fuck about human beings. And they bitch about people talking about civil war, but dont give a shit about the conditions and authoritarianism they are pushing on the people that makes them talk about it.

 

[Dove]

Oh lol

The prosecutor is trying to bad mouth kyle for not offering aid to Rausebuam

yeah, kyle put the gun down and tend to the guy you were just forced to shoot as the mob starts to close in. :facepalm:

That prosecutor is a joke. He legit said it doesnt matter if the men Kyle shot were the aggressors because Kyle had a gun.

Yeah.

 

[Dove]

Not a good sign. Prosecution seemed to keep trying to kick as many men as possible believing they would be more willing to side with the prosecutions appeals to emotion over facts because that is all the prosecution has.



It would also be interesting to see how many are from the western half of the county and how many from the eastern half.

I'm guessing that the judge is already biased in favor of Kyle.




...but that also means that he is not impartial either.

I think there should have been grounds to replace the judge with someone else.

Ideally, the judge should not express biases or terms favorable to one side like that.

This matter might come up if there is another trial or appeal.

He is in no way impartial. Disallowing the use of the word "victim" to describe the people Kyle killed? You can't get much more biased than that. I think he should be removed from the trial for that alone. Reprehensible.

She is 100% right when she says whether or not one of the victims was setting a fire has no bearing on whether or not they were murdered by that fat little fuck killer.

It's not a clear cut case as there is fault on either side.

But hopefully the outcome of the case would be to discourage vigilante justice & for governments to take a proactive stance by intervening to prevent situations like these from spiralling out of control in the future.

As a judge, I'd be more inclined to find fault with both sides in the Kenosha incident rather than inject personal biases which could result in a flawed verdict.

Of course there is fault on both sides, but ultimately, the only question is: Did the people Kyle murdered actually pose a threat to him, or was he acting as a vigilante? Vigilantism is against the law. Doesn't matter who the victim of it is.

The fact you use the word "murder" says since Kyle symbolizes "right wing" he is guilty no matter what.

You really need to do a lot of mental gymnastics to come to any conclusion besides self defense. You can WATCH these men chasing him.

And no Lotus.....regular people do not have a right to run down after other people for any reason. So stop giving rioters authority over others. Only police have that authority. Any other random person doing it should be seen as a threat.

And the question also arises....where were the police &/or the National Guard that Night?

There was an absence of authority which allowed a complete breakdown of law and order.

Stupid fuck, they werent deployed because of cunt libtards like you.

What the heck is a 'cunt libtard', Buddy?!?

I ain't no woman, Lokmeer !

I don't even take a side in this case.

If I was a judge I'd throw the book at both of them then advise that an independent state inquiry be held to make recommendations as to how incidents like these could be prevented in the future.

Both of them? You mean the murderer and the people he murdered?

But weren't there also others involved in this incident who were not murdered that were either wounded or were unharmed? They took part in it too and their actions have to be taken into account as well.

He shot another guy who did not die. That guy has his own legal troubles. He wasn't left out.

But murder trumps anything anyone else did there that day.

Except in Atlanta when BLM "protesters" shot and murdered a little girl.

Murder now means you defended yourself against leftwing radicals. You are supposed to let them kill or maim you.

 

[Oerdin]

Binger is just openly lying in his opening statements. Rosenbaum and Ziminski ambushed and attacked Kyle, Kyle ran away, but Binger lies and claims the opposite. It is obvious the man has no case. Why lie if you have a case?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Prosecutor just got clowned

 

[Oerdin]

 

[Biggie Smiles]

This prosecutor is a clown.

He didn't want something introduced to the jury that HE JUST INTRODUCED!!!!

 

[Biggie Smiles]

you have two conservatives watching the trial as it unfolds

now watch the dipshits on the left claim they know more because CNN and occupy democrats feeds them their meme thoughts

 

[Oerdin]

Live coverage here.

 

[Oerdin]