Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[Oerdin]

 

[Oerdin]

You should pay attention to what the use of force expert had to say about the use of a skateboard as a deadly weapon. Lotusbud would cry if she ever saw it. Facts and reality often make her cry. Aidsman's hunting lies always get destroyed.

 

[Joe]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

 

[Dove]

It's scary how many people find this confusing.

Its terrifying. Seriously.

I know right?

Only because these imbeciles have as much of a right to sit on a jury as an intelligent person does.

This is why I got the fuck outta New York.

Down here in Florida Kyle wouldn't even get charged

here's a little story I find so lovely. Just the other day there was a major shoot out on interstate 4 which runs east to west through Polk county. Somewhere between Lakeland and Orlando two rival motorcycle gangs got into a mobile shootout. Meaning, while they were riding at upwards of 100 miles an hour gang members were shooting at one another.

So as the story goes the first gang member pulls out a gun and shoots opposing gang member in the back. The opposing gang member then pulls out his own gun and returns fire hitting the motorcycle passenger riding with gang member one dead in her head.

Aside from the fact that this was an amazing shot the Sheriff of Polk county (A man I respect greatly and know personally) has opted not to charge shooter two in connection with the death of passenger one. He has chosen instead to lay all the blame on shooter one as he was the initiator of the sequence of events which led to his passenger getting struck

Now THAT's justice folks.

don't start nothing there wont be nothing. We don't fuck around in the great state of Florida

The fact Kyle is being charged when he did absolutely NOTHING wrong is purely partisan.

The prosecution should get sued or penalized in some way because they are directly violating rights.

they're sending a message to everyone else

don't try this shit unless you too have 2 million dollars to bond out

I know.

Thw prosecution wanted to release the info of everyone who donated.

We need to really fight back and nail these people. No more playing this narcissistic game.

There needs to be consequences for charging Kyle with a crime.....especailly considering no one is going after rioters for destroying that town.

These mobs terrorize the public and get away with it. But we are being told we cant defend ourselves?

Um no.

You're not going to be able to do it in a blue state

Voting with your feet is the only way. that's what I did, and took my 50K + in combined state tax revenue with me.

Not to mention the lost revenue from my purchase habits, which, when considered alone is minuscule by comparison but when times by half a million like minded migrants is very considerable.

Let them run their shithole states into the ground once all the Red blood is gone.

My state is complicated. It's really mostly red......yet the "leadership" always ends up Democrats.

It's something a lot of people do not understand.....and it's why even my grandmother believed our elections were rigged.

No one knows anyone who voted for Whitmer. I'm not kidding. It's been asked in groups LOL

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Yep, they wanted to get people to attack the donors in order to discourage donations to his legal defense fund. That is not law ebforcement; that is mafia shit. That is why the judge put an end to it.

The fact that they would try shows you just how vile and unscrupulous the left really is

 

[Biggie Smiles]

It's scary how many people find this confusing.

Its terrifying. Seriously.

I know right?

Only because these imbeciles have as much of a right to sit on a jury as an intelligent person does.

This is why I got the fuck outta New York.

Down here in Florida Kyle wouldn't even get charged

here's a little story I find so lovely. Just the other day there was a major shoot out on interstate 4 which runs east to west through Polk county. Somewhere between Lakeland and Orlando two rival motorcycle gangs got into a mobile shootout. Meaning, while they were riding at upwards of 100 miles an hour gang members were shooting at one another.

So as the story goes the first gang member pulls out a gun and shoots opposing gang member in the back. The opposing gang member then pulls out his own gun and returns fire hitting the motorcycle passenger riding with gang member one dead in her head.

Aside from the fact that this was an amazing shot the Sheriff of Polk county (A man I respect greatly and know personally) has opted not to charge shooter two in connection with the death of passenger one. He has chosen instead to lay all the blame on shooter one as he was the initiator of the sequence of events which led to his passenger getting struck

Now THAT's justice folks.

don't start nothing there wont be nothing. We don't fuck around in the great state of Florida

The fact Kyle is being charged when he did absolutely NOTHING wrong is purely partisan.

The prosecution should get sued or penalized in some way because they are directly violating rights.

they're sending a message to everyone else

don't try this shit unless you too have 2 million dollars to bond out

I know.

Thw prosecution wanted to release the info of everyone who donated.

We need to really fight back and nail these people. No more playing this narcissistic game.

There needs to be consequences for charging Kyle with a crime.....especailly considering no one is going after rioters for destroying that town.

These mobs terrorize the public and get away with it. But we are being told we cant defend ourselves?

Um no.

You're not going to be able to do it in a blue state

Voting with your feet is the only way. that's what I did, and took my 50K + in combined state tax revenue with me.

Not to mention the lost revenue from my purchase habits, which, when considered alone is minuscule by comparison but when times by half a million like minded migrants is very considerable.

Let them run their shithole states into the ground once all the Red blood is gone.

My state is complicated. It's really mostly red......yet the "leadership" always ends up Democrats.

It's something a lot of people do not understand.....and it's why even my grandmother believed our elections were rigged.

No one knows anyone who voted for Whitmer. I'm not kidding. It's been asked in groups LOL

I don’t know anyone other than the dumb plebs like oak and adumb here who voted for Biden either but viola here he is running amuck

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

I'd rather see this country burn. I mean that 100 percent. The day citizens are legally charged because they defended themselves from domestic terrorists is a day this country should consider itself at civil war.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

I wish Kyle would have been able to take out more of those rodents

 

[Dove]

Sorry not sorry but I'm not giving my bodily rights to left wingers.

I'll kill ANYONE who is a threat to me and my family.

Since they love violence so much they should be prepared to die and stop whining when people they attack best them.

You support violence? Suck it the fuck up. Or get your terrorists back in a leash.

 

[Dove]

Kyle didnt do a thing wrong.

These tyrants can go fuck themselves.

 

[Oerdin]

He did what was necessary to protect himself for violent would be murderers and nothing more. Exactly as the law said he should.

 

[Joe]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to re-offend than that animal.

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

 

[Joe]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines to access a firearm he was not licensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age yet either.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state. That is an undeniable fact.

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

No one understands this "crossing state lines" bullshit. You are allowed to go into other states here. It's never been illegal to go into another state.

And if it was than all those rioters crossed state lines.

So you guys are fine with crossing state lines to terrorize a town but no one can cross those state lines to defend it? Uh no.....it doesn't work like that.

 

[Joe]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

I'm literally legally allowed to cross every state in this country. I'm not sure why you guys think that's illegal or that if it was it ONLY applies to Kyle. Most of those rioters do not live in that state....but thats okay?

 

[Dove]

If it's okay for a bunch of felons to cross state lines to go riot and destroy other peoples HOME?

Then its fine for others to cross that same state line to stop those felons.

Its completely delusional to think otherwise. No one is entitle to domestic terror. Which is what happened to Kenosha.

There is absolute NO law that says you cant cross state lines......seriously where do you guys get that?

 

[Dove]

Basically the argument is Kyle broke a nonexistent law and lost his right to defend himself because he crossed state lines?

 

[LotusBud]

Well, duh. A pro-Kyle youtube guy. Big whoop.

 

[Dove]

Well, duh. A pro-Kyle youtube guy. Big whoop.

So now everything you are being shown that goes over the facts and arrives at a conclusion you dont like is just a "pro Kyle" thing and its dismissed based on that.

So basically you are so unwilling to be objective, that you are literally mad that these rioting pieces of shit were shot while they were attacking an innocent person who was fleeing.

So you are saying people you view as political opposition are to be dehumanized, and thier rights are removed.

And you want to accuse US of being pro murder because they were entitled to murder Kyle and he isnt a human to you, so he had no right to defend himself and is a murderer now because you said so.

So if people are not on your side of politics, they have no rights and it's okay to kill them and assault them. That's your position here.

 

[Oerdin]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

No one understands this "crossing state lines" bullshit. You are allowed to go into other states here. It's never been illegal to go into another state.

And if it was than all those rioters crossed state lines.

So you guys are fine with crossing state lines to terrorize a town but no one can cross those state lines to defend it? Uh no.....it doesn't work like that.

Fact: The rifle never crossed state lines. It was stored by Kyle's friend and co-worker's house in Kenosha. The small friend who legally purchased the rifle.

As for crossing state lines... We are talking he works in Kenosha and lives 7 miles away. He shops, volunteers (just the day he was attacked he spent the morning cleaning Antifa graffiti off a local school), and works in Kenosha. The owner of a local small business asked Kyle to help protected it (the man owned a gas station and a used car business, the night before arsonists from Antifa burned all of the cars on the used car lot) thus why he stayed after work to help.

There is nothing illegal about any of that.

 

[Oerdin]

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Biggie Smiles]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

No one understands this "crossing state lines" bullshit. You are allowed to go into other states here. It's never been illegal to go into another state.

And if it was than all those rioters crossed state lines.

So you guys are fine with crossing state lines to terrorize a town but no one can cross those state lines to defend it? Uh no.....it doesn't work like that.

Fact: The rifle never crossed state lines. It was stored by Kyle's friend and co-workers house in Kenosha.

As for crossing state lines... We are talking he works in Kenosha and lives 7 miles away. He shops, volunteers (just the day he was attacked he spent the morning cleaning Antifa graffiti of a local school), and works in Kenosha. The owner of a local small business asked Kyle to help protected it (the man owned a gas station and a used car business, the night before arsonists from Antifa burned all of the cars on the used car lot) thus why he stayed after work to help.

There is nothing illegal about any of that.

rodent scum like lotus simply hates the fact that neither her or any of her worthless sprogs could have 1/10 the integrity this kid has

 

[Jeannie]

he should send a bill for the bullets spent on them, except that one he killed - bill his family instead

 

[Biggie Smiles]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to re-offend than that animal.

No. KYle should be hailed as a selfless and compassionate hero and an example to this snot rocket jerkoff youth animals we have running around like chimps on Tik tok and instagram

and once a year the state of wisconsin should open the grave site of that pedo jagoff and clown face idiot so that people could come and piss on them

 

[Biggie Smiles]

A very good and objective piece that rodents like Lotus will never read because it is fair and unbiased

 

[Joe]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

 

[Oerdin]

At just before the 2 minute mark you can see the car lot getting destroyed by Antifa rioters. The owner of the used car store/lot also owned a gas station and mechanic shop directly across the street. That is the local business owner who requested help from Kyle to help safe guard his one remaining business after his used car business was burned to the ground the night before.

 

[Oerdin]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

Yes, and that underlined part is the charge the judge is currently reviewing for dismissal. This has been explained to you before. WI law says a 17 year old my legally possess a long rifle as long as they get a hunting safety certificate. Which Kyle had.