Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

[Jeannie]

he should post his AR on e-bay, should fetch a lot

 

[Adam Hitler]

Imagine the liberal meltdown LMAO.

Hmm, I wonder what happened to James Fields car? It would be worth a fortune covered in dents and blood stains of various Antifa members....

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

It's perfectly okay for leftwing mobs to cross state lines and destroy a community they dont live in, who doesn't want them there....and then leave the place destroyed and force tax payers to clean up after the leftwing tantrum. Oh....and criminally charge someone who didnt offer up thier body for the rioters that felt like murdering someone.

Oh and while BLM founders make millions and buy mansions while leaving peasents communities in shambles.

 

[LotusBud]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

Oh. So those people aren't really dead?

Imagine if some left winger murdered you at a MAGA rally when you were running at him with a plastic bag to try to stop him from shooting others. And the defense for the shooter was, "Well, she was a heroin addict and a stripper, so no big loss. She deserved to die."

 

[Dove]

A very good and objective piece that rodents like Lotus will never read because it is fair and unbiased

Excellent but she will call it "pro kyle". So basically shes decided absolutely nothing that contradicts her political feelings is valid.

This is why leftists are an active detriment to the country. They apply law like fucking tyrants based on politics and not facts and they zero empathy.

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

Oh. So those people aren't really dead?

Imagine if some left winger murdered you at a MAGA rally when you were running at him with a plastic bag to try to stop him from shooting others. And the defense for the shooter was, "Well, she was a heroin addict and a stripper, so no big loss. She deserved to die."

I'm not a fucking idiot that would chase an armed person who was literally running TOWARDS police.

Imagine being so fucking entitled that you think you have the RIGHT to put your hands on another human being.

I also wouldnt attend or support a violent riot. And if a MAGA rally resulted in firebombing businesses, destroying communities and brutalizing innocent people I would condemn the fuck out of.

Why do you think that's okay? And then argue that people actively engaging in violence should be allowed to assault and disarmed a fleeing citizen?

No, sorry. Most people are not stupid enough to persue an armed person who is running towards police. That makes you an aggressor.

Those men had ZERO right to persue, stop or disarm him. NONE. They dont own that town, Lotus. Kyle shot who was aggresing on him. Each person he shot he RAN from first, then shot them only when he couldnt continue to flee. It's open and shut self defense.

Those men are dead by thier own bad choices. If they didnt try to assault Kyle and persue him? No one would have been shot. You dont get to decide who has rights here. NO ONE is obligated to allow these rioters to touch them.

 

[LotusBud]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

Oh. So those people aren't really dead?

Imagine if some left winger murdered you at a MAGA rally when you were running at him with a plastic bag to try to stop him from shooting others. And the defense for the shooter was, "Well, she was a heroin addict and a stripper, so no big loss. She deserved to die."

I'm not a fucking idiot that would chase an armed person who was literally running TOWARDS police.

Imagine being so fucking entitled that you think you have the RIGHT to put your hands on another human being.

I also wouldnt attend or support a violent riot. And if a MAGA rally resulted in firebombing businesses, destroying communities and brutalizing innocent people I would condemn the fuck out of.

Why do you think that's okay? And then argue that people actively engaging in violence should be allowed to assault and disarmed a fleeing citizen?

No, sorry. Most people are not stupid enough to persue an armed person who is running towards police. That makes you an aggressor.

Those men had ZERO right to persue, stop or disarm him. NONE. They dont own that town, Lotus. Kyle shot who was aggresing on him. Each person he shot he RAN from first, then shot them only when he couldnt continue to flee. It's open and shut self defense.

Oh, and Kyle does own it, so he can stomp around with his gun and shoot people? Fuck off with that shit, Dove.

Besides, you're only 5 feet, so if the liberal guy with a gun had shot you, no biggie.

 

[Dove]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

Oh. So those people aren't really dead?

Imagine if some left winger murdered you at a MAGA rally when you were running at him with a plastic bag to try to stop him from shooting others. And the defense for the shooter was, "Well, she was a heroin addict and a stripper, so no big loss. She deserved to die."

I'm not a fucking idiot that would chase an armed person who was literally running TOWARDS police.

Imagine being so fucking entitled that you think you have the RIGHT to put your hands on another human being.

I also wouldnt attend or support a violent riot. And if a MAGA rally resulted in firebombing businesses, destroying communities and brutalizing innocent people I would condemn the fuck out of.

Why do you think that's okay? And then argue that people actively engaging in violence should be allowed to assault and disarmed a fleeing citizen?

No, sorry. Most people are not stupid enough to persue an armed person who is running towards police. That makes you an aggressor.

Those men had ZERO right to persue, stop or disarm him. NONE. They dont own that town, Lotus. Kyle shot who was aggresing on him. Each person he shot he RAN from first, then shot them only when he couldnt continue to flee. It's open and shut self defense.

Oh, and Kyle does own it, so he can stomp around with his gun and shoot people? Fuck off with that shit, Dove.

Besides, you're only 5 feet, so if the liberal guy with a gun had shot you, no biggie.

No one said Kyle can "stomp around with his gun and shoot people".

He did NOT just "shoot people", he directly shot people who were perusing him.

You are flat out being dishonest and lying.

What YOU are saying that a leftwing man is entitled to MY body. That's what you are saying. That if a leftwing man wants to come after me, assault me, murder me I HAVE to allow it or I'm a "murderer" who is "killing people".

STOP lying about this. Those men were perusing and attacking him and they had NO RIGHT to do so.

In your mind these rioters are allowed to do whatever they want to whoever they want. That's not reality.

No one is entitled to commit acts of violence because you agree with thier politics.

You are dehumanizing people based on political bias.

 

[Adam Hitler]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

 

[Dove]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

 

[LotusBud]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

OMG. LMAO. Dream on, Baby Hitler.

 

[LotusBud]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

Except that is not what I think. I think his defense team made up shit and you people are buying it, like the lemmings you are. He went in there itching to kill, and he did just that. AFTER he killed two people, he had to defend himself from a man who also had a gun, and who was trying to stop him. He put a stop to being stopped by shooting a third person. You people are defnding a murderer. It's sickening.

I have said mutiple times that I do not approve of any of the destruction or violence. ZERO. But I don't claim the people who perpetrated the destruction as being MY people. They are of another ilk, not mine. There are more than two types of people in the world. I do NOT support the destruction, but you defend the murderer. That makes YOU the one who is dehumanizing people.

 

[Dove]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

Except that is not what I think. I think his defense team made up shit and you people are buying it, like the lemmings you are. He went in there itching to kill, and he did just that. AFTER he killed two people, he had to defend himself from a man who also had a gun, and who was trying to stop him. He put a stop to being stopped by shooting a third person. You people are defnding a murderer. It's sickening.

It IS what you think.

Right so you are saying none of us had an opinion based what we SAW on VIDEO.....but that we are just parroting blatant lies from his defense team?

So you havent even LOOKED at anything. You've just decided you are right and WE are misled and any facts that support our stance is just "pro Kyle" nonsense.

So who made these videos that show the men he shot attacking him? Was that all fake? Edited? Did they get superimposed chasing him?

Kyle killed two men who were ATTACKING him. You can literally WATCH it. The entire incident is on video.

So you dont approve of destruction and violence. It's just that if mobs of leftwing rioters start destroying and getting violent.....no one should be able to protect themselves. So our property and our bodies dont belong to us but are the property of any left winger who decides to use violence.

So even though you dont approve of what they are doing.....your stance is the public is obligated to surrender thier property or die before any harm comes to these terrorists, right?

And they are terrorist. Make no mistake on that. These riots are the definition of domestic terrorism.

 

[LotusBud]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

Except that is not what I think. I think his defense team made up shit and you people are buying it, like the lemmings you are. He went in there itching to kill, and he did just that. AFTER he killed two people, he had to defend himself from a man who also had a gun, and who was trying to stop him. He put a stop to being stopped by shooting a third person. You people are defnding a murderer. It's sickening.

It IS what you think.

Right so you are saying none of us had an opinion based what we SAW on VIDEO.....but that we are just parroting blatant lies from his defense team?

So you havent even LOOKED at anything. You've just decided you are right and WE are misled and any facts that support our stance is just "pro Kyle" nonsense.

So who made these videos that show the men he shot attacking him? Was that all fake? Edited? Did they get superimposed chasing him?

Kyle killed two men who were ATTACKING him. You can literally WATCH it. The entire incident is on video.

So you dont approve of destruction and violence. It's just that if mobs of leftwing rioters start destroying and getting violent.....no one should be able to protect themselves. So our property and our bodies dont belong to us but are the property of any left winger who decides to use violence.

So even though you dont approve of what they are doing.....your stance is the public is obligated to surrender thier property or die before any harm comes to these terrorists, right?

And they are terrorist. Make no mistake on that. These riots are the definition of domestic terrorism.

I have looked at the videos multiple times. You people are amking up shit.

 

[Dove]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

Except that is not what I think. I think his defense team made up shit and you people are buying it, like the lemmings you are. He went in there itching to kill, and he did just that. AFTER he killed two people, he had to defend himself from a man who also had a gun, and who was trying to stop him. He put a stop to being stopped by shooting a third person. You people are defnding a murderer. It's sickening.

It IS what you think.

Right so you are saying none of us had an opinion based what we SAW on VIDEO.....but that we are just parroting blatant lies from his defense team?

So you havent even LOOKED at anything. You've just decided you are right and WE are misled and any facts that support our stance is just "pro Kyle" nonsense.

So who made these videos that show the men he shot attacking him? Was that all fake? Edited? Did they get superimposed chasing him?

Kyle killed two men who were ATTACKING him. You can literally WATCH it. The entire incident is on video.

So you dont approve of destruction and violence. It's just that if mobs of leftwing rioters start destroying and getting violent.....no one should be able to protect themselves. So our property and our bodies dont belong to us but are the property of any left winger who decides to use violence.

So even though you dont approve of what they are doing.....your stance is the public is obligated to surrender thier property or die before any harm comes to these terrorists, right?

And they are terrorist. Make no mistake on that. These riots are the definition of domestic terrorism.

I have looked at the videos multiple times. You people are amking up shit.

Show us what videos.

Because EVERYONE else.....including the judge and jury, will see those men going after Kyle and Kyle attempting to FLEE.

You opposing Kyle's RIGHT to self defense from these is a level of partisanship that CLEARLY says that you dont view anyone as human who isnt in what you see as your "team", so no one is allowed to defend themselves or communities from violent rioters. Because you view them as dogs who have no rights.

That is EXACTLY what you are saying. That these violent mobs are entitled to chase us, beat and kill us and destroy our communities and we shouldnt be able to do a THING about it.

And that is BULLSHIT and you need to take several steps back and really THINK about what you are saying.

 

[Oerdin]

The Prosecution is upset that Kyle's Defense Attorney refers to rioters and looters as rioters and looters.

 

[Oerdin]

That hag just lies. That is all she does and she clearly has never watched the video evidence because you says the exact opposite of what it clearly shows.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

1st degree intentional homicide - lmao

THe prosecutor has more of a chance of sprinkling pixie dust onto a volkswagon beatle to turn it into a flying Bently with a soul than scoring a conviction on that one.

Liberals are so fucking stupid tho they buy into this shit like the gut hooked lemmings they are

 

[Biggie Smiles]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

Oh. So those people aren't really dead?

Imagine if some left winger murdered you at a MAGA rally when you were running at him with a plastic bag to try to stop him from shooting others. And the defense for the shooter was, "Well, she was a heroin addict and a stripper, so no big loss. She deserved to die."

Whoa, stop the car right there doofus maximus. Who was the pedo Rossenbaum trying to prevent kyle from shooting when he became enraged that Kyle had just extinguished a dumpster fire which was going to be used as a fucking torpedo in a gas station?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

Except that is not what I think. I think his defense team made up shit and you people are buying it, like the lemmings you are. He went in there itching to kill, and he did just that. AFTER he killed two people, he had to defend himself from a man who also had a gun, and who was trying to stop him. He put a stop to being stopped by shooting a third person. You people are defnding a murderer. It's sickening.

I have said mutiple times that I do not approve of any of the destruction or violence. ZERO. But I don't claim the people who perpetrated the destruction as being MY people. They are of another ilk, not mine. There are more than two types of people in the world. I do NOT support the destruction, but you defend the murderer. That makes YOU the one who is dehumanizing people.

So the videos are doctored to make it look like Pedoman is chasing Kyle and trying to grab the barrel of the gun? The guy with the skate is an adobe edit in too?

fer fucks sake you are too stupid to live

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Lotus has been really going off the deep end lately.... I suspect we're in store for a meltdown of biblical proportions from her very soon.

People actually find the fact this kid was forced to defend himself infuriating.....just because of beliefs.

They really think thier side in entitled. Has specail rights to terrorize, destroy and kill......but any innocent people who happen to be there has NO rights at all.

They are so one sides they completely dehumanize people outside thier ideological bubble.

That's also why they arent bothered by the destruction in Kenosha. They lost humanity a long time ago.

We actually have people arguing for a mob to be able to assault and murder people with no resistance.

Except that is not what I think. I think his defense team made up shit and you people are buying it, like the lemmings you are. He went in there itching to kill, and he did just that. AFTER he killed two people, he had to defend himself from a man who also had a gun, and who was trying to stop him. He put a stop to being stopped by shooting a third person. You people are defnding a murderer. It's sickening.

It IS what you think.

Right so you are saying none of us had an opinion based what we SAW on VIDEO.....but that we are just parroting blatant lies from his defense team?

So you havent even LOOKED at anything. You've just decided you are right and WE are misled and any facts that support our stance is just "pro Kyle" nonsense.

So who made these videos that show the men he shot attacking him? Was that all fake? Edited? Did they get superimposed chasing him?

Kyle killed two men who were ATTACKING him. You can literally WATCH it. The entire incident is on video.

So you dont approve of destruction and violence. It's just that if mobs of leftwing rioters start destroying and getting violent.....no one should be able to protect themselves. So our property and our bodies dont belong to us but are the property of any left winger who decides to use violence.

So even though you dont approve of what they are doing.....your stance is the public is obligated to surrender thier property or die before any harm comes to these terrorists, right?

And they are terrorist. Make no mistake on that. These riots are the definition of domestic terrorism.

I have looked at the videos multiple times. You people are amking up shit.

I swear to God, if you and are were in the jury pool at the same time on this case I'd end up asphyxiating you with a plastic bag ... i wouldn't be able to help myself

 

[Oerdin]

All three of those men were violent criminals but she doesnt think they were going to kill him.

They were just gonna tickle him.
And blunt force trauma isnt a real thing that causes death......so Kyle should have sat still and let skateboard guy beat him with it

And shes ignoring the guy who had his (illegal and across state lines) gun drawn.
The self defense laws are suppose to change now and if you are being chased by aggresive people and you get cornered or you fall, you dont KNOW if they are kill or seriously harm you.....so you have no business defending yourself.

Like she thinks you have to sit there and get beaten.
Kyle has ALL the responsibilities. These rioters have NONE. Not a lick. THEY are okay to be savages and brutalize people. It's the people who have to roll out the red carpet and hand over thier property and thier bodies.

Actually, prior to this incident that night, did all 3 men commit violent acts or vandalize/destroy/loot property in the area?

Or were they merely protesting?

I'll admit, that Rosenbaum guy looked rather scary, but I'm not sure about the others whom Rittenhouse shot to death.

So aside from the incident, I'd like to see what the actions whom Rittenhouse shot were.

If these men were vandalizing property, there may be merits in your argument.

But if they were not, might be a case where Rittenhouse shot people who were merely protesting.

Have to look at all the facts, not just the shooting incident itself.

He

Kyle shot people who physically attacked him first. He did not shoot anyone who did not attack him. Only those who did attack him and so who posed a deadly threat to his life and well being. He always retreated when he had an opportunity to do so while his attackers always were the aggressing party.

That is the very definition of self defense.

There is video, and I have posted it multiple times already, of three of the four antifa involved setting a dumpster on fire and trying to push the burning dumpster into a gas station. So, no, they were not "peaceful protestors. They then attacked Kyle because he put the fire out and foiled their plan to destroy an innocent business and probably kill multiple people with the resulting explosion.

But the judge might not see it that way.

It could end up being a mixed verdict with both parties sharing the liability and guilt.

Maybe like a car accident where the blame is assessed 75/25%? Or 50/50%?

It's not a black and white open/shut case.

Both sides appear to have broken the law.

They both have strikes against them.

Kyle didnt break a single law. It IS black and white.

You are victim blaming. It's this simple. They should not have chased him. Because they did chase him? They took a bullet and I support that to the point where I'd rather see a bloody civil war than live in a country where people cannot protect themselves from violence.

At best Kyle should go on probation or serve house arrest with ankle bracelet.

BUT He's certainly no worse than that guy in NYC who murdered his mother & brutally assaulted an old Asian woman and yet was allowed to walk the streets like a free man.




I would be more inclined to trust Kyle not to kill again than that animal.

Kyle didnt break a single law, and absolutely fucking NO ONE should be charged for defending thier own life.

If I had shot my rapist should I have been put on probation? Charged with murder? That's what you are saying.

Yeah let's tell people that if they are being raped or assaulted to be careful not to hurt thier aggressor because you know......you ain't innocent either!!!

Fuck that. I hope REAL violence breaks out if Kyle so much as gets ONE day of probation. Seriously the gloves should come off if anything happens to him.

Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm he was not lucensed to carry nor use. Plus he was not of legal age.

Regardless of the events which followed Kyle broke the gun law in that state.

It's not illegal to cross state lines or have a gun, Joe.

He didnt break a single law. Cite the law he broke.

Every mother fucker that crossed state lines for the purpose of burning down Kenosha is a domestic terrorist.

He was underage.

Law says 18.

He was 17 at the time.

Okay?

It's not illegal to cross state lines.

Where do you get this idea that America has laws about crossing state lines?

Sm

@Joe

Please read this. The rifle was purchased legally in Kenosha, it was legally stored in Kenosha, and Kyle was legally possessing it in public in Kenosha. All in accordance to state and local laws wrt long rifles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Rittenhouse, 17, still faces multiple charges in Wisconsin, including first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first degree recklessly endangering safety, first-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18."

And he WILL walk on every single charge. Because he didnt do any of that.

That's why we are saying he will walk.

These charges are political theatrics. Nothing more.

Also there is no law in this country about crossing state lines. People are parroting this "he crossed state lines" like they are brainwashed zombies. Wtf does "crossing state lines" have to do with anything? Those rioters crossed state lines and destroyed a town that did not want them there. Does that community have ANY rights? Or do they just have to eat this? We know the answer.

Oh. So those people aren't really dead?

Imagine if some left winger murdered you at a MAGA rally when you were running at him with a plastic bag to try to stop him from shooting others. And the defense for the shooter was, "Well, she was a heroin addict and a stripper, so no big loss. She deserved to die."

Whoa, stop the car right there doofus maximus. Who was the pedo Rossenbaum trying to prevent kyle from shooting when he became enraged that Kyle had just extinguished a dumpster fire which was going to be used as a fucking torpedo in a gas station?

Not to mention Kiminski, with Rosenbaum standing right next to him, fires his pistol (it is on video) and tells Rosenbaumbaum "Get him!" (Meaning Kyle), with Rosenbaum immediately running at Kyle. Multiple eye witnesses all said Rosenbaum tried to grab Kyle's gun while an armed Kiminski is also running at Kyle.

Rosenbaum was shot four times, three with a 5.56mm and once with a 9mm. The 9mm hit Rosenbaum in the back. Kaminski had a 9mm as his wife said when the police interviewed her even though being on parole Kaminski could not legally possess a firearm.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Best video I've seen


I absolutely loved watching those two rodents die.

 

[Dove]

The worst part is?

These people would knowingly lie and throw the book at an innocent person who defended themselves for thier sake of thier narratives.

That CANT be tolerated here in this country or we truly have become an authoritarian 3rd world. Our system is completely broken if people can be punished like that over partisan beliefs.

We need a full blown revolt the very second someone gets charged with murder over defending themselves. It doesnt MATTER what politics someone has. It's all a lost cause the minute justice is gone and it becomes about ideology.

That's a direct attack on our rights, and our rights should NOT depend on politics. The fact that some people think like this is a serious problem. It should immediately disqualify someone from having a single say in how our society is managed.

Otherwise you are just a fucking tyrant who would imprison innocent people because of your dumb fucking politics. While turning a blind eye to acts of political violence on other innocent people.

Dont criticize people when they see this happening and feel threatened enough to talk about civil war. That is blow back.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

You couldn’t get me to render a guilty verdict in this case if you put a gun to my head

fuck all these shitstain vermin filth liberals

 

[Oerdin]

@LotusBud thinks the police are lying, that video is all faked, and that all the eye witnesses are wrong. Ziminski even admitted to police that he fired the first shot. We know he fired more because another one if his 9mm bullets ended up in Rosenbaum's back.

Read the title Lotusbud. "Man admits to firing..."

 

[Dove]

@LotusBud thinks the police are lying, that video is all faked, and that all the eye witnesses are wrong. Ziminski even admitted to police that he fired the first shot. We know he fired more because another one if his 9mm bullets ended up in Rosenbaum's back.

Read the title Lotusbud. "Man admits to firing..."

You really have to be disconnected from reality to say those videos were faked and everyone is lying.

That's how deep the hate is though. Sadly. Like I said, they have dehumanized everyone outside thier belief system. Once that happens? They will defend anything done by thier "side". Anything.

We really need to understand this. A lot of us were just living our lives with no idea the contempt and hate that was growing.

I don't know why or why anyone would want to see an innocent person charged for self defense or excuse or minimize mobs destroying communities but it's happening and dems/progs are perfectly fine with it.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Look at this video.

Watch how RossenbuamMajor chases Kyle with obvious intent to confront. Especially when compared with earlier videos

THe minute RossenbuamMajor put his hands on Kyle it was kyle's right to shoot him. End of

anyone who thinks otherwise is a brain dead fuckstick

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Kyle RIttenshouse personifies everything that is still worth saving about this country.

fuck ANYONE who thinks otherwise.

I'd spit in my own mother's face if she condemned this good kid

 

[Oerdin]

"Self-defense is not only our right; it is our duty" - Ronald Reagan