Kyle Rittenhouse to go free!!!

Reaction score
7,486
The defense needs a refresher in due diligence….

:LOL3:
Liberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principle

this much we can agree on.

If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there

We agree on nothing. Period.
Fine by me

But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.

nah…

these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?

hmmmm...

ok

let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….

“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”

HAIL. MARY.

Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
it was the android that changed the file size and file program association on the Prosecution's laptop

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

dumbest argument of the week.

next idiot please.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,032
Location
United states
it was the android that changed the file size and file program association on the Prosecution's laptop

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

dumbest argument of the week.

next idiot please.

Its excuses.

Even democrat leaning attorneys are saying the same thing we are.

I guess they are not well versed in law. Prosecutors always with hold evidence.... it's totally normal.

Well actually if you are from a state where Harris was in charge.....you would think with holding evidence is normal. How many times did she do that to black men over weed charges so she could have cheap state slave labor?
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
The defense needs a refresher in due diligence….

:LOL3:
Liberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principle

this much we can agree on.

If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there

We agree on nothing. Period.
Fine by me

But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.

nah…

these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?

hmmmm...

ok

let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….

“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”

HAIL. MARY.

Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.

:Frustration1: :Frustration1: :Frustration1:

that isn’t withholding

if the video was damaged or couldn’t be viewed when it was produced, then it was up to the defense to get it

A phone call/fax/email from the defense to the prosecution saying “hey, we got this file and we can’t open it” is how these things are typically handled BEFORE TRIAL.
 
Reaction score
7,486
The defense needs a refresher in due diligence….

:LOL3:
Liberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principle

this much we can agree on.

If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there

We agree on nothing. Period.
Fine by me

But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.

nah…

these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?

hmmmm...

ok

let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….

“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”

HAIL. MARY.

Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.

:Frustration1: :Frustration1: :Frustration1:

that isn’t withholding

if the video was damaged or couldn’t be viewed when it was produced, then it was up to the defense to get it

A phone call/fax/email from the defense to the prosecution saying “hey, we got this file and we can’t open it” is how these things are typically handled BEFORE TRIAL.

The prosecution claims they didn't even get it u til day four of the trial and got it from a person who refused to identify themselves. Second they did not give it to the defense u til day 10 of the trial. Even then they only gave a copy which the prosecution had cut to a much lower resolution and compressed. They never gave the full copy to the defense as required by law.

Facts.
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
The defense needs a refresher in due diligence….

:LOL3:
Liberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principle

this much we can agree on.

If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there

We agree on nothing. Period.
Fine by me

But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.

nah…

these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?

hmmmm...

ok

let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….

“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”

HAIL. MARY.

Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.

:Frustration1: :Frustration1: :Frustration1:

that isn’t withholding

if the video was damaged or couldn’t be viewed when it was produced, then it was up to the defense to get it

A phone call/fax/email from the defense to the prosecution saying “hey, we got this file and we can’t open it” is how these things are typically handled BEFORE TRIAL.

The prosecution claims they didn't even get it u til day four of the trial and got it from a person who refused to identify themselves. Second they did not give it to the defense u til day 10 of the trial. Even then they only gave a copy which the prosecution had cut to a much lower resolution and compressed. They never gave the full copy to the defense as required by law.

Facts.

a claim is not a fact
 
Reaction score
7,486
it was the android that changed the file size and file program association on the Prosecution's laptop

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:

dumbest argument of the week.

next idiot please.

Yep, the fucker had both programs on his laptop, admitted to withholding in court, then tried to claim he was stupid and didn't know what the programs he installed on his own laptop were for. This was intentional withholding of evidence that the prosecution then buffaloes their way in even though they knew their own zoom program said "not to be used for evidence in a trial."

Second the blob doesn't even show what the prosecution claims.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
it's funny watching people who don't understand how file type associations in windows work try to explain this shit to an IT expert

carry on, it's most amusing
 
Reaction score
7,486
Exhibit lists and evidence are submitted BEFORE trial. They are filed with court. Whatever the court got was served on ALL parties.



omg this is fucking painful

What is your major malfunction?

There is something seriously wrong with you.

I am saying it was not introduced BEFORE trial and it was not served to ALL parties. Did you get that through your skull? Has your malfunctioning stopped now? WTF?

Are you starting to get a clue about why there was a problem for admitting this video yet? Especially an edited and altered video from an unknown source which isn't there to be cross examined? This is why we have rules about evidence to begin with.
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
Exhibit lists and evidence are submitted BEFORE trial. They are filed with court. Whatever the court got was served on ALL parties.



omg this is fucking painful

What is your major malfunction?

There is something seriously wrong with you.

I am saying it was not introduced BEFORE trial and it was not served to ALL parties. Did you get that through your skull? Has your malfunctioning stopped now? WTF?

your argument is asinine… you actually think that some random video was rushed in last minute? This isn’t a movie.

wait till this motion is bounced out on its ass… just fucking wait
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,032
Location
United states
Exhibit lists and evidence are submitted BEFORE trial. They are filed with court. Whatever the court got was served on ALL parties.



omg this is fucking painful

What is your major malfunction?

There is something seriously wrong with you.

I am saying it was not introduced BEFORE trial and it was not served to ALL parties. Did you get that through your skull? Has your malfunctioning stopped now? WTF?

Are you starting to get a clue about why there was a problem for admitting this video yet? Especially an edited and altered video from an unknown source which isn't there to be cross examined? This is why we have rules about evidence to begin with.

Good luck.

When she thinks she is right, she doesnt listen to a single damn thing anyone says and she just argued and gets condescending.

Trying to discuss the Blake shooting was a painful frustrating wreck. On BC there is a thread about it. She just kept arguing the media version. Like 5 people told her there was a second video from another angle that showed him fighting police and resiting taser. Several people posted it.

It was posted about 3 times, and a few weeks later she STILL didnt know it existed and even after being shown the police reports she STILL didnt know he was being arrested on a warrant for sexual assault.

There is something very wrong with her and shes not interested in honest discussions or truth. Shes interested in feeling better and smarter than other people. Which... is unfortunate considering.

You are only ever going end up flabbergasted, frustrated and irritated trying to discuss anything with her. She only gets spiteful and she doesnt care about the facts.

See how she is just now understanding what the issue is and how shes claiming its absurd and didnt happen? She may or may not notice it's an indisputable fact and the basis for the mistrial being requested.

I dont know if she intentionally plays dumb to manipulate and now she realized shes wrong so shes going to pretend she didnt know to lessen the level of dumb she sounds or if it's a frontal lobe injury from one too many drunken falls down the stairs.

I'm right here and I totally get it if you need validation to know it's not you....shes nuts.

Dont expect her to look at anything you link to back your position... she will ignore it and argue whatever bullshit without pausing to understand what is being said.

I'm not peeking anymore lol.
 
Last edited:

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,398
Location
California
It did. Fact!

yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…

and it’s being televised on National television

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


DEAD

Yo Murdock, you're on "ignore" but your discussion on this thread is what IT is posting about! How does this magic occur?
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,124
What is the name of that software the prosecutor used to reduce the quality of the video before sending to the defense?
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
It did. Fact!

yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…

and it’s being televised on National television

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


DEAD

Yo Murdock, you're on "ignore" but your discussion on this thread is what IT is posting about! How does this magic occur?

I personally enjoy the sycophant chiming in.

It really gives it that extra ounce of flavor since she is angry that she couldn’t convert me to satanic Debbil worship disguised in Jesus freak robing.


But I’m the one obsessed :LOL3:
 
Reaction score
7,486
What is the name of that software the prosecutor used to reduce the quality of the video before sending to the defense?

I think it was like Hammer or something like that. Then there was the compression software as well so two programs. I posted a twit with the names and screen shots earlier today in this thread.
 
Reaction score
7,486
It did. Fact!

yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…

and it’s being televised on National television

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


DEAD

All I can say is it is very clear you have not been watching the trial and that you have no idea what you are talking about. That is not a good look. Consider actually learning what is going on before you speak.
 

Murdy

cute & psycho
Site Supporter
Reaction score
6,810
Location
The Wild Wild West
It did. Fact!

yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…

and it’s being televised on National television

:LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:


DEAD

All I can say is it is very clear you have not been watching the trial and that you have no idea what you are talking about. That is not a good look. Consider actually learning what is going on before you speak.

I know trial evidence and how it actually gets entered with the court…. now wut?