- Reaction score
- 23,124
:facepalm:
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?Fine by meLiberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principleThe defense needs a refresher in due diligence….
![]()
this much we can agree on.
If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there
We agree on nothing. Period.
But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.
nah…
these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
hmmmm...
ok
let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….
“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”
HAIL. MARY.
it was the android that changed the file size and file program association on the Prosecution's laptop
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
dumbest argument of the week.
next idiot please.
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?Fine by meLiberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principleThe defense needs a refresher in due diligence….
![]()
this much we can agree on.
If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there
We agree on nothing. Period.
But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.
nah…
these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
hmmmm...
ok
let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….
“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”
HAIL. MARY.
Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?Fine by meLiberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principleThe defense needs a refresher in due diligence….
![]()
this much we can agree on.
If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there
We agree on nothing. Period.
But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.
nah…
these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
hmmmm...
ok
let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….
“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”
HAIL. MARY.
Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.
![]()
![]()
![]()
that isn’t withholding
if the video was damaged or couldn’t be viewed when it was produced, then it was up to the defense to get it
A phone call/fax/email from the defense to the prosecution saying “hey, we got this file and we can’t open it” is how these things are typically handled BEFORE TRIAL.
Pretty common for Prosecutors to violate the brady rule?Fine by meLiberals are lying maleficent pieces of shit who cannot be trusted to honor a decades old legal principleThe defense needs a refresher in due diligence….
![]()
this much we can agree on.
If there were any hint of where additional evidence could be found the defense should have followed it like a dog with a bone. No arguments there
We agree on nothing. Period.
But you just admitted to liberals be lying sacks of scum. Period.
nah…
these Hail Mary antics are pretty common at trial
hmmmm...
ok
let’s say this in egghead so maybe you get it through that thick skull….
“Prosecutors say a detective tried to AirDrop full-res video, but couldn’t because defense attorneys use Android”
HAIL. MARY.
Not even close. The prosecution withheld evidence. End of.
![]()
![]()
that isn’t withholding
if the video was damaged or couldn’t be viewed when it was produced, then it was up to the defense to get it
A phone call/fax/email from the defense to the prosecution saying “hey, we got this file and we can’t open it” is how these things are typically handled BEFORE TRIAL.
The prosecution claims they didn't even get it u til day four of the trial and got it from a person who refused to identify themselves. Second they did not give it to the defense u til day 10 of the trial. Even then they only gave a copy which the prosecution had cut to a much lower resolution and compressed. They never gave the full copy to the defense as required by law.
Facts.
it was the android that changed the file size and file program association on the Prosecution's laptop
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
dumbest argument of the week.
next idiot please.
Exhibit lists and evidence are submitted BEFORE trial. They are filed with court. Whatever the court got was served on ALL parties.
omg this is fucking painful
Exhibit lists and evidence are submitted BEFORE trial. They are filed with court. Whatever the court got was served on ALL parties.
omg this is fucking painful
What is your major malfunction?
There is something seriously wrong with you.
I am saying it was not introduced BEFORE trial and it was not served to ALL parties. Did you get that through your skull? Has your malfunctioning stopped now? WTF?
Exhibit lists and evidence are submitted BEFORE trial. They are filed with court. Whatever the court got was served on ALL parties.
omg this is fucking painful
What is your major malfunction?
There is something seriously wrong with you.
I am saying it was not introduced BEFORE trial and it was not served to ALL parties. Did you get that through your skull? Has your malfunctioning stopped now? WTF?
Are you starting to get a clue about why there was a problem for admitting this video yet? Especially an edited and altered video from an unknown source which isn't there to be cross examined? This is why we have rules about evidence to begin with.
It did. Fact!
It did. Fact!
yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…
and it’s being televised on National television
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DEAD
It did. Fact!
yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…
and it’s being televised on National television
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DEAD
Yo Murdock, you're on "ignore" but your discussion on this thread is what IT is posting about! How does this magic occur?
What is the name of that software the prosecutor used to reduce the quality of the video before sending to the defense?
It did. Fact!
yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…
and it’s being televised on National television
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DEAD
It did. Fact!
yeah… cause someone reached into their briefcase and pulled the old switcharoo right in the courtroom with the judge and the bailiff sitting right there…
and it’s being televised on National television
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DEAD
All I can say is it is very clear you have not been watching the trial and that you have no idea what you are talking about. That is not a good look. Consider actually learning what is going on before you speak.