- Messages
- 46,751
- Location
- United states
The fact that he had no peaceful reason to be there and was illegally armed pretty well fucks his defense, Charlie. That fact that he was openly and illegally armed was threat enough to those around him.if you had reason to believe he was about to harm you with said rifle you could erect a defense of self defense after you are indicted for murder. Sure.If I saw Kyle the retard, brandishing a rifle and I felt threatened would it be okay if I stabbed him in the neck?§ 939.48. Section 939.48 - Self-defense and defense of others (1) A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person.you are defending yourself.If I carry a hand grenade to a Trump rally and toss it into a crowd when someone turns on me for being a gawl-dern shoshulisht is that self defense?I see, so by your logic because he was not home playing video games that night he lost the right to defend himself.yyyyyYep.First of all he was illegally in possession of a firearm - no matter how you split it.
Secondly - why was he there instead of at home playing video games or out trying to get laid?
What intention did he have in being there and being armed?
.Had he not been there and armed, would he have murdered anyone in Kenosha?
Why did he go on the lam if he is innocent?
....Obviously guilty on all counts.
Does any of that make the case for homicide?
It speaks to intent that he was there and armed with a semi automatic long gun, dummy.
Opportunity was easy to find, and he took it w/o hesitation.
Does a woman lose the right to remain free of sexual assault by a thirsty man when she dresses provocatively too?
or do you think someone might rightly ask what I was doing there with an illegal weapon to begin with?
PS: btw - where did KR get the alleged fire extinguisher?
Did he loot it?
That's another charge then - looting.
Or, if I showed up at the Capitol with an automatic weapon and started waving it around, and then a bunch of people came at me to disarm me, and I killed two of them, am I actually defending myself, or am I a murderer?
you do not lose the right to defend yourself... even while in the midst of doing something illegal, provided that illegal thing is not actively threatening the life of another.
Honey, he was threatening people. That's why they tried to disarm him.
that's the statue
now, the prevailing and unsustainable argument by you leftist dupes is that Kyle is guilty because he either a) violated curfew b) crossed state lines with a firearm c) wasn't home playing video games or d) some other bubbling gibberish the leftist media has instructed you to say
the fact of the matter is this: it is entirely inconsequential what Kyle was doing at the moment in time he felt his life was being threatened. According to Wisconsin law which the jury will undoubtedly be told to consider, it wouldn't matter if Kyle were pogo dancing on the barrel of his AR with a KKK hoodie over his head yelling out racial slurs. YOU DO NOT LOSE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND YOURSELF EVEN DURING THE COMMISSION OF A CRIME
here.... let an attorney break the bad news to you gaping hollow headed morons
Self defense, right?
Whether you will have overwhelming proof to support your argument of self defense like Kyle has is another matter entirely.
He was the aggressor by virtue of the presentation he chose to make.
...and the result, that he murdered 2 people and injured another, is on his head.
You realize those protesters that destroyed Kenosha were the violent intruders, right?