Elon Musk offers to BUY twitter, reinstate the God Emperor

[Dove]

BTW H is the one who calls Trump a dictator.

 

[1Holliday1]

@Holliday1881 You can't tell me that BLM didn't plan some of their riots via that platform and weren't banned for it. WHY?? Twitter gave them lefty privilage :/

I wouldn't know. I have nothing to do with BLM, though as I understand it Twitter is often used to organize political actions by many groups. I say I don't know because I have never been on Twitter - Who needs Twitter when one has BTF?

 

[Dove]

He is fine with his glorious handlers inciting riots and is right there to blame the deaths and destruction on "right wing extremists" and "police".

Oddly his manipulative standards on what yelling fire in a crowded theater looks like ONLY applies to his politcal opponents.

Claiming police brutality and white supremacy to the point of entire communities being destroyed and innocent people dying when it's not even police brutality?

Eh.....he doesnt know much about that. Twitter is used by many groups. And as long as they dont get deemed "right wing" they should be fine.

 

[1Holliday1]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

 

[Dove]

It's pretty clear she....and most real liberals....firmly believe that people should be permitted to challange the election and discuss their opinions on it.

Whether or not she agrees that the election was legit or not really isnt relevant here. The topic isnt "was the election legit". The topic is about the left wings obsessive need to push government control over the flow of info they dont like.

So stop with the gaslighting moot points that you fall on to deflect attention away from tyrannical info stance.

No one stomped out the hysterical Russiagate shit or any such musings by leftists that the elections are rigged everytime they lose. Funny how when its reversed they scream for censorship.

 

[RAVEN]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

 

[Biggie Smiles]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

 

[1Holliday1]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

I ask this because opinion has to be based on something. One can not have the "opinion" that an uhleckshun was stole, in the total absence of evidence, any more than they can undermine efforts to address a public health crisis with misguiding bs which costs lives and creates economic distress by prolonging and worsening the crisis.

 

[RAVEN]

I understand that, Biggie.. There just wasn't proof enough for me to believe there was wide spread fraud (illegal). Certainly not enough to take such bold action..

 

[1Holliday1]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

Fine, then please explain how deliberately misinforming people about the election in order to stoke political dissent to the point of insurrection is protected free speech. That was the other portion of the question I had asked.

 

[RAVEN]

It's up to individuals to evaluate and decide what they want to read and act on, Holliday.. You will never get me to change my mind on censorship.. EVER.. so stop trying lol

 

[Admin.]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

Fine, then please explain how deliberately misinforming people about the election in order to stoke political dissent to the point of insurrection is protected free speech. That was the other portion of the question I had asked.

If I was a pundit with a large twitter following, would my telling my audience that chugging large quantities of Neet's Foot Oil will cure cancer, be protected speech?

 

[Admin.]

It's up to individuals to evaluate and decide what they want to read and act on, Holliday.. You will never get me to change my mind on censorship.. EVER.. so stop trying lol

So I can advertise cigarettes on Sesame Street?

 

[RAVEN]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

Fine, then please explain how deliberately misinforming people about the election in order to stoke political dissent to the point of insurrection is protected free speech. That was the other portion of the question I had asked.

If I was a pundit with a large twitter following, would my telling my audience that chugging large quantities of Neet's Foot Oil will cure cancer, be protected speech?

Yes... And it would be my CHOICE to read it and call you an idiot.. See how that works ;)

 

[Dove]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

I ask this because opinion has to be based on something. One can not have the "opinion" that an uhleckshun was stole, in the total absence of evidence, any more than they can undermine efforts to address a public health crisis with misguiding bs which costs lives and creates economic distress by prolonging and worsening the crisis.

That was cool with Russiagate. And our tax dollars were spent on that lie.

And free speech doesnt have to be "based on" anything.

You just dont want your political opponents to have an equal voice. That's it.

 

[1Holliday1]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

But Bigly, I thought as a goobmint computer wizard you'd have the inside track and genius to uncover the conspiracy. Maybe you just aren't a good as you think you are, or maybe
..you yourself are a Deep State agent....hmmmmmmm?

 

[Dove]

It's up to individuals to evaluate and decide what they want to read and act on, Holliday.. You will never get me to change my mind on censorship.. EVER.. so stop trying lol

So I can advertise cigarettes on Sesame Street?

Here we go with these ridiculous comparisons where if things are age restricted for minors who are not even voting age.....the SAME standards should apply to adults.

The fact you guys dont understand the differences between children and adults and you draw these parallels is disturbing.

Let me know when you guys remove an adults ability to legally consent to content.

 

[1Holliday1]

It's up to individuals to evaluate and decide what they want to read and act on, Holliday.. You will never get me to change my mind on censorship.. EVER.. so stop trying lol

So I can advertise cigarettes on Sesame Street?

Sure, as long as they aren't shaped even vaguely like a dick.

 

[Dove]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

But Bigly, I thought as a goobmint computer wizard you'd have the inside track and genius to uncover the conspiracy. Maybe you just aren't a good as you think you are, or maybe
..you yourself are a Deep State agent....hmmmmmmm?

See how you believe stupid shit and we still dont ban you?

 

[Dove]

See notice how they spew misinfo about other people.

And we just rip them. We do not BAN them.

These fucks would have BF banned from the net for "dangerous misinfo" given the chance.

 

[RAVEN]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

But Bigly, I thought as a goobmint computer wizard you'd have the inside track and genius to uncover the conspiracy. Maybe you just aren't a good as you think you are, or maybe
..you yourself are a Deep State agent....hmmmmmmm?

See how you believe stupid shit and we still dont ban you?

True that!! He's kind of making my point HAHAHAHAHA

 

[Dove]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

But Bigly, I thought as a goobmint computer wizard you'd have the inside track and genius to uncover the conspiracy. Maybe you just aren't a good as you think you are, or maybe
..you yourself are a Deep State agent....hmmmmmmm?

See how you believe stupid shit and we still dont ban you?

True that!! He's kind of making my point HAHAHAHAHA

They do that all the time and dont even see it. It's amazing.

 

[1Holliday1]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

But Bigly, I thought as a goobmint computer wizard you'd have the inside track and genius to uncover the conspiracy. Maybe you just aren't a good as you think you are, or maybe
..you yourself are a Deep State agent....hmmmmmmm?

See how you believe stupid shit and we still dont ban you?

True that!! He's kind of making my point HAHAHAHAHA

You didn't get that I was joking with brother Bigly there?
I mean shit, you know that Deep State only hires the best.

 

[Admin.]

 

[Dove]

I left Twitter because of their blantant censorship of all things "they deemed" rightwing. Wasn't even a fan of D.Trump, but felt he had the right to express his opinions. In his case, tho, I believe Twitter was his biggest downfall and didn't help him with likability (he talked too much shit) You either sink or swim by your words/views, but the important thing is having a place where all views are welcome.. LOL.. Anyway.. not a huge fan of Musk, but glad he's opening the doors to free speech once again :)

So is a "view" the same as deliberate lying/misinforming in order to rile people into violent frenzy?

I believe people have the right to read what they want to read and voice their opinions.. PERIOD. :)

Okay - I'll take that as your white flag. An opinion and deliberately spreading misinformation aren't the same thing. A message platform undoubtedly has not only a right, but a responsibility to put a lid on bullshit like repeated and unsubstantiated/unsubstantiatable claims of the stole uhleckshun.
You know, Ravin, yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire isn't protected free speech.

Free speech isn't always pretty ... Toughen up, snowflake.. It's not all about YOO and YOUR beliefs.. Look away if you don't like it.. ffs..

Are you saying that you believe in the stole uhleckshun? Please present your case on that, or if you don't believe it explain why you believe that deliberate misinformation designed to cause division among the public and set up an attempted overthrow of the duly elected government (as we saw on Jan. 6) is covered under free speech.

If I truly believed the election was stolen and would have been in DC on that date.. I would have been there. ;)

I believe the election was stolen but wouldn't bother fighting it cause I realize that dark money doesn't spend billions to sway the outcome of an election in a manner that can be easily discovered through any means our government is willing to employ

But Bigly, I thought as a goobmint computer wizard you'd have the inside track and genius to uncover the conspiracy. Maybe you just aren't a good as you think you are, or maybe
..you yourself are a Deep State agent....hmmmmmmm?

See how you believe stupid shit and we still dont ban you?

True that!! He's kind of making my point HAHAHAHAHA

You didn't get that I was joking with brother Bigly there?
I mean shit, you know that Deep State only hires the best.

."Jokes" rooted in spiteful hatred usually are not funny at all.

A good joke is somewhat rooted in a truth. Had Big ever made claims that he had access to anything in the government of that nature... sure joke away.

Since he didnt, your "joke" is rooted in hyper bias hate and narratives that exist solely to smear opposition.

So yeah.... we know it's an attempt to be funny. It missed by miles. Js.

 

[Dove]

This reason this fails is because this Elon hate is coming from elitests who openly say they dont mind 20 bucks a gallon gas to be "Patriotic"

It's the party who is anti working class who actually are the ones who use the "save your money stop being poor" bullshit to patronize those of us who voted for Trump.

The ones who can afford Biden. Js.

I'm willing to bet "right wingers" also made this one. It doesnt jive otherwise.

 

[Lokmar]

When conservatives say they advocate Free Speech, what they really are talking about is unrestricted .misinformation and hate speech.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

 

[1Holliday1]

It's up to individuals to evaluate and decide what they want to read and act on, Holliday.. You will never get me to change my mind on censorship.. EVER.. so stop trying lol

Then you believe yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire is free speech, and everyone should be responsible for taking a look around and evaluating the statement/claim - correct?

 

[Admin.]

This reason this fails is because this Elon hate is coming from elitests who openly say they dont mind 20 bucks a gallon gas to be "Patriotic"

It's the party who is anti working class who actually are the ones who use the "save your money stop being poor" bullshit to patronize those of us who voted for Trump.

The ones who can afford Biden. Js.

I'm willing to bet "right wingers" also made this one. It doesnt jive otherwise.

No it just went over your head, Duh’v.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

It's up to individuals to evaluate and decide what they want to read and act on, Holliday.. You will never get me to change my mind on censorship.. EVER.. so stop trying lol

Then you believe yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire is free speech, and everyone should be responsible for taking a look around and evaluating the statement/claim - correct?

You’re a retard. Lol