It's the difference between a fairy tale and a myth.
So is voter fraud swinging the 2020 election fairytale of myth?
.Name one person whose FAKE vote turned the election?
Well, there aren't any. We all know that, and yet many many red states are changing their voting laws and procedures in the absence of any evidence of need to do so. Why?
Sorry dickhead, there are all kinds of affidavits signed testifying that fake ballots were trucked in.
The heck, you say....
All kinds? How many kinds?
Could you give the names of the individuals who falsified those affidavits?
..and explain why they have not been presented in court?
Yea, yea, yea. You saw all the links I've posted multiple times. Not a single one of you libtards so much as lifted a finger to imprison or persecute any of these supposed "perjurers".
Now, when the space ship brought all of the fake ballots in the middle of the night who did the Aliens give them to? Was it big intimidating black men wearing BLM t-shirts?
If you ever needed a first hand accounting of the irreparable damage airplane glue does to the human brain
Is that what was going on when you met Jesus?
No, that is what was going on when I read holiday's spastic drivel
Holliday's post made you sniff glue?
Did you see the way it stopped abruptly w/o any concluding punctuation - like a period or something.
It's like Bigly's brain just froze or forgot what it was doing, or the glue hit critical mass and BOOOOOF!
Thank Dog his ER has a low wait time.
So how exactly did you deal with all those skivvies skid marks down in the boat laundry? Was there a special kind of super military bleach or something? I imagine there were a lot of stubborn shit stains from all those hunky sailors, huh?
Did you not get the new Politics/News forum rules memo? Your sophomoric shenanigans don't belong here.
In an attempt to improve the standards of posting here and find new members willing to jump into this hornets nest. Politics is HiGHLY divisive. Understood. Arguments happen, whatever, keep it in this forum. As for those repetitive, 'one on one' member attacks - spammings/redundancies -...
bastardfactory.net
...but the way I see it is this:
Threads have a founding idea presented by the thread starter, and as in a natural conversation it evolves
(not that evolution is a verified fact) through a series of modifications. It's like a hike, the way I do it, you start on a marked trail, you see something over there so you leave the trail and wander over to that place and maybe see something else of interest a ways in another direction, then maybe you cross back to the trail for a time etc. I personally have no issue with side discussion if it comes as part of the natural flow of discussion - they can even be more interesting than the original topic.
..Then there is thread jacking. Now where I have posted in the past that has always been a part of the game, and so long as it's a artful effort then it's all part of the entertainment, and that means an actual topic of discussion, not a playground bully making unfounded accusations about, or direct attacks on another poster for the 10,000th time, or a spambot troll farm parrot/psychotic broken record making some version of the same post they make multiple times every day.
. In any case - with regard to the Bigly Rule which BF alleges to have instituted, I think it should actually be left in the hands of the thread starter to make the call on actionable violations, to be reviewed by a responsible arbiter (obviously here I mean to exclude the mods).
. Let me offer an example of a non-actionable comment. Let's say that a poster calls another poster, as part of an exchange, a fucking retard, then substantiates that evaluation with verifiable information within that same post. No harm no fowl as they say in the sports world.......and, I feel quite certain that the site's proprietor is quite happy that there are retards here, since if there weren't there would be no more than 5 or 6 of us posting. I mean, this place is widely known as the thBadTardFactory for good reason. So no, a single such comment is hardly actionable, but repeated to the same poster 10, 15, 20 times a day to the disruption of thread after thread(?) - actionable.
. So that's my proposal - that it be the thread starter who lodges the objection.